Jump!

I see the only way Michelle can get any attention from the low-IQ knuckle-dragging wingnuts is to dress and act like a total bimbo.

What’s next, a wet t-shirt/daisy dukes car-wash shot while commenting on the Israeli-Lebanese conflict?

What do you want? Do you want Michelle, and the rest of us to wear that symbol of death, slavery, and appeasement…the Burka?

Indeed. Well, Blue, needless to say, I disagree with you.

IN DEFENSE OF MICHELLE MALKIN

First, lets get the physicality out of the way. Michelle is definately one georgeous, ravishing, red hot all-American babe. A tropical beauty. She looks great in tank tops, belly T-shirts, shorts, jeans, gowns, low cut tops, whatever. We guys who are commentors here enjoy looking at Michelle and hope that she continues to wear such items of clothing. This might be difficult to believe, but despite the desparate attempts of the National Organization of Worthless Women, the MSM, legislation, etc., NOT ALL MEN IN THIS COUNTRY ARE FEMINIZED. NOT ALL MEN ARE INFECTED BY PC. NOT ALL MEN APPROACH LIFE WITH A SENSITIVE TOUCHY-FEELY ATTITUDE. INDEED, MANY OF US STILL BELIEVE THAT IT IS MEN WHO HAVE THE ERECTION, NOT THE LADIES. Sorry about that all you man haters and enemies of our nation.

Furthermore, this is an INFORMAL site, not an official meeting or official press conference at the White House where more formal dress is required.

The women on the liberal side wear, for the most part, tight fitting, revealing clothing. The women reporters, DNP advisors, and commentators of the liberal MSM and liberal cable channels wear low cleavage, tight tops, tight skirts or pants from time to time. WHY IS THAT ACCEPTABLE, BUT WHEN MICHELLE WEARS WHAT SHE WEARS, SHE IS DRESSING LIKE A BIMBO? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT DOUBLE STANDARD? And let us not forget Hollywood’s lady elites who from time to time let a boob slip out during public appearances. But, that’s OK, because they are modern day, tough, liberated, PROGRESSIVE, Heintz Catsup using women. But Michelle is a bimbo who dresses like a bimbo to get attention, eh? WHOM ARE YOU TRYING TO CONVINCE, BLUE?

You raise the question of the possibility of Michelle wearing a wet T-shirt while commenting on the Israeli-HEZNOBALLSA conflict (it is not the Israeli-Lebanese conflict because Heznoballsa is the problem, not the Lebanese). Well, Michelle does not have to show skin like that to get attention. Her interviews, her articles, her books, her public appearances, and her commentaries ALWAYS attract attention without her having to show showing skin. Michelle’s websites are one of the most heavily visited sites on the ‘net. Why? Because her journalist skills are thought provoking for Americans, and challenging to the established MSM and to the enemies of America. And no, Michelle is NOT perfect.

But, I will say this (and MISTER Malkin, I beg your pardon, sir) I would definately be delighted to see Michelle in a wet T-shirt. If Michelle does a vent concerning the enivornment, I hope she does so in a thong bikini (leopard pattern if you please, Michelle, and never mind what PETA might say).

Why? Once again, Michelle looks great. And most importantly she is lady enough, down-to-earth enough, to take and enjoy a compliment. She does not pull a Paula Zahn reaction like most feminist infected women do today when complimented on how good she looks, on how nice she might look in a dress, etc. And NO, I am NOT referring to crude remarks that NO WOMAN SHOULD TOLERATE).

OK, I have said more than enough on how great Michelle looks.

Blue, you call us low-IQ knuckle-dragging wingnuts because we are Michelle Malkin fans. Indeed. Why is it that when the left side of the political spectrum totally agrees and bobble-heads with everything that Kerry claims, that Al Gore roars, that Howard Dean yells, that Hillary and Bill Clinton proclaim, it is a sign of intellegent, independant thought? But, when WE agree with Pres Bush, VP Cheney, ENJOY MICHELLE’S COLUMNS AND VENTS, we are classified as low life, unthinking, environmental hating, kick Grandma down the stairs, threats to society that are not thinking for ourselves. How is that double standard justified?

Indeed, if we were such mindless entities, we would not have DISAGREED with Pres Bush on numerous issues (like the border and illegal aliens, for example). Nor do we always agree with Michelle (just study the archives).

Furthermore, just look at the articles written by Bryan, Michelle, and Allahpundit. And look at the replies that my fellow commentors make on those articles (I have a long way to go before I can attain their level, so I do not included myself in their class). but, if we were all possessed of low-IQ, we would not be able to read their writings, nor would we be able to comment on those writings. We would just sit there and bobble headedly accept what is written without thought, without question. Also, there is no willful misleading of her fans when it comes to her articles. Michelle has printed erratas when errors have been found, and will continue to do so, and never coverup (this is what I believe and what I hope). Indeed, if Michelle printed false information on purpose, she would have been discredited a long time ago.

Michelle DID NOT create the phrase “Fake, but accurate.” That was Dan Rather-Not-Tell-The-Truth and CBS (the MAINSTREAM MEDIA!)when they tried to push that fake story about Pres Bush and his Air Guard service. And yet, too many of the highly educated, elite, upright walking, progressive marvels of society STILL believe and rationalize that form of journalistic acid reflux.

I call your attention to another foundation of the mainstream media…NBC. There is a reporter whom I call CANOE-GIRL. Now, Canoe-Girl was doing a story about severe flooding in New Jersey. She was “demonstrating” how dangerous and deep the flood waters had risen by bravely embarking in a canoe and paddling down a public street. THE AQUATIC HORROR OF THE SITUATION! Then, during her report, two men wearing boots WALKED IN FRONT OF HER. The height of the water? ABOUT A LITTLE MORE THAN ANKLE DEEP. But, yet, this was accepted as a legitimate report, NOT accepted by the knuckle draggers, but by the highly educated, elite upright walking, progressive marvels of society despite its proven falseness.

I call your attention to the last election. The DNC party held a convention. There, Whoopie Goldberg made a reference to the President’s name with her crotch and then grabbed her crotch. This was happily received as the highlight of the evening and Senator Kerry THANKED her for her great contribution to the rally. Indeed, I do not recall a Republican convention having anyone do such a thing, let alone thanking them for that vulgarity. Why was crotch grabbing viewed by the DNC as a great contribution to the political dialog, an important comparison between Senator Kerry and Pres Bush? And yet, we are the ones looked upon as primitive, backward, and not being “with it.”

To conclude, us low-IQ knuckle draggers? No. Us perfect? Absolutely not. Us always correct? Hell, no.

We just have Michelle and her staff, MarkLevinFan.Com, WABC-radio, the Washington Times, etc., that have challenged and surpassed the mainstream media and tends to give us an edge along with a stong belief in God, in our nation, in the rights of the individual, faith in our laws (not European laws), a belief in our sovergnity, and the good fortune that we are Americans.

The False Dervish on July 20, 2006 at 5:00 PM