Comments on: Ned Lamont’s “video blog”

By: gary

gary — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 21:56:52 +0000

I don’t know what a blog is! Blog sounds so disgusting.
Where is my PR man??

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 05:56:55 +0000

frankj:”it’s hard to imagine someone so dumb as to be denouncing Wal-Mart while jumping on it as an investment opportunity; if he were that stupid, how’d he get rich in the first place?”
Let me guess…inherited riches? If I were going to make Wal-Mart an issue, I would have divested first. The bit about ‘being so rich, he has people investing for him’ doesn’t make sense; if he hates Wal-Mart, he could have told them at any time not to touch that stock. Do the Democrats really want this guy going to Congress for them? Would they even know his name if Lieberman had not spoken up about progress in Iraq?
And if they are so delusional that they are ready to shoot the kneecaps off one of their Senators for not following the quagmire template…should they be trusted with any political power?
It should be up to the voters in Connecticut to decide who they want to represent their interests. But big name Dems from Calif to NY are joining in the Lieberman blanket party.
Shame on them all.

By: frankj

frankj — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:54:37 +0000

BTW, I agree the attack on him owning Wal-Mart stock is weak. The guy is rich and probably pays people to do his investing for him and thus has no idea what stock he owns. It’s hard to imagine someone so dumb as to be denouncing Wal-Mart while jumping on it as an investment opportunity; if he were that stupid, how’d he get rich in the first place?

By: frankj

frankj — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:49:32 +0000

Essex,
He does have the shoulder’s of a girl!

I’d love to see that attack in a campaign ad. Everyone would laugh off the attack as silly, but then his support among men would erode (what self-respecting guy could vote for some fanny pack wearing sissy?) and then most women would turn against him (most women want a government that will protect them, and they just won’t feel safe placing such responsibility on such girly shoulders).

By: Essex

Essex — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:18:21 +0000

Everyone with his wealth is bound to own stock in something which can be used to call them hypocrites. The minstrel stuff is playing the left’s “I’m so offended” game when everyone knows it is sorta funny in a puerile kind of way, no race is being put down and nobody is really offended.

Better to go after Mr. Ned on substance. He has the shoulders of a girl. Look at how they slope. His head is longer than one shoulder is wide. He’s a fanny pack man. They don’t make knapsacks for shoulders like that.

By: doingwhatican

doingwhatican — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:01:14 +0000

I cannot understand how anyone takes this milquetoast prissy moron seriously. I read somewhere (maybe right here on HotAir) that he looks like Malcolm from the TV series “Malcolm in the Middle”.

He’s a hypocrite lambasting WalMart while he actually owns over $31K in stock.

I hate WalMart and I don’t like nor trust him.

By: Too Cool for Words

Too Cool for Words — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:58:17 +0000

Liberalism? You can’t afford it …

Don Surber nails it:

They go to the best schools. They attend the best parties. They know whats best for all you little people.The accountants of their fathers and their fathers fathers were good enough to protect their fortunes from confiscator…

By: politicalpartypoop.com - Politics and other stuff in life that stinks » Mr. Ned

Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:07:37 +0000

[...] From Hot Air: Here’s something almost as mysterious as how the word “blog” found itself in Lamont’s mouth: the photo of sweet Jane directing him during the filming of a campaign spot — which, wouldn’t you know it, looks like it might be this very same “video blog” promo — has disappeared from Flickr. The WashTimes reports this morning that Neddy the Wal-Mart dragonslayer owns $31,000 of stock in the company. All of which he’ll no doubt quickly divest himself of, as quickly as he shed that membership in a racially-restricted country club when it too became “inconvenient.” This entry is filed under General, Liberal Fun, Liberal hypocrisy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave a Reply [...]

By: One Angry Christian

One Angry Christian — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:50:15 +0000

Leave it to a lefty to drop a racial slur on what is supposed to be a “racially sensitive” subject. How amazingly ironic.

By: frankj

frankj — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:44:59 +0000

What is it with all you dumb honkeys and crackers getting your panties in a bunch everytime someone uses a racial slur?

Now that Lamont has done a “video blog”, that put more pressure on me to get with the times. I just don’t understand how standing there saying something is more compelling than just writing it… especially if it’s Lamont. The only thing less compelling would be a Lieberman “video blog”.

By: protein wisdom

protein wisdom — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:40:48 +0000

Odd, Ends…

1. Thanks so much to David Parish for the Requiem for a Heavyweight DVD. Been meaning to watch this one for years but had forgotten about it until my recent "Twilight Zone" and "Night Gallery" marathons reminded me Serling had writt…

By: Super Fun Power Hour

Super Fun Power Hour — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:38:16 +0000

Lamontistas – Racist, Homophobes…

Afternoon UPDATE: Heh. At an anti-Wal-Mart rally earlier this week, Lamont passed out the typical lefty kool aide about the retail giant needing a “wake up” from socialists “progressives” like himself and his followers. Unfortunately…

…Mr. L…

By: georgej

georgej — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:16:09 +0000

Question: How do you download a video from youtube?

Back to the business at hand….

How ironic that the left violates its own strictures against racially and ethnically based “hate speech.” Isn’t what “The Hamster” did a “hate crime?”

I can just imagine an RNC commercial being televised starting next month with a morphing of the real photo into the Hamsher photoshopped one and the voice over saying something like this:

“The Democrats claim to be against racisims and hate speech. Yet watch how they treated one of their own, 3 term Senator Joe Lieberman (D), in August’s primary. They are so filled with hatred that they willingly turn on their own.

Vote Repubican in November, and keep these crazy, hate-filled people out of power.”

By: Alex K

Alex K — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:05:33 +0000

The specific thing one of the “crackers” said that got Arnold’s panties bunched was to describe it as an “invasion.” Arnold called this “prejudice.”

By: Environmental Republican

Environmental Republican — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:37:58 +0000

Did Hamsher Sink Lamont?…

I ask again: wouldn’t it be ironic if Jane Hamsher ruined Lamonts campaign that she has spent months working on? …

By: Kevin M

Kevin M — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:37:28 +0000

What is so incriminating about that photo that is not also incriminating in all of the other photos at that guy's flickr page? Almost every one on the first page shows Ned hangin' out with the blackface girl... Did I miss something?

By: Old War Dogs

Old War Dogs — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:21:44 +0000

Ned Lamont’s “video blog”…

Allahpundit: Those aren’t scare quotes. I’m not being arch or sarcastic in calling it that. It’s a direct quotation, straight from the Freshmaker’s mouth. The same Freshmaker who doesn’t “know anything about the blogs.” Well done, SeeDuby…

By: Michelle Malkin

Michelle Malkin — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:16:44 +0000

Friday lite links…

A little comic relief. Go spam Hezbollah. Fun with Lamont. More. More. More. Allah does drunkblogging. Don’t try this at home. Code Pink forced to flee!……