<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Ventriloquism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 03:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambien.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-397792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambien.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 10:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-397792</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ambien....&lt;/strong&gt;

Ambien latest side effects. Ambien online. Ambien. Generic ambien. Ambien onlilne overnite shipping. Ambien next day delivery where....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ambien&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Ambien latest side effects. Ambien online. Ambien. Generic ambien. Ambien onlilne overnite shipping. Ambien next day delivery where&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23877</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23877</guid>
		<description>Spurius - Same to you, my Greek (or is it Latin? Educate me!) loving friend.

Bryan - I just watched it again and listened closed. Upon further review, I&#039;ve decided that in those two words, you sound exactly like a man imitating Kiefer Sutherland as Jack Bauer channeling a mildly gay and wildly fabulous Clint Eastwood.

That&#039;s some talent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spurius &#8211; Same to you, my Greek (or is it Latin? Educate me!) loving friend.</p>
<p>Bryan &#8211; I just watched it again and listened closed. Upon further review, I&#8217;ve decided that in those two words, you sound exactly like a man imitating Kiefer Sutherland as Jack Bauer channeling a mildly gay and wildly fabulous Clint Eastwood.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s some talent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23868</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23868</guid>
		<description>Sorry.  I&#039;m a Texan.  Lisps do not come easily to me.  I honestly wouldn&#039;t have it any other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry.  I&#8217;m a Texan.  Lisps do not come easily to me.  I honestly wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23818</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23818</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to comment on some comments-

The False Dervish- revent? I think it was completely relevant to &quot;current&quot; events. I also liked it for the most obvious reasons...;) Thanks Michelle, Allahpundit, and Bryan.

JayTea- I&#039;m on the Wizbang Bomb Squad. It&#039;s a pretty mixed bag over there. That&#039;s what makes it interesting.

Allah- I saw the Mentos parody a while back and I&#039;m still amazed at the synchronization thing...It&#039;s kinda like Pink Floyd and the Wizard Oz synch (with cheesier subjects of course).

Professor Blather-I agree the &quot;screw them” wasn’t lispy enough but funny none the less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to comment on some comments-</p>
<p>The False Dervish- revent? I think it was completely relevant to &#8220;current&#8221; events. I also liked it for the most obvious reasons&#8230;;) Thanks Michelle, Allahpundit, and Bryan.</p>
<p>JayTea- I&#8217;m on the Wizbang Bomb Squad. It&#8217;s a pretty mixed bag over there. That&#8217;s what makes it interesting.</p>
<p>Allah- I saw the Mentos parody a while back and I&#8217;m still amazed at the synchronization thing&#8230;It&#8217;s kinda like Pink Floyd and the Wizard Oz synch (with cheesier subjects of course).</p>
<p>Professor Blather-I agree the &#8220;screw them” wasn’t lispy enough but funny none the less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayTea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23779</link>
		<dc:creator>JayTea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23779</guid>
		<description>Not to exploit Michelle&#039;s generosity, but I&#039;d like to make sure that Professor Blather, Spurious, and any other former fans of Polipundit know that Lori and Alex have found a new home with us over at Wizbang, and even have their own sub-page, Wizbang Politics. Lori splits her time between there and the main page, and it&#039;s been great having her with us. Poli&#039;s loss was indisputably our gain.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to exploit Michelle&#8217;s generosity, but I&#8217;d like to make sure that Professor Blather, Spurious, and any other former fans of Polipundit know that Lori and Alex have found a new home with us over at Wizbang, and even have their own sub-page, Wizbang Politics. Lori splits her time between there and the main page, and it&#8217;s been great having her with us. Poli&#8217;s loss was indisputably our gain.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23775</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23775</guid>
		<description>Actually I don&#039;t much care what Atrios et al think.  I just like pointing out when the so-called reality based community is peddling fantasies.  Which, come to think of it, is pretty much all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I don&#8217;t much care what Atrios et al think.  I just like pointing out when the so-called reality based community is peddling fantasies.  Which, come to think of it, is pretty much all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23771</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23771</guid>
		<description>Jim, I think those are one and the same. Seen Paul Hackett lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I think those are one and the same. Seen Paul Hackett lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23758</guid>
		<description>Kos sounds like he should be telling me today&#039;s specials, not who to vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kos sounds like he should be telling me today&#8217;s specials, not who to vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurius Ligustinus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23757</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurius Ligustinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23757</guid>
		<description>Professor: I bailed out from Polipundit (at least from commenting under former moniker Gaius Livius) during the immigration tussle as well.  Still look it over every now and then, but it&#039;s not what it used to be after they gave Lorie and DJ the boot.

Anyway, pleasure to make your acquaintance again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor: I bailed out from Polipundit (at least from commenting under former moniker Gaius Livius) during the immigration tussle as well.  Still look it over every now and then, but it&#8217;s not what it used to be after they gave Lorie and DJ the boot.</p>
<p>Anyway, pleasure to make your acquaintance again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkey Cons</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23755</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkey Cons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23755</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;StarGate no problem?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle&#039;s cooking up dinner in the HotAir kitchen, and I think I smell some piping hot .... JOE-MENTUM!
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>StarGate no problem?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michelle&#8217;s cooking up dinner in the HotAir kitchen, and I think I smell some piping hot &#8230;. JOE-MENTUM!<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23729</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23729</guid>
		<description>Spurious:

Gave up on Polipundit during Harriet Miers; went back and gave up during the Dubai Ports deal; gave up for good after the recent implosion over immigration.

No offense if you still hang out there, but that place is everything wrong with conservatism. It is the exact opposite of this blog, in my (not so) humble opinion.

Haven&#039;t been back in a long time. Not really interested in a blogger who forces agreement from everyone. I can go to DU for that.

Ned Lamont in &#039;08 - because we need more Kos in our lives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spurious:</p>
<p>Gave up on Polipundit during Harriet Miers; went back and gave up during the Dubai Ports deal; gave up for good after the recent implosion over immigration.</p>
<p>No offense if you still hang out there, but that place is everything wrong with conservatism. It is the exact opposite of this blog, in my (not so) humble opinion.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t been back in a long time. Not really interested in a blogger who forces agreement from everyone. I can go to DU for that.</p>
<p>Ned Lamont in &#8217;08 &#8211; because we need more Kos in our lives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WuzzaDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23728</link>
		<dc:creator>WuzzaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Suggestion For Ned Lamont...&lt;/strong&gt;

Cranky Neocon sez: Connecticut Senate hopeful, Ned Lamont is securing his seat on the garbage truck of history, next to the dustbin of history, by surrounding himself with the creme de la creme of ballot box poison. What led Mr....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Suggestion For Ned Lamont&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Cranky Neocon sez: Connecticut Senate hopeful, Ned Lamont is securing his seat on the garbage truck of history, next to the dustbin of history, by surrounding himself with the creme de la creme of ballot box poison. What led Mr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23727</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23727</guid>
		<description>Bryan:

You know what Atrios et al are saying? And you care?
Kudos to you - that sort of extra work and initiative deserves a gold star or something. Personally I wouldn&#039;t even know how to find those places.

And why are you expect liberals to be logically consistent? Do you have a fever or something?

For the record, I hereby endorse Ned Lamont! Sure he&#039;s a nancy boy liberal moonbat, but he&#039;s wonderfully entertaining. I could watch his commercials endlessly. Let&#039;s get him on the ticket in &#039;08, Dems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan:</p>
<p>You know what Atrios et al are saying? And you care?<br />
Kudos to you &#8211; that sort of extra work and initiative deserves a gold star or something. Personally I wouldn&#8217;t even know how to find those places.</p>
<p>And why are you expect liberals to be logically consistent? Do you have a fever or something?</p>
<p>For the record, I hereby endorse Ned Lamont! Sure he&#8217;s a nancy boy liberal moonbat, but he&#8217;s wonderfully entertaining. I could watch his commercials endlessly. Let&#8217;s get him on the ticket in &#8217;08, Dems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23700</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23700</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;POLITICAL VENTRILOQUISM...&lt;/strong&gt;

Putting words in the mouths of Joe Lieberman, George Bush, Ned Lamont, and Kos.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>POLITICAL VENTRILOQUISM&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Putting words in the mouths of Joe Lieberman, George Bush, Ned Lamont, and Kos&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23630</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23630</guid>
		<description>Liberal literacy rears its head again.  How does pointing out that Lamont is Kos&#039; favorite candidate, and that Kos himself is a whackjob, and that Lamont&#039;s ad is easily turned against him, constitute &quot;endorsing Lieberman?&quot;  We could do all of that and still not weigh in on Lieberman at all.  Which is what we did in this Vent, other than to note that Lieberman still stands by his vote to authorize the war and most Democrats don&#039;t, preferring to pass themselves off as dupes of Karl Rove rather than adults who stand by their votes.  

Yet Atrios et al are insisting that we&#039;ve endorsed Lieberman today.  Lamont&#039;s own campaign blog apparently started that little lie.  I edited this Vent (and supplied the extra voice acting), so I know pretty well what we did and didn&#039;t do here--and we didn&#039;t endorse anyone.  We merely mocked Lamont and his association with Kos by turning their own tactics against them.

Nice candidate you got there, lefties.  His campaign is not above the casual lie if they think it will earn them some points with the nutroots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal literacy rears its head again.  How does pointing out that Lamont is Kos&#8217; favorite candidate, and that Kos himself is a whackjob, and that Lamont&#8217;s ad is easily turned against him, constitute &#8220;endorsing Lieberman?&#8221;  We could do all of that and still not weigh in on Lieberman at all.  Which is what we did in this Vent, other than to note that Lieberman still stands by his vote to authorize the war and most Democrats don&#8217;t, preferring to pass themselves off as dupes of Karl Rove rather than adults who stand by their votes.  </p>
<p>Yet Atrios et al are insisting that we&#8217;ve endorsed Lieberman today.  Lamont&#8217;s own campaign blog apparently started that little lie.  I edited this Vent (and supplied the extra voice acting), so I know pretty well what we did and didn&#8217;t do here&#8211;and we didn&#8217;t endorse anyone.  We merely mocked Lamont and his association with Kos by turning their own tactics against them.</p>
<p>Nice candidate you got there, lefties.  His campaign is not above the casual lie if they think it will earn them some points with the nutroots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Fag &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michelle Malkin Endorses Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23608</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Fag &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michelle Malkin Endorses Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23608</guid>
		<description>[...] So now the Connecticut Democrat(?) has gotten the endorsement of Michelle Malkin, adding her name to the likes of George W Bush, Sean Hannity, and her Sith Master Ann Coulter. Interesting. But then again Michelle likes Kos and anything he does so Ned Lamaont was bound to attract her attention anyways. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So now the Connecticut Democrat(?) has gotten the endorsement of Michelle Malkin, adding her name to the likes of George W Bush, Sean Hannity, and her Sith Master Ann Coulter. Interesting. But then again Michelle likes Kos and anything he does so Ned Lamaont was bound to attract her attention anyways. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Heretics Or Traitors? Old Saying Or New?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Clive Davis links to Norm Geras, who writes:As the old political saying has it, the Right looks for converts, the Left looks for traitors.... Clive notes that &quot;This saying was new to Norm. And to me too&quot;. And me three--the......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Heretics Or Traitors? Old Saying Or New?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Clive Davis links to Norm Geras, who writes:As the old political saying has it, the Right looks for converts, the Left looks for traitors&#8230;. Clive notes that &#8220;This saying was new to Norm. And to me too&#8221;. And me three&#8211;the&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurius Ligustinus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23587</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurius Ligustinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23587</guid>
		<description>OK, Professor, I&#039;ll put away the gun.  BTW, I haven&#039;t seen you commenting at Polipundit in a long time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Professor, I&#8217;ll put away the gun.  BTW, I haven&#8217;t seen you commenting at Polipundit in a long time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23526</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even the “Mentos” theme can’t quite overcome my instinctive reaction to reach for my .45. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I understand your instinct - but its massive overkill. I&#039;d think reaching for a flyswatter would be more appropriate. Maybe a feather duster. Something like that. Alternatively, you could tell Kos that you just saw Barbara Streisand outside. That would get him and his crew out of your house in a flash.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even the “Mentos” theme can’t quite overcome my instinctive reaction to reach for my .45.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I understand your instinct &#8211; but its massive overkill. I&#8217;d think reaching for a flyswatter would be more appropriate. Maybe a feather duster. Something like that. Alternatively, you could tell Kos that you just saw Barbara Streisand outside. That would get him and his crew out of your house in a flash.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurius Ligustinus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23523</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurius Ligustinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23523</guid>
		<description>It still gives me the creeps to see &quot;Kos&quot; peering in Lamont&#039;s front window like some voyeuristic perv, then busting into the guy&#039;s living room with his home invasion crew.  Even the &quot;Mentos&quot; theme can&#039;t quite overcome my instinctive reaction to reach for my .45.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still gives me the creeps to see &#8220;Kos&#8221; peering in Lamont&#8217;s front window like some voyeuristic perv, then busting into the guy&#8217;s living room with his home invasion crew.  Even the &#8220;Mentos&#8221; theme can&#8217;t quite overcome my instinctive reaction to reach for my .45.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23480</guid>
		<description>HA! Darth Rove was my favorite.  I just checked out the video of Kos &#039;clarifying&#039; the &quot;screw them&quot; comment.  It&#039;s funny that he says we haven&#039;t changed out talking points in two years, considering the left hasn&#039;t changed theirs in &lt;strong&gt;forty years&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! Darth Rove was my favorite.  I just checked out the video of Kos &#8216;clarifying&#8217; the &#8220;screw them&#8221; comment.  It&#8217;s funny that he says we haven&#8217;t changed out talking points in two years, considering the left hasn&#8217;t changed theirs in <strong>forty years</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23478</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23478</guid>
		<description>Now a not-so-politically-correct comment. I really don&#039;t know how to put this, so I&#039;ll just say it:

Don&#039;t Democrats realize that IMAGE is important? Can&#039;t they find ANY candidates that seem, well ... manly? That have charisma? A chin? Shoulders? Why do they seem obsessed with finding these vaguely effeminate metrosexual 98-pound weakling types to run for office?

I really don&#039;t get it. Remember JFK? Camelot? All that?

Now it&#039;s the party of Dukakis and Mondale and Ned Lamont.

I guess my question is -- don&#039;t they have any MEN in their party?

Like I said, not politically correct. But curious. I&#039;m just sayin&#039;. Ned Lamont does not exactly inspire me with confidence. Why can&#039;t liberals figure this out? Or is that they want leaders that remind them of themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now a not-so-politically-correct comment. I really don&#8217;t know how to put this, so I&#8217;ll just say it:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Democrats realize that IMAGE is important? Can&#8217;t they find ANY candidates that seem, well &#8230; manly? That have charisma? A chin? Shoulders? Why do they seem obsessed with finding these vaguely effeminate metrosexual 98-pound weakling types to run for office?</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t get it. Remember JFK? Camelot? All that?</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s the party of Dukakis and Mondale and Ned Lamont.</p>
<p>I guess my question is &#8212; don&#8217;t they have any MEN in their party?</p>
<p>Like I said, not politically correct. But curious. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;. Ned Lamont does not exactly inspire me with confidence. Why can&#8217;t liberals figure this out? Or is that they want leaders that remind them of themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23472</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23472</guid>
		<description>I concur - the voice saying &quot;screw them&quot; was pretty damn funny. Wasn&#039;t lispy enough though. :)

I loved Kos&#039; argument: oh, those mean Republicans just love to bring up stuff from the past, and they shouldn&#039;t do that.

Naaaaw. Democrats NEVER do that, do they? (How old was Laura Bush when she was in that car accident they obsessed over? Wasn&#039;t that like the 1950s and she was a teenager?)

I love hypocrisy. It tastes like liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur &#8211; the voice saying &#8220;screw them&#8221; was pretty damn funny. Wasn&#8217;t lispy enough though. :)</p>
<p>I loved Kos&#8217; argument: oh, those mean Republicans just love to bring up stuff from the past, and they shouldn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Naaaaw. Democrats NEVER do that, do they? (How old was Laura Bush when she was in that car accident they obsessed over? Wasn&#8217;t that like the 1950s and she was a teenager?)</p>
<p>I love hypocrisy. It tastes like liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easy87us</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23464</link>
		<dc:creator>easy87us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23464</guid>
		<description>It would be lovely if they can include Cindy McKinney in Lamont&#039;s commercial for some diversity...

nah...that would spoil the &quot;white cute American&quot;..look.

Viva Le Lamont Mento( for that clean spearmint taste that can kill girls on contact)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be lovely if they can include Cindy McKinney in Lamont&#8217;s commercial for some diversity&#8230;</p>
<p>nah&#8230;that would spoil the &#8220;white cute American&#8221;..look.</p>
<p>Viva Le Lamont Mento( for that clean spearmint taste that can kill girls on contact)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easy87us</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/comment-page-1/#comment-23454</link>
		<dc:creator>easy87us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/vent/2006/06/28/political-ventriloquism/#comment-23454</guid>
		<description>Lamont is the New Democrat!

Cute, white as colgate, song and dance, the New No-Grease homely boy, the pure White fantasy, almost like Happy Days Richie Cunningham running!

The revitalization of the Democratic Party has begun! Horray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamont is the New Democrat!</p>
<p>Cute, white as colgate, song and dance, the New No-Grease homely boy, the pure White fantasy, almost like Happy Days Richie Cunningham running!</p>
<p>The revitalization of the Democratic Party has begun! Horray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
