<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero hour: Lieberman vs. Lamont (Update: Liebs contacts U.S. Attorney about site hack)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:16:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35972</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35972</guid>
		<description>I should stick with betting on the ponies.   ;^)

The Brownshirts won by about 10,000 votes. I expected a much closer race, even a slight Lieberman victory.  

I hope Lieberman really runs as an Independent in the fall. The man deserves better than the slander and anti-semitic hatred and website hacking that his campaigned received from the new &quot;owners&quot; of the Democratic Party.

Kos, DU, moveon, Soros, and so forth, will, no doubt, claim this to be the &quot;wave of the future.&quot; No doubt we&#039;ll be seeing them sing this tune (or one like it):

&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh Fatherland, Fatherland,
Show us the sign
Your children have waited to see.
The morning will come
When the world is mine.
Tomorrow belongs to me!

[&lt;em&gt;Cabaret&lt;/em&gt;, &quot;Tomorrow belongs to me, Reprise&quot;]
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Well, 150,000 DEMOCRATS voting &quot;&lt;em&gt;Brownshirt&lt;/em&gt;&quot; in Connecticut, do not a nation represent, nor a trend make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should stick with betting on the ponies.   ;^)</p>
<p>The Brownshirts won by about 10,000 votes. I expected a much closer race, even a slight Lieberman victory.  </p>
<p>I hope Lieberman really runs as an Independent in the fall. The man deserves better than the slander and anti-semitic hatred and website hacking that his campaigned received from the new &#8220;owners&#8221; of the Democratic Party.</p>
<p>Kos, DU, moveon, Soros, and so forth, will, no doubt, claim this to be the &#8220;wave of the future.&#8221; No doubt we&#8217;ll be seeing them sing this tune (or one like it):</p>
<blockquote><p>Oh Fatherland, Fatherland,<br />
Show us the sign<br />
Your children have waited to see.<br />
The morning will come<br />
When the world is mine.<br />
Tomorrow belongs to me!</p>
<p>[<em>Cabaret</em>, "Tomorrow belongs to me, Reprise"]
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, 150,000 DEMOCRATS voting &#8220;<em>Brownshirt</em>&#8221; in Connecticut, do not a nation represent, nor a trend make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitemous &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joe Lieberman&#8217;s Website (juicy technical details)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35714</link>
		<dc:creator>mitemous &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joe Lieberman&#8217;s Website (juicy technical details)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35714</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005684.htm http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/8/144119/5628 http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/ http://www.verumserum.com/?p=478 http://www.sdmoderate.com/2006/08/08/hacked/ I can confirm that the site is currently hosted at The Planet (just looked it up in the routing table).  This is one of the largest and most well known providers in Dallas.  They have 4 datacenters (including one inside the Dallas Infomart), and bandwidth is plentiful enough to handle a DDoS at the network level.  The network admins are probably some of the most competent in the business&#8211;I know because I have a couple production servers with them.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005684.htm" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005684.htm</a> <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/8/144119/5628" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/8/144119/5628</a> <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/</a> <a href="http://www.verumserum.com/?p=478" rel="nofollow">http://www.verumserum.com/?p=478</a> <a href="http://www.sdmoderate.com/2006/08/08/hacked/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sdmoderate.com/2006/08/08/hacked/</a> I can confirm that the site is currently hosted at The Planet (just looked it up in the routing table).  This is one of the largest and most well known providers in Dallas.  They have 4 datacenters (including one inside the Dallas Infomart), and bandwidth is plentiful enough to handle a DDoS at the network level.  The network admins are probably some of the most competent in the business&#8211;I know because I have a couple production servers with them.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35691</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35691</guid>
		<description>Both republicans, and independants were changing their party affiliation so as to vote in this race. I cannot find any exit polling data. Add that in with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lanny Davis article&lt;/a&gt;, and my bet gets placed on a Lieberman win. 

If nothing else, this sure has been great in dividing, and defining democrats across America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both republicans, and independants were changing their party affiliation so as to vote in this race. I cannot find any exit polling data. Add that in with the <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763" rel="nofollow">Lanny Davis article</a>, and my bet gets placed on a Lieberman win. </p>
<p>If nothing else, this sure has been great in dividing, and defining democrats across America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35683</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35683</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I guess I was tired...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorta related to Spending way too much time on this I finally broke down and took a coupla my bedtime happy pills the nice man at the VA gives me and disappeared for about 14 hours. Guess I musta needed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I guess I was tired&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sorta related to Spending way too much time on this I finally broke down and took a coupla my bedtime happy pills the nice man at the VA gives me and disappeared for about 14 hours. Guess I musta needed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: januarius</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35674</link>
		<dc:creator>januarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35674</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t primaries at the Congressional, state, and local levels traditionally have very low turnouts with only the hardcore base turning out?  Lamont has definitely galvanized the socialists (the core of the Democratic party these days), so I would guess that he will beat Lieberman hands down.  Lamont 54/Lieberman 46.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t primaries at the Congressional, state, and local levels traditionally have very low turnouts with only the hardcore base turning out?  Lamont has definitely galvanized the socialists (the core of the Democratic party these days), so I would guess that he will beat Lieberman hands down.  Lamont 54/Lieberman 46.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pullingmyhairout</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35629</link>
		<dc:creator>pullingmyhairout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35629</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s my hope for a lamont win - it sure would make things much more interesting in November.  i&#039;m thinking 51-49.

Also, in regard to problems at the polls, they&#039;ll figure out SOME way to blame it on Rove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s my hope for a lamont win &#8211; it sure would make things much more interesting in November.  i&#8217;m thinking 51-49.</p>
<p>Also, in regard to problems at the polls, they&#8217;ll figure out SOME way to blame it on Rove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35621</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35621</guid>
		<description>Today I agree with &lt;em&gt;honora&lt;/em&gt; (run out an buy lotto tickets). To predict percentages is very hard.

Either outcome is a win-win for Karl Rove, who will have good reasons for champagne tonight.

If Mr. Lieberman wins, decency and the sane Democratic wing wins a little. The fight so far, and after, will still benefit Karl Rove and the nuts will camp out and throw a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-mexico08aug08,0,2561703.story?coll=la-opinion-leftrail&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tantrum&lt;/a&gt; with Lopez Obrador. Democracy is only when &quot;we win&quot; and &quot;we will recount until we do&quot;!

If Mr. Lieberman loses by a few points tonight, he has great chances of winning in Nov. since even the Republican cadidate might give his support to him.

If the nuts win, I&#039;d hire Mr. Lieberman into the Bush Admin. as a prominent foreign advisor for the Middle East and give him a loud mic to undermine his party&#039;s &quot;supporters&quot;, for 2006 and 2008. Just thinking...

Ms. Cynthia McKinney will join Marion Berry, after tonight, and smoke something, while contemplating a &#039;come-back&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I agree with <em>honora</em> (run out an buy lotto tickets). To predict percentages is very hard.</p>
<p>Either outcome is a win-win for Karl Rove, who will have good reasons for champagne tonight.</p>
<p>If Mr. Lieberman wins, decency and the sane Democratic wing wins a little. The fight so far, and after, will still benefit Karl Rove and the nuts will camp out and throw a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-mexico08aug08,0,2561703.story?coll=la-opinion-leftrail" rel="nofollow">tantrum</a> with Lopez Obrador. Democracy is only when &#8220;we win&#8221; and &#8220;we will recount until we do&#8221;!</p>
<p>If Mr. Lieberman loses by a few points tonight, he has great chances of winning in Nov. since even the Republican cadidate might give his support to him.</p>
<p>If the nuts win, I&#8217;d hire Mr. Lieberman into the Bush Admin. as a prominent foreign advisor for the Middle East and give him a loud mic to undermine his party&#8217;s &#8220;supporters&#8221;, for 2006 and 2008. Just thinking&#8230;</p>
<p>Ms. Cynthia McKinney will join Marion Berry, after tonight, and smoke something, while contemplating a &#8216;come-back&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35609</link>
		<dc:creator>fogw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35609</guid>
		<description>Everybody&#039;s $MONEY$ is on Lamont. I hope the guy loses the primary and all of his $MILLIONS$ he sunk into the campaign.  Our forefathers must be turning over in their graves watching this spectacle we now call an election.

Go Joe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody&#8217;s $MONEY$ is on Lamont. I hope the guy loses the primary and all of his $MILLIONS$ he sunk into the campaign.  Our forefathers must be turning over in their graves watching this spectacle we now call an election.</p>
<p>Go Joe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35605</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35605</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what happened in the above post, but this paragraph was supposed to read:

Lamont is defined by his supporters.

Further, these Brownshirts have given the Republicans a &lt;em&gt;political weapon of mass destruction&lt;/em&gt; (i.e., the behavior of the “nutroots”) to use against the Democratic Party, if they are smart and capable enough to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what happened in the above post, but this paragraph was supposed to read:</p>
<p>Lamont is defined by his supporters.</p>
<p>Further, these Brownshirts have given the Republicans a <em>political weapon of mass destruction</em> (i.e., the behavior of the “nutroots”) to use against the Democratic Party, if they are smart and capable enough to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35603</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35603</guid>
		<description>I would have said Lamont by a less than a thousand votes, but I just read an posting at &lt;a href=&quot;http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014937.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;powerline pointing &lt;/a&gt;to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;opinion journal article by Lanny Davis&lt;/a&gt; that makes me thinking that the neo-brownshirt behavior of the netroots may backfire big-time.

Davis writes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Moreover, the support he [Lamont] gets from these haters should not be attributed to Mr. Lamont--nor should he be blamed for their extremism, bigotry and intolerance. But he ought to denounce them. He hasn&#039;t as yet. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Davis is wrong.  Lamont is &quot;one&quot; with the Brownshirt Class of 2006.  He is actively accepting their support.

Davis also writes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Mr. Lamont and all other liberal Democrats should remember the McCarthy era and not fall into the trap of the hypocrisy of the double standard&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Too late.

Lamont is &lt;strong&gt;defined&lt;/strong&gt;political weapon of mass destruction&lt;/em&gt; (i.e., the behavior of the &quot;nutroots&quot;) to use against the Democratic Party, if they are smart and capable enough to use it.

At a birthday bash for a friend, I had the opportunity to see BDS and Bush-hate up close, including foul-mouth descriptions of Bush and the Republicans, and the raw hatred they hold against Republicans.  Rather than cause a scene or incite violence, I simply took notes while watching multiple &quot;minute of hate&quot; exercises run their course.

I now think that Lieberman might win after all, because I believe that moderate America will reject the Brownshirt Class of 2006. I believe that they will be either upset or alarmed at the degree of hatred the BDS and haters carry in their hearts and that they will recoil in disgust the minute they discover that the Democratic Party is run by these people.

It now becomes the business of the Republican Party leadership to insure that this connection be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have said Lamont by a less than a thousand votes, but I just read an posting at <a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014937.php" rel="nofollow">powerline pointing </a>to this <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008763" rel="nofollow">opinion journal article by Lanny Davis</a> that makes me thinking that the neo-brownshirt behavior of the netroots may backfire big-time.</p>
<p>Davis writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Moreover, the support he [Lamont] gets from these haters should not be attributed to Mr. Lamont&#8211;nor should he be blamed for their extremism, bigotry and intolerance. But he ought to denounce them. He hasn&#8217;t as yet. </p></blockquote>
<p>Davis is wrong.  Lamont is &#8220;one&#8221; with the Brownshirt Class of 2006.  He is actively accepting their support.</p>
<p>Davis also writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Lamont and all other liberal Democrats should remember the McCarthy era and not fall into the trap of the hypocrisy of the double standard</p></blockquote>
<p>Too late.</p>
<p>Lamont is <strong>defined</strong>political weapon of mass destruction (i.e., the behavior of the &#8220;nutroots&#8221;) to use against the Democratic Party, if they are smart and capable enough to use it.</p>
<p>At a birthday bash for a friend, I had the opportunity to see BDS and Bush-hate up close, including foul-mouth descriptions of Bush and the Republicans, and the raw hatred they hold against Republicans.  Rather than cause a scene or incite violence, I simply took notes while watching multiple &#8220;minute of hate&#8221; exercises run their course.</p>
<p>I now think that Lieberman might win after all, because I believe that moderate America will reject the Brownshirt Class of 2006. I believe that they will be either upset or alarmed at the degree of hatred the BDS and haters carry in their hearts and that they will recoil in disgust the minute they discover that the Democratic Party is run by these people.</p>
<p>It now becomes the business of the Republican Party leadership to insure that this connection be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electionblogging: Lieberman vs. Lamont</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35591</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electionblogging: Lieberman vs. Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35591</guid>
		<description>[...] Consider this an open thread for all things related to Liebs and the Freshmaker. Exit polls and results will be posted here later too. And we&#8217;re still accepting predictions. But in the meantime, enjoy politics the way it ought to be. I&#8217;d like to tell you that the fat guy with the chair-throwing problem is the Democrat and the mafioso type is the Republican. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consider this an open thread for all things related to Liebs and the Freshmaker. Exit polls and results will be posted here later too. And we&#8217;re still accepting predictions. But in the meantime, enjoy politics the way it ought to be. I&#8217;d like to tell you that the fat guy with the chair-throwing problem is the Democrat and the mafioso type is the Republican. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35587</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35587</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m with Dave S. except with Lamont by a tiny amount. That way we get to laugh at the nutroots indignantly saying “how dare you question the results of this election!”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I dunno.  I know Joe is a lefty, but I think he has more class than that.  If he loses, he won&#039;t push a blatantly unfounded recount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m with Dave S. except with Lamont by a tiny amount. That way we get to laugh at the nutroots indignantly saying “how dare you question the results of this election!”</p></blockquote>
<p>I dunno.  I know Joe is a lefty, but I think he has more class than that.  If he loses, he won&#8217;t push a blatantly unfounded recount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Beltway &#124; OTB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35580</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Beltway &#124; OTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35580</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lieberman&#8217;s Campaign Manager On Website Problems (Video)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sen. Lieberman&#8217;s campaign manager Sean Smith was just on FOX News to talk about the website troubles that have plagued the Lieberman campaign since yesterday morning and, according to Smith, the Lieberman campaign is taking this very seriously: t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lieberman&#8217;s Campaign Manager On Website Problems (Video)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sen. Lieberman&#8217;s campaign manager Sean Smith was just on FOX News to talk about the website troubles that have plagued the Lieberman campaign since yesterday morning and, according to Smith, the Lieberman campaign is taking this very seriously: t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35571</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Children of the Cornhole&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re killing me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Children of the Cornhole</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re killing me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Point Five &#187; Media Consensus: Results of Lieberman/Lamont Race Good News For Dems</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35558</link>
		<dc:creator>Point Five &#187; Media Consensus: Results of Lieberman/Lamont Race Good News For Dems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35558</guid>
		<description>[...] Allah is taking predictions. I predict meltdown either way. But what the hell, Lieberman-49 / Lamont-48. We&#8217;ll see how my anti-poll, anti-CB-radio-with-pictures bias does for me when written down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allah is taking predictions. I predict meltdown either way. But what the hell, Lieberman-49 / Lamont-48. We&#8217;ll see how my anti-poll, anti-CB-radio-with-pictures bias does for me when written down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35556</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35556</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tracking The Primaries...&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course, I&#039;m keeping a close eye on the primaries around the country, but almost to the exclusion of all else, I&#039;m going to be REALLY watching the McKinney/Johnson primary in the 4th District of Georgia, and, of course, the Lieberman/Lamont Senate ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tracking The Primaries&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m keeping a close eye on the primaries around the country, but almost to the exclusion of all else, I&#8217;m going to be REALLY watching the McKinney/Johnson primary in the 4th District of Georgia, and, of course, the Lieberman/Lamont Senate &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35551</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hack attack...&lt;/strong&gt;

Joe Lieberman cries foul. John at Verum Serum smells a rat. Howard Mortman is tracking &quot;Joebituaries.&quot; Real Clear Politics has all the latest.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hack attack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Joe Lieberman cries foul. John at Verum Serum smells a rat. Howard Mortman is tracking &#8220;Joebituaries.&#8221; Real Clear Politics has all the latest&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iblis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35544</link>
		<dc:creator>Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35544</guid>
		<description>This red on red stuff is great. Let &#039;em beat the snot outta each other. Its not like this is a conservative seat anyway. And if the DUmmies want to treat this as a bellweather, even better. It&#039;ll drive them even further left, driving the middle-of-the-roaders away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This red on red stuff is great. Let &#8216;em beat the snot outta each other. Its not like this is a conservative seat anyway. And if the DUmmies want to treat this as a bellweather, even better. It&#8217;ll drive them even further left, driving the middle-of-the-roaders away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35541</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35541</guid>
		<description>55-45 for the Freshmaker. But we&#039;ll never see a Senator Lamont. The general will go more like 65-25 Liebs with the last 10 for the R, if there is one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>55-45 for the Freshmaker. But we&#8217;ll never see a Senator Lamont. The general will go more like 65-25 Liebs with the last 10 for the R, if there is one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutty S.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35540</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutty S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35540</guid>
		<description>I think its too close to call right now, what with the Lamont supporters are doing to gain support, from Anti-War movements to blackfacing and such... I agree with those who&#039;ll say it&#039;s win-win... I somewhat agree.

If Ned Freshmaker wins, perhaps, just perhaps the people might come to their senses and realizes the Democrat party is dead, and it speaks about diversity and tolerance but refuses to practice it.  Their bigotry will be exposed, the political bigotry highlighted especially since they want Lieberman out because they think he sucks up to Bush because of Lieberman&#039;s agreement on the War on Terror.  They will express, &quot;You must be like us lock-step or else you&#039;re the enemy and you must go!&quot;  Sort-of like what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/08/02/mckinney-vs-johnson-round-1-videos/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cynthia &quot;&lt;i&gt;I should get away with punching the Police because I&#039;m &#039;a female &lt;b&gt;black&lt;/b&gt; congresswoman&#039;&lt;/i&gt;&quot; McKinney said of her opponent Hank Johnson during her debates&lt;/a&gt;.

I can&#039;t say I believe the people might wake up though... Remember how close the 2004 Presidential elections were?  And the fits and Anti-Bush campaigns afterward?  All the (failed) attempts to impeach Bush?  I wonder how many today believe &quot;Bush lied, people died.&quot; hype many try to put out there in the United States...

So, I can&#039;t say for sure if it&#039;ll be a win-win situation for us no matter who wins... I think the election&#039;ll be too close to call, but my hope is--in spite of all the spin-masters--that Liberman would win.  If he does, then there&#039;s hope for today&#039;s Democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its too close to call right now, what with the Lamont supporters are doing to gain support, from Anti-War movements to blackfacing and such&#8230; I agree with those who&#8217;ll say it&#8217;s win-win&#8230; I somewhat agree.</p>
<p>If Ned Freshmaker wins, perhaps, just perhaps the people might come to their senses and realizes the Democrat party is dead, and it speaks about diversity and tolerance but refuses to practice it.  Their bigotry will be exposed, the political bigotry highlighted especially since they want Lieberman out because they think he sucks up to Bush because of Lieberman&#8217;s agreement on the War on Terror.  They will express, &#8220;You must be like us lock-step or else you&#8217;re the enemy and you must go!&#8221;  Sort-of like what <a href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/08/02/mckinney-vs-johnson-round-1-videos/" rel="nofollow">Cynthia &#8220;<i>I should get away with punching the Police because I&#8217;m &#8216;a female <b>black</b> congresswoman&#8217;</i>&#8221; McKinney said of her opponent Hank Johnson during her debates</a>.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I believe the people might wake up though&#8230; Remember how close the 2004 Presidential elections were?  And the fits and Anti-Bush campaigns afterward?  All the (failed) attempts to impeach Bush?  I wonder how many today believe &#8220;Bush lied, people died.&#8221; hype many try to put out there in the United States&#8230;</p>
<p>So, I can&#8217;t say for sure if it&#8217;ll be a win-win situation for us no matter who wins&#8230; I think the election&#8217;ll be too close to call, but my hope is&#8211;in spite of all the spin-masters&#8211;that Liberman would win.  If he does, then there&#8217;s hope for today&#8217;s Democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycotte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35538</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35538</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think I&#039;m alone when I hope that both Lamont and McKinney are defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m alone when I hope that both Lamont and McKinney are defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MamaAJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35537</link>
		<dc:creator>MamaAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dave S. except with Lamont by a tiny amount. That way we get to laugh at the nutroots indignantly saying &quot;how dare you question the results of this election!&quot;

Scary thing is they wouldn&#039;t see the irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dave S. except with Lamont by a tiny amount. That way we get to laugh at the nutroots indignantly saying &#8220;how dare you question the results of this election!&#8221;</p>
<p>Scary thing is they wouldn&#8217;t see the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35533</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35533</guid>
		<description>You are forgetting the cardinal rule for the netroots: &lt;em&gt;You don&#039;t have to make any sense at all, so long as you are rationalizing your inability to succeed in the political arena of ideas.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are forgetting the cardinal rule for the netroots: <em>You don&#8217;t have to make any sense at all, so long as you are rationalizing your inability to succeed in the political arena of ideas.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35530</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35530</guid>
		<description>Rush reported there are problems at some polling stations.

Which begs the inevitable question. If there are problems voting in a Democrat primary, how do Republicans get blamed?

Discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush reported there are problems at some polling stations.</p>
<p>Which begs the inevitable question. If there are problems voting in a Democrat primary, how do Republicans get blamed?</p>
<p>Discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-35522</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/08/zero-hour-lieberman-vs-lamont/#comment-35522</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think there&#039;s about a 30% chance of that scenario occurring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think there&#8217;s about a 30% chance of that scenario occurring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
