SCOTUS: GOP, DeLay win big in Texas redistricting case

posted at 12:07 pm on June 28, 2006 by Allahpundit

To the state victors go the congressional spoils.

Better that legislatures draw the lines than courts, but better still that some objective standard, like a grid, be used. Lines like this, from the AP story, make me wince:

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority, said Hispanics do not have a chance to elect a candidate of their choosing under the plan.

De facto racial gerrymanders not only do more, arguably, to disempower minorities than to empower them (by shunting them out of areas where their votes might decide the election and into majority-minority districts), but they’re poisonous in providing an infrastructure to support identity politics. Non-racial gerrymanders provide an infrastructure, too, of course — of incumbency, by making 90% of congressional elections foregone conclusions. It ends up as a quasi-parliamentary system where each district is configured so that the party is assured a seat no matter whom it nominates; they might as well have the people vote by party and then let the winner choose whom among its ranks it wants to send to Congress.

Moran notes, correctly, that the real blockbuster is the Court’s holding that state legislatures can redraw district lines anytime they want instead of just once per decade. Which means, obviously, that local elections just got a lot more important vis-a-vis national business. Good news for federalism and better news for the GOP if it rolls craps in the Congressional elections this November but holds power at the state level. We’ll see how various state legislatures take the news, and which ones move quickly to press the majority party’s advantage.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Well, hopefully it will induce redistricting in California, where a thin, about 4-mile wide “sliver of shame” is gerrymandered along the coast to concentrate liberal voting power.

NTWR on June 28, 2006 at 12:34 PM

Speaker Pelosi was unavailable for comment.

JammieWearingFool on June 28, 2006 at 2:53 PM

My U.S. representative Henry Bonilla represents the district that must be redrawn. He had a rough race against Democrat Cuellar in 2002 because Cuellar swept Laredo. However, 2004 was a cakewalk for him because part of Laredo was put into the adjoining district in DeLay’s redistricting. He may get all of Laredo back again, due to rhe SC decision.

The district, even as drawn now, contains over 50% Hispanic voters and leans Democratic. Bonilla originally won it in a fluke in 1992 and has since held it for the Republicans because of his ethnic appeal to Hispanics. I think Bonilla can hold it under any circumstances (the 2002 candiate was exceptionally strong), but it will return to having a Democrat congressperson(I am politically correct!) after he retires.

ptolemy on June 30, 2006 at 8:57 AM