Bush won’t endorse Republican in Connecticut Senate race
posted at 1:31 pm on August 17, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Intriguingly, at the request of Connecticut’s Republican party.
What’s the strategy here? Eight seven possibilities.
1. The White House wants Lamont to win. There’s good reason to think so. Thse semi-endorsements from Rove and Cheney alone probably cost Liebs five points among Democrats, and don’t think Rove didn’t know it. Call this the “party first” option: neo-McGovernites seizing power on the left is obviously good news for Republicans’ long-term prospects, so they’re going to do whatever they can to hurry it along.
2. The White House wants Liebs to win. By refusing to endorse the Republican, Bush gives Connecticut conservatives the green light to cross the aisle and carry Joementum. Call this the “America first” option: we need Democrats who are strong on defense now more than ever. If that means biting the bullet on a race we’re not going to win anyway, so be it.
3. The White House ostensibly wants Lieberman to win, but secretly wants Lamont to win. The “party first” option in disguise and the Republican conventional wisdom. The best of both worlds: you signal to your own base your continuing seriousness about terrorism while pushing the reactionaries in the other party further into the dead-end peacenik camp.
4. The White House ostensibly wants Lamont to win, but secretly wants Lieberman to win. “America first” in disguise. Rove and Cheney quasi-endorsing Liebs? A transparent ploy to undermine Joe’s liberal bona fides and bait Democrats into voting for Lamont. If the head of the Rethuglikkkan snake is this hot for the Freshmaker, the best way to thwart them may, in fact, be to reaffirm that hawkishness isn’t uniquely a conservative virtue.
5. The Connecticut GOP wants Lamont to win. The dead-end logic on a local scale. Who are they more likely to beat in 2012? A four-term incumbent or a strict anti-war candidate whose naivete about Islamism will only become starker as events unfold in the years to come? Elect the dove now so you can elect a hawk later.
6. The Connecticut GOP wants Lieberman to win. Can’t think of a single solitary reason why they’d want this.
7. The Connecticut GOP wants the Republican candidate to win. The president? Not the most popular guy right now, least of all in the Nutmeg State. The further away he stays, the better.
8. The White House doesn’t know what it’s doing and is operating at cross-purposes. As usual.
Which is it? Before you decide, nota bene:
Lieberman’s advantage in the general election comes from broad support among unaffiliated and Republican voters. Fifty-three percent of likely voters polled said he deserves to be re-elected, and nearly half doubted that Lamont, a political novice who founded a company that wires college campuses for cable television, has enough experience to be senator.
“Senator Lieberman’s support among Republicans is nothing short of amazing. It more than offsets what he has lost among Democrats,” poll director Douglas Schwartz said. “As long as Lieberman maintains this kind of support among Republicans, while holding a significant number of Democratic votes, the veteran senator will be hard to beat.”
Answer below in the comments!
Update: We could do an entirely separate matrix for the Democrats.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Number eight, of course.
Allahpundit on August 17, 2006 at 1:33 PM
No! No!
Number six!Carvin Guitar Man on August 17, 2006 at 1:37 PM
I vote #2. Bush is nothing if not loyal.
mikeyboss on August 17, 2006 at 1:40 PM
I say 8.
I’m a realist. I mean, a pessimist. I mean, I’m working at cross purposes.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on August 17, 2006 at 1:46 PM
It would also serve to drive the wedge between the old-school Democrats and the moonbats even deeper. A divided enemy will be that much easier to spank in 08, when it really counts.
B Moe on August 17, 2006 at 1:46 PM
I go with No. 2.
Lieberman is gonna crush this idiot.
BTW, Republicans cheered when he beat Lowell Weicker back in 1988, so it’s not as if they haven’t supported him before.
JammieWearingFool on August 17, 2006 at 2:08 PM
GO JOE!!
venmax on August 17, 2006 at 2:22 PM
The Answer is of course….
42….
Now… what was the question again?
Romeo13 on August 17, 2006 at 2:29 PM
I’ll take Door #2, Alex.
labwrs on August 17, 2006 at 2:48 PM
I’ll go with Option #7.
Lawrence on August 17, 2006 at 2:54 PM
All the above?
I suspect the WH has a plan no matter what happens. I would were I them.
Bob's Kid on August 17, 2006 at 2:55 PM
How do we know if we win?
Iblis on August 17, 2006 at 3:03 PM
I suspect it’s mainly 5 but with a mixed up cross between 1,3, and 8 for the WH.
RH
RobertHuntingdon on August 17, 2006 at 3:05 PM
8, of course.
Kid from Brooklyn on August 17, 2006 at 3:31 PM
#8 The Republicans are stooopid as usual. How many good Conservative candidates have they let dry on the vine under Bush and that “genius” Rove. Lieberman is a lib through and through. Just because he agrees with you on one issue doesn’t make him your savior. BTW, I wasn’t implying that the Republican candidate is a good Conservative just that they’re backing Lieberman instead of the Republican. How about NY, they’ve already conceded that to Hillary, why? Another BTW, these are some of the reasons why I’m registered Independent, I don’t have too much use for Republicans either. Even with a Republican POTUS and congress, we Conservatives or half-Libertarian/Conservative, as I consider myself, couldn’t be any worse off.
Jeff on August 17, 2006 at 3:59 PM
Who cares… let’s sit back and watch a very expensive campaign where the winner is guaranteed to be a Democrat. Every dollar spent by either candidate is a dollar not spent in a race that involves an actual Republican.
Lieberman wins – the Netroots are dead.
Lamont wins – let the purges begin.
What’s not to like?
rw on August 17, 2006 at 4:18 PM
Oh my.
honora on August 17, 2006 at 5:00 PM
La vostra seconda scelta è il più logico – your 2nd choice is the most logical.
The “Oh my” from poor honora (I really like and respect you for being a good sport and participating in our own fights – note we fight over our own almost as much as over the DU and Kos creatures) comes from the linked article in AP’s Update section.
The internecine executions have begun over there – the Schadenfreude from that Tuesday night of Aug. 8, 2006, will linger for quite a while…
Entelechy on August 17, 2006 at 6:44 PM
Geez …. Lamont promised to crown Markos “King of the Nutroots” when he wins Connecticut. With even the President pulling for Joementum, Markos better hold off on the jewel placement for his head adornment.
Number 2 all the way.
darwin on August 17, 2006 at 6:44 PM
Here’s a second #8 vote from me. Lieberman has an ADA voting record of 80% and an ACU voting record of 8%. So it stands to reason that the Republicans would be enamored of a liberal Democrat with an 80% liberal, ADA voting record. Makes all the sense in the world to me. Yeah that good old Joe is the bee’s knees.
Jeff on August 17, 2006 at 8:11 PM
I’m with you guys.. its a tossup between #2 & #8. Anyway, I will be voting for Alan Schlesinger. I hope my fellow CT Republicans do the same regardless of the outcome. Its time to draw the battlelines.
RobertCSampson on August 17, 2006 at 8:26 PM
Sorry, I can’t get off this. Here’s my third #8. Here in Pennsylvania Bush and that “evil genius” Rove screwed the Conservative, Toomey, in favor of Specter, “we need him in there, he’s one of us”. Now we’re getting the same for Mr. 80% ADA rating, Lieberman, “he likes us”. Why not back Hillary in NY, you might as well say we give, we can’t win it anyway so let’s back Hillary. Deep down inside we know she really likes us too. BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!
Jeff on August 17, 2006 at 9:13 PM
I might add, they’ve gone from backing the least Conservative and least loyal “Republican” candidates to backing Democrats. Another BRILLIANT!!!!!
Jeff on August 17, 2006 at 9:18 PM
The Republican candidate is extraordinarily weak, with some honesty/ gambling issues.
You’d have to have a screw loose to back that guy.
If you’re a Republican in Connecticut, the only reason you have to vote for Lieberman is to crush ultra-lefty nuts and enjoy their wailing and tearing of hair.
Which is plenty enough reason of course.
lauraw on August 18, 2006 at 12:10 PM
Comment pages: