<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT embraces pre-emption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:04:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b7656b3e5031</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-1116672</link>
		<dc:creator>b7656b3e5031</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-1116672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;b7656b3e5031...&lt;/strong&gt;

b7656b3e503129417255...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>b7656b3e5031&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>b7656b3e503129417255&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cable jersey new tv</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-646617</link>
		<dc:creator>cable jersey new tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-646617</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cable jersey new tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

Therefore, our advice is for you to buy an up-to-date cable descrambler from your cable TV company....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cable jersey new tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Therefore, our advice is for you to buy an up-to-date cable descrambler from your cable TV company&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: co denver home new</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-645232</link>
		<dc:creator>co denver home new</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-645232</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;co denver home new...&lt;/strong&gt;

The House of Commons is not sitting today....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>co denver home new&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The House of Commons is not sitting today&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-52245</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-52245</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/20060918/20060918_Steve_Kornacki_politics_wiseguys.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jersey Dems &lt;/a&gt;panic...

&lt;blockquote&gt;A powerful clue that U.S. Senator Robert Menendez might ultimately be forced to withdraw from his bid for a full term in New Jersey emerged last Friday, when he addressed the question head-on just hours after the world learned that he is the subject of a federal criminal investigation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/20060918/20060918_Steve_Kornacki_politics_wiseguys.asp" rel="nofollow">Jersey Dems </a>panic&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>A powerful clue that U.S. Senator Robert Menendez might ultimately be forced to withdraw from his bid for a full term in New Jersey emerged last Friday, when he addressed the question head-on just hours after the world learned that he is the subject of a federal criminal investigation.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51817</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51817</guid>
		<description>Zogby &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Sep-12-Tue-2006/news/9596045.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;spokesman Fritz Wenzel&lt;/a&gt;...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, the national political mood, seen as boosting the Democratic Party, has cooled somewhat. &quot;A month ago, even two weeks ago, the Democrats nationwide were doing better than they are today,&quot; he said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

More from &lt;a href=&quot;http://ace.mu.nu/archives/196380.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ace of Spades &lt;/a&gt;HQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zogby <a href="http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Sep-12-Tue-2006/news/9596045.html" rel="nofollow">spokesman Fritz Wenzel</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Also, the national political mood, seen as boosting the Democratic Party, has cooled somewhat. &#8220;A month ago, even two weeks ago, the Democrats nationwide were doing better than they are today,&#8221; he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>More from <a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/196380.php" rel="nofollow">Ace of Spades </a>HQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51723</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51723</guid>
		<description>Danno, while I agree with your &quot;boneheads&quot; assessment, I believe the conservative voters are more scared, or s/b, about what a liberal House/Senate would do to finish an unconditional Amnesty bill.

They would make it soooo liberal, one, to up the conservatives, two, to endear themselves with the new voters, and three, because they&#039;d know that this President would sign it.

This alone, should drive them to the voting booths in droves. The immigration bill will not be decided by items within it (i.e. employers) but by how comprehensive and liberal it will be in the end. Though, the border item does need to be addressed, even now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danno, while I agree with your &#8220;boneheads&#8221; assessment, I believe the conservative voters are more scared, or s/b, about what a liberal House/Senate would do to finish an unconditional Amnesty bill.</p>
<p>They would make it soooo liberal, one, to up the conservatives, two, to endear themselves with the new voters, and three, because they&#8217;d know that this President would sign it.</p>
<p>This alone, should drive them to the voting booths in droves. The immigration bill will not be decided by items within it (i.e. employers) but by how comprehensive and liberal it will be in the end. Though, the border item does need to be addressed, even now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51695</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51695</guid>
		<description>Here is the point I&#039;ve been making all along, and it might put &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/09/the_democrats_can_win_on_immig.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;republicans out of power &lt;/a&gt;since they have decided to take their eye off of this ball...

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the Missouri Senate race, which candidate is more serious about curbing illegal immigration? 

a) Republican Jim Talent, who says, &quot;The only way you&#039;re going to stop illegal immigration ... (is) at the border.&quot; 

b) Democrat Claire McCaskill, who wants to crack down on the employers who hire them. &quot;It&#039;s not fair to beat up on those people,&quot; she says, &quot;and meanwhile give the people who are profiting off of them a free pass.&quot; (Both quotes courtesy of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.) 

The resounding answer is (b), the Democrat. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Boneheads!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the point I&#8217;ve been making all along, and it might put <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/09/the_democrats_can_win_on_immig.html" rel="nofollow">republicans out of power </a>since they have decided to take their eye off of this ball&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>In the Missouri Senate race, which candidate is more serious about curbing illegal immigration? </p>
<p>a) Republican Jim Talent, who says, &#8220;The only way you&#8217;re going to stop illegal immigration &#8230; (is) at the border.&#8221; </p>
<p>b) Democrat Claire McCaskill, who wants to crack down on the employers who hire them. &#8220;It&#8217;s not fair to beat up on those people,&#8221; she says, &#8220;and meanwhile give the people who are profiting off of them a free pass.&#8221; (Both quotes courtesy of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.) </p>
<p>The resounding answer is (b), the Democrat. </p></blockquote>
<p>Boneheads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51660</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bill&#039;s Bites...&lt;/strong&gt;

The webmaster&#039;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated and bumped, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill&#8217;s Bites&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The webmaster&#8217;s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated and bumped, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51537</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51537</guid>
		<description>honora, sincerely, you have two traits which I admire, you&#039;re intelligent and objective. The liberals were just as fierce about &#039;splitting&#039; the goods on voting territories, as are the conservatives. Those in power make the rules - it&#039;s an old hat.

Here&#039;s more to Bryan&#039;s theme - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-gadems10sep10,1,3198738.story?coll=la-headlines-politics&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why would the LA Times care about Georgia races&lt;/a&gt;? More pre-emptive gabbing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honora, sincerely, you have two traits which I admire, you&#8217;re intelligent and objective. The liberals were just as fierce about &#8216;splitting&#8217; the goods on voting territories, as are the conservatives. Those in power make the rules &#8211; it&#8217;s an old hat.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more to Bryan&#8217;s theme &#8211; <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-gadems10sep10,1,3198738.story?coll=la-headlines-politics&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true" rel="nofollow">why would the LA Times care about Georgia races</a>? More pre-emptive gabbing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: there it is</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51517</link>
		<dc:creator>there it is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51517</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s also well known that the New York Times editorial board also &lt;strong&gt;embraces&lt;/strong&gt; pitchin/catchin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s also well known that the New York Times editorial board also <strong>embraces</strong> pitchin/catchin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tormod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51494</link>
		<dc:creator>tormod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51494</guid>
		<description>The left seems to think the only legitimate election is one that they win.-&lt;blockquote&gt;
One Angry Christian on September 12, 2006 at 11:11 AM


Aint that the truth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left seems to think the only legitimate election is one that they win.-<br />
<blockquote>
One Angry Christian on September 12, 2006 at 11:11 AM</p>
<p>Aint that the truth.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51478</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51478</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Zogby: Republican Senate Hopefuls Surging...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ensign (R) now ahead for Senate in Nevada. Also, the national political mood, seen as boosting the Democratic Party, has cooled somewhat. &quot;A month ago, even two weeks ago, the Democrats nationwide were doing better than they are today,&quot; he......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zogby: Republican Senate Hopefuls Surging&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ensign (R) now ahead for Senate in Nevada. Also, the national political mood, seen as boosting the Democratic Party, has cooled somewhat. &#8220;A month ago, even two weeks ago, the Democrats nationwide were doing better than they are today,&#8221; he&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51477</link>
		<dc:creator>EFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51477</guid>
		<description>Your days at Junk Yard Blog were before my time so I missed out on that opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your days at Junk Yard Blog were before my time so I missed out on that opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51473</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51473</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I&#039;ve a bet going with a co worker. I&#039;ve said for the last year that the dems are over confident, and that we&#039;re going to hold the house and the senate. We might lose the presidency, but I can sum up why everyone thinks we&#039;re going to lose come election time in two words: The Media. 

People keep talking about this mythical eight year pendulum. It exists in the presidency but not in the house or the senate. The dems held the senate for two decades. We&#039;ve had it for ... eight years? I might be wrong on that. It might only be four. 

The republican party might lose a few seats, but frankly I think we&#039;re going to give them another beating. The visceral hatred coming out of the left is a stick they seem to be good at beating themselves with. 

Expect more conspiracy theories about the up and coming elections. The left seems to think the only legitimate election is one that they win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;ve a bet going with a co worker. I&#8217;ve said for the last year that the dems are over confident, and that we&#8217;re going to hold the house and the senate. We might lose the presidency, but I can sum up why everyone thinks we&#8217;re going to lose come election time in two words: The Media. </p>
<p>People keep talking about this mythical eight year pendulum. It exists in the presidency but not in the house or the senate. The dems held the senate for two decades. We&#8217;ve had it for &#8230; eight years? I might be wrong on that. It might only be four. </p>
<p>The republican party might lose a few seats, but frankly I think we&#8217;re going to give them another beating. The visceral hatred coming out of the left is a stick they seem to be good at beating themselves with. </p>
<p>Expect more conspiracy theories about the up and coming elections. The left seems to think the only legitimate election is one that they win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51471</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51471</guid>
		<description>Republicans have engaged in shameless gerrymandering;  before them, the Democrats.  The goal being:  the fix is in.  Odd how the parties can cooperate when it comes down to the noble goal of keeping the collective ass of the incumbents safe.  This is the biggest problem in gov&#039;t today, the institutionalization of the status quo.

Teddy Kennedy is a pure partisan--this is hardly news.  And he&#039;s not alone, both sides are rotten with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have engaged in shameless gerrymandering;  before them, the Democrats.  The goal being:  the fix is in.  Odd how the parties can cooperate when it comes down to the noble goal of keeping the collective ass of the incumbents safe.  This is the biggest problem in gov&#8217;t today, the institutionalization of the status quo.</p>
<p>Teddy Kennedy is a pure partisan&#8211;this is hardly news.  And he&#8217;s not alone, both sides are rotten with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51464</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51464</guid>
		<description>They are worried. Kennedy comes out with &quot;Bush&#039;s speech did not unite the country&quot;. 80% or better, of the entire country had not yet gone to work! Had not yet talked with another soul about the speech. How could he make such an asinine statement within hours of the speech? 
 &#039;No plan&#039; cowards running at the mouth with pre-emptive verbal strikes. Wish they could spend that much time, thought and energy against the real enemy, the terrorists. Pre-emptive strikes could be better used elsewhere.  
  Maybe Kennedy&#039;s just already drunk today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are worried. Kennedy comes out with &#8220;Bush&#8217;s speech did not unite the country&#8221;. 80% or better, of the entire country had not yet gone to work! Had not yet talked with another soul about the speech. How could he make such an asinine statement within hours of the speech?<br />
 &#8216;No plan&#8217; cowards running at the mouth with pre-emptive verbal strikes. Wish they could spend that much time, thought and energy against the real enemy, the terrorists. Pre-emptive strikes could be better used elsewhere.<br />
  Maybe Kennedy&#8217;s just already drunk today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51461</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51461</guid>
		<description>Eh, I&#039;ve always been snarky.  My old blog wasn&#039;t called JunkYardBlog for nothin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I&#8217;ve always been snarky.  My old blog wasn&#8217;t called JunkYardBlog for nothin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51451</link>
		<dc:creator>EFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51451</guid>
		<description>Good news indeed.  I wonder if the party drives the people, or the people drive the party.  By this I mean, are the democrats sounding so wacky because a large percentage of the population has been feeling the same way about Iraq and &quot;Bushitler&quot;, or have the democrats been beating the drum about Iraq and &quot;Bushitler&quot; because they think they can convince the population to believe the same.

I hope it is the later, because I think that would signify that we could have a real victory in the election results in November.  And it means that the crazyness is isolated in the democratic parties fringe, and isn&#039;t really mainstream thought.

By the way Bryan, your writting style seems to have evolved somewhat.  Since this blog took off, I think I have noticed your style evolving to include some AP style snark.  Your &quot;The Democrats are struggling in New York? That’s just weird. If they can’t make it there, they can’t make it anywhere.&quot; line being a good example.  I like it.

Anyway, a real good post.  The McCain-Feingold legislation about political speach within 60 days of an election is gonna be a real interesting topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news indeed.  I wonder if the party drives the people, or the people drive the party.  By this I mean, are the democrats sounding so wacky because a large percentage of the population has been feeling the same way about Iraq and &#8220;Bushitler&#8221;, or have the democrats been beating the drum about Iraq and &#8220;Bushitler&#8221; because they think they can convince the population to believe the same.</p>
<p>I hope it is the later, because I think that would signify that we could have a real victory in the election results in November.  And it means that the crazyness is isolated in the democratic parties fringe, and isn&#8217;t really mainstream thought.</p>
<p>By the way Bryan, your writting style seems to have evolved somewhat.  Since this blog took off, I think I have noticed your style evolving to include some AP style snark.  Your &#8220;The Democrats are struggling in New York? That’s just weird. If they can’t make it there, they can’t make it anywhere.&#8221; line being a good example.  I like it.</p>
<p>Anyway, a real good post.  The McCain-Feingold legislation about political speach within 60 days of an election is gonna be a real interesting topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokonut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-51450</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/12/nyt-embraces-pre-emption/#comment-51450</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed that the media spotlight on Dean or that Dean himself has quieted down lately? This silencing seemed to have started a few months ago but I&#039;m not starting to noticed. Has the DNC finally put the reign in on Dean? Has the DNC finally recognized how stupid they were in getting Howard Dean who allowed him to flap his gums for nearly 2 years embarrassing the DNC at every move?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed that the media spotlight on Dean or that Dean himself has quieted down lately? This silencing seemed to have started a few months ago but I&#8217;m not starting to noticed. Has the DNC finally put the reign in on Dean? Has the DNC finally recognized how stupid they were in getting Howard Dean who allowed him to flap his gums for nearly 2 years embarrassing the DNC at every move?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
