The War Continues
posted at 12:24 pm on September 11, 2006 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
In Afghanistan, where NATO is still taking the fight to the Taliban:
NATO airstrikes and artillery have killed a further 92 suspected Taliban fighters, the alliance reported Monday, pushing its toll of militant dead in a 10-day offensive past 500.
Isn’t this a disproprotional response to the Taliban’s cross-border attacks and bombings? The Taliban doesn’t have an air force and hasn’t killed 500 NATO troops. Or is it only disproportional to fight terrorists when the Jews do it?
The fatalities reported Monday bring the toll so far to at least 510. NATO has said that 20 foreign soldiers have died, 14 of them in British reconnaissance plane crash. It says it has yet to confirm any of the several civilian casualties reported by Afghan government and hospital officials.
The operation has targeted hundreds of Taliban militants who had gathered near the main southern city of Kandahar. It has prompted some of the heaviest fighting since the U.S.-led ouster of the hard-line Taliban regime in late 2001 for hosting Osama bin Laden.
“Estimating enemy casualties is not a precise science,” the statement quoted Col. Chris Vernon, chief of staff for the NATO force in the south.
“With our considerable technical intelligence, human intelligence and surveillance onto the battle area, we are able to establish figures to a reasonable level of accuracy,” said Vernon. “The Taliban in the Panjwayi-Zhari area have suffered significant attrition.”
On the negative side, the world would be a far better place if the Taliban had ceased to exist a long time ago. But on the positive side, if they’re fighting to reclaim what we took from them nearly 5 years ago, they’re not hosting al Qaeda camps on the scale they once did and they’re certainly not advancing to any great extent. We usually overlook the fact that without secure bases it’s difficult to train operatives to the level al Qaeda once did, and al Qaeda just doesn’t have the network of bases it once had. The loss of those bases has had a great deal to do with the lack of major attacks on us since 9-11.
On another front, the North Koreans may act up again soon.
A British newspaper reported Sunday that Russian diplomats believe it is now highly probable that North Korea will carry out its first underground test of an atomic device.
The Sunday Telegraph said North Korean leader Kim Jong Il had made his intentions clear during recent talks with Russian and Chinese officials in Pyongyang.
Although he was pressed to resume six-party talks over his nuclear program, the Russians concluded that he was serious about showing that his scientists have successfully built a nuclear weapon, the newspaper said.
“Their fears appear to bolster American suspicions that a test is being prepared, after intelligence reports last month of unusual vehicle movements in the area believed to be the test site,” the Sunday Telegraph reported.
The newspaper said Russia and China, who are North Korea’s closest friends, have warned Kim that detonating an atomic device would alienate them.
I doubt he takes them very seriously, given China’s and Russia’s record of enabling him and Iran. And the bottom line is, Kim already rules the most reclusive state on earth. Unless Russia and particularly China are ready to cut him off entirely and back action against him if it comes to that, Kim’s behavior won’t change.
One reason that we’re still fighting this war against the axis of evil 5 years after 9-11 is the fickle and unreliable behavior of Russia and China. They could have played constructive roles but instead have run interference for the terror masters for years, even after Beslan should have proved to Russia that it is as much under threat as we are, if not more.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
From the MSM, you would hardly know there is a war in Afghanistan, except that the Left-heads use it as a talking point, as a place we should be instead of Iraq. Is an American soldier ever injured or killed in Afghanistan? Is an American soldier ever herioc in Afghanistan?
That is why the MSM counts Iraq war dead, not Afghanistan war dead.
The MSM has no soldier heros in our war, only villians. I wonder the left has not moved to disband the military, except they need them for real conflicts like Haiti, Bosnia, Katrina, the Tsunami zones. They are also needed by Bush to handle clerical duties at the Mexican border in election years.
This is worse than Vietnam. Then, the sacrifice of the conscripted American soldier was highlighted to stop the war. Here, the sacrifice of our volunteer soldiers might engender empathy for the cause so it cannot exist.
If the Taliban are attacking, it means they haven’t won. If they haven’t won, we are still winning. Pretty good for that part of the world. Remember the nay sayers when the war started?
entagor on September 11, 2006 at 2:56 PM
CIA statistics on killed terrorists…
Entelechy on September 11, 2006 at 3:31 PM
I remember they (we) were about 20% of the country. We are now 60%. Preey bad for this part of the world.
honora on September 11, 2006 at 4:45 PM
The problem right now is not Afghanistan so much that there is now a new Afghanistan, right in the middle of Pakistan.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1971329.cms
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan6sep06,1,5656004.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct=us/7-0&fp=450505c9eb5860c3&ei=jvAFRairMbuiHOqSjN4O&url=http%3A//www.nytimes.com/2006/09/10/weekinreview/10rohde.html&cid=0
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091001145.html
Lehuster on September 11, 2006 at 7:27 PM
I didn’t know Afghanistan had fallen. We must be having a hard time landing planes there. Did the Taliban behead Karzai or just deport him? This is all new to me. I haven’t been reading the Huffington Report lately.
Waziristan is nothing new. It is now official instead of unofficial. A lot easier than pretending. This area has always been off limits to the USA. The Pak army may have lost 800 soldiers, but probably also gained millions of dollars in payoffs. It also is a good place to dump the percentage of the Pak military that supports Islamo fascists, but still wants to wear a uniform and get a paycheck. This simply means the islamists have not gained ground in Pakistan.
entagor on September 11, 2006 at 9:27 PM
What I love about Fox news is that they’ve been the only source for info on the fight in Afghanistan. Not many pictures but at least a running total of how many talibani’s killed each day on the scroll (or crawl, whatever it’s called).
As to bin laden, I wish Dubya would just come out and say “We know he’s in Pakistan, but they won’t allow us in there to get him for fear the people would overthrow the govt, take control of the nukes … and use ‘em.” Simple as that. Libs are always complaining about it but never offer their idea as to how we can get this prick without Musharraf being overthrown by a.q. supporters.
Tony737 on September 12, 2006 at 6:23 AM
Comment pages: