I really don’t care if you approve of me, my opinions or my posting style.

But thanks for the “kind” words anyway.

A clever debater can win arguments against her, in which case I have seen her concede and sometimes retract and restate. She is actually good natured about losing points. She sometimes oversteps in her ramblings, which are near Paglia speed.

The dolts on the left foolishly decided to elevate her to the honored position of greatest enemy. She is now not just funny, but notorious. How lucky because now her words will reach a much greater audience.

I enjoy her because she exudes happiness, not bile like the humorless humorists of the left. I love the fact that many of her retorts pass over the heads of her opponents.

She toys with them.

better off blue and honora clearly hate Coutler almost as much as they hate George W. Bush.

That says (1) Coulter’s message is one that they and their komrades fear and (2) that, in their mind at least, her message is effective AND her method of dissemination is working.

What is not to like about that?

Regardless of what we (including you Allahpundit) think of Coulter (and I understand and somewhat agree with you), our enemy fears her. And they express their fear every time they attack and defame her, though the fools on the left will deny this obvious truth.

She is a weapon unsheathed; one that has drawn our enemy’s blood and one they fear greatly. As long as she is effective — and it is the wailing from the left that determines that, not our disagreement over her tactics — I’ll not criticize her in public. I will sit back and enjoy watching our enemies run in confusion and bleed out in the dust thanks to their own, self-inflicted throat slittings.

georgej on July 26, 2006 at 6:05 PM

georgej: I think you’re a little, well, off. But I must compliment you on your prose style, it’s a little “It was a dark and stormy night”, but enjoyable nonetheless!

How proud her mother must be. What’s the name of her latest book that slams the left–Godless? Huh.

pistolero, BoB is not a ‘he’.

BoB, if Michelle Malkin were of your political persuasion you’d have to call her adherents “Malkinistas” vs. “Malkinites”. I’m thankful for the latter.

BoB, again, your only sound argument would have been “there is nothing wrong with homosexuals”.

BoB, one more thing – how snooty of you to designate some conservatives smart or not – who do you think you are?

opiemuyo and honora, sin or no sin, Schadenfreude is an emotion and no other language can express its true meaning the way German does. Therefore the word was adopted into other languages.

Schaden = misfortune/detriment.
Freude = joy/delight.
Schadenfreude = malicious joy in the misfortunes/detriment of others.

There is a saying in German “Schaden-freude ist auch eine Freude”, meaning “Schadenfreude is also a joy/delight”.

The author of this site http://junkyardblog.transfinitum.net/ has invented a derivative: Verrücktenfreude. I believe Narrenfreude could have the same effect.

Verrückte/Narren = the insane/fools
Verrücktenfreude/Narrenfreude = malicious joy in the insanity of others (especially your opponents, ex. BoB)

There is also a German expression “Sich zum Narren machen” = to make an ass of oneself.

Speaking of ‘asses’ – we might have Ann making one of herself proudly, now and then (she is still one of the wittiest beings ever created) and Rep. now-in-jail Cunningham – BoB’s side has: Howard Dean, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Sen. Teddy Kennedy, Sen. John Kerry, Rep. Kucinich, Rep. John Murtha, Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Cynthia McKinney, Sen. Durbin, Sen. Reid, Rep. Pelosi, Sen. Boxer, etc. etc. Note how many more they have and how many are elected or appointed by BoBs constituency.

Verrücktenfreude/Narrenfreude!!! And, yes, Schadenfreude!

The only red blooded men who don’t have a crush on Ann are those who just won’t admit it.

Clinton would screw anything with four legs…

…I mean two…

…wait no I mean four!!!

.

That says (1) Coulter’s message is one that they and their komrades fear and (2) that, in their mind at least, her message is effective AND her method of dissemination is working.

What is not to like about that?

Regardless of what we (including you Allahpundit) think of Coulter (and I understand and somewhat agree with you), our enemy fears her. And they express their fear every time they attack and defame her, though the fools on the left will deny this obvious truth.

She is a weapon unsheathed; one that has drawn our enemy’s blood and one they fear greatly. As long as she is effective — and it is the wailing from the left that determines that, not our disagreement over her tactics — I’ll not criticize her in public. I will sit back and enjoy watching our enemies run in confusion and bleed out in the dust thanks to their own, self-inflicted throat slittings.

few select, smart conservatives

Looks like we’re making progress with our angry little Bob. The fact that he admits that there are any smart conservatives is a major breakthrough. Watch out Bobby. You’re talking heresy here.

Granted, this isn’t something that anyone with any sense really wants to put out there about the former president of the United States, but if you look at it with intellectual honesty, there may be a sliver of truth there somewhere. Anne just has the balls to say it, where many don’t.

Hillary; that tastes like Sh@t!
Bill; oh yeah, I forgot Al wanted to go too.

Good job, blue. Once again, you’ve won the Ronnie Retard Award of the Day.

Excuse me, but I think retarded people would be offended by being compared to B.O.B.

;-)

Ah, Ann,keeping me addicted to shadenfreude with the discontent she causes folks like better off blue..

Q) Is Shadenfreude a sin? My parish priest and I think so…

opiemuyo on July 26, 2006 at 12:24 PM

It’s a sin obviously, but recognizing it in yourself is more than most people are willing to do!!! I find myself up to my ass with shadenfreude with W these days; know it’s not an attractive trait, but goshdarn it, it’s so much fun!!!!

Rant over……

Q) Is Shadenfreude a sin? My parish priest and I think so…

But to Malkinites and other bottom feeding Savage-loving wingnuts, this woman is, and always will be a national hero.

I just wrote a post slamming Coulter on this very blog, which is owned by Michelle, and you dismiss Coulter’s apologists as “Malkinites.”

Good job, blue. Once again, you’ve won the Ronnie Retard Award of the Day.

AC could go on camera throwing puppies into a woodchipper and the Malkinites would still buy her book and Hannity would still lick her boots.I would prefer that she throw liberals into the woodchipper. Manure in, manure out.

I don’t understand Cigarmans behavior nor latent homosexuality. While I understand the concepts it just doesn’t make sense. Maybe a sex therapist could explain these things to me so that I could decide if Ann is onto something. Usually she offers an explination for remarks like these which causes me to believe this idea was rushed out a bit early.

Could latent homosexuality cause guys to search for adams apples?