But by hauling NY Times to the court we could sqeeze out the leaker.

After serious thought ( with at least two beers),

I am all for it. Prosecute NY Times.

The problem is that this administration has shown no real desire to dig these traitors out and punish them accordingly. This also goes for the illegal immigration problem. They arrest a few illegals just for show and then immediately free them with only a promise that they will show up later for a court trial. End of story. This is disgraceful. What about the woman they fired from the CIA recently for leaking info to one of the treasonous newspapers. Why hasn’t she been jailed and charged with treason? I’ll answer my own question – because the are not going to charge her. She walks because nobody has the guts to bring her to trial. This must end. These people will never stop leaking until the government shows that they will not stand for this any longer. Let’s set an example with at least one of these traitors and see if the rest want to keep leaking.
God bless America!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/world/middleeast/25military.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

U.S. General in Iraq Outlines Troop Cuts

By MICHAEL R. GORDON
Published: June 25, 2006
WASHINGTON, June 24 — The top American commander in Iraq has drafted a plan that projects sharp reductions in the United States military presence there by the end of 2007, with the first cuts coming this September, American officials say.

According to a classified briefing at the Pentagon this week by the commander, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the number of American combat brigades in Iraq is projected to decrease to 5 or 6 from the current level of 14 by December 2007….

…General Casey’s briefing has remained a closely held secret, and it was described by American officials who agreed to discuss the details only on condition of anonymity.

Remember that Kevin Nealon SNL skit I cited yesterday?

It is hard to imagine what could be more damaging then TELLING THE ENEMY OUR PLANS!!

As I wrote in the other thread, unless MANAGEMENT and the REPORTERS involved at the NY Times go to jail, this stuff will continue. Sulzberger and Keller fully intend to insure that the USA loses the war on terror.

If no newspaper wanna print their story, they could send the story to Al Jezerra or BBC!

Therefore we must get the leaker!

Don’t you see? Leaking classified information is protected by the U.S. Constitution where it says “Love thy enemy.”

No..wait a min…..!

They’re pushing the envelope hoping Bush choose’s to prosecute. The only winning hand Bush has is if he can provide direct evidence of harm done as a result of publishing classifed national security information.

Since I’m not the President, I would choose to gather up all the leakers and publishers and ship them off to Iraq or Afghanistan where their al Qaeda hosts would show their appreciation by cutting their heads off quickly instead of slowly and painfully.

Michelle’s on it. *** Bryan Preston: Whose side are they on? Like there’s any doubt? *** Laughing Wolf is livid. Captain Ed has some interesting thoughts on the matter here. *** Don’t miss Uncle Jimbo’s press briefing. *** Captain Ed:…

…we don’t have that long. New York or some other US city will be a radioactive crater by then.

I sincerely hope not.

The reason for these leaks, clearly, is animus against George W. Bush.

The way to stop it is to put the leakers to the MSM in prison, as well as those media editors, publishers, and reporters who insist on printing classified information as part of their “gotcha” game against Bush.

It is not in the public interest to place American lives in danger, and Keller is lying when he says it is.

In fact, I consider the disclosure of classified information that costs Americans their lives to be treason, as in “adhering to [our] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

I have long held the belief that treason, partisan anger born of unhappiness that your candidate lost an election, is the worst form of treason possible — worse than treason for economic gain and treason based upon an individual’s ideology.

I no longer question the loyalty of the leakers and the editors, publishers, and reporters in question.

I know exactly where they stand — they want Al Qaeda to win.

Er, at least I hope that’s why there were Chinese officers watching those exercises from our ships.

These days, Chinese intelligence officials don’t have to conduct deals with slime. They just have to read the New York Times, and they’ll learn all they need to know.

Or board U.S. warships conducting naval exercises in the Pacific.

Does everyone have to lose their mind at the same time, or can they at least take turns?