Comments on: New York Times receives “powder” envelope (Update: Prank)

By: 5b3c02ddd84537fb0e1f

5b3c02ddd84537fb0e1f — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:42:20 +0000

5b3c02ddd84537fb0e1f…

5b3c02ddd845…

By: entagor

entagor — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:19:41 +0000

If if was non-threatening and non-hazardous why won’t they tell it what it was?

Or was it something so crass and plebian they are ashamed to tell us?

Is this a cover-up?

I think it was Kerry. Pass it on.

By: TheSev

TheSev — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:54:16 +0000

I’d have to agree that this one is probably self-inflicted. The Slimes manufacture most of their “news” as it is, so why not give yourself a shot of Victim Juice with a story about how the “evil” conservatives just MUST have done it.

“Keep digging Cornelius, you’ll soon find the master of this house, an ape.” – Dr. Zaius

By: Dave Shay

Dave Shay — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:01:18 +0000

Reuters, the Associated Press, and in fact the rest of the MSM is so confused that they mistake opposition to the NYT’s leaking of national secrets as conservativism, instead of what it really is: nationalism. You know… borders, language, culture, emerging from a war against radical Islam victorious instead of the loser — that kind of stuff (apologies to Michael Savage).

There was a time when it was perfectly acceptable to be a Democrat AND a Nationalist. The 60s planted the seed to change this, and now it has grown to fruition. Those few Nationalists remaining in the Democrat party are too afraid to speak out, lest they get Liebermanized by the 419s in charge of the party now.

By: JamesVersusEveryone

JamesVersusEveryone — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:47:32 +0000

Guys, stop talking about food… I’m fasting!

By: Kokonut

Kokonut — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:22:41 +0000

Would a heavily powdered sugar donut left on the table of Times magazine be any different?

By: speed647

speed647 — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:46:48 +0000

Maybe a gift of Persian White heroin from the grateful AQ leadership…

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:09:23 +0000

The letter had a copy of the Times’s editorial about the SWIFT program with a big red X through it.

Still could be from a disgruntaled ex-employee thus I can remain outraged by the al-Reuter implication. Besides, a conservative would be smart enough to not use his/her own handwriting. >;o)

By: shooter

shooter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:56:35 +0000

It’s not an inside ‘blow’ job, but it is a pathetic attempt to use another terrorist’s plot to send as a message. The terrorists do that crap, we don’t.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:42:53 +0000

Please. I’m sure they didn’t do it themselves.

By: LegendHasIt

LegendHasIt — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:40:53 +0000

I guess we have a few people on ‘our side’ who are unhinged enough to do something like this….

But I figure that the odds are about 95-5 that THEY did it themselves so that they could blame conservatives. Just one more tool (and an increasingly popular one) in their bag of tricks, that substitutes for having any actual workable ideas.

By: Allahpundit

Allahpundit — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:39:21 +0000

The letter had a copy of the Times’s editorial about the SWIFT program with a big red X through it.

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:37:40 +0000

Hahaha! Romeo, salt isn’t a powder. Besides, Michelle would have delivered such a letter in person.

We still don’t know the content of the letter, nor do we know what the powder was. Leave it to the liberals to ignore the facts and just the facts, ma’am.

By: Romeo13

Romeo13 — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:51:35 +0000

And wait…. in her Vent today, wasn’t there a SALT SHAKER on her table??? HUH???

And she apparently KNOWS HOW TO WRITE!!!

See? proof positive…

Come one Michelle… admit it…

/takes off his tinfoil hat…

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:38:28 +0000

Not only has Malkin criticized the Times, but she hasn't expressed any remorse now that this has happened. Where is the decency?

By: Kadnine

Kadnine — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:26:44 +0000

That Josh Marshall is brilliant, brilliant I tell, you. What better way to submit your application for the position of Karl Rove’s executive assistant than his Time column? And mailing a questionable envelope to the NYT? That’s just showing off, IMO.

The job is his, for sure. In. the. bag.

(Though, now that I think about it, I question the timing of my own analysis…)

By: RobertHuntingdon

RobertHuntingdon — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:23:09 +0000

Sure… this one we’ll call “Loose Screws”… describes their brains perfectly anyway…

By: Old War Dogs

Old War Dogs — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:12:18 +0000

A Gift for al-NYT…

New York Times investigates envelope with powder NEW YORK (Reuters) – The New York Times said on Friday it had received in its mailroom an envelope containing white powder, raising fears of a possible recurrence of anthrax-tainted letters sent to…

By: Eric12470210

Eric12470210 — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:10:49 +0000

I question the timing of this… ;-)

The evidence clearly suggests that the Times staged this attack on themselves in order to gather support for their cause. This is exactly what Bush did on 9/11, right?

I’m waiting for the moonbats to release a video explaining how this had to have been an inside job.

By: Theworldisnotenough

Theworldisnotenough — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:51:33 +0000

They need a lttle sympathy. See we are the victims…we get attacked… we are not out to do any harm…

By: The Jawa Report

The Jawa Report — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:33:10 +0000

NYT Alleges Receiving Envelope With ‘White Powder’…

From Reuters:NEW YORK (Reuters) – The New York Times said on Friday it was investigating an envelope received at the paper containing white powder, raising fears of a possible recurrence of anthrax-tainted letters sent to newsrooms and other offices in…

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:22:52 +0000

Reported is an envelope with a hand written letter was opened, and there was white powder in it, but what did the letter say? Was it threatening? Did it blast the Slimes for being anti-American? Aside from the demonstration where is the connection?

It is clear how those at Al-Reuters think. Let’s totally forget that they recently laid off hundreds of people at the Times and that some liberals consider the reporters there to be too conservative Take take this chance to label righties as being the type to act in this manner. Dan Rather got away with this sort of trash reporting, right?

By: E L Frederick

E L Frederick — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:12:57 +0000

If it was one of us, they wouldn’t of lived long enough report it. When we conservatives set out to do something, we do it right.

After all, isn’t the left screaming that we are callous warmongering animals that need to be euthanized anyway?

By: BrunoMitchell

BrunoMitchell — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:02:04 +0000

Yeah, that was REAL subtle. Actually, I think it must be residue from all the crack they must be smoking.

By: Perchant

Perchant — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:59:18 +0000

And they didn’t snort it?