Russia: Lending North Korea a nuclear helping hand

posted at 6:04 pm on July 9, 2006 by Bryan

If it weren’t for the fact that Russia lent similar help to Iraq shortly before and after the 2003 invasion, I’d say that this story is unbelievable. Unfortunately, it’s all too believable:

Russia faces criticism following a report it secretly offered to sell North Korea technology to protect its nuclear stockpiles and safeguard weapons secrets.

“Protect,” mostly like from airstrikes. “Safeguard,” from similar harm. Russia has Kim Jong-Il’s back, in other words, no matter what he does. Just like Russia had Saddam’s back before the war.

The Sunday Telegraph of London says Russian officials privately touted the technology in Pyongyang as recently as two weeks ago — just days before the communist state caused an international alarm by launching short- and long-range missiles into the Sea of Japan.

Aleksei Grigoriev, deputy director of Russia’s Federal Information Technologies Agency, said privately North Korea planned to buy equipment for the safe storage and transportation of nuclear materials, the Telegraph said.

He also said — evidently unaware that an Itar-Tass news agency reporter was taking notes for publication — that Moscow wanted to discuss “future cooperation” with Pyongyang, the newspaper reported.

The problem is, only the US and maybe UK, Australia and Japan might stand up to Russia on this. The rest of the world will whistle past the graveyard. And the crisis will worsen until we either get a war or until we see nuclear states popping up like mushrooms all over Asia to counter Pyongyang’s threat. Which in turn increases the chances of nuclear wars breaking out as Asian states collide with one another. The long-term implications of Russia’s duplicity are staggering.

Russia is responsible for a great deal of misery in the world; propping up Kim Jong-Il and helping him pester us is merely Russia’s latest crime. Leftwingers like to point at this or that in American history and condemn us as evil for all time, but won’t cast the same critical gaze on Russia, for 70 years a Communist imperial menace and for the past several years a spider working with the world’s worst regimes against the world’s freest. If we’re going to start isolating states on the basis of bad international behavior, Russia might be a good one to start with.

What this points to, in the final analysis, is that the United Nations will be of no use in dealing with North Korea. Russia holds a veto on the UNSC, as does China, and both will block any resolution dealing with North Korea that has any teeth. China has its own reasons for not wanting a war in Korea, mostly having to do with the massive humanitarian crisis that is guaranteed to follow Kim’s collapse and that will spill over into China in the form of millions of starved, brainwashed Koreans. Russia, however, seems to playing a very dangerous game of realpolitik, selling weapons expertise to whoever wants it, no matter the long-term harm done, and all in the name of increasing Russia’s influence while denting ours.

The fact that Russia is also linked to the Proliferation Security Initiative, the John Bolton creation intended to cage Kim’s weapons trafficking, means the PSI may be compromised as well.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The Russians are doing two things
One is selling anything not nailed down to the floor to get cash their economy needs
Two, show they’re still a power by opposing the US at every turn on everything

Defector01 on July 9, 2006 at 8:10 PM

Holy Sh*t! Man, things aren’t looking good

gmoonster on July 9, 2006 at 10:05 PM

If it weren’t for the fact that Russia lent similar help to Iraq shortly before and after the 2003 invasion, I’d say that this story is unbelievable. Unfortunately, it’s all too believable…

Considering how much it helped Saddam, this might not be such a bad thing. I think they need a good international-type knuckle wacking for being asses, but I wonder how much help they have to offer.

B Moe on July 9, 2006 at 10:20 PM

Putin’s a pussy. He’s more afraid of Kim than he is a friend of him.

What his motive? Money? Yeah. Security? Oh, yeah. My hunch is that he’s not so much conspiring against us than that he is appeasing the madman out of his own leftist Chamberlain-like cowardace. Principled confrontation is not in his blood.

Then again: If you were a ruler, and all you had was @#$% Russia to work with, would you do any different?

F@#$%ng backstabber…

Tuning Spork on July 9, 2006 at 11:48 PM

I don’t think we have enough information to draw definite conclusions that Russia’s support of hostile foreign powers is not exclusively for their benefit.

The question is whether Russia is also taking actions to deliberately attack or undermine the United States by use of proxies. Is Russia using Iran, North Korea and other hostile foreign powers as proxies or is their support an expression of willfil neglect to the interests to the US and other western powers?

Russia certainly is looking to it’s economic and political benefit with hostile foreign powers with little or no regard for the United States and other western powers. These beneifts take the form of military equipment (such as air defense equipment to Iran) and resistance to any UN action involving those hostile foreign powers.

The question is whether Russia is moving beyond it’s own economic and poltical interests to actively undermine the United States. Is Russia using Iran, North Korea, and others as proxies to actively attack and undermine the interests of the United States? Are they actively moving beyond their own gain to hurt the United States, or are their activities designed solely for their own economic and political benefit without regard to hurting others?

I don’t think we have enough information to come to conclusions whether or not Russia is actively using proxies to undermine the intrests of the United States at this time.

Perhaps some of you bright, insightful Hot Air folks will provide views on this topic.

omegaram on July 10, 2006 at 12:35 AM

There is a front page story on Iran this morning in the Washington Times with a Bush administration threat of serious “action” by the Security Council if Iran breaks the deadline.

What moron still believes in this threat? Does anyone still believe Russia and China will back the U.S. in the U.N. on anything? Certainly North Korea and Iran don’t.

The Bush administration has been great with missile defense, funding our military, and taking Saddam out of power. However, this reliance on the U.N. and making threats with no backup is appeasement.

They threatened North Korea with serious action if they launched ONE missile. They launched FIVE and even South Korea refuses to back sanctions. Result: the same exact policy before North Korea launched the missiles. What does Iran learn from these empty threats?

It is time to give up on the U.N.

januarius on July 10, 2006 at 8:02 AM

omegaram: I believe Russia is acting out of self-interest (duh) and would go further and suggest there is no cohesive long term plan, but more of an opportunistic approach to building political and economic relations based on immediate gains. The Chinese, on the other hand, I suspect are very deliberate in trying to hamstring the US. One woman’s opinion….

januarius: George Will had an interesting POV on this yesterday–learn to live with it (N.K); this in part is derived from the fact there are no good options, just a choice among bad ones, and in part from our natural disinclination to launch a second war that would gravely endanger our S.K allies at a time when we are stretched pretty thin militarily. I don’t always agree with Will, don’t know if I agree with this frankly, but it took some balls to lay this out there.

honora on July 10, 2006 at 11:00 AM

“Russia faces criticism…”

Criticism??? That’s it??? At the very least, start by dumping “Back in the USSR” from G8.

Aunt B on July 10, 2006 at 11:04 AM

Why President Bush ever thought Putin could be trusted has always been beyond my comprehension.
Putin is ex-KGB> IMHO, he is and always has been de facto against America. He screwed us over Iraq and will screw us again over Iran & North Korea. Nothing new there.

Abigail Adams on July 10, 2006 at 11:20 AM

I realize there are more serious concerns here, but in a narrower track, and in the abstract, Putin selling North Korea an ineffective (and worthless to the Russians now) weapons system* that is going to survive approximately a tenth of a second into a US strike, and selling it for millions, tens of millions, or hundreds of millions of dollars, just doesn’t bother me that much. Of course, I’m greedy, and Putin’s broke, so as someone that would consider such a sale “clever,” I feel for him.

It seems like Russia’s nature, as a problem, comes in two flavors right now: (1) its greed, which borders on the justifiable, and (2) its nationalism, which is where it started to go dangerously wrong (for Putin). If all this “taking care of established customers” was actually an attempt to balance the scale (rebuild Glorious Russia as a military presence) I’d be with you, Bryan. But it still just looks like opportunism to me, so it never gets beyond mildly annoying.

I think … I think it might be time for a new Russian leader, here around this road’s fork.

*An assumption. I don’t know what technology we’re actually talking about. If it were, as a rather non-sequitur example, poison gas canisters, strike all I just wrote.

Axe on July 10, 2006 at 11:50 AM

I think Russia is thinking with its bruised ego instead of its brains. It must be gratifying to get back at the Americans, but it’s not in their interests. We might be wise to cool it on admitting every former bit of the old USSR into NATO; it buys us little and irritates Russia much. Besides, what good is a NATO that can be shut down by turning a faucet in Siberia?
Somehow we got to break up the Russia/China club; until that happens our hands are tied. Yak, yak, yak, that’s all we can do right now.

dhimwit on July 10, 2006 at 12:29 PM