Comments on: Bethanymania: RealVerse returns

By: Number 2

Number 2 — Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:13:58 +0000

Now who has the bandwidth to host it?

Nobody has the bandwidth to host that. It would break the internet in half.

By: Physics Geek

Physics Geek — Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:52:19 +0000

I’m with Rick. MKH made a suggestion that we’re not taking seriously enough. Mix together Bethany and Mary Katherine Hamm, add some mud and you’ve got a recipe for a pay-per-view vlog event. In fact, it would be the biggest grossing such event in recorded history, now and forever. Amen.

Now who has the bandwidth to host it?

By: Dave Shay

Dave Shay — Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:42:28 +0000

Time to break out the video editing software and edit myself a “women of Hot Air” remix….

By: Mark Jaquith

Mark Jaquith — Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:38:13 +0000

If you have to choose, AP, I say go with MKH.

1) Unknown if she currently has a significant other… Bethany on the other hand, is definitely taken.
2) She has more on screen presence… moves around more. Looks like she could duck a punch, if it came to that. Probably the better choice for one of those bar fights that starts with “you eyeballin’ mah lady friend?!”
3) She has my phone number. You know, in case michellemalkin.com blew up while Michelle was on vacation. Still, I think I can construe this into a bonus, somehow.
4) Her last name is a pork product. QED

But then, Bethany did wink. Tough call, man.

By: Rick

Rick — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:11:47 +0000

Any word on the mud-wrestling? Comments like that are taken very seriously.

By: Terp Mole

Terp Mole — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:05:29 +0000

Michelle’s curvacious feet and Bethany’s elegant smile… that’s just too erotic for one webpage.

By: Halley

Halley — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:03:40 +0000

Best thread EVER. Make Bethany a permanent thread at Hotair! It brings out the best in everyone… : )

By: Spurius Ligustinus

Spurius Ligustinus — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:12:55 +0000

More Bethany, please.

By: Lawrence

Lawrence — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:01:34 +0000

I’m sitting here wondering: what if Bethany told me it would amuse her if I killed every man on these boards? Would I do it?

Allahpundit on September 7, 2006 at 12:57 AM

I suppose you could try… but some of us won’t be all that easy to take down.
;)

By: Anwyn

Anwyn — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:46:14 +0000

Also, I don’t recall anybody saying anything about who is more “bangable”

I was talking about ladder theory, not anything anybody said here.

By: SisterToldjah

SisterToldjah — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:40:17 +0000

Mary Katherine, Bethany, Kirsten. You’re going to have to change your name from Allah to Playa pretty soon.

That would make him PlayaPundit, and I, for one, would be uncomfy calling him “PP” – so I think he should stay as “AP” :)

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:26:47 +0000

Is Allah gonna have to break a man tonight?

Must…not…make…obvious…joke…

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:25:56 +0000

That message, btw, is for MKH, who Jack has identified as his perfect woman.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:25:49 +0000

“Don’t be deluded into thinking Allah is your only option. You can do much, much better.”

Who is that directed at? I know it ain’t directed at my Bethany.

Is Allah gonna have to break a man tonight?

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:24:44 +0000

Crap. Forgot to add the message was for Mary K.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:24:18 +0000

Okay, Jack M. can’t comment here, but has asked me to convey a message:

“Don’t be deluded into thinking Allah is your only option. You can do much, much better.”

Remember…I’m the messenger.

By: Gottafang

Gottafang — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:01:27 +0000

Eh. . .I guess she’s kinda okay-lookin’.

**ducking at various items hurled my way**

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:00:54 +0000

So…what is your approach?

Ha. Well, I have no approach. But I feel reasonably sure in saying that “honest and humble” is not the way to go.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:00:06 +0000

An “Allah’s Guide to Dating” would be something to see.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:58:55 +0000

“Honest and humble” is precisely the wrong approach, in my opinion.

Tsk…tsk. Such cynicism.

So…what is your approach?

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:54:25 +0000

“Honest and humble” is precisely the wrong approach, in my opinion.

By: Rick

Rick — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:52:33 +0000

AP is taking the right approach. He’s being honest and humble at the same time. Also, I don’t recall anybody saying anything about who is more “bangable” – as for the fantasies…well, we are what we are.

By: Anwyn

Anwyn — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:48:16 +0000

Besides, the ladder theory really only describes how women treat men.

!!!

I’m sure that’s what the guy thought who wrote it. But allow me to inform you that the idea ranking women solely on a “bangable” scale very decidedly speaks to how men treat women. Just because that part of the theory is laconic doesn’t make it invisible.

Man. Men and their, “What? I didn’t do anything!” fantasies.

By: RightWinged

RightWinged — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:42:24 +0000

AP, practice up here so you're ready to properly respond next time one of the fine ladies of the blogosphere comes a callin'.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:41:41 +0000

Per your precious ladder theory, I’m fairly sure it’s unwise to reveal the ranking of your “special ladies” directly to them.

I haven’t really. Besides, the ladder theory really only describes how women treat men. I’m low enough on enough people’s ladders that I can afford to be especially choosy about my fantasy love interests.