Blogwars: Hewitt, Lileks, Barnett vs. Sullivan (Updated with debunking!)

posted at 1:11 pm on August 4, 2006 by Allahpundit

I want to use an analogy of Sully having lobbed a rocket across the border at Hewitt and Hewitt and his allies having responded with a bombardment. But I can’t use that analogy or else Sullivan will write some whiny shinola about how I’m equating him with Hezbollah — in true “Christianist” fashion, mind you — instead of just using a convenient, comically overstated military metaphor.

So not only will I not use it, I’ll explicitly condemn it in the high-minded, above-the-fray spirit of his new favorite blogger, Rick Ellensburg. I mean, Thomas Ellers. I mean, Glenn Greenwald.

Speaking of whom, after dividing the blogosphere into “Malkin people” and “Greenwald people” just before GG’s sock-puppet psychodrama broke, Sully makes another ill-timed endorsement today by linking approvingly to Alex Jones’s YouTube video about a possible cover-up of Dick Cheney’s hunting accident.

Alex Jones. Wackjob 9/11 conspiracy theorist extraordinaire and a virtual cottage industry for the Screw Loose Change guys.

Sully didn’t know and, to his credit, has posted a follow-up acknowledging Jones’s lunacy. Nevertheless, I’m reliably informed that Dean Barnett will be addressing the matter shortly at Hewitt’s site. And I have a feeling Ace will have something to say, too.

If the video does end up being debunked, expect another follow-up from Sully blaming the debacle on Dick Cheney, the enormity of whose evil is such as to turn sane, moderate people — like Alex Jones — into ranting, mendacious lunatics.

After all, he’s done it before.

Update: Jodie Foster, Christianist.

Update: Confederate Yankee e-mails to say not only is the Alex Jones video old, but he and Dan Riehl debunked it elaborately when it first broke four months ago.

Update: Ace politely declines my invitation.

I think I’m just sitting this one out. I can’t believe I’m going to write what I’m about to write, but I guess I’ve hit my limit: Who cares what Andrew Sullivan thinks?

He’s a joke, he’s a disgrace, he’s dishonest, he’s hopelessly narcisstic, he’s emotionally promiscuous and hyperbolic, he’s a lefty, he’s the only writer I’m aware of who manages to turn every post on every topic a discusion of his favorite topic, Andrew Sullivan. Enough with him.

Update: Dean Barnett responds.

Update: Goldstein anticipates Sully’s next post:

Why doesn’t he bother to check up on this old bit of crazed conspiracy-mongering before running with it, you ask? Beats me. But if I had to guess, I’d say it’s because Andrew Sullivan cares more than you and I do about this nation. Which is why the current administration’s penchant for secrecy has forced him — HE HAS NO CHOICE, CAN’T YOU SEE?—to expect that behind every accident or misstep lies a dark conspiracy led by powerful men who can control time and space and gravity and dispersal patterns for birdshot (but who, ironically, cannot seem to keep the truth away from one Alex Jones, who of all men can pierce the grand facade).

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Sullivan’s actions over the past few years indicate to me a very physically sick man. This is not meant as a personal attack but we all know he suffers from one of the worst diseases of the human race and it was only a matter of time before it manifested mentally. This may be why he is continuing to devolve from someone we used to admire to someone who is little above drooling all over himself.

Do we even know if he is even writing his own blog or if someone else is under his name. His writing and thinking indicate someone else is using him as a sockpuppet.

marianpaul on August 4, 2006 at 1:42 PM

Please. Don’t smear the guy with such nonsense. Just because you disagree with him doesn’t mean he’s demented. And anyone who’s read him regularly the past four years knows that it’s the same guy now as then.

Allahpundit on August 4, 2006 at 1:46 PM

I haven’t been around long enough to understand most of this ‘blog-dogging’, but you guys seem to be into it. While I cant make heads nor tails of some of it, I’ll just have to wait for something more pertinent…. BUT, I did like your analogy, too bad you cant use it. GiGi does seem to have more names than Dikembe Mutumbo, and recent history shows he will most likely blame our VP on anything he cant blame on the ‘Malkin side’ or the Prez.
Have fun

shooter on August 4, 2006 at 2:07 PM

I believe Sullivan’s blog was the very first blog I read on a regular basis (despite the fact that I hate gay people). I think I even donated once during one of his fundraisers. But I just can’t stand him lately because almost everything he writes seems to be based on some huge chip on his shoulder. I still scan it on occasion (same as left-wing blogs which his style seems to imitate), but I tune out anytime I see that wacky “Christianist” word.

frankj on August 4, 2006 at 2:54 PM

So not only will I not use it, I’ll explicitly condemn it in the high-minded, above-the-fray spirit…

I refer to this as the (Dave) Barry Maneuver. Another example: “I am absolutely, positivity NOT suggesting you put a Barbie doll in a toaster just to see what happens to her hair.”

GPE on August 4, 2006 at 4:32 PM

…and don’t be thinking of any pink elephants, either.

GPE on August 4, 2006 at 4:32 PM

Jones is a nut, but I think Sully’s emailer is wrong about him blaming the Joooz for 9-11. Jones always couches it as the New World Order, and while that may be a dodge, it gets him a lot of criticism from those who want to blame it on the Zionists. Of course, one of the hilarious things about watching all these conspiracy nutbars is that almost all of them hate everybody else.

Brainster on August 4, 2006 at 7:11 PM

Allah, I respect you very much and I will take your advice. It was never meant as disrespect to Sullivan and I’m sorry it came out that way.

marianpaul on August 4, 2006 at 7:50 PM

this is like a really bad yahoo chatroom political fight.

One Angry Christian on August 5, 2006 at 10:53 AM