Video: Michelle discusses, uh, “Girls Gone Wild” on O’Reilly
posted at 10:23 pm on September 12, 2006 by Allahpundit
Our beloved boss, saddled with a topic like this. Oh, the indignity. And the lost opportunity: if they wanted an expert on GGW from Hot Air, that could easily have been arranged.
To top it all off, O’R had the temerity to refer to the lovely Ms. Powers as a “fascist.” I’ll warn you once, Billy boy, and not again: no one puts KP in the corner.
Michelle did manage to change Bill’s mind in the span of a twenty-second comment, though, so all was not lost. And check out the plug on the graphic. Sweet.
As you can see, she was really happy to be talking about this.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Open arms, Allah.
Kid from Brooklyn on September 12, 2006 at 10:38 PM
I couldn’t believe what I was watching. What was Bill “Jessica’s Law” O’Reilly thinking, criticizing law enforcement efforts against exploitation of underage women?
mikeyboss on September 12, 2006 at 10:39 PM
ok, ok…but she is pegged!
Entelechy on September 12, 2006 at 10:39 PM
Wow, slow news night at FOX.
Good one, Michelle.
Though I agree with prosecuting slugs like Francis when they film underagers, I also believe that the rest of these idiot women deserve to have their silly naked butts prominently displayed in the videos. A little reapin’ what you sowed.
Little Tiffany, I bet your mama’s damn proud of you!
And Allah…the blonde badger actually sounded intelligent there. In a moment like that, I can grant you your fascination. ;o)
tickleddragon on September 12, 2006 at 10:50 PM
KP and MM: “Girls Gone Wild” slap-down on Bill O’Reilly.
I love it!
old_dawg on September 12, 2006 at 10:56 PM
Appeared Bill just was in the mood to be argumentative. He was trying to make good tv but at what cost.
realVerse on September 12, 2006 at 11:00 PM
Kirsten: This is a feminist issue.
Michelle: *wince*….*crickets chirping*
LOL…..
The Ugly American on September 12, 2006 at 11:09 PM
if they wanted an expert on GGW from Hot Air, that could easily have been arranged.
Talk’s cheap.
:)
Anwyn on September 12, 2006 at 11:13 PM
If they wanted an expert on GGW from Hot Air, that could easily have been arranged.
You mean you would have revealed your face to the world?
Yeah, right. You would have sat in shadow and altered your voice.
Carvin Guitar Man on September 12, 2006 at 11:24 PM
mmm….KP in a corner…
I’m sorry, what were we talking about? My mind sorta trailed off for a minute…
MacStansbury on September 12, 2006 at 11:34 PM
Ah, what a topic to have to debate on the eve of 9/11. Does Bill pick these and spring them on Michelle and KP? Michelle is just too funny on live tv; she just can’t quite manage to hide what she’s thinking…good clip.
austinnelly on September 12, 2006 at 11:49 PM
I can kind of understand Olberman’s rage, how must it feel to consistently get destroyed in the ratings by that pompous hack.
B Moe on September 12, 2006 at 11:51 PM
Bah. Girls who want to get drunk and strip are extremely plentiful. Girls who want to do it straight for cash are as well, as the porno mags prove. That this guy is exploiting that fact doesn’t seem to be that big of a deal.
It would be nice to be able to prove they are over 18, but aren’t those videos made in bars where you have to be 21?
Kevin M on September 13, 2006 at 12:16 AM
Now, Allah; implying that you’re an expert on GGW may not set well with Bethany. You may have just blown it.
Mike O on September 13, 2006 at 12:30 AM
this was so ridiculous
and today’s factor started out ok
Defector01 on September 13, 2006 at 12:31 AM
AP, I finally watched the video – there might be movement – from this clip KP is more conservative than you are libertarian. There is hope for this relationship…but I still like MKH the best, of the 3 dames you’re always teasing us about…
Entelechy on September 13, 2006 at 12:32 AM
I forgot – meant to say that O’Reilley would feel differently if one of the girls were his daughter…
Entelechy on September 13, 2006 at 12:32 AM
For Bethany I’d give it up!
Allahpundit on September 13, 2006 at 12:35 AM
Yikes… O’Reilly was scaring me at first! I can’t handle it when he’s making good points. Glad to see that he was just playing devil’s advocate.
Of course, bottom line here is that it’s the law. It’s a stupid law that is aimed at burying pornographers in mountains of paperwork — but it’s the law.
And what is up with KP being so prudish? She seemed more conservative than Michelle up there!
Mark Jaquith on September 13, 2006 at 12:44 AM
Sooooo…AP’s virginity is confirmed.
MacStansbury on September 13, 2006 at 12:44 AM
O’Reilly is an embarrassment to himself, Fox, and large segments of society.
Hardly a newsflash, that.
Patton on September 13, 2006 at 12:45 AM
“Of course, bottom line here is that it’s the law. It’s a stupid law that is aimed at burying pornographers in mountains of paperwork — but it’s the law.”
But that’s the point, Mr. Jaquith. Stupid laws should be repealed. I don’t have a dog in the GGW race, but everyone does in the ‘stupid law’ category. Let’s get all those G-men who are looking at porno for illegality to listen to jihadi conversations instead. I understand there is a serious backlog.
I’m for making it a law to repeal stupid laws.
Kevin M on September 13, 2006 at 1:33 AM
Poor Michelle. I agree that someone like ALLAHPUNDIT would have volunteered to go on as a user of the videos! Especially if someone told him Bethany was in one of those videos just for him. :-)
jasoneverts on September 13, 2006 at 1:41 AM
Kevin is right. The “national” drinking age is 21. It’s tied into federal highway dollars.
Hence, there ARE two crimes here: Underaged drinking (under 21) and exploitation of children under 18.
In my state, sexually exploiting an underaged child through the use of alchol or any other drug, is an aggravating factor that brings serious felony time.
“Our beloved boss” ???
Is it review time, AP? Or are you simply trying to make up to Michelle for your fantasy trysts with Bethany AND KP? Inquiring minds want to know….
;^)
georgej on September 13, 2006 at 2:28 AM
O’Reilly might as well have said, “Why are we wasting our time trying to protect these whores?” I agree with his point that “it’s a life lesson: wise up or be exploited your whole life”, but much of what he said made him sound like a misogynist.
Bellicose Muse on September 13, 2006 at 5:05 AM
OMG, it was like parody. You got O’Reilly — a verifiable nitwit — going all common sense on us with “why bother protecting these drunk sluts?”. Bing.
You got MM — and sorry, gotta say it, but when she goes all serious and “I’m not going to give you the satisfaction? She gives me the satisfaction. She was way.too.hot. — going all conservative and deadpan. Perfect, and did I mention really, really hot?
And then you have the lovely KP doing the predictable — yes — feminist thing. NBD.
Jaibones on September 13, 2006 at 8:28 AM
Michelle is waaaaaaaaay hotter than Kirsten. Way. Smarter too.
darwin on September 13, 2006 at 9:21 AM
True.
Lawrence on September 13, 2006 at 10:04 AM
I’m in complete agreement with both Kirsten and Michelle on this. Maybe not for exactly the same reasons and Kirsten with regard to feminism, but still in agreement with both regarding exploitation and illegal activities.
‘cmon Moms and Dads… think about it in context of your own daughters.
Lawrence on September 13, 2006 at 10:07 AM
LAME O’ ! Wonder if a producer lost a job today? OH Well. Gotta hate those last minute changes.
Had it not been for MM & KP lookin’ hot, I’d been hunting down Gunsmoke or Gilligan.
shooter on September 13, 2006 at 10:27 AM
I rarely watch O’Reilly, life is too short, but caught this last night. I find O’Reilly’s demeanor with these women vaguely repulsive. He just seems tickled pink to have two good looking women talking–willingly–to him. He can’t stop grinning. What a creep.
Think you see his true colors here–misogynist to the core.
honora on September 13, 2006 at 10:28 AM
Impressive. Well spoken by both women.
High Desert Wanderer on September 13, 2006 at 10:28 AM
Exploitation of children is just that..even STUPID children who lie about their ag, get drunk and try to emulate the “hoochies” on MTV.
BTW AllahP, you have a NEW RIVAL for KP’s affections!
She was just on the Denny Schaffer WGST radion Atlanta. He was overcome with her and wants to have her back “often”. She sounded like her usual self altho I did have to laugh when she told Denny the possibility of Dem’s holding impeachment hearings “when” they take back the House was “right-wing” gossip and not based on fact.
labwrs on September 13, 2006 at 10:50 AM
That’s from Dirty Dancing when Patrick Swayze says, “No one puts Baby in the corner.”
pullingmyhairout on September 13, 2006 at 10:52 AM
We need to keep an eye on the slippery slope in cases like this. If 17 and 3/4 years old is no longer enforced soon it’ll be 16 and 3/4 then 13 & 3/4. How low are we willing to go here. The sexualizing of little girls already is getting gross—you can buy padded bras for six year olds.
As a father of two girls, I say let our girls be little girls for as long as we can. They’ve got their whole life to be “grownups”. They only get to be little girls once.
jdpaz on September 13, 2006 at 11:01 AM
Here I was, thinking I was going to be original on this….anyway.
I saw this last night, and I was a bit irritated. I don’t think Ms. Malkin should let herself get involved in these kinds of things. When I see O’Reilly do stories like this it just reminds me of his earlier “journalistic” carreer on Current Edition or Inside Edition or whatever the Hell it was called.
I agree with O’Reilly a lot, when he tells people he is stupid, but I could not disagree more when he characterizes himself as a “political analyst”. To be an analyst requires insight.
Ms. Malkin wipes the floor with O’Reilly (and, for that matter with Ms. Powers). She IS an analyst, and she is wasted (and perhaps exploited) when consigned to idiocy like GGW…though,that said,she made a slik purse out of a sow’s ear by focussing on the importance of upholding the law.
Ms. Malkin is all over issues such as immigration, 9/11 remembrance, islamic terrorism to name a few. Perhaps O’Reilly recognizes that Ms Malkin overshadows him badly when discussing such matters. Perhaps that is why she is left to talk about GGW and other idiocies (there was another forgettable topic a few weeks ago).
In the meantime, I don’t think Ms. Malkin ought to involve herself in such things…just don’t be available. It won’t be a problem…O’Reilly needs her more than she needs him.
Blaise on September 13, 2006 at 11:42 AM
Michelle, did you recently get your hair cut?
(translation: do I get brownie points for noticing?)
thirteen28 on September 13, 2006 at 12:49 PM
The technical staff missed a boob shot on a dancer they should have censored. Will the FCC fine the Factor?
kmackie6612 on September 13, 2006 at 1:23 PM
I HOPE he was playing “devil’s advocate”. If he was playing “freedom of speech” or “victimless crime” he’s in serious need of either therapy or a 17 year old teenage daughter to worry about.
Let’s face it. If worrying about your kid won’t shake you out of your “comfortable with this nonsense” space, nothing will.
And as for the girls who ARE of age, insisting that they don’t need some sort of legal protection or recourse is just plain stupid. Different protections from underaged girls? Yes. NO protect whatsoever? Come on Bill! That’s a “Pull that melon head of yours out of your nether regions and buy a clue” moment. I’m glad he stepped back on that one when MM told him the Jersey story from a few weeks back.
52Ranger on September 13, 2006 at 1:45 PM
It sounds more like AP has an addiction (to GGW).
Rick on September 13, 2006 at 2:53 PM
Gosh, honora, I’d grin too if I were talking to two good-looking women. I hope that doesn’t make me a misogynist.
mikeyboss on September 13, 2006 at 3:20 PM
I don’t think Bill O. is a misogynist. I think he really enjoys having bothe Kirsten and Michelle on at the same time. I think it is a major boost to his labido.
Lawrence on September 13, 2006 at 4:20 PM
For once, I’m glad I had no clue about that piece of movie trivia.
It’s all about my deep-seeded jealousy, anyways.
That, and AP (who I now refer to as AP since it’s easier to write than Allah Pundit or AllahPundit or however you’re supposed to do it) sounds sort of like KP, and that stands for Kristen “Dirty Dancing” Powers, and now I’m back in my dreamland where we are slow dancing to some indecipherable track off a generic music album, and I’m back to the distraction I was working on about 12 hours ago.
[INSERT KP REACTION SHOT PHOTO HERE]
Michelle was great on this subject. I was thoroughly entertained. She was definetly NOT AMUSED.
NTWR on September 13, 2006 at 7:23 PM
To have sex with an inebriated female, no matter what age she may be, is rape. Under the law, a male can be convicted of sexual assault. I don’t see much difference between the actions of “Girls Gone Wild” enticing drunk young women to perform for the camera and someone having sex with a drunk young woman. Both acts are despicable and should be delt with to the maximum extent of the law.
DAT60A3 on September 13, 2006 at 8:24 PM
I’m sure you’re not. And I’m sure he is. I have seen him talking with these ladies before on serious topics and he didn’t have that panting demeanor. Talking dirty with pretty girls–seems like a theme with old Bill-o. It’s creepy but perhaps less obvious to a man.
honora on September 14, 2006 at 11:54 AM