Comments on: House vote on resolution condemning NYT expected tomorrow

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Breaking: House passes resolution condemning media blabbermouths

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:32:05 +0000

[...] Waiting for the exact vote count. It was in the ballpark of 227-183 — a much more party-line vote than I expected. But that’s the Democrats for you. [...]

By: NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » House vote on resolution condemning NYT expected tomorrow

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:24:48 +0000

[...] Courtesy of Hot Air: [...]

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:27:46 +0000

ScottyDog, I agree with you. They were probably members of committees which were briefed on the program during the last 5 years and felt it necessary, for political reasons, to release the info in the last few months, when they were sure to gain at least the House in Nov.

How things have changed, though. The administration might still list all who have been briefed, closer to Nov. I wouldn’t feel comfortable if I were one of the leakers. Those who asked the NYT to hold the story might come out and defend themselves.

By: ScottyDog

ScottyDog — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:17:07 +0000

I said it before and still believe the reason the administration will not pursue the traitors at the NYT times is that the leaker’s are Senators and Congressional members.

It was probably Leaky Leahy or Rockefellar.

By: Conservative Outpost

Conservative Outpost — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:12:09 +0000

Daily Summary…

NEWS: – Supreme Court to End Term With Major Rulings – Israel Steps up Pressure on Hamas – Boehner stands ground on border-security – House Supports Bilingual Ballots in 31 States – Justices Affirm GOP Map For Texas – Same-Sex……

By: tormod

tormod — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:21:02 +0000

LEAKERS are the ones who MUST be stopped. Go after the paper if it has nothing to print?

By: Warner Todd Huston

Warner Todd Huston — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:07:53 +0000

Congress is afraid of the Press.

It’s just that simple.

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:46:32 +0000

With this escalation in the Middle East, North Korea, Iran et all, the President is preoccupied with much more significant items than the miniature-NYT. Surely, they are smart enough to know/hate this – they are and should feel diminished.

I believe that even they see how defeating and treaturous their attitute and acts have been. They are not helping but hindering their liberal protegees.

Ignore them!

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:37:04 +0000

The NY Slimes has it in their heads that they are the only ones fit to decide what keeps America safe as they ride rough shod on an Elected President. Time to cut them down to size!

Bush has all of the support he needs in this fight. I hope he gets the ball rolling soon. ;o)

By: Alex K

Alex K — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:03:36 +0000

I think Washington would say that talk is cheap, and passing resolutions is talk.

That said, either this thing is classified and the White House should have told the Times outright not to publish under threat of prosecution, or it’s not. And if it’s so dangerous to reveal it, why the hell wasn’t it classified? If it was classified why was it leaked, however quietly, by the UN, and by SWIFT itself? Why is the law so ambigious in these enormously important areas? Or is it? I am going insane.

By: Small Town Veteran

Small Town Veteran — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:58:26 +0000

More Quick Links…

Up all night working on Old War Dogs stuff, need some sleep, but I can’t let you miss these: Vent: Political Ventriloquism MM: Operation Summer Rains CQ: Gaza Incursion Gains Ground Tom Bevan: Ward Churchill’s Strange Defense CQ: 9/11 Commission…

By: 4thelittleguy

4thelittleguy — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:09:53 +0000

Congress is voting to condemn the NY Times?

I guess that is the first step in a long process of not actually doing anything to hold that paper accountable for their actions.

By: In Search Of Utopia

In Search Of Utopia — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:44:08 +0000

Patriotism and the Press…

Excellent response from the Editorial department of the NYT: Over the last year, The New York Times has twice published reports about secret antiterrorism programs being run by the Bush administration. Both times, critics have claimed that the paper wa…

By: NRA4Freedom

NRA4Freedom — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:42:35 +0000

Now that the liberal MSM is going full guns running cover for the Times on all the talking head shows trying to convince a sleeping America that “it doesn’t REALLY matter because they already knew”, the only thing that is missing is CAIR and the rest of the Muslim terrorists coming out spinning for them also. Look for a Bin Laden tape shortly telling the world that the Times didn’t tell him anything he didn’t already know.

Real Americans despise liberal seditious traitors, and those who don’t, well, they are seditious traitors themselves.

By: The Bullwinkle Blog » Blog Archive » The War On American Soldiers

The Bullwinkle Blog » Blog Archive » The War On American Soldiers — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:34:36 +0000

[...] Some reporters believe they owe no allegience to America. Hot Air notes the extremism of the NY Times’ view: [...]

By: Psycotte

Psycotte — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:23:13 +0000

So if they condemn the NYT with this vote exactly what is accomplished? I say let a vote be held on Peter King’s suggestions to prosecute the times and investigate them. I do mean prosecute and then investigate, in that order. That is the way the anything dealing with the GOP is handled. Prosecute first then print a retraction weeks or months later on the 40th page. Let them have a taste of there own medicine. Seeing Keller in the Judiciary subcommitee answering as many questions as say, Sam Alito, would be a sight worth seeing.

By: pat

pat — Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:51:42 +0000

Prosecute the leakers.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:45:46 +0000

Fallout from Swift story continues: ‘Human rights’ group lodges formal complaints with 32 countries (UPDATE III)…

In light of the NYT’s “Swift Boating” of the Swift story comes this news:
BRUSSELS, June 27 — A human rights group in London said today that it had lodged formal complaints in 32 countries against the Brussels-based banking consorti…

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:45:46 +0000

Fallout from Swift story continues: ‘Human rights’ group lodges formal complaints with 32 countries (UPDATE III)…