Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill  

Video: McCain starts distancing himself from Iraq (Update: GOP issues “research briefing” — on Kos)

posted at 10:29 pm on August 23, 2006 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend | printer-friendly

Karol sneers, calls him a liar, then vows to support him if he’s the nominee. I can’t take too much umbrage. My boy Rudy’s going to have to serve up some war caveats eventually, too. Just a fact of political life in summer ‘06.

This dance has two steps. Click here to watch him tell Tim Russert on MTP that he has no confidence in Rumsfeld, then click below and watch him put the boots to Cheney. Both clips are short.


Time eschews the obvious explanation for the more daring “calculated maverickness” theory:

McCain’s aides know the senator’s reputation for independence and integrity is his most valuable political asset. They monitor its health closely. They knew that McCain’s efforts to ingratiate himself with the party establishment would lead to stories suggesting the Senator had compromised his principles in order to appease conservatives… “John didn’t say anything he hasn’t said before — he’s always been critical of the way the war’s been handled even though he supports the war and thinks we have to win,” an adviser told Time.com this morning. “But sometimes it’s a good idea to remind people that he’s still John McCain, telling it like it is.”

Meanwhile, Liebs’s independent bid just got certified. The latest poll puts him two slim points up on the Freshmaker, with fully 11% undecided. Geraghty and A.J. Strata crunched the numbers and came away optimistic, but I’m less sanguine: Democrats outnumber Republicans 33-24, and Lamont’s already huge lead among the former is likely to widen as perceptions that Lieberman is the de facto Republican candidate take hold. Independents will have to break hard for Joementum, and I don’t see that happening unless there’s some sort of major terror scare. Which, for the record, I hope there isn’t.

Hillary and the Freshmaker will be meeting on Friday to kiss each other’s rings and swear eternal loyalty. The Times ran a piece this morning wondering why the fightin’ nutroots hasn’t gone after her with the same enthusiasm they’ve shown going after Lieberman. Kos plays dumb:

Markos Moulitsas, whose blog, the Daily Kos, championed Mr. Lamont, was more blunt in explaining why he had not taken up Mr. Tasini’s banner.

“I fed off the excitement and energy Lamont created amongst Connecticut activists and bloggers,” Mr. Moulitsas wrote in an e-mail message. “I see none of that energy or excitement for Tasini.”

Others know better:

To many antiwar partisans and liberal groups, Mr. Tasini is also not enough of a threat to Mrs. Clinton to be useful in pressuring her over Iraq. They say that instead of intervening in the primary race, it is more important to keep Mrs. Clinton as an ally and try to influence her foreign policy in friendly ways, since she could well become a presidential candidate in 2008. Otherwise, some fear, she might freeze them out.

What would a Hillary thread be without gratuitous mockery? Not much, my friends. Not much.

One more poll to mention: Rasmussen predicts that the GOP will hold on to the Senate — barely. Greg Tinti has video of Chairman Dean-o targeting one prominent Republican incumbent in particular. At this point, I’m not sure I disagree with him.

Update: In case there was any doubt, Kos has officially arrived. Read the “research briefing” for yourself. It’s a PDF compilation of all his greatest hits.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Wow. What a stand up guy.

DaveS on August 23, 2006 at 10:42 PM

What the hell is the interviewer up to asking McCain if he sticks with “the position” that the president is entitled to choose his own cabinet? “The position” more commonly known as “the Constitution”? McCain has no confidence in Rumsfeld. Fine. Shorter interview: “Do you think he should keep his position?” “Uh, it’s not up to me, dumbass.”

Anwyn on August 23, 2006 at 10:48 PM

Can you imagine trying to keep track of the daily positions in a Kerry vs. McCain campaign? They would have to hand out motion sickness bags if they had a debate.

B Moe on August 23, 2006 at 11:14 PM

Yes, Mr. Allen needs to grow up, though it’s a bit late.

But to hear Mr. Dean say this about anyone:

He always shoots from the hip

Priceless!

Entelechy on August 24, 2006 at 1:05 AM

Oh, forgot…and to hear C. Matthews call anyone a “knucklehead”, also priceless!

Entelechy on August 24, 2006 at 1:07 AM

I don’t think this means much at this time…but your “boy” leads in Iowa, Allah.

Entelechy on August 24, 2006 at 1:10 AM

Let McCain distance himself if he so chooses. In case he didn’t notice, many of us distanced ourselves from him long ago.

As he slithers further and further left, he is aligning himself with the wrong group.

Anti-War? Hardly!

LewWaters on August 24, 2006 at 3:06 AM

Where are the conservative candidates in all of this? You know, the ones who actually realize we are at war! If Rudy is the nominee and faces Hillary, suddenly the press will change the contest to ‘womanizing man’ vs. ‘aggrieved woman’. Rudy wouldn’t stand a chance, sadly.

Mike O on August 24, 2006 at 8:29 AM

McVain once again plays to the opinion pages of the NYTimes, believing somehow that this is the magical path to a sure nomination from conservatives. Karol must’ve taken all of about two seconds to pull up that quote which utterly refutes McVain’s Pinchy-pandering position that Bush said the war would be “a day at the beach”. And other conservatives who read blogs (also known as “those who will be voting in the primaries”) will certainly see this refutation.

There is plenty about the conduct of the war for which criticism of Bush and his cabinet is duly warranted - saying it would be “a day at the beach” does not fall under that umbrella, Mr. DoubleTalk Express.

thirteen28 on August 24, 2006 at 10:57 AM

What would a Hillary thread be without gratuitous mockery? Not much, my friends. Not much.

It did not strike me as “gratuitous mockery.”

It makes a valid point about the MSM bias in their choices of photographs. Shot number three is what the cover would have looked like if Hillary were more conservative. Democrats and terrorists always get flattering glamour shots taken, and Republicans and Israelis unflattering ones.

BTW, I am getting more and more impressed with Michael Steele, who is running for the Senate in Maryland. If he wins, he might have a shot at the 2008 Presidential nomination. I especially like his making the immigration issue forefront in his campaign.

I would be really enthusiastic with a George Allen/Michael Steele ticket or vice-versa–two rock solid conservatives.

januarius on August 24, 2006 at 11:00 AM

Kos may ‘arrive’ anywhere and at anything, and will always be remembered for this:

On April 1, 2004, Kos wrote this about the brutal slayings of four U.S. citizens in Fallujah: “I feel nothing over the death of mercenaries … They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them.”

Entelechy on August 24, 2006 at 12:49 PM

januarius, you might like to peruse this…a real danger for our leftie friends - quelle tristesse!

Entelechy on August 24, 2006 at 12:52 PM

Entelechy,

That must make the MSM and Democrats shiver! If Steele does win, I hope he runs for President in 2008. Hispanics and blacks are overwhelmingly pro-life, anti-gay marriage, and pro-school choice.

Another reason why Giuliani would be a BIG mistake in 2008, right when there could be a seismic shift in party affiliation because of social issues.

januarius on August 24, 2006 at 1:26 PM

Another example why he will never be President. As I recall, Rumsfeld wrote his long slog memo in July 2003, during the 04 campaign the President said it was hard work. The Mission Accomplished remark is a cheep shot. The reason the public has soured for the Iraq, the Democrat Sunni insurgency was calling it a failure the first day the conflict started, every set back is pronounced as failure. This is the same McCain that showed his weak temperament with the downing of our spy plane by China, and the start of the Afghan invasion. This is his impatience and this type of rhetoric does nothing to shore up the public’s confidence to be patient until the mission has succeeded.

Fritz on August 24, 2006 at 2:44 PM

Actually, the polls show there is very little more Lamont can squeak out of the Democrats since these were less than 20% of the undecideds left (only 5% were undecided). Leiberman has wide leads with the Reps and Indies, which represent 2/3rds of CT voters and 4/5ths of the undecideds in the polls. The only way for Lamont to win is to (a) gain more on the indies or (b) see Reps go for Schlessinger instead of Leiberman. So it is not in the Dems hands at all. Is it possible for Lamont to win? Of course. Is it likely given these three polls? Nope. This is a snapshot in time, so I am not saying it will not change. But the race is not that close in reality.

AJStrata on August 24, 2006 at 3:06 PM

Actually, the polls show there is very little more Lamont can squeak out of the Democrats since these were less than 20% of the undecideds left (only 5% were undecided).

You’re assuming the Democratic numbers will hold, though. I think Lieberman’s perception as the de facto GOP candidates is going to cause quite a few defections among that 30% of Dems currently in his camp.

Allahpundit on August 24, 2006 at 3:08 PM

After e-mailing McCain, i still haven’t heard from him about my not ever, ever voting for him!!

gary on August 24, 2006 at 6:16 PM


You must be logged in to post a comment.