Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Thugs for life: Dems threaten ABC’s broadcast license over “Path to 9/11″ Update: Stolen Honor redux?

posted at 8:42 pm on September 7, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view

Via Spruiell. I forget the context, but I remember Bob Owens at Confederate Yankee saying a while back how disappointed he was in the Democrats over something, and I told him there’s an easy fix for that: expect nothing from them, like I do, and you’ll never be disappointed. Turns out I was wrong, though, because even with zero expectations, I can’t quite believe they’d stoop to this. As naked an example of intimidation as you’ll see this side of British Muslims playing good cop/bad cop with Tony Blair. If the GOP pulled this crap, it’d be top of the f’ng fold tomorrow in the Times. As it should be.

Wonderful network you’ve got there. It’d be a shame if something happened to it:

[T]he manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC… Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation…

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events…

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows…

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.

My only question is this: was that letter typed, or did they use letters cut out from magazines?

You can’t play nice with them. I conceded they had a point about the scene with Sandy Berger. Ace conceded it. Dean conceded it. Geraghty conceded it. Others have conceded it. Facts is facts, and “composite” scenes play a little too loose for a film about 9/11. But the fightin’ nutroots wanted to see some fight, and Reid — who suddenly seems willing to crap in whatever color the fringe left tells him to — wanted to show he was a tough guy by throwing his weight around with ABC.

Fair enough. Everything is a precedent. There’s nothing anyone can do except remember and use it when Michael Moore’s new movie comes out and someone on the Republican side criticizes it as inaccurate and the droning about dissent-crushing begins. Here’s a post to help memorialize it for future reference. I hope others will do so too.

Update: Oh — and Scholastic, the schoolbook publisher, has suddenly reversed course and decided that they won’t use the miniseries as a teaching tool after all, even though it’s been edited. I bet their texts have lots of interesting passages about terrorism, “root causes,” etc etc. To paraphrase Harry Reid, it’d be a shame if someone started looking into them.

Update: The front page at dKos has to be seen right now to be believed. Just keep scrolling.

Update: I can’t say it any better than Bryan did in the comments:

You all should go look at the DNC’s web page. With the fifth anniversary of 9-11 on the horizon, what are they all about? Reflection? National unity? Defense?

Nope. Censorship. Plain and simple.

demo-pt9.png

Update: I’m pinching this from Ace, who pinched it from someone else. Guess who’s up in arms about the disingenuousness hackery of the miniseries. That’s right: the leading authority in the field.

Update: If you’re going to link, don’t link this post. Link Texas Rainmaker’s. That’s another way to stick this incident up Reid’s ass — use it as an opportunity to discuss Clinton’s record as a miserable failure, to borrow another favored left-wing term, on terrorism.

Call it a “teachable moment.”

Update: Bryan’s been having fun with the Democrats’ “send a message to Disney” window.

abc-petition.jpg

Update: Captain Ed welcomes you to the Enforced Perspective Party. And he’s exactly right — they’ve snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Again.

Let’s hope they can do it one more time in November.

Update: No wonder Reid felt safe threatening Disney. We all forgot who the Chairman of the Board is.

Update: Ed Driscoll e-mails to say that no, in fact, not all of us forgot.

Update: (Bryan) Or flashback. To 2004. The *Swiftboat Veterans for the Truth were participating in a documentary called Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. It was about John Kerry’s actual service in Vietnam, as opposed the one he has built his career on. You did know that he served there, didn’t you?

Sinclair Broadcasting owns 62 local TV stations around the country. It planned to air Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal on about 40 of them in October 2004. That would be right before the presidential election. But the Kerry campaign got wind of it and threatened Sinclair that its licenses might be in jeopardy if it aired the doc and Kerry happened to win.

The polls were close, so Sinclair caved. It ended up airing just a few minutes of Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal inside a bromide wrapper.

I’m of the opinion that ABC will likewise cave, Friday evening.

The Democrats will have stomped on the First Amendment, again, just ahead of a national election. Like the man said in A Few Good Men, they just can’t handle the truth.

*correction. Stolen Honor is mainly about Vietnam POWs betrayed by Kerry.

(Thanks to Chris R. for remembering all of this.)

Update: Reader John C. helpfully crops the screencap.

democrats.JPG

Update: Video so tasty it deserved its own post!


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Holy crap, they are scared! I’ve been meaning to post on this all day but the news has been non-stop… I peeked at KOS and DU earlier and this story was the subject of virtually every post. On a related note, Hume mentioned the planned “Google bomb” today, and noted that if successful they plan to do this all the way up to the elections (pressumably with all other issues)… Don’t they ever feel pathetic? They have to manipulate the Google’s search engine in order to get their non-message across?

RightWinged on September 7, 2006 at 8:45 PM

This is like a hissy-fit of previously unseen proportions. Granted, the “taking artistic liberties” left a window open for such a tantrum, but I never saw them obsessing over it like this.

If Lieberman were to come out for taking government action against ABC, I bet the nutroots would now support him.

frankj on September 7, 2006 at 8:50 PM

With perfect timing, one of the History channels has a show on Stalin coming on shortly.

Uncle Joe would be proud.

JammieWearingFool on September 7, 2006 at 8:55 PM

You all should go look at the DNC’s web page. With the fifth anniversary of 9-11 on the horizon, what are they all about? Reflection? National unity? Defense?

Nope. Censorship. Plain and simple.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 9:01 PM

Well, when you think about it, they really had no choice. If a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat party — ABC — could come up with a depiction of 9-11 that condemned Democrats, every mindless nitwit in America that watches it instantly hates the Dems. They had to go nuclear and stop this thing.

When you see Durbin involved, you know the Dems are scared; he’s their uber-partisan and debate team Captain. But the text of this letter is juvenile; it sounds more like something Schumer or Reid would write, not Durbin.

And quoting the honored, objective members of the Dem 9-11 team was priceless: Ben-Veniste, Gorelick, Clarke…heh.

Jaibones on September 7, 2006 at 9:02 PM

The more I think about, the more angry I get. I was leaning towards ABC should pull this the movie if it was going to use made up events, but for politicans to threaten speech like this?

I really want to punch something right now.

frankj on September 7, 2006 at 9:03 PM

Just when the Dems thought they had the midterms locked up, too…

First, Bush pulls some old-school Steven Seagal aikido with Gitmo and the tribunals; and now the left shows its ass with this 9/11 docudrama business.

Is there any doubt that a Dem majority would attempt an immediate reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine upon swearing in? What other purpose could there be behind this level-5 bitch fit, other than to lay that very foundation?

Kid from Brooklyn on September 7, 2006 at 9:05 PM

What a disgusting display of immaturity. The offending scene was changed, what more do they want? Do they want everyone to forget that all of this happened on their beloved Clinton’s watch? Perhaps if he thought more about safeguarding this country than finding the next intern to bang, the situation might be different. I wholly believe the Democrats can do nothing but complain. They have become a joke of a political party. The next time a leftwing nutroot complains about so-called conservative attempts to silence critics, you can bet I’ll bring up these shenanigans being perpetrated by Democrats.

schlagerman on September 7, 2006 at 9:06 PM

What I find really interesting is that this is a docuDRAMA. Where were they when Michael Moore put out what he called a “documentary”, that has since had virtually every single “point” blown apart as lies and misrepresentations, out of context quoting, and clever nonsequential editing. How did they react to this “highest grossing documentary” that couldn’t keep it’s name out of the news, hype hype hype… They put the creator in the VIP seat at the Democratic National Convention!

RightWinged on September 7, 2006 at 9:14 PM

Hey, Bryan. Quick question.

I clicked on that DNC link, and found their online petition. It has its own comment section at the bottom. Would it be helpful to include some strong statement of support for the documentary there? I’m such a fan of that jiujitsu, you know.

Kid from Brooklyn on September 7, 2006 at 9:16 PM

“Everything is a precedent… when Michael Moore’s new movie comes out… To paraphrase Harry Reid, it’d be a shame if someone started looking into them.”

It’s a comforting fantasy, but I think here in the real world the Right doesn’t have the nads. Anyway, no incident ever is exactly the same, that’s how they weasel out of everthing. They freak out over an alleged outing of a CIA agent by journalists but then when journalists out entire counterterrorism programs…it’s different! You get the idea.

Alex K on September 7, 2006 at 9:20 PM

this is incredulous
just how far does the DNC want to go for total control
seriously, ask who really is stifling decent and this is a better example then anything done by Don Rumsfeld or John Ashcroft

Defector01 on September 7, 2006 at 9:26 PM

Kid, you know they’ll hate that. Free speech obviously isn’t a bedrock value for the Dems.

But me? I think it’s just fine. Swing away.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 9:27 PM

Markos focus on details is amazing:

Midday open thread
by kos
Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 12:08:18 PM PDT

* This woman will be on “Dancing with the Stars”. Make sure you vote against her if you watch the show (and even if you don’t). She’s Tom DeLay’s friend.

This is some seriously funny shit.

B Moe on September 7, 2006 at 9:27 PM

Go to giveemhellharry.com and tell the disgraceful senator from searchlight to stop lying and resign.

ScottG on September 7, 2006 at 9:29 PM

How is this any different than Michael Moore’s hitpiece on Bush right before the 2004 election with his piece, which he called a documentary, whereas ABC is calling this a drama?

Enoxo on September 7, 2006 at 9:40 PM

The difference is one was put out by Disney’s film company Miramax, the other was put out by Disney’s television network ABC.

Alex K on September 7, 2006 at 9:45 PM

Looking around, while the insane leftists are complaining about this television drama being aired… there’s another new film, 911: Press for Truth, claiming to be a documentary that they’re pushing and in favor for–because it goes after conspiracy theories and the current administration.

And yet this isn’t hypocritical. Hmmm…

Enoxo on September 7, 2006 at 9:49 PM

Of course that’s not hypocritical. Liberals don’t believe in any objective facts, just their own subjective impressions and emotions. Therefore, hypocrisy is a state no liberal can possibly occupy.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 9:53 PM

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged.

Who the hell wrote this? Sounds like something Carville or Begala cooked up for der Slickmeister. How many times did we hear the poor little children phrase during Clinton’s reign of groping?

Words uttered before the next Grand Jury …….

“I did not give any written instructions to that man, Sandy Berger, to retreive documents and stuff them down his pants.”

“Right Vince Sandy?”

fogw on September 7, 2006 at 9:54 PM

With the fifth anniversary of 9-11 on the horizon, what are they all about? Reflection? National unity? Defense?

Nope. Censorship. Plain and simple.

Yeah, the FCC has really overstepped their bounds, making decisions based on content.

How is this any different than Michael Moore’s hitpiece on Bush right before the 2004 election with his piece, which he called a documentary, whereas ABC is calling this a drama?

The difference is that the FCC cannot stop a movie from coming out, but the FCC can threaten fines or revocation of a license if enough people (actually, one or two is usually enough) complain about an OTA (over-the-air) station’s programming.

Mark Jaquith on September 7, 2006 at 9:55 PM

Karl has his fingers in many pies. The Dems are a national joke.

Stormy70 on September 7, 2006 at 9:59 PM

Think back to when Oliver Stoned came out with a movie about Nixon. It was highly erroneous (more than 200) and full of fables. All across America nitwit schoolteachers were forcing their students to watch it and called it a “history lesson.” Compare that with what Scholastic was going to do with this flick.

firegeezer on September 7, 2006 at 10:01 PM

I just have to say, I really like seeing “The Democratic Party” looming over the phrase “A Despicable, Irresponsible Fraud” on their page right now. How many Democrats and/or policies does that phrase fit? Kennedy? Check. Clinton? Check. Gore? Check. And on and on. Feigned devotion to Constitutional rights like, oh to pick one out of a hat, free speech? Check. Its stance in the war on terror? Check. The Democrat Party is indeed a despicable, irresponsible fraud. Has been for years.

It’s very helpful of them to put that banner above that phrase on their own web page. It’s the closest I’ve ever seen the DNC get to actually describe its own muckety mucks and its own policies in one turn of phrase.

Bravo!

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 10:02 PM

They are nutroots but you have to respect their effectiveness. They got ABC to do an about face after their statement this afternoon

“No one has seen the final version of the film, because the editing process is not yet complete, so criticisms of film specifics are premature and irresponsible.”

They got Scholastic to pull out of the deal with ABC for classroom use.

They have their elected leaders threatening to pull ABC’s license.

Nice work of censorship we can lob right back at ‘em next time they wet their red diapers. The uncut version will come out and enough conservatives have seen it to draw massiveattention to the censored portions.

Valiant on September 7, 2006 at 10:04 PM

Oh come off it, Mark. The FCC has always made decisions based on content. Or do you think it ever allowed hard-core p0rn to air during the Saturday cartoon hour.

Get. a. grip.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 10:04 PM

Kid, you know they’ll hate that. Free speech obviously isn’t a bedrock value for the Dems.

But me? I think it’s just fine. Swing away.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 9:27 PM

I did. This is what I just dropped on their petition. Heh.

Dear Mr. Iger:

Freedom of speech is one of our societal bedrocks, and that encompasses artistic freedom as well. I urge you to hold the line against those who defend these freedoms only when it suits their agenda. For the sake of these very freedoms, you must allow the broadcast to proceed as planned. Your planned airing of this broadcast less than two years from the theatrical release of “Fahrenheit 9/11″ shows a commitment to the very freedoms of speech that this uproar seeks to supress. Thank You.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

Kid from Brooklyn on September 7, 2006 at 10:04 PM

They got Scholastic to pull out of the deal with ABC for classroom use.

Actually, the only thing Scholastic did was rewrite their “lesson plans.” They’re still in the deal with ABC, they just made it seem like they’ve changed. They still encourage it to be watched and talked about.

Enoxo on September 7, 2006 at 10:09 PM

Glad to hear Newt reitterate my point about the Dems silence of F911 which was supposed to be a documentary vs. this ABC thing which is a docudrama, and how instead of threatening Moore, they gave him the VIP seat at their last convention.

RightWinged on September 7, 2006 at 10:09 PM

(Newt on Greta right now, is what I am referring to)

RightWinged on September 7, 2006 at 10:09 PM

Harry Reid sure looks like one bitter old man in that pic. Must be tough carrying all that hate and loathing every day….

sMack on September 7, 2006 at 10:09 PM

What I find really interesting is that this is a docuDRAMA. Where were they when Michael Moore put out what he called a “documentary”, that has since had virtually every single “point” blown apart as lies and misrepresentations, out of context quoting, and clever nonsequential editing. How did they react to this “highest grossing documentary” that couldn’t keep it’s name out of the news, hype hype hype… They put the creator in the VIP seat at the Democratic National Convention!

Bingo.

The far left enjoy inventing their own little ‘realities’ aka strawmen (as advanced by Michael “The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not ‘insurgents’ or ‘terrorists’ or ‘The Enemy.’ They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win. Get it, Mr. Bush?” Moore), work at convincing everyone they exist, and then proceeding to argue against them. It’s all part of what’s commonly known now as BDS.

BTW, this Dem threat is absolutely outrageous. Greg Tinti at Poltical Pit Bull had a great suggestion: The GOP needs to run with this threat as a campaign ad.

SisterToldjah on September 7, 2006 at 10:19 PM

Actually, the only thing Scholastic did was rewrite their “lesson plans.” They’re still in the deal with ABC, they just made it seem like they’ve changed. They still encourage it to be watched and talked about.

True, but if you go over to the demented site of Kos, you will see they are putting serious pressure on Scholastic by threatening their pocketbook. They did delink the special from their Web site. Since the public school classroom is the monastery of liberalism, I expect they will fully cave by tomorrow.

Valiant on September 7, 2006 at 10:21 PM

Out. Of. Control.

CP on September 7, 2006 at 10:28 PM

Crud, am I behind in reading the HOTAiR threads, I was still putsing around on the original thread on this topic.

ACLU: “We are filing this class-action lawsuit today on behalf of the many conservative men and women deprived of their right to freedom of expression and imagination.

We, as the most credible defender of the First Amendment, supported fully by the Democrat leadership and the party’s multiple wings, including the most liberal, and having equally supported faux-productions, like Fahrenheit 911, are utterly and totally oposed to Fauxmatography, or the post-production modification of movies, dramas and docu-dramas, except and unless they claim to be 100% in the category of documentaries.

A further lawsuit will be filed to address any modification of historical facts, i.e. modifying what “is is”. What was was and can’t be modified, no matter who files the request. We, after all are a democratic republic and not a kingdom”.

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 10:14 PM

The overreaction of the Left is a sheer Act of Desperado!

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 10:31 PM

I seem to recall the NBC Evening News running a full minute unedited trailer from Fahrenheit 9/11 on its newscast. I think it was the day before it opened. IMHO, it was the 2nd most biased jaw-dropping lib media moment of 2004 (Rathergate being #1 of course).

sbvft contributor on September 7, 2006 at 10:32 PM

I love the pic of Ol’Harry on the post.

Put a beard on him and wrap a dish towel around his head and he’d look just like the terrorist in the post below.

Kini on September 7, 2006 at 10:37 PM

Allah, I realize you’re a connected guy but you know not EVERYONE know who or what you know. So when you make a comment like this and use the link how about telling dinosaour guys like me what the hell you mean by the comment instead of letting me either try to guess or just say I give up and then beg yo to tell me. It would be greatly appreciated with out having to do pages of searching and exploratory work just to understand what you are trying to get accross here. Thanks.

“No wonder Reid felt safe threatening Disney. We all forgot who the Chairman of the Board is.” WTF?

auspatriotman on September 7, 2006 at 10:40 PM

Mickey and Rove in cahoots… who’da thunk it?

These lefties are creative, ya gotta give ‘em that.

speed647 on September 7, 2006 at 10:43 PM

AP and Bryan, don’t go to sleep tonight. A domestic civil war might erupt over this and HOTAiR might miss the start of it…

Reid — who suddenly seems willing to crap in whatever color the fringe left tells him to

That would be white, my friend, only white, like in surrender and shitless fear of Nov. 7

The funniest thing on the DNC home page is that with all that contention at the top, on the right side is this “Join PartyBuilder” – good luck! They’ve just won me over today!

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 10:45 PM

The Democrat Mantra-do as we say not as we do. Farenheit 9/11 is an outstanding piece of history but this docu drama is a piece of crap. Yeah, right. Well, I agree that this threat is a great campaign ad for the GOP. But doubt they have the you know what to use it.

Catie96706 on September 7, 2006 at 10:45 PM

Bryan, your Harry Reid e-mail gag is genius. I’ll be laughing about it all evening. Thanks.

High Desert Wanderer on September 7, 2006 at 10:53 PM

Auspatriotman, Disney’s Chairman of the Board is one George Mitchell. He’s a former Senate Majority Leader for the Democrats.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 10:55 PM

Dear Senator Landrieu:

Thank you so much for your kind service to Louisiana as one of our Senators. It occurs to me as I write that it would be a much finer thing, were I to find an occasion to thank you when I am not on fire about a matter concerning which it seems necessary to raise a complaint.

I have just read part of a threatening letter to ABC and Disney, signed by just a handfull of Democratic Senators, but presented as if it were a directive from the Senate Democrats at large. The text of the letter is available online at this URL.

http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&

I have thought all along that licensing of the use of “the airwaves” can easily be abused as a means to take away freedoms of speech and the press. Now that I have seen this shocking example of such abuse, I am writing to ask you to consider sponsoring legislation to sell outright the ownership of frequencies in the radio and television broadcast spectra. Perhaps before the availability of cable and Internet communications, a case could be made for a special role of the federal government in controlling the use of radio and television broadcast frequencies. However, with so many means of mass communication available now, subjecting users of these specific media to special controls based on licensure is unwarranted. Licensure is merely dangerous to liberty, as this present case shows.

I am delighted that you are not a signatory to this letter, Senator Landrieu. Please set an example for the rest of the Senate by speaking out against this abuse of power and pressing for an end to the antiquated practice of licensure that has made it possible.

Thank you again for your service to our state.

Sincerely,

[redacted]

Kralizec on September 7, 2006 at 10:57 PM

fogw – “der Slickmeister” – you are the best!

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 10:58 PM

It will be interesting to see if this aires or not.

Catie96706 on September 7, 2006 at 11:02 PM

I’ve been reading a bunch of websites, and blogs, about this mini-series. I am practically speechless as to the insane number of comments where people are touting that the show is all pure fiction and that the 9/11 tragedy was an inside job. I mean, I’ve seen it before with all the whack job conspiracy theories about 9/11, but I hadn’t truly appreciated just how brain washed so many people are about what happened all the way across the spectrum. It’s indescribable just how many people actually BELIEVE the United States perpetrated the horror of 9/11 … gah!

The utter lack of even basic intelligence in this country, en masse, disturbs me greatly :(

SilverStar830 on September 7, 2006 at 11:24 PM

Cliff Kincaid, editor of publications for conservative watchdog group Accuracy in Media, said the Democratic outcry is a bit of a surprise.

“Usually Democrats can count on the support of big media in Hollywood,” he said. “It’s like things are upside down now.”

I’m so excited. I never thought this would turn out this way. I was so upset that it didn’t get enough or hardly any coverage in the last 2 weeks. No matter what ABC decides, everyone will know what the topic is and how ’strong’ the Left was when it was in charge.

Oh, but remember the economy was great, stupid!

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 11:33 PM

“The Path to 9/11″ mocks the truth and dishonors the memory of 9/11 victims to serve a cheap, callous political agenda.

Wait are they still talking about the movie or themselves?

Ian on September 7, 2006 at 11:34 PM

They confused this film with the one made by their beloved patron saint of dishonest filmmaking, Fahrenheit 9-11.

Bryan on September 7, 2006 at 11:38 PM

Why aren’t we trying to defend our nation, which in my opinion, is our values. Once our values are sacrificed, then its just earth, land, soil. So, who cares. My country is values above all, period.

THeDRiFTeR on September 7, 2006 at 12:36 PM

Is “freedom of speech” a value? If, yes, for liberals only?

Entelechy on September 7, 2006 at 11:50 PM

I Am In Shock Here! While libs are well known for over reacting, this is way over the top.

As I sit here, and try to digest the entire debacle I wonder if these Senators could be up on charges for abusing their power as this is censorship pure, and simple, and to do this in an election year is as inept a move as I can recall right now.

I did as requested, and Dugg Texas Rainmaker instead of this site, but someone did Digg this. I hope someone will keep the story alive.

Mark J., I cannot believe that you aren’t concerned as censorship affects everyone, and while it might begin elsewhere the net cannot be far behind in perpetuating such actions if they succeed with their current debacle.

Now I have a reason to vote.

DannoJyd on September 7, 2006 at 11:54 PM

The difference is that the FCC cannot stop a movie from coming out, but the FCC can threaten fines or revocation of a license if enough people (actually, one or two is usually enough) complain about an OTA (over-the-air) station’s programming.

The FCC does not exist, however, to censor political speech, which is what Reid & Co. are intimating here. If anything, that is the one form of speech that should be protected above all others. What the Brownshirt libs are attempting to do here is censor the very type of speech that they claim to embrace, merely because it doesn’t fit into their “Bush-is-100%-at-fault” packaging. But hey, keep it coming. By November, perhaps more people will know exactly what they’d get with a Democratic-controlled Congress.

Fly_in_Ointment on September 8, 2006 at 12:04 AM

Why don’t we just say it’s “fake but accurate” and call it a day?

And does it address at all Jimmah Carter’s contributions to the war with Islamofascists at all? I mean, he is mostly responsible for this war, which started on his watch, in November 1979.

LissaKay on September 8, 2006 at 12:05 AM

Brian,

“got that, mousey?”

LMAO

Sacwannabe on September 8, 2006 at 12:35 AM

Following an earlier commentator’s suggestion, I signed the D.N.C. petition. Here’s my contribution:

The Democratic Party is completely terrified of the truth coming out about Bill Clinton’s neglect of matters not involving cigars, interns, etc.

And I hate to see grown men cry, so I must insist that you immediately pull this docuDrama from the air before it airs because:

1.) You’ve been threatened (and Democrats love caving into threats, so be a good boy now)

2.) When “acclaimed” docuMENTARY producer Michael Moore whose documentary points were blown out of the water for being outright lies, distortion, non-sequential editing, misrepresentations by people who are now suing him, etc. and he’s granted a V.I.P. seat at the D.N.C. convention, well, fairness demands that Disney and ABC pull their drama before it has a chance to air to the public

3.) This will kill the Democrats’ midterm re-election chances faster than Bill Clinton making crocodile tears in front of cameras at Ron Brown’s funeral… dumb, dumb D-U-M-B d-u-m-b!

I never thought the Republicans would pick up seats again. Thanks for helping Rove out!

Why don’t you all support the petition too? Click here to voice your say.

Do… the Democrats really want to be known as the party that censors kids’ favorite network, Disney?

ChrisInCanadaOrAussy on September 8, 2006 at 12:40 AM

I’ve seen it before with all the whack job conspiracy theories about 9/11, but I hadn’t truly appreciated just how brain washed so many people are about what happened all the way across the spectrum. It’s indescribable just how many people actually BELIEVE the United States perpetrated the horror of 9/11…

I was thinking the same thing today, how many people are absolutely convinced Saddam had absolutely nothing to do with AQ or 9-11, but can’t rule out Bush being behind the whole thing.

B Moe on September 8, 2006 at 12:41 AM

B Moe, look what the Canadians, especially in Quebec think.

Hillary: “Bill, you bastard, who would have thought that your ‘cigar in intern fetish’ could have such dire and long-lasting ramifications for our party?

You not only ruined your legacy but also my chances of becoming Leader of the Senate and possibly the first woman President.

On top of it you really did let that Osama live, truth be told, while filandering behind my back, in the same house, mind you.

We might not even win the House now. Rove, that Machiavelli, and Chimp, win again.

Only chance I have of taking the Minority leadership of the Senate is if H. Reid has a heart attack over the Nov. loss. You’ve just increased those chances. Thank you”

Entelechy on September 8, 2006 at 1:18 AM

Is it partisan of me to think that Democrats can lie out of both sides of their mouths at once while making false hand signals behind their backs?
Here’s a signal, bright and clear: If you don’t want to see this Democratic buffoonery machine back in power, vote Republican this November. After so many lost elections, eventually the Democrats may catch a clue that they are rendering themselves obsolete.

Doug on September 8, 2006 at 1:49 AM

This is an outrage. First of all the information in the docudrama is truw. Second, I guess we should start raising hell about every misleading anti-republican show on the air. From Dick Wolf to Cnn we have to out up with this shit everyday. There is one show they don’t like and all hell beakes loose. It makes me sick. Pinky Reid is such a loser, God forbid he leads the Senate in a few months.

marktwain on September 8, 2006 at 2:29 AM

The Kos take on this fits his MO. Recall these 24 infamous words from the dear leader to his Townhouse e-mail pals:

My request to you guys is that you ignore this for now. It would make my life easier if we can confine the story.

That’s all it is really. They’re confining the story.

John on September 8, 2006 at 2:32 AM

ChrisInCanadaOrAussy, great idea! I did add to the controversy.

DannoJyd on September 8, 2006 at 2:43 AM

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan

The above Democrats should be expelled from the United States Senate for extortion and racketeering.

georgej on September 8, 2006 at 2:59 AM

DannoJyd writes:

I Am In Shock Here! While libs are well known for over reacting, this is way over the top.

Why are you in shock?

This is how America’s Brownshirts act. This is how the Democratic Party operates.

You also said: “Now I have a reason to vote.”

My friend, you always had a reason to vote, if only to keep Brownshirt thugs like these out of power.

georgej on September 8, 2006 at 3:24 AM

Georgej, as I stated, this debacle is way over the top even for the brownshirts.

I am familiar with the Hush Rush bill, the attempts of liberals to rewrite Cigarmans legacy, and I even follow the attempts of Soros to purchase our government, but for liberal Senators to publicly act in such an UnAmerican way defies belief, especially as they are about to come up for re-election.

I still cannot believe that they can get away with holding ABC’s license over their heads. Legal blackmail?

DannoJyd on September 8, 2006 at 4:18 AM

If Clinton and his hacks & minions had put as much effort, thought and outrage in fighting world-wide terrorism as they put into stopping/ altering this movie, Osama would have been dead or incarcerated in 1998 or earlier, the World Trade Center would still be standing, and several thousand innocent people would still be alive.

LegendHasIt on September 8, 2006 at 5:05 AM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.