Comments on: Video: Michelle discusses, uh, “Girls Gone Wild” on O’Reilly

By: honora

honora — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:54:47 +0000

Gosh, honora, I’d grin too if I were talking to two good-looking women. I hope that doesn’t make me a misogynist.

mikeyboss on September 13, 2006 at 3:20 PM

I’m sure you’re not. And I’m sure he is. I have seen him talking with these ladies before on serious topics and he didn’t have that panting demeanor. Talking dirty with pretty girls–seems like a theme with old Bill-o. It’s creepy but perhaps less obvious to a man.

By: DAT60A3

DAT60A3 — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:24:51 +0000

To have sex with an inebriated female, no matter what age she may be, is rape. Under the law, a male can be convicted of sexual assault. I don’t see much difference between the actions of “Girls Gone Wild” enticing drunk young women to perform for the camera and someone having sex with a drunk young woman. Both acts are despicable and should be delt with to the maximum extent of the law.

By: NTWR

NTWR — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:23:50 +0000

Michelle was great on this subject. I was thoroughly entertained. She was definetly NOT AMUSED.

By: MacStansbury

MacStansbury — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:43:09 +0000

That’s from Dirty Dancing when Patrick Swayze says, “No one puts Baby in the corner.”

For once, I’m glad I had no clue about that piece of movie trivia.

It’s all about my deep-seeded jealousy, anyways.

That, and AP (who I now refer to as AP since it’s easier to write than Allah Pundit or AllahPundit or however you’re supposed to do it) sounds sort of like KP, and that stands for Kristen “Dirty Dancing” Powers, and now I’m back in my dreamland where we are slow dancing to some indecipherable track off a generic music album, and I’m back to the distraction I was working on about 12 hours ago.

[INSERT KP REACTION SHOT PHOTO HERE]

By: Lawrence

Lawrence — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:20:30 +0000

I don’t think Bill O. is a misogynist. I think he really enjoys having bothe Kirsten and Michelle on at the same time. I think it is a major boost to his labido.

By: mikeyboss

mikeyboss — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:20:23 +0000

Gosh, honora, I’d grin too if I were talking to two good-looking women. I hope that doesn’t make me a misogynist.

By: Rick

Rick — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:53:26 +0000

For Bethany I’d give it up!
Sooooo…AP’s virginity is confirmed.

It sounds more like AP has an addiction (to GGW).

By: 52Ranger

52Ranger — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:45:50 +0000

I HOPE he was playing “devil’s advocate”. If he was playing “freedom of speech” or “victimless crime” he’s in serious need of either therapy or a 17 year old teenage daughter to worry about.
Let’s face it. If worrying about your kid won’t shake you out of your “comfortable with this nonsense” space, nothing will.
And as for the girls who ARE of age, insisting that they don’t need some sort of legal protection or recourse is just plain stupid. Different protections from underaged girls? Yes. NO protect whatsoever? Come on Bill! That’s a “Pull that melon head of yours out of your nether regions and buy a clue” moment. I’m glad he stepped back on that one when MM told him the Jersey story from a few weeks back.

By: kmackie6612

kmackie6612 — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:23:09 +0000

The technical staff missed a boob shot on a dancer they should have censored. Will the FCC fine the Factor?

By: thirteen28

thirteen28 — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:49:24 +0000

Michelle, did you recently get your hair cut?

(translation: do I get brownie points for noticing?)

By: Blaise

Blaise — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:42:04 +0000

Here I was, thinking I was going to be original on this….anyway.

I saw this last night, and I was a bit irritated. I don’t think Ms. Malkin should let herself get involved in these kinds of things. When I see O’Reilly do stories like this it just reminds me of his earlier “journalistic” carreer on Current Edition or Inside Edition or whatever the Hell it was called.

I agree with O’Reilly a lot, when he tells people he is stupid, but I could not disagree more when he characterizes himself as a “political analyst”. To be an analyst requires insight.

Ms. Malkin wipes the floor with O’Reilly (and, for that matter with Ms. Powers). She IS an analyst, and she is wasted (and perhaps exploited) when consigned to idiocy like GGW…though,that said,she made a slik purse out of a sow’s ear by focussing on the importance of upholding the law.

Ms. Malkin is all over issues such as immigration, 9/11 remembrance, islamic terrorism to name a few. Perhaps O’Reilly recognizes that Ms Malkin overshadows him badly when discussing such matters. Perhaps that is why she is left to talk about GGW and other idiocies (there was another forgettable topic a few weeks ago).

In the meantime, I don’t think Ms. Malkin ought to involve herself in such things…just don’t be available. It won’t be a problem…O’Reilly needs her more than she needs him.

By: The Agitator

The Agitator — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:15:28 +0000

Hot College Girls Exploited! Stay Tune for Lots of Video!…

In typical cable shout show fashion, super scold Bill O’Reilly tapes a segment on the Justice Department’s pursuit of Girls……

By: jdpaz

jdpaz — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:01:58 +0000

We need to keep an eye on the slippery slope in cases like this. If 17 and 3/4 years old is no longer enforced soon it’ll be 16 and 3/4 then 13 & 3/4. How low are we willing to go here. The sexualizing of little girls already is getting gross—you can buy padded bras for six year olds.

As a father of two girls, I say let our girls be little girls for as long as we can. They’ve got their whole life to be “grownups”. They only get to be little girls once.

By: pullingmyhairout

pullingmyhairout — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:52:09 +0000

mmm….KP in a corner…

I’m sorry, what were we talking about? My mind sorta trailed off for a minute…

MacStansbury on September 12, 2006 at 11:34 PM

That’s from Dirty Dancing when Patrick Swayze says, “No one puts Baby in the corner.”

By: labwrs

labwrs — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:50:25 +0000

Exploitation of children is just that..even STUPID children who lie about their ag, get drunk and try to emulate the “hoochies” on MTV.
BTW AllahP, you have a NEW RIVAL for KP’s affections!
She was just on the Denny Schaffer WGST radion Atlanta. He was overcome with her and wants to have her back “often”. She sounded like her usual self altho I did have to laugh when she told Denny the possibility of Dem’s holding impeachment hearings “when” they take back the House was “right-wing” gossip and not based on fact.

By: High Desert Wanderer

High Desert Wanderer — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:28:23 +0000

Impressive. Well spoken by both women.

By: honora

honora — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:28:07 +0000

I rarely watch O’Reilly, life is too short, but caught this last night. I find O’Reilly’s demeanor with these women vaguely repulsive. He just seems tickled pink to have two good looking women talking–willingly–to him. He can’t stop grinning. What a creep.

Think you see his true colors here–misogynist to the core.

By: shooter

shooter — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:27:30 +0000

LAME O’ ! Wonder if a producer lost a job today? OH Well. Gotta hate those last minute changes.
Had it not been for MM & KP lookin’ hot, I’d been hunting down Gunsmoke or Gilligan.

By: Lawrence

Lawrence — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:07:02 +0000

I’m in complete agreement with both Kirsten and Michelle on this. Maybe not for exactly the same reasons and Kirsten with regard to feminism, but still in agreement with both regarding exploitation and illegal activities.

‘cmon Moms and Dads… think about it in context of your own daughters.

By: Lawrence

Lawrence — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:04:40 +0000

Michelle is waaaaaaaaay hotter than Kirsten. Way. Smarter too.

darwin on September 13, 2006 at 9:21 AM

True.

By: The LLama Butchers

The LLama Butchers — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:43:48 +0000

Pundit babes Michelle Malkin and Kirstin Powers on Girls Gone Wild…

Allahpundit’s fantasy comes true. Even with Bill O’Reilly involved…….

By: darwin

darwin — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:21:32 +0000

Michelle is waaaaaaaaay hotter than Kirsten. Way. Smarter too.

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:28:26 +0000

OMG, it was like parody. You got O’Reilly — a verifiable nitwit — going all common sense on us with “why bother protecting these drunk sluts?”. Bing.

You got MM — and sorry, gotta say it, but when she goes all serious and “I’m not going to give you the satisfaction? She gives me the satisfaction. She was way.too.hot. — going all conservative and deadpan. Perfect, and did I mention really, really hot?

And then you have the lovely KP doing the predictable — yes — feminist thing. NBD.

By: Bellicose Muse

Bellicose Muse — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:05:10 +0000

O’Reilly might as well have said, “Why are we wasting our time trying to protect these whores?” I agree with his point that “it’s a life lesson: wise up or be exploited your whole life”, but much of what he said made him sound like a misogynist.

By: georgej

georgej — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:28:04 +0000

Kevin is right. The “national” drinking age is 21. It’s tied into federal highway dollars.

Hence, there ARE two crimes here: Underaged drinking (under 21) and exploitation of children under 18.

In my state, sexually exploiting an underaged child through the use of alchol or any other drug, is an aggravating factor that brings serious felony time.

“Our beloved boss” ???

Is it review time, AP? Or are you simply trying to make up to Michelle for your fantasy trysts with Bethany AND KP? Inquiring minds want to know….

;^)