Video: Bush buys reporter coffee at Dunkin Donuts
posted at 2:07 pm on July 5, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
He loves the “entrepreneurs and dreamers and doers and people who are running things” — whether they’re here legally or not.
The stuff with the reporter starts about two-thirds of the way through in case you don’t want to sit through his platitudinal nonsense about comprehensive immigration reform. I forced myself, and I assure you that by the time he was done, the donuts weren’t the only things there that were glazed.
Still, it’s good to know the line about “jobs Americans aren’t willing to do” grates every bit as much as it ever did.
Transcript here. The lucky recipient was April Ryan of American Urban Radio.
Update: If you missed the Bush immigration remix, enjoy.
Update: The House town-hall hearings on immigration begin today in San Diego. The Democrats will be there to agitate on behalf of the “undocumented.” Says Rep. Brad Sherman:
Democrats initially considered boycotting the hearings, but will treat them as a platform to assail an enforcement-only approach to immigration reform, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Sherman Oaks.
“If they want to have a dog-and-pony show, that’s fine,” said Sherman, the ranking Democrat on the International Relations subcommittee on International Terrorism and Non-proliferation, which will host the San Diego hearing. “They have really ugly dogs and really mangy ponies.”
The Times says that Bush has signalled his willingness to compromise with the House by describing as “pretty intriguing” Rep. Mike Pence’s plan — a proposal so unrealistic as almost to defy belief:
One major question is whether Mr. Bush would give up on a path to citizenship for some of the estimated 11 million to 12 million people living here illegally. He has said repeatedly that it is impractical to deport those who have lived in the United States for a long time and built lives here; the Senate bill permits some longtime illegal residents to become eligible for citizenship if they learned English and paid taxes and a fine.
Many House Republicans deride such a proposal as amnesty. Mr. Pence would require illegal immigrants — even those in the United States for decades — to leave the country briefly before returning, with proper documentation, to participate in a guest worker system. Private employment agencies would set up shop overseas to process applications; after six years in a guest worker program, an immigrant could apply for citizenship.
Got that? They’re going to deport themselves, then queue up to come right back in. And this is what one of the hardliners is suggesting.
Update: It’s no accident, by the way, that Bush chose a Dunkin Donuts for the photo op.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Gag…
Romeo13 on July 5, 2006 at 2:22 PM
Allah said:
This is a great compendium on our fierce leader’s incapacity to speak freely and babble on a senseless immigration reform. Why this subject when bigger issues loom? Because the hearings are going 180 degrees in opposition. Getting closer to the House’s position every minute…
I don’t recall the liberals being able to criticize Mr. Clinton so freely. Then, I might be partial and forgetful.
Entelechy on July 5, 2006 at 2:27 PM
This moment in the Donut shop was Mr Bush at his absolute best
He’s the real people person type, very friendly, very cheerful and very down to earth. This is why he wins
Defector01 on July 5, 2006 at 2:53 PM
Mr. Pence would require illegal immigrants — even those in the United States for decades — to leave the country briefly before returning, with proper documentation, to participate in a guest worker system. Private employment agencies would set up shop overseas to process applications; after six years in a guest worker program, an immigrant could apply for citizenship.
Oh, problem solved then.
Whew. Glad we got that debate settled.
Slublog on July 5, 2006 at 2:56 PM
Isn’t Dunkin’ Donuts the chain that tightened up their hiring rules in order to prevent the hiring of illegals (as Michelle reported on her blog a month or two ago)?
If so, then oh the irony.
thirteen28 on July 5, 2006 at 3:19 PM
I believe that president Bush is an enigma; a caring friendly unassuming person that is rare in politics today.
docdave on July 5, 2006 at 3:24 PM
I want a donut.
Alex K on July 5, 2006 at 3:26 PM
NO AMNESTY. PERIOD. I hope that is what Bush said.
Shmo on July 5, 2006 at 3:30 PM
Bush carries cash? I guess he learned from his father gazing in amazement at the checkout scanner. I gotta admit, he does well in these situations. Clinton did too, but in a different way.
Vanya on July 5, 2006 at 4:22 PM
I firmly believe that the President and congress miss the point of why they are here in the first place. They don’t want citizenship, they want jobs! We need to give preference to our own citizens who are jobless and stop pandering to other countries problem citizens who broke our laws!
rattrap47 on July 5, 2006 at 5:43 PM
I still believe that until the unemployment rate goes back up, way up, there won’t be enough pressure from the electorate to force Congress and the President to start booting illegals out of the country.
As long as unemployment remains low and continues to drop, its going to be hard to argue that illegals are taking away jobs that Americans want.
GT on July 5, 2006 at 6:04 PM
GT’s probably right, unless they are stupid enough to have mass ‘rights’ demonstrations again.
Mike O on July 5, 2006 at 6:17 PM
As a former trucker for Dunkin, they also have a English Only policy at all of their stores in the northeast, even in the back room.
I was “ordered” to report back to HQ if they were speaking Portuguese or Spanish in the back.
Not that I ever did… them Brazilians are hawt….
Mortis on July 5, 2006 at 6:23 PM
I hope he said no amnesty too. We have been here before. 1986 and now it is much worse. Are we really willing to pass on to or kids and future generations a situation that would be unfathomable in another 20 years if we don’t get it right this time?
Altura Ct. on July 5, 2006 at 8:08 PM
So, in theory, if President Bush buys a hot cup of coffee for a liberal reporter and he accidentally spills it on his lap causing some minor burns, will the reporter accuse President Bush of making him spill his drink?
Kokonut on July 5, 2006 at 9:07 PM
That is a big factor in alot of the country. We have a growing economy and a stable native population, we need workers. The construction industry in the Atlanta area is booming right now and would be devasted if the amigos were to leave. I work in a construction consulting business were English proficiency is a must, and we are hurting bad for help, there just aren’t that many natives down here that need jobs.
I think Bush is in a bind here, none of the solutions are really feasible, deportation would wreck alot of local econonmies, be enormously expensive and a legal fiasco. Same with a fence, one that would actually work would be insanely expensive, and who in the hell would wind up building it? Most of the real problems are caused by liberal social programs and hand outs, anyway. Cut off the handouts and you would solve the problem. Go after the democrats that are the root of the problem, and quit kickin’ the amigos around like a political football. And make it easier to come over legally if you want to work and pay taxes, we need the help down here.
B Moe on July 5, 2006 at 9:30 PM
Well, he’s always said that he wants to work with Congress. I think he’s realizing that this is an issue that needs some compromising and tweekin’. It’s going to happen; even if this is only phase I. And gee, what a guy! Buys a lady a cup of coffee, doesn’t let the owner pick up the tab, is genuinely happy to do it and she has the courtsey to say “Thank you, Mr. President.”
He sets a good example for us all.
jatfla on July 5, 2006 at 10:27 PM
As reported before, I email them my support and received $5 in coupons!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on July 6, 2006 at 8:38 AM
I’m a faithful person-I still have faith that before we get another President, Bush will hear what the American people are saying, just as he did in the Harriet Miers debacle and the UAE Ports issue, and fix Immigration, starting with agressively policing the borders with the laws already on the books. I have no problem with deporting those people against their will who come here uninvited. You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here!
Doug on July 6, 2006 at 9:00 AM
How much of the work force is illegal?
Unemployment is around 4%…
So if they were to close the borders and turn back the illegals we would loose workers. Now, reform welfare and force the able bodied to have to work instead of collecting a check from us.
That would increase the work force pool so the menials jobs would not be empty.
Extremely simple minided solution, but it gets the ball rolling. (I could write a three page treatise on it, but I do enough of that at work)
Wyrd on July 6, 2006 at 9:34 AM
This makes me love President Bush even more.
vabirish on July 6, 2006 at 11:27 AM
There may be high employment, but around here it means people with those 6 dollar jobs have to work two jobs to eat. Meijers pays 6.15 an hour for cashiers here. Taco Bell starts at 6.50. Walmarts pays a bit more about $7. Meijers and Walmarts hire part time only (32 hours or less) to avoid paying benefits.
A lot of these folks (who I have talked to ) have to juggle multiple jobs, especially when the employer gives them 20 hours a week to keep a big employee base available, so everyone becomes highly expendable. Quit and there is someone ready to take your 20 hours immediately.
I mention these jobs because the other venues for non skilled, who are not going to become engineers and nurses, have been sucked up by illegals. One legal immigrant I speak with has a second job with a big hotel chain. Sje told me her manager said he would hire all illegals if he could get away with it. As it is, he uses the illegal via subcontractor to supply cleaners, maids etc.
Non illegals can still get laborer jobs with city governments, where citizenship is checked, so we still have black and white sanitation workers, janitors, amd even landscapers in those positions where they are not been pushed out by the illegals.
I personally know someone whose spouse, a roofer, cannot get work, and is applying out of state, although there is a lot of construction in our area. All the sites are majority illegals, working under sub contractors.
I should have kept a diary of all the spin words the White House keeps throwing out to make the word ‘illegal’ taste like pork chops to the fool citizen:
– jobs americans won’t do, can’t do, don’t fill.
Bush’s newest:
“And people are willing to do the work that others aren’t willing to do, but we want to make sure there’s a legal way to do it”
Mr. ‘President’, here is a clue. Until something is LEGAL, you are not supposed to let them do it!
If that isn’t the case, then maybe I will decide that you are not ‘The President’. Until you start upholding your oath, taken under God, maybe I will decide to consider someone else my ‘President’.
Everyone choose their own set of laws to obey.
entagor on July 6, 2006 at 11:43 AM
PROPOSED NYT HEADLINE: Bush Caught in Dunkin’ Orgy.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on July 6, 2006 at 2:58 PM
This reminds me. Any chance that Hot Air can start a pledge drive to buy donuts for Ann Coulter?
That girl has simply got to start eating.
Labamigo on July 6, 2006 at 11:28 PM
It’s not that Americans are unwilling to do certain jobs, they’re just mostly not willing to do them for a competitive wage as compared to illegal immigrants. There’s also the problem of the minimum wage, were Americans willing to do the jobs for competitive wages. A guest worker program doesn’t really help matters if companies are forced to pay the minimum wage to workers… they already have that option and it still leaves them overpaying for their labor.
Solution: eliminate minimum wages, make legal immigration (or a guest worker program) easier, and crack down on illegal immigration. That solves the needs of workers, employers, and the American people.
Things like Medicare and Social Security compound matters, as they add costs to employers and make legal labor undesirable, but that’s another battle.
Mark Jaquith on July 7, 2006 at 6:30 AM
Dunkin’ Donuts—I LOVE their garlic bagels!
pjcomix on July 7, 2006 at 7:59 AM
True and not true. Here Meijers supermarket really does start at 6.00 or 6.15/hour, with no raise in sight as they hire part time only for new hires so no benefits. They don’t hire illegals because they are unionized, and those jobs still get filled. It is just above minimum wage in Michigan. It still leaves the employee in the poverty level, if they have a family, which is why such people work multiple jobs.
What I see, is employers preferring illegals even at the same wage, because illegals are easier to handle. They don’t complain to the state about working conditions, or make workmen’s compensation claims. That hotel worker I mentioned makes the same kind of wage, but her boss prefers the controllable, no public complaint illegal. Her job is visible, so she has to be legal.
Consider construction. If a legal worker has a choice of working like a dog for $6.00/hour unloading cases of canned goods at a supermarket (that means lifting filled cases from pallet to cart), with no benefits and 20-30 hours a week maximum hours, why wouldn’t that same man want to get the $8.00/hour the illegals get as laborers at a construction site hauling lumber or sacks of goods?
Most would take it, but they won’t get the offer because the construction bosses have shut them out, and hire through the sub-contracting illegal jobbers.
There is a dollar factor in hiring illegals, but the silent slave factor is a big part of it too.
IMHO ( as a Reagan ex-Bush republican) this is returning America from the Land of the Free to the Plantation that Lincoln had to spend hundreds of thousands of lives to eliminate.
entagor on July 7, 2006 at 10:37 AM
Whatever happened to the idea that the President is THE chief enforcer of our laws? That having been said, I’m glad that the debate is out in public. As more people hear both sides I’m sure support for enforcement first will increase.
Democrats will bemoan the issue no matter which way the debate goes, but will they run against enforcing border security? One can always hope.
DannoJyd on July 7, 2006 at 11:16 AM
Lots of good comments here; I agree with entagor particuarly, especially as it concerns creating another ‘worker class’. Not only is it morally repugnant, it’s also socially dangerous as it invites a ‘workers revolution’ based on a perceived inequity in treatment of one ethnic group to another.
Illegal immigrants make up less than 5% of the total US work force. They don’t command any more than about 36% in any job category (when looked at across the United States). The CBO even admits that illegal immigrants have caused wages for people with the same education level as most illegals (less than HS diploma), to drop, and Americans in that category have seen their unemployment levels increase. So it IS hurting America and Americans.
The majority of the jobs that illegals take aren’t meant to be jobs that you can support a family on. They’re meant to be part time work for High School or college students, starting jobs for young people, etc.
Instead many times, illegals come in, take these jobs, and receive Federal aid to the tune of $26 billion dollars while contributing $16 billion in taxes. You and I, my friends, pick up the remainder of the tab.
You’re right that many employers just jump to hiring illegals; Fox News had several stories earlier this year about illegal immigrant smuggling rings, where ads for workers would be placed in national language newspapers in Mexico (for instance) and then the applicants would be smuggled to their employers in the US. No payroll taxes, no vacation benefits to pay, no FICA to the government, no health benefits to pay for; it’s a blatant circumventing of our laws on the part of many employers.
There are a few things to consider here: in many areas there is a dearth of labour in a field; that has always been a problem in burgeoning economies, unfortuantely. Legalising millions of lawbreakers- and their dependents- isn’t reversible.
The Center for Immigration Studies, Pew, Heritage, Hoover, etc., have some interesting tidbits to consider: the majority of illegal immigrants are Mexican, the Mexican population in the US has ballooned (1 in 10 Mexicans lives in the US), the average wage for a Mexican in the US is $9, the poverty rate for Hispanics in the US in the past 20 years has increased alarmingly at a rate of 162% (compared with 3% for whites and 9% for blacks), and 60% of illegal immigrants from Mexico/Central America don’t even have a High School education. Mexican immigrants into the US also have the worst assimilation rate of all Hispanic groups; barely 62% of them are fluent in English after over 30 years of residency. They are also one of the largest growing population groups by virtue of births; only 10% of non-Hispanic Americans have a family size of 5 people or more, while almost 31% of Mexican families do.
To me, the large influx of illegals from one country (1 out of 7 Mexican citizens able to work is in the United States) tells me that Mexico has a serious and systemic problem. The relative lack of education of immigrants from that country also further reinforces that. Illegal immigration (particularly through Mexico) shows no sign of abating, and the statistics with regard to outlays in services for illegals isn’t comforting; quite the contrary.
What we’re looking at with the Presidents proposal is increasing the number of people who require Federal Aid without significantly shoring up a reliable worker base that pays into the system. We are using people here illegally as de-facto employees, when what we SHOULD be doing – if we truly lack workers – is making it a competitive market where people from other countries can also vie for these jobs. Competition is best: everyone wins. Employers get to pick, highly motivated people have a chance to enter America, and we get to choose from people with highly varied skill sets who then are potentially a better fit.
The President’s plan is flawed on so many other levels; there’s no way to know how long someone has really been in the US – document forgery is rife; none of us are allowed to ’skip’ paying taxes for years, so his idea is basically a violation of equal protection; there’s no way to accurately compute taxes on someone whose income has largely been paid under the table! The list goes on.
My steps to a better employment situation in America?
1. Build a fence; If we built one along the lines of the Minuteman design, it would cost about 1.2 billion. Build temporary detention facilites, deploy UAVs, etc.
2. Offer a short amnesty period of employers who have broken the law; they have 30 days to surrender their illegal employees or pay huge fines. Then, enforce the laws; arrest illegal immigrants, fingerprint them and deport them. If they show up again in America, they are subject to fines, including having any and all property seized to satisfy those fines.
3. Start charging government workers with felonies who knowingly grant illegal immigrants Federal Aid. My mom went down for her regular Social Security review and sat near a man who told his aid rep that he didn’t have ‘papers’; she told him not to worry about it.
4. Allow some time for the employment situation to stabilise in America. I believe with all my heart that an equilibrium will be reached.
5. Go after companies and counties that allow people to use alternate IDs to get bank accounts, driver’s licenses, etc.
6. If America continues to grow and outstrip areas of the blue collar labour market, THEN INS can consider creating a labour visa that is constrained by the same rules as other visa programmes; it’s competitive, people need to have a job before they enter the US, etc.
7. Instead of a ‘National ID’, the ID should be for legal immigrant workers, Green Card holders and visa holders. Americans already have a ‘National ID’; it’s called a passport.
8. STOP printing things in multiple languages that pander to ethnic groups for voting, etc. If someone doesn’t understand English well enough to read a ballot, how can they possibly have been exposed to enough data that allows them to make a decision? It also costs the government a LOT of money to print things up in multiple languages and to have translators, etc.
Perhaps this all sounds a bit draconian; I don’t think so. The key to America is that it has always welcomed ALL immigrants and treated them equally (I’m a second generation immigrant myself – my heritage is Ukrainian). If America is still to retain her melting pot quality and American character, it’s important to have an unbiased baseline that welcomes ALL people and gives them clear expectations. We met a woman recently who was in our neighbourhood and got lost; while talking with her she mentioned how much she loved being in the US (she was French), because of how many different people and cultures she was exposed to. This is America’s strength, and we need to retain that American undercurrent of diversity without seeming to favour a few groups; everyone should feel that they would be welcomed equally and that they have an equal opportunity here. Otherwise we just become an image of another country, alienate other potential immigrants, and we cease to be America.
linlithgow on July 7, 2006 at 2:55 PM
Comment pages: