<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Korea: Japan mulls pre-emption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 133fa415cffe8fc42532</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-568523</link>
		<dc:creator>133fa415cffe8fc42532</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-568523</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;133fa415cffe8fc42532...&lt;/strong&gt;

133fa415cffe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>133fa415cffe8fc42532&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>133fa415cffe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khyber Pass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-27022</link>
		<dc:creator>Khyber Pass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-27022</guid>
		<description>Oh ya just gotta love Kim Jong mentally-Il. China sends him trainloads of aid, and he accepts the aid, and keeps the trains! Oh, what a prankster. 

Soon, I suspect that Japanese video makers will come up with a video version of Whack-A-Mole featuring N. Korea&#039;s Chia-in-Chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh ya just gotta love Kim Jong mentally-Il. China sends him trainloads of aid, and he accepts the aid, and keeps the trains! Oh, what a prankster. </p>
<p>Soon, I suspect that Japanese video makers will come up with a video version of Whack-A-Mole featuring N. Korea&#8217;s Chia-in-Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PartisanTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26899</link>
		<dc:creator>PartisanTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Dormant US Emboldens N. Korea...&lt;/strong&gt;

Since launching a series of missiles less than a week ago, the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong Il, has yet to face the promised consequences of his actions. The United States and Japan were particularly vocal in their opposition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Dormant US Emboldens N. Korea&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Since launching a series of missiles less than a week ago, the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong Il, has yet to face the promised consequences of his actions. The United States and Japan were particularly vocal in their opposition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26818</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26818</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CQ: Japan Considers Pre-Emption...&lt;/strong&gt;

North Korea may have awoken the Japanese military impulse, this time in self-defense, with its missile launches. The Chief Cabinet Secretary announced that Tokyo would rethink the common interpretation of its constitution that restricts Japanese milita...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CQ: Japan Considers Pre-Emption&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>North Korea may have awoken the Japanese military impulse, this time in self-defense, with its missile launches. The Chief Cabinet Secretary announced that Tokyo would rethink the common interpretation of its constitution that restricts Japanese milita&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs of War</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26762</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs of War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26762</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Japan Considering Military Strike on North Korea...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tough talk in Japan:
Japan said Monday it was considering whether a pre-emptive strike on the North&#8217;s missile bases would violate its constitution, signaling a hardening stance ahead of a possible U.N. Security Council vote on Tokyo&#8217;s propo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Japan Considering Military Strike on North Korea&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tough talk in Japan:<br />
Japan said Monday it was considering whether a pre-emptive strike on the North&#8217;s missile bases would violate its constitution, signaling a hardening stance ahead of a possible U.N. Security Council vote on Tokyo&#8217;s propo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rode Werk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26758</link>
		<dc:creator>Rode Werk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26758</guid>
		<description>Japan has far more to lose should North Korea continue to pursue nuclear ballistic offensive weapons. Japan is falling into the same trap Israel has fallen into with the Palestine. Diplomacy has absolutely no chance of working with North Korea. The longer the situation continues, the more dangerous it becomes for Japan.

If anyone thinks China wants to intervene and reign North Korea back to reality, I have several thousand acres of prime water front real estate to sell you in Nevada. China has nothing to gain by reducing tensions in eastern Asia, and everything to gain by having a junior partner to aid with their expansionist goals.

The only thing the UN is doing is prolonging the inevitable confrontation, which will come to pass. This works in North Korea&#039;s favor by providing a lull which allows them to fine tune existing weapons and develop more dangerous systems. Time is running out on Japan, and any semblance of FREEDOM in eastern Asia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan has far more to lose should North Korea continue to pursue nuclear ballistic offensive weapons. Japan is falling into the same trap Israel has fallen into with the Palestine. Diplomacy has absolutely no chance of working with North Korea. The longer the situation continues, the more dangerous it becomes for Japan.</p>
<p>If anyone thinks China wants to intervene and reign North Korea back to reality, I have several thousand acres of prime water front real estate to sell you in Nevada. China has nothing to gain by reducing tensions in eastern Asia, and everything to gain by having a junior partner to aid with their expansionist goals.</p>
<p>The only thing the UN is doing is prolonging the inevitable confrontation, which will come to pass. This works in North Korea&#8217;s favor by providing a lull which allows them to fine tune existing weapons and develop more dangerous systems. Time is running out on Japan, and any semblance of FREEDOM in eastern Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26757</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26757</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is any evidence that China has any interest at all in reigning in NK.  If they were really worried about Japanese rearmament, they would have acted long ago to push real progress in the 6-party talks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is any evidence that China has any interest at all in reigning in NK.  If they were really worried about Japanese rearmament, they would have acted long ago to push real progress in the 6-party talks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venmax</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26755</link>
		<dc:creator>venmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26755</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;BRING BACK THE SAMURAI!!!!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>BRING BACK THE SAMURAI!!!!</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunt B</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26740</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26740</guid>
		<description>I shudder at the thought of an armed Japan.  We may have to encourage it, but will we rue it, eventually?  That said, would a stout economic stick persuade the PRC to check itself and its useful idiot in NK?  I dunno…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shudder at the thought of an armed Japan.  We may have to encourage it, but will we rue it, eventually?  That said, would a stout economic stick persuade the PRC to check itself and its useful idiot in NK?  I dunno…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26739</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26739</guid>
		<description>I think everyone is ignoring a major point here; China has a major &lt;strong&gt;historical&lt;/strong&gt; issue with Japan re-arming and changing their constitution away from a &#039;homeland defense&#039;.  Chinese all over the world massively distrust the Japanese- even my wife&#039;s generation (born after WWII).  We in this country don&#039;t have things like &#039;the Rape of Nanking&#039; in our recent past and cannot comprehend the impact (indeed, some of you might not even know that term and what it means).  

China may actually now put its foot down in terms of Northe Korea; they literally pleaded with Japan to give them one more week immediately after Japan started talking &#039;pre-emptive&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone is ignoring a major point here; China has a major <strong>historical</strong> issue with Japan re-arming and changing their constitution away from a &#8216;homeland defense&#8217;.  Chinese all over the world massively distrust the Japanese- even my wife&#8217;s generation (born after WWII).  We in this country don&#8217;t have things like &#8216;the Rape of Nanking&#8217; in our recent past and cannot comprehend the impact (indeed, some of you might not even know that term and what it means).  </p>
<p>China may actually now put its foot down in terms of Northe Korea; they literally pleaded with Japan to give them one more week immediately after Japan started talking &#8216;pre-emptive&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: januarius</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26731</link>
		<dc:creator>januarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26731</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see.

We tell NK there will be serious consequences if ONE missile is launched.  We then react to FIVE by referring them to the U.N. security council when we know Russia and China will do nothing and by stating that the world is &quot;mad.&quot;  No consequences, and even SK will not give up their economic support of the North (which we knew).

I don&#039;t blame Japan for losing confidence in President &lt;strike&gt;Clinton&#039;s&lt;/strike&gt; Bush&#039;s foreign policy of relying on the UN and multilateralism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see.</p>
<p>We tell NK there will be serious consequences if ONE missile is launched.  We then react to FIVE by referring them to the U.N. security council when we know Russia and China will do nothing and by stating that the world is &#8220;mad.&#8221;  No consequences, and even SK will not give up their economic support of the North (which we knew).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame Japan for losing confidence in President <strike>Clinton&#8217;s</strike> Bush&#8217;s foreign policy of relying on the UN and multilateralism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhimwit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26727</link>
		<dc:creator>dhimwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26727</guid>
		<description>It suits Russia and China to have this pitbull snarling and pulling on his chain.  And for some reason, they&#039;re letting the chain out.  If this leads to a Japan and Taiwan with nukes of their own, it would make the US&#039;s life simpler, since they would be able to defend themselves without dragging us in. I can&#039;t conceive why Bejing &amp; Moscow don&#039;t realize this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It suits Russia and China to have this pitbull snarling and pulling on his chain.  And for some reason, they&#8217;re letting the chain out.  If this leads to a Japan and Taiwan with nukes of their own, it would make the US&#8217;s life simpler, since they would be able to defend themselves without dragging us in. I can&#8217;t conceive why Bejing &amp; Moscow don&#8217;t realize this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gash</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26724</link>
		<dc:creator>gash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26724</guid>
		<description>Hey Murtha - what do you think, should the Japanese forces redeploy to Iraq?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Murtha &#8211; what do you think, should the Japanese forces redeploy to Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26721</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26721</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wrong Hornets&#039; Nest...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s unknown whether Kim Jong-Il&#039;s less-than-overwhelming fireworks were meant to serve this particular purpose: &quot;Japan was badly rattled by North Korea&#039;s missile tests last week, and several government officials openly discussed whether the countr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wrong Hornets&#8217; Nest&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s unknown whether Kim Jong-Il&#8217;s less-than-overwhelming fireworks were meant to serve this particular purpose: &#8220;Japan was badly rattled by North Korea&#8217;s missile tests last week, and several government officials openly discussed whether the countr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docdave</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26710</link>
		<dc:creator>docdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26710</guid>
		<description>One thing for sure is that Japan will defend itself if it feels it is be endangered by either China or Korea.  The enmity between these countries is very deep and can easily be inflamed.  That said, I believe that an armed Japan could be a real danger to the world as they proved over 60 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing for sure is that Japan will defend itself if it feels it is be endangered by either China or Korea.  The enmity between these countries is very deep and can easily be inflamed.  That said, I believe that an armed Japan could be a real danger to the world as they proved over 60 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defector01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26707</link>
		<dc:creator>Defector01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26707</guid>
		<description>South Korea&#039;s military is strong and efficient but they can&#039;t pick a fight on their own with North Korea. Even with Japan its tough to imagine the two could beat NK. Both nation&#039;s armies and air forces are small and localized because the US provides the bulk of defense of the two countries. If it was Japan and S. Korea vs North, then Menta-Li-Ill will run the korean peninsula. 

Btw I&#039;ve LONG advocated arming Japan, Taiwan and S.Korea with nukes, let them provide a strong counter incase China has visions of establishing dominance. The problem with arming Japan is that this is what the Russians saw in re-arming the Germans after WWII; Japan raped, pillaged and murdered accross SE Asia and so an armed Japan would worry the entire Orient area even if we&#039;re there to keep both China and Japan in check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Korea&#8217;s military is strong and efficient but they can&#8217;t pick a fight on their own with North Korea. Even with Japan its tough to imagine the two could beat NK. Both nation&#8217;s armies and air forces are small and localized because the US provides the bulk of defense of the two countries. If it was Japan and S. Korea vs North, then Menta-Li-Ill will run the korean peninsula. </p>
<p>Btw I&#8217;ve LONG advocated arming Japan, Taiwan and S.Korea with nukes, let them provide a strong counter incase China has visions of establishing dominance. The problem with arming Japan is that this is what the Russians saw in re-arming the Germans after WWII; Japan raped, pillaged and murdered accross SE Asia and so an armed Japan would worry the entire Orient area even if we&#8217;re there to keep both China and Japan in check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26706</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26706</guid>
		<description>South Korea&#039;s military is strong.  South Korea&#039;s political leadership is, basically, French.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Korea&#8217;s military is strong.  South Korea&#8217;s political leadership is, basically, French.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesVersusEveryone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26705</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesVersusEveryone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26705</guid>
		<description>To answer my own question:

&quot;The South Korean military is composed of the Republic of Korea Army (ROKA), Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN), Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF), and Republic of Korea Marine Corps (ROKMC), together with reserve forces. Many of these forces are concentrated near the border with North Korea. All South Korean males are constitutionally required to serve in the military, typically for a period of 24 months.&quot;

Seems like they would be feeling most threatened (and likely to preempt) in all this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer my own question:</p>
<p>&#8220;The South Korean military is composed of the Republic of Korea Army (ROKA), Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN), Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF), and Republic of Korea Marine Corps (ROKMC), together with reserve forces. Many of these forces are concentrated near the border with North Korea. All South Korean males are constitutionally required to serve in the military, typically for a period of 24 months.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems like they would be feeling most threatened (and likely to preempt) in all this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesVersusEveryone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26703</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesVersusEveryone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26703</guid>
		<description>They need an amendment that allows them to amend their Constitution more rapidly.

What is South Korea&#039;s military like?  It seems like they should be doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need an amendment that allows them to amend their Constitution more rapidly.</p>
<p>What is South Korea&#8217;s military like?  It seems like they should be doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26701</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26701</guid>
		<description>Japan and Taiwan already have close relations, and Japan has signed onto any US-led defense of Taiwan should China invade.  For what it&#039;s worth.

Japan&#039;s left can&#039;t manage to remove Koizumi, who has served a full term and been re-elected, and it&#039;s common knowledge that he&#039;s a hawk who supports amending the constitution to allow a more robust Japanese military.  For what it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan and Taiwan already have close relations, and Japan has signed onto any US-led defense of Taiwan should China invade.  For what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s left can&#8217;t manage to remove Koizumi, who has served a full term and been re-elected, and it&#8217;s common knowledge that he&#8217;s a hawk who supports amending the constitution to allow a more robust Japanese military.  For what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26700</guid>
		<description>There you go, Time Magazine: &lt;b&gt;Less Buckaroo, More Banzai&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go, Time Magazine: <b>Less Buckaroo, More Banzai</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCPO Airdale</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26698</link>
		<dc:creator>MCPO Airdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26698</guid>
		<description>China is counting on the left in Japan to fight any change to the constitution. Japanese communist&#039;s demonstration are well planned, disciplined and violent. It will take a determined government to get any changes through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is counting on the left in Japan to fight any change to the constitution. Japanese communist&#8217;s demonstration are well planned, disciplined and violent. It will take a determined government to get any changes through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DakRoland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26697</link>
		<dc:creator>DakRoland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26697</guid>
		<description>Kramer, that was a completely different Japan than the country that exists today. I do agree with Bryan that a re-armed Japan would be a nightmare to China and most certainly to North Korea. What remains to be seen is if South Korea, Taiwan, et al will support and join in, or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kramer, that was a completely different Japan than the country that exists today. I do agree with Bryan that a re-armed Japan would be a nightmare to China and most certainly to North Korea. What remains to be seen is if South Korea, Taiwan, et al will support and join in, or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26694</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26694</guid>
		<description>Japan is already studying amending its constitution.  Last I heard, that may be accomplished by this fall.  North Korea&#039;s actions may speed that up a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan is already studying amending its constitution.  Last I heard, that may be accomplished by this fall.  North Korea&#8217;s actions may speed that up a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kramer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/comment-page-1/#comment-26691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/07/10/north-korea-japan-mulls-pre-emption/#comment-26691</guid>
		<description>Strike Now!!!!!!!!!
We know how sneaky the Japanese can be when it comes to attacking suddenly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strike Now!!!!!!!!!<br />
We know how sneaky the Japanese can be when it comes to attacking suddenly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
