Breaking: UNSC unanimously adopts resolution on North Korea (Update: NK to UN: Get bent)

posted at 4:03 pm on July 15, 2006 by Allahpundit

Calling for them to immediately suspend their ballistic missile program. It’s just across on Fox.

The sticking point with China was whether the resolution would specifically mention Chapter 7, which provides for sanctions and ultimately even military action in the event of noncompliance. It does not, which means if the NorKs balk there’ll be another round of debate over whether punitive measures are appropriate.

According to this article, the revised language simply says “the Security Council should act under the special responsibility to maintain international peace and safety.”

Bolton seemed pretty happy with it, though. I’ve got video of his presser coming up. I’ll try to find the full text of the resolution, too.

Update: Details from Reuters:

It requires all U.N. members to prevent imports from or exports to North Korea of missiles and missile-related items as well as materials that could be used in weapons of mass destruction.

To avert a veto from China, the resolution does not mention Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which is used on a legally binding document. But Security Council members say the resolution is mandatory because of the way it is worded.

Update: Here’s Bolton insisting that the resolution does fall under Chapter 7, even if it doesn’t actually say so. We’ll see what China thinks about that when the NorKs fire off their next Taepodong.

Tammy Bruce is disgusted.

Update: However weak the resolution might be, it’s still enough to draw this reaction from the NorKs:

“It is clear to everyone that there is no need for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to unilaterally put on hold the missile launches under such a situation,” Ambassador Pak Gil Yon told the council following the vote, using his country’s formal name.

The measure had “the despicable aim of isolating and putting pressure” on his government, he said. “The DPRK’s missile development therefore serves as a key to keep the balance of force and preserving peace and stability in Northeast Asia.”

The envoy’s remarks prompted a sharp retort from U.S. Ambassador John Bolton.

“This has been a historic day. Not only have we unanimously adopted Resolution 1695, but North Korea has set a world record in rejecting it within 45 minutes after its adoption,” Bolton said.

The text of Bolton’s own prepared remarks at the Security Council session after the vote follows.

Mr. President,

Eleven days have passed since the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) brazenly defied the international community and fired seven ballistic missiles, including a Taepo-dong 2 intercontinental ballistic missile, into the waters surrounding its neighbors, notably Japan. Despite intense diplomatic efforts by a number of countries prior to these launches, North Korea chose to recklessly disregard the collective will of its neighbors, indeed the world. In so doing, it violated several international commitments it had entered into, most recently the Joint Statement of the Six-Party Talks from September 2005.

Since the words of the North Korean leadership and the agreements it signs have consistently over time been shown to hold little value, it is only appropriate for the international community and the Security Council to evaluate North Korea based on its actions — actions which have been deeply disturbing. It would be dangerous for the international community and this Council to look at these missile launches in isolation from North Korea’s unrelenting pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability. When North Korea launched a missile over Japan in 1998, we were not aware at that time that Pyongyang was pursuing a covert uranium enrichment program in violation of the 1994 Agreed Framework. In the intervening eight years, North Korea has withdrawn from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), kicked out inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and declared not just that it is pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, but that it already possesses them.

Mr. President, we are pleased the Council has taken clear, firm and unanimous action in passing this Resolution. The launching of seven ballistic missiles by North Korea constitutes a direct threat to international peace and security and demands a strong statement from the Council in the form of a strong Resolution. The past eleven days have witnessed a flurry of diplomatic activity here in New York, a number of capitals around the world, and notably in Pyongyang itself, where a high-level delegation from the People’s Republic of China made one last attempt to make the North Korean leadership see reason.

It was appropriate for us to show this flexibility on timing and allow diplomatic efforts a chance to succeed. Those efforts are now exhausted, though, and the continued intransigence and defiance of the North Korean leadership demands a strong response from this Council. The Resolution before us today does just that. It also sends a much stronger signal than the weak and feckless response of the Council in 1998, which only issued a press statement.

In condemning the multiple launches of these ballistic missiles, the Council is affirming in this Resolution that these launches threaten international peace and security. It is not just launching of these missiles that poses a threat, but the propensity of North Korea to proliferate this technology. North Korea is the world’s leading proliferator of ballistic missile technology, so it was entirely appropriate for this Council to reaffirm Resolution 1540, which states that, “the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, as well as their means of delivery, constitutes a threat to international peace security.”

This Resolution also demands action. It sends an unequivocal, unambiguous and unanimous message to Pyongyang: suspend your ballistic missile program; stop your procurement of materials related to weapons of mass destruction, and implement your September, 2005 commitment to verifiably dismantle your nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs. It is not just Pyongyang, though, that must act. It also “requires” Member States to do what they can to prevent the transfer of resources to the DPRK missile program or the procurement of missile-related items from the DPRK. The United States expects that the DPRK and all other UN Member States will immediately act in accordance with the requirements of this resolution passed by the Security Council.

This is the first UNSC resolution on North Korea since 1993, reflecting the gravity of this situation and the unity and determination of the Council. We hope this Resolution will demonstrate to North Korea that the best way to improve the livelihood of its people and end its international isolation is to stop playing games of brinkmanship and restore its missile moratorium, return to the Six-Party Talks and implement the terms of the Joint Statement from the last round of those talks.

We look forward to North Korea’s full, unconditional and immediate compliance with this Security Council Resolution. We hope that North Korea makes the strategic decision that the pursuit of WMD programs and threatening acts like these missile launches, make it less, not more secure. We need to be prepared, though, that North Korea might choose a different path. This is why it is important that if the DPRK does not comply with the requirements of this Resolution, the United States and other Member States have the opportunity at any point to return to the Council for further action.

In closing, I would like to thank all Members of the Council for their efforts in helping us secure a strong and unanimous Resolution. In particular, I would like to thank the efforts of my friend and colleague Kenzo Oshima, who lead the effort to being this Resolution to finality.

I thank you Mr. President.

Update: A day late, but here’s the text of the resolution. Note numbered paragraphs 2-4.

North Korea says it won’t be bound.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

NK already said stick it…

Gonna get interesting..

Romeo13 on July 15, 2006 at 5:16 PM

Oh goodie! The UN all got along, and managed to do nothing of consequence. I doubt if any liberal feels all fuzzy, and safer now. Anyone planning to vacation in Hawaii soon? Not I.

Just how many proofs will the US GoBernment need of the uselessness of the UN before they decide to kick them out of America? Currently the UN is trying to procure funding to revamp their building. My thought is they should start from scratch with a new building in another country. One on another continent. Maybe Iran would be interested.

DannoJyd on July 15, 2006 at 6:26 PM

Currently the UN is trying to procure funding to revamp their building.

Perhaps the new funding will help them pay off their parking tickets.

speed647 on July 15, 2006 at 8:10 PM

Though he had to do it through a recess appointment, I’m glad that President Bush put Bolton at the UN.
Will the real N. Korea Leader please stand up?
(Shifting of chairs, Jong Il almost gets to his feet, but then the Chinese Premier stands up to a smattering of liberal applause.)
Are we ready to tell the Chinese government to get out of North Korea…again?

Doug on July 15, 2006 at 9:08 PM

North Korea got you down? Take Syria out behind the woodshed and spank the hell out of them.
Why Syria? Because Iran mails a fat check every month so the Syrian bad boys will do their bidding in the most underhanded and hideous way. If we occupy the inside of the Syrian border all the way around and then march towards the middle, I think we can take’em. With Syria on a leash Iran will deal or can be dealt with. The Israelis will go home and the number of insurgents in Iraq will fall. Without Iran’s oil money feeding Mother Russia in trade for Hi tech weapons and (psst advisers of ALL sorts)and then when China stops getting oil from Iran and their stupidly supported by US economy slows down.
North Korea? (who? big deal). Syria is the key.

Speakup on July 15, 2006 at 11:28 PM

The scene in Team America where Hanz Brix (Blix) meets Kim Jong-il says it all.

Tony737 on July 16, 2006 at 1:23 AM

I’ll respect Ambassador Bolton if it ever gets to the point that what he says implies necessary obedience. But that’s not up to him; it’s up to the United States. A diplomat who knows how to talk tough is valuable if we plan to back him up; otherwise, he’s wasting his time and talents and making himself a buffoon.

The coverage of the UN and UNSC here on HotAir is, similarly, valuable only to the extent that the UN and UNSC matter. Does a UNSC “resolution” rate a headline? I can’t think of a reason, unless it’s just that it’s another occasion to heap scorn on the Administration’s preoccupation with the UN, or to list once more all the reasons that the UN is dangerous to our life and liberty.

I wonder if the UN seems more important than it is, just because it’s in the same city as the HotAir staff and gets a lot of coverage by other news-reporting organizations based in the city. Those organizations are probably run by old codgers who have the lifelong habit of thinking of the UN as “progressive” and as the nucleus of a world government. The young iconoclasts at HotAir would do well to keep the focus solidly on the U.S. Administration and its dangerous tendency to waste its energy and everyone’s time negotiating resolutions–highly esteemed paragraphs of nothing.

Kralizec on July 16, 2006 at 10:19 AM

But folks, this is a GOOD thing. Anything th Useless Nitwits gets involved in is ultimatly a failure and winds up costing lives and money of the US

Duty, Honor, Country
(in THAT order)
Rowane

Rowane on July 16, 2006 at 1:11 PM

I read a story that has gotten lost in all the big events of late- South Korea has stopped food aid to the North . To me, that seems as though it could be big. But then again, perhaps China will just increase aid to compensate.

gmoonster on July 16, 2006 at 3:08 PM

If I load a pistol & fire it at your head, are you gonna talk to me, or pick up a baseball bat & try to rearrange my skull?

NK shot at us…….With something far worse than a pistol, yet here we are, sitting on our hands like idiots.

:/

VonHelton on July 16, 2006 at 5:57 PM

Gonna get interesting..

Unfortunately in a “May you live in interesting times” sort of way. There’s a reason some people consider that phrase a curse.

High Desert Wanderer on July 17, 2006 at 1:56 PM