63% of Israelis say Olmert must go

posted at 10:59 pm on August 25, 2006 by Allahpundit

Call it a meme-crusher. If Israel really did win the war, word of the victory is, shall we say, slow to reach home. Fully 63% want Olmert out compared to 29% who want him to stay. Likud will be the likely beneficiary of the disaffection, which means Ariel Sharon might actually outlive Kadima.

Early indications are that UN peacekeepers will be allowed to shoot back in self-defense and “back up” the Lebanese army, but that’s only a proposal on the table. Think about that. 15,000 troops are being sent to help disarm a top-notch guerrilla army, and the UN hasn’t yet decided whether they can return fire. The proposed rules also allow for offensive actions, but Kofi put terrorist minds at ease about that earlier this afternoon when he reiterated that peacekeepers won’t be involved in disarming Hezbollah. That’s the Lebanese army’s job. Israel’s response?

Israel has essentially given up hope of Hizbullah being disarmed, and instead is now concentrating on ensuring that an arms embargo called for in UN Security Council resolution 1701 be implemented, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

Furthermore, senior Israeli officials have made it clear in recent days during talks with foreign governments that Israel realizes a Hizbullah presence south of the Litani River is unavoidable, if for no other reason than because the organization is so well rooted there that the only way to get rid of Hizbullah would be to evacuate the entire region.

If this is a defeat, what would a Hezbollah victory have looked like?

Some people are pointing to the fact that Siniora said Hezbollah’s learned its lesson, but as Michael Totten notes, how can that be true if they’re being resupplied by Syria and Iran? Lebanon, apparently at Syria’s behest, is in fact refusing to allow peacekeepers to guard the Syrian border and prevent weapons from being smuggled in. Merkel calls Assad’s maneuvering “unconstructive.”

After originally promising to lead the force, France scaled back its contribution of troops to 200. When the world screamed, they insisted they felt no embarrassment — then upped their contribution to 2,000, thus becoming the first country in history to make a troop deployment look like a surrender. Italy’s going to lead the force now with a contingent of 3,000 soldiers.

A few French troops have already been deployed. AFP captured the stirring scene:

french-troops.jpg

So what’s the solution? Killing Nasrallah, according to a senior Israeli commander. They actually had Hassan Nasrallah in custody a few weeks ago, but — you know the punchline. He’s a full-blown, honest to goodness folk hero in the Arab world now, which might explain why a Hezbollah official felt bold enough to tell Tony Blair not to come to Lebanon or else. The secular Sunni regimes in the region are sufficiently spooked by his power play to make peace overtures to Israel, the idea being that a Palestinian state would cool some of the fundamentalist fires that Hezbollah’s victory — I mean, defeat — has stoked. Egypt’s even taken to reporting some of Assad’s “excesses” in Lebanon in one of its house organs.

Remainders: no one knows how al-Manar managed to stay on the air despite being targeted by the IAF, although I’ll bet some folks in the Iranian embassy have a theory or two; Italy says it knows the two IDF soldiers kidnapped by Hezbollah are alive, but they’re not doing so hot; and the New York Sun discovers a surprising conduit for Iranian weapons smuggling into Lebanon. If it’s true, says Totten, they can forget joining Europe. I only wish that were true. As, I’m sure, does he.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Man, I’d rather have bubonic plague than be a world leader right now. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Leaders of the free world are so busy trying to please the loudest most obnoxious tantrum thrower masses, no one’s willing to do what’s needed to be done and go the distance… save one.

God Bless you President Bush!

SilverStar830 on August 26, 2006 at 12:43 AM

That’s one bigassed tic-tac-toe game going on.

JammieWearingFool on August 26, 2006 at 10:20 AM

Is that the entire French Military? Or just their navy?

shooter on August 26, 2006 at 10:22 AM

Larger version of the ‘tic-tac-toe’ game here.

-Bryan @ Sanctuary

Prophet on August 26, 2006 at 11:02 AM

What’s all that red and blue crap on the French flag?

Kid from Brooklyn on August 26, 2006 at 11:33 AM

Let me add my voice to the 63% of Israelis who believe Olmert must go. Olmert may be adequate as a peace-time prime minister, but these are anything but peaceful times. Netanyahu may be a lousy peace-time prime minister, but then these are anything but peaceful times. Bring back Netanyahu! He at least understands the peril Israel is in from its enemies and what to do about it whereas Olmert is clueless on both counts.

ptolemy on August 26, 2006 at 11:50 AM

Photo caption:

“And over there is where we go to surrender.”

speed647 on August 26, 2006 at 12:00 PM

What’s all that red and blue crap on the French flag?

Among the funniest replies I’ve seen at Hot Air. Well done.

Regarding the Beirut Squares game…who is the center square? It can’t be a gay guy like Paul Lynde because gay guys get stoned (unless they are clerics and such, in which case it’s winked at). I’m thinking George Galloway would be perfect as the center square. He’s not funny, but no game involving psychotic, backward, murderous, blood-letting, black-hearted hatemongers would be.

Bellicose Muse on August 26, 2006 at 2:59 PM

…because gay guys get stoned (unless they are clerics and such (???), in which case it’s winked at)…

and

…black-hearted hatemongers…

Bellicose Muse on August 26, 2006 at 2:59 PM

Can you substantiate the invective, and have you no mirrors in your home?

THeDRiFTeR on August 26, 2006 at 4:47 PM

SilverStar830: I agree that anyone running for holding a world leadership position must at heart be a sadomasochist!

On the other hand, Olmert should go, he totally screwed up this mission. He should have struck Southern Lebanon with massive carpet bombing from the Syrian border to the coast and from the Israeli border to that river, I forget its name. Yes, there would have been an incredibly great number of civilian deaths; but Hezbollah would have been nearly destroyed and Iran would not feel as bold as it does today!

Umnumzana on August 27, 2006 at 12:39 PM