More Geneva: Pali PM cites Fourth Convention in WaPo op-ed
posted at 2:43 pm on July 11, 2006 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
For the proposition that Palestinians are entitled to defend themselves from the occupation … which, um, ended in Gaza ten months ago.
The Geneva Conventions: is there anything they can’t do?
Awesome propaganda awesomely deconstructed by Captain Ed. Haniyeh wants an end to the current operation in Gaza, the evacuation of Israeli troops and settlers from the West Bank, statehood, a capital in East Jerusalem, the right of return, a pony, two copies of “Caddyshack,” an airplane fueled and ready to fly to the destination of his choice, and that file on everyone who’s seen the Sound of Music more than four times that Shatner wanted in Airplane II.
As always with Islamist parasites, every list of demands ends in a threat:
We present this clear message: If Israel will not allow Palestinians to live in peace, dignity and national integrity, Israelis themselves will not be able to enjoy those same rights.
Here’s some stuff that didn’t make it into the final draft.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Palestinians living in peace (!)
They will be at peace when everyone is a Muslim or dead.
JamesVersusEveryone on July 11, 2006 at 2:55 PM
I’ll take dead!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on July 11, 2006 at 3:24 PM
I’ll add a third
Convert every muslim to judaism :-D
Defector01 on July 11, 2006 at 4:53 PM
Two points:
Regarding the “false pretences”, obviously he is incapable of regarding the life of a human being, least of all the life of a Jewish human being, as something worth saving, and worth moving heaven and earth for. He’s HAMAS(!) for crying out loud….their idea of a smart bomb is a suicide pack strapped to a kid.
Second, he’s HAMAS(!) for crying out loud. Isn’t that a terrorist organization? In the War on Terror, aren’t they the ones on the other side? How does he get into the Washington Post? Does he get freelancer fees? How will the New York Times top this…a piece by Osama?……uh oh…
Blaise on July 11, 2006 at 4:58 PM
The usual drivel. Utterly transparent (except to the target audience). This specious line of “argument” will fizzle the moment people wise up… and not a moment sooner.
RD on July 12, 2006 at 10:32 PM
By “wising up” I mean acquiring a deep understanding of just how much we’re being played, just how little the messenger actually believes in the message.
The only message of Haniyeh’s worth believing in is the one he believes in himself: jihad.
RD on July 12, 2006 at 10:53 PM