Deadline expires: Moronic Iranian nuke kabuki continues (Update: Europeans headed to UNSC)

posted at 11:01 am on July 12, 2006 by Allahpundit

Today’s the day. And guess what.

Why, the disillusionment is enough to break your heart:

[W]hen the two sides met in Brussels on Tuesday, they simply talked past each other, again dashing hopes that the incentives proposal would reinvigorate negotiations. Instead, the talks have stalled, ensuring that nothing will be accomplished before the summit meeting of leading industrial countries that opens this weekend in St. Petersburg, Russia.

“We’re still talking about the framework for talks, not at all about the substance,” one European official said…

That the two sides failed to bridge the gaps was painfully obvious in the terse public statements by Mr. Larijani and Mr. Solana. They did not characterize the talks as positive. There was no warmth between them. They took no questions. But they did pledge to stay in contact.

European officials were furious at Iran afterward, saying that their governments had been lured into talking to Iran while it was still enriching uranium and while action at the United Nations Security Council was on hold.

Uh huh. The deception being practiced by Iran here is about as sophisticated as one of those trails of candy leading to a box on a stick that Bugs used to leave for Elmer Fudd. Technically he was “lured” too, but when even a three-year-old can see it coming, the fury at having been duped falls a bit flat, shall we say.

More genius insight via WaPo:

The United States and some Security Council countries have now concluded that Iran has decided to test American resolve and the solidarity of Security Council cooperation, U.S. and European officials said.

And how does Condi react to the gauntlet being thrown down? From the Times:

Ms. Rice said that such a step would not rule out any chance at negotiations, and she suggested that there would be no quick push for sanctions or other punishments.

“If we go to the Security Council, we’ll take our time in terms of putting together the best response,’’ Ms. Rice said, according to The Associated Press.

This charade has now become sufficiently transparent that WaPo’s lead editorial this morning asserts, as bluntly as can be, that “Iran’s excuses are designed merely to buy time for its uranium enrichment program.”

Which of course is true. And has been true for years.

Prediction: When all’s said and done, Bush’s handling of Iran will weigh almost as heavily in his legacy as his handling of Iraq.

Update: Fox just broke in to say that the meeting of western foreign ministers and the French FM says they have no choice but to refer the matter to the Security Council. That’s the first step towards sanctions, although I’ll believe that when I see it.

Here’s Reuters on the announcement.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

“Iran’s excuses are designed merely to buy time for its uranium enrichment program.”

Gee, ya think? But still people think we should talk. Yes, that solves so much.

Mr. Bingley on July 12, 2006 at 11:15 AM

Talking, incentives and capitulation did wonders to reign in North Korea, too.

It’s almost like we want them to have nukes.

Hoodlumman on July 12, 2006 at 11:18 AM

China and Russia both see too much upside to an Islamic war against the West… as they don’t consider themselves part of the west.

Both are selling arms, and getting oil contracts, from Middle Eastern coutries because those same countries don’t want to deal with the West…

Both will block any Security Council move, just as they did with North Korea.

Iran, is now ratcheting up the Israeli problem with Lebanon… so the West’s focus is on that crises, instead of Iran’s nuc ambitions.

Time for a bit of Cowboy diplomacy here folks… Dam, where are the Earps and Doc Holliday when ya need em…

Romeo13 on July 12, 2006 at 11:38 AM

“Dam, where are the Earps and Doc Holliday when ya need em…”
They were corralled by the PC police.

Iran is like a teenager with car keys. They will be as crazy as they think they can get away with without being ‘grounded’.
Here’s a few dots to connect:North Korea’s strings are being pulled by China. Iran seems to be working in concert with North Korea-is China pulling Iran’s strings also? Could it be like it was in WWII when Japan and Germany each wanted to reign supreme, but worked together to defeat the rest of the world? Do Iran and China think they are duping each other?

Doug on July 12, 2006 at 12:25 PM

Ms. Rice said that such a step would not rule out any chance at negotiations, and she suggested that there would be no quick push for sanctions or other punishments.
“If we go to the Security Council, we’ll take our time in terms of putting together the best response,’’ Ms. Rice said, according to The Associated Press.

Someone needs to teach the mediocre Secretary of State Rice some leadership lessons (can apply to teaching, business, and CERTAINLY a leader of the most powerful country in the world: Don’t threaten consequences and/or give deadlines if you have no intention of following through! She knows China and Russia will block any Security Council resolution with teeth (and so does Iran). In her two years as Secretary of State, she has completely undermined our credibility gained by the liberation of Iraq.

januarius on July 12, 2006 at 12:34 PM

Well, we’ll never get the UN to agree on anything (anywhere) with Russia and China in on it. How about NATO? Can they make some kind of binding resolution? I’m not a fan of sanctions, since they really only hurt the poor. But could NATO say ‘stop enriching, or we’ll start bombing on Aug. 15th’ or something?

Kevin M on July 12, 2006 at 1:58 PM

its a little like iraq; exhaust diplomacy then shock and awe them
the UN will enver agree with it unless we chat with China/Russia and promise them they can heavily involved in the rebuilding (big bucks)

Defector01 on July 12, 2006 at 2:05 PM

Euros dhimmied out
The US is extended
Enrich a go-go

Oh wait…Allah said kabuki

Kid from Brooklyn on July 12, 2006 at 2:41 PM

Euros crack me up, they think they’re so intelligent and sophisticated, they think we’re barbaric madmen and cowboys, yet the Iranians con them every time and we say “Hate to say I told ya so, but I told ya so.”

Tony737 on July 12, 2006 at 3:18 PM

America is determined not to “go it alone” with Iran or Korea. So all we can do is go to the UN, which accomplishes nothing.
The UN is worthless because the worst murderers, rapist, and human rights abusers are a part of it and all have a vote. They will always block us.
Maybe when half the Middle east is a glowing crater from Irans peacefull nukes, Maybe when S. Korea is gone and Japan glows, and Taiwan have been reunited with mainland china, maybe, just maybe then their will be a few changes in the UN’s charter.

Wyrd on July 12, 2006 at 3:20 PM

Possibly the weakling euro’s china , etc are just planning their way to back out, making American go it alone…again. They know eventually we will do something, we have to. F-em!

shooter on July 12, 2006 at 3:59 PM

I’m afraid shooter is right, we’re going to have to do this alone, to the accompaniment of screams from the left and Europe about our “violent cowboy ways”
F-em, indeed.

Abigail Adams on July 12, 2006 at 4:18 PM

N.A.T.O.

Kevin M on July 13, 2006 at 12:53 AM