The press seems to really be circling the wagons over Zombie’s ambulance report. The Sydney Morning Herald interviews the victim in the ambulance who lost his leg. The Age wonders about the identity of our li’l Zombie, all the while missing that …

I’m at the point where I simply don’t care anymore. In war, stuff like this happens.

Maybe you should be asking the question and focusing as to why a supposedly reputable news agency is embedding with a TERRORIST ORGANIZATION in the first place?

I stll stand by me theory and would still bet beer on it.

I want to change my theory based on CY’s picture. Who knew the Israeli’s could field such a weapon of destruction? Have they no shame?!

WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT FROM ME!!!!

And unlike Greg Mitchell, I didn’t have to do it after the fact.

ahem.

The Israeli press is not acquitting itself well here.

Yeah, look at the headline. I didn’t know Bob spoke for the IDF.

Wait–maybe there are two trucks, one with a cracked back window, one with a front windshield!!!! Plus the mysterious olive one–how deep does this go? HOW DEEP?

Bob linked my post in the post that Lappin cites, too, so presumably Lappin was aware that experts were making counterarguments.

The Lappin piece has a link to that post too, saying “Other blogs have discussed other possibilites…” Is that new?

He added: “The damage to the roof looks to me very consistent with possible shrapnel penetration from an object other than a rocket or missile itself… The damage to the back window is certainly not consistent with any missile, bomb or rocket blast that would have occurred on impact if a rocket were fired around and directly at the vehicle.”

Hmmm….

Looks like we’ve got an expert horse race on our hands. I sure would like to hear some specifics from the IDF.