Join Ed and Allahpundit on Facebook!
GreenRoom
- Chris Matthews tired of being asked if he still feels ‘thrill up his leg’
- Feds forced to release list of words used to monitor online speech
- The enduring legacy of Elizabeth Warren’s tribal roots
- Is the Obama campaign really incompetent?
- Calling a spade a spade: most forms of entitlement reform are theft
- Thou Shalt Not Steal…Unless You Have To
- Barack Obama: Scatologist in chief
- Senator Jon Kyl, sequestration, and the economy
- TV chef Lidia Bastianich sued for stealing tips from staff at swanky restaurant
- Movie Review: “For Greater Glory”
Hot Links
|
|
Feeds
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Pro-life arch conservatives breaking heavy for Giuliani.
Will be interesting to see how the media pinheads spin that.
JammieWearingFool on September 12, 2006 at 9:10 PM
I hope the RINOs McCain and Hagel are watching. Brownback is DOA becaus of his stance on immigration. How many illegals did he think would vote for him in the GOP primary?
Valiant on September 12, 2006 at 9:17 PM
What about Condoleezza Rice????
Lothar on September 12, 2006 at 9:19 PM
“What about Condoleezza Rice????”
She said she won’t run, that’s what about her!!!!
Any other questions????
Watcher on September 12, 2006 at 9:30 PM
Vote for Lamont. We need to send a message to the GOP establishment!
frankj on September 12, 2006 at 10:18 PM
You need a “I don’t know this person” option. Because I couldn’t really tell you about some of these people and I consider myself well read.
Skywise on September 12, 2006 at 10:37 PM
Well I voted for some “Yankees”..and being a born and bred Southerner that is something! BUT I would absolutely support Guliani..and possibly Romney..Newt? He makes me NUTS..I support many things he says BUT his personal life bothers the hell out of me..if he can discard wives so easily..well..as a woman..it just simply bothers me. I would be OK with Newt in a Cabinet position but honestly, I would hesitate to vote for him IF he was facing another Republican candidate I liked..BUT were he the nominee….NO PROBLEM..Newt or a Dem? NEWT..and until 1996 I was a “yellow dog Democrat” so that is really saying something!
labwrs on September 12, 2006 at 10:57 PM
Is it too late to add a ‘how libertarian do you consider yourself?’ button?
Kevin M on September 12, 2006 at 11:34 PM
You need a “I don’t know this person” option. Because I couldn’t really tell you about some of these people and I consider myself well read.
If I don’t know ‘em, they are automatically unacceptable just from a practical standpoint.
Lehuster on September 13, 2006 at 4:43 AM
I couldn’t find Michael Badnarik listed. Oh, it’s a poll of GOP guys. I’ll pass, though I will offer the following points:
1. Mitt Romney is the most electable because he isn’t tainted by scandal and will be most agreeable to the cross section of
sheepvoters in this country.2. Newt Gingrich? Newt Gingrich?! I thought the GOP wanted to win this election. Actually the entire list is quite uninspiring to me.
3. If Brownback gets the nomination he should choose a running mate whose last name is “Mountain”. Brownback-Mountain might just win over the gay vote.
Bellicose Muse on September 13, 2006 at 5:11 AM
Brownback-Mountain! HA! Good one!
Our next president isn’t on that list. Condi is the only Pubbie (other than Cheney or Rummy) who’ll continue the Bush (Rice) Doctrine of Pre-emption to fight this global war on islamic terror. Now that’s she’s the S.o.S. she’s playing “good cop” and some conservatives are turning against her. But when she was N.S.A. and playing “bad cop”, conservatives loved her. Have we forgotten so easily? Condi was the “rock star” of the G.O.P. The brains behind Dubya’s long term stategery to defeat the islamic maniacs who wish to kill us. The “Velvet Hammer”, the “Warrior Princess”. Now she’s relegated to “RINO” status because she’s doing her job in a hostile environment at foggy bottom. She needs to replace more of the Klintonite leftovers, but good cop or bad cop, she is still our best hope for ’08 and the best hope that our grandkids won’t still be fighting this war. President Rice will be the ultimate Bad Cop.
Tony737 on September 13, 2006 at 5:42 AM
Condi?…….Are people crazy. This affirmative action Sec of State should be a kindergarten teacher at most, or a writer of resumes.
LZVandy on September 13, 2006 at 6:35 AM
Afirmative action and other domestic policy issues matter little in ’08; if we don’t have someone who truly understands the nature of the Global War on Terror, the odds of us having a radioactive crater in New York or Washington go way up. Without a knowledgeable wartime president, we might not have a domestic policy. Condi understands that; I’m not sure many of the others do.
I am a Goldwater conservative and would oppose many domestic policies Condi might want; I figure Congress could hold the fort on that. But we must have her level of knowledge and commitment to the GWOT at the top, or risk more than we can afford to lose.
Flame me all you want, but I say draft Condi.
Mike O on September 13, 2006 at 10:40 AM
You don’t get it Mike.
I mean she has her job, because of affirmative action. She is totally unqualified. Dumber and more dangerous than Albright!!!
LZVandy on September 13, 2006 at 10:56 AM
Bluntly, after the ’06 elections, here’s the switchup I’d like to see in the Administration. Cheny, God bless him, retires for medical reasons and goes on the stump pitching the administration with no restraints. Condi moved to VP, to show everyone what she’s made of and get her toes into the ultimate political pool. Bolton as Secretary of State, Tony Snow to the U.N. Wouldn’t that be fun?
Mike O on September 13, 2006 at 10:57 AM
I need to know more about Mitt, but he won major points with me when he ordered the state of Mass. to not provide any security for Khatami (sp?) during his visit to Harvard.
Newt definitely has some baggage, but it’s mostly in regard to his personal life. In his political life, he was the architect of the 1994 mid terms when Republicans re-took the house, and that is a huge, huge plus in his favor. It says he knows how to win, and knows how to do it with ideas. Underestimate him at your own peril.
thirteen28 on September 13, 2006 at 11:22 AM
Don’t think that the Dems won’t pull out all personal baggage in the ’08 knifefight. That’s also a ding on Guliani, unfortunately. If he and Hillary are nominated, they would very quickly tried to turn it into ‘philandering man vs. aggrieved woman’ contest. And that is likety to be a winning strategy, pulling the entire Oprah camp out to vote.
Mike O on September 13, 2006 at 11:28 AM
I like Mitt Romney too and he would be my 1st choice but I fear the “religious right” is going to make toast of him for being a Mormon. We can’t afford for them to stay away from the polls .. as much as I hate it .. that’s the reality.
Texas Gal on September 13, 2006 at 11:40 AM
These times are too serious – we’re not in the mid-to-late nineties – for idealistic experimentation and message-sending. Come to think of it, the 90s, in retrospect, shouldn’t have been that either.
Entelechy on September 13, 2006 at 12:07 PM
I would like to see Steve Laffey run for Pres. We have to remove the Bush-Clinton cabal. They are one in the same. We need a conservative, not another Rommey, whose daddy ran with Nixon. God save us from this bunch political class that has given us this mess!
LZVandy on September 13, 2006 at 2:05 PM
Along with Bush/Clinton cabal………we have these two dumb broads……Albright/Rice…..one in the same.
LZVandy on September 13, 2006 at 2:08 PM
only one clear choice.. as always its Newt. Baggage shmaggage.. that doesn’t mean anything in American politics. Think William Jefferson Clinton.. Newt is perfect by the job and as much as some of you don’t think so, he IS electable.. Watch and see..
RobertCSampson on September 13, 2006 at 2:42 PM
LZ, I usually agree with you, but I’m getting annoyed by the whole “dumb” Condi thing. She’s the ONLY politician I heard say that Bin Laden wanted to fly planes into buildings before it happened. She has spent her life studying these things. Granted, I wish she could be more tough, but to put her in the same boat with the Brisket Legged Butcher of the Balkans Halfbright is an absolute stupid joke.
Newt/Guiliani or Newt/Romney.
Baggage can’t matter. Get Newt’s newsletter and check out how right on he is. He recently outlined the top 11 priorities we need to accomplish and he was dead on with all of them.
Romney is brilliant and crafty around libs. Guiliani showed awesome leadership after 9/11.
I still wish Oliver North would run though.
NTWR on September 13, 2006 at 7:15 PM
Guiliani is liberal but his is absolutely credible.
Newt has the same baggage for moderates that Hillary has for conservatives. I don’t know if he can get past the image.
Romney has done some clever things. He seems to have true convictions. He also seems to have the ability to blurt out some honest remark that could bury him, like Barry Goldwater and the nuclear war remark. Goldwater was right but the words ran without him. I need to see more of Romney to know.
Intuitively I like Condi. The problem is, she is always working for someone else, and presenting the other person’s opinion. I really don’t know her personal politics. She is discrete and always backs Bush. right now she is a cipher. She appears fearless. is she?
Romney’s stand on the Iranian leader was cool. It wasn’t something Condi could do in her job.
Guiliani is a proven warrior, I believe him. We disagree on a lot, yet I don’t think he would shove something at the public if most people didn’t want it. He has decency, propriety in public behavior as seen in 911. He also moves lightening fast in crisis. No deer in the headlights. Does anyone doubt Katrina would have been different under Guiliani. He would have kicked the governor in the ass if he had to to save people. That has value.
entagor on September 13, 2006 at 8:01 PM
I would love to see a Newt vs. Hitlary debate. He can run circles around some of the best that Washington has to offer.
DannoJyd on September 13, 2006 at 9:12 PM