Red State has the video link. Much thanks for sharing it. Please watch the videos (split in 6 videos) And Video synopsis is here If you are having trouble seeing it at Red State, try here
This has Clinton all over it.
And now here is an interview d…

Devastating.

Well the debate between Hector and Myself concerning the 9/11 film due to air Monday Tonight and tomorrow might have been made moot by the Redstate blog as the scenes in dispute are youtubed. Hotair says the following: Go watch……

Well the debate between Hector and Myself concerning the 9/11 film due to air Monday might have been made moot by the Redstate blog as the scenes in dispute are youtubed. Hotair says the following: Go watch before it’s pulled…….

Deep-thinking lefty Andy Ostroy slams ABC for giving Bush an unbeatable lead-in to his speech Monday night at 9 — even though “Path to 9/11″ was scheduled for that time slot weeks ago, before Bush announced when he’d be speaking.

So you think it is just a coincidence that a SPEECH about 9/11 and a MOVIE about 9/11 would just “happen” to BOTH actually be on the actual date of 9/11?

RRiiiiiigggggghhhhhhhttttt!

Keep on drinking that Kool-Aid, so-called “Allah-Pundit”

Is there another mirror site that somebody already captured it for download?

Red State has clips from the “Path to 9/11″ movie. It looks pretty good. Via Hot Air…….

“Go watch before they get pulled”

Allahpundit

If they get pulled that would be a shame. If that does happen and the page/links die – then the actual clips might still reside on the server.

Here are the links to the clips – from the source code.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58750/video.mov/17926

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58751/video.mov/17926

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58753/video.mov/17926

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58756/video.mov/17926

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58763/video.mov/17926

http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58767/video.mov/17926

To be honest, I didn’t know what category to place this in. I was going to put it under “Whackos”, but I think it’s more an “Idiots and Morons” type thing.

AmericaBlog is calling for “war against Disney” (they’re words, not mine). They’v…

Left bloggers prepare for war on ABC

Better than “war” on terrorism …
Video: Scenes from “Path” (HT: Allahpundit)

Destined for the memory hole …
Video: Khatami at National Cathedral

The “moderate” Islamofascist ……

Reader William observes: Originally, TV listings showed Path to 9/11 as being commercial free for three hours tonight and two hours tomorrow night. Now ABC’s web site shows tonight’s episode as only 2.5 hours, followed by a special 30 minute……

But again, maybe it should be pulled in favor of the real truth which is much much worse for the Clinton admin. Again, it should start with this quote:

“The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, ‘96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, ’cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn’t and that’s how he wound up in Afghanistan.”

Then cover all points from the book “Losing Bin Laden”. Then it should get deep in to Able Danger (or as far as we’re able to go so far)… Gorelick being appointed 9/11 commissioner, an obvious conflict of interests after she strengthened and built up the wall that blocked Able Danger from passing along intell to the proper authorities. Intell that specifically identified Atta and other hijackers as potential terrorists back during the Clinton years. Another HUGE story that the 9/11 commission refuses to address. The Berger pants dance needs to be mentioned as well.

Then, although obviously (as far as we can tell) unrelated to 9/11, Saddam’s connections to Bin Laden and Al Qaeda need to be discussed. I’ve been pretty pissed off all week about all the talk and lying headlines that Saddam had no ties, simply because he didn’t have ties to Zarqawi. Zarqawi was an effing nobody at the time, everyone already knew that. But he did have Bin Laden/Qaeda ties before that, as we learned from the tiny sliver documents (of the millions) captured in Iraq that were translated and released.

If you bought in to these headlines this week, you’ve been lied to.

Not to mention all of this. Alright, I’m getting too worked up again… Gotta crash.

Clinton and his administration failed miserbly in protecting us. I don’t know how he can show his face in public.