I’ve been puzzled by the administration’s behavior since the day it was obvious they were holding back on purpose.

I think they mostly have been ignoring the WMD thing because WMD’s weren’t the primary reason they went into Iraq, they never said they were, and to respond to the Moonbats only gives their arguments credibility.

Jane Harman, California congresswoman, said that since these WMD’s were from 1991 and before they are probably no more lethal than what is underneath your kitchen sink.

I think maybe ATF ought to take a look under her sink. Damn.

In one, we have unnamed sources outing a perfectly legal intelligence mission, and getting a LOT of airplay…

In the other, we have good source giving information about a critical piece of prewar intelligence, and prooving many to have lied, but it gets very little airplay.

I would also point out that it seems that our intelligence apparatus would rather leak imporant information that they shouldn’t, than release imporatant information that should be told…

(“‘Colme-sized’? What ‘size’ is that exactly? Judging by his lackluster performance on the tube…”)

If Bush went public with the evidence, the Russians or Chinese might retaliate by balking on Iran sanctions — but of course, they might end up balking on Iran anyway. On the other hand, a WMD scandal could have a salutary effect by restoring America’s credibility on the issue and putting international pressure on Russia/China to atone for arming Saddam by cracking down hard now on the Iranians. Or am I missing something?

Allah, I’ve been puzzled by the administration’s behavior since the day it was obvious they were holding back on purpose. My only theory is that they want to be the first to actually find/seize the weapons – in Syria if need be – and the last to accuse anyone (even if justified) of having done so without the proof in hand. Perhaps making the accusation public will trigger Syria & enablers to move them yet again, this time in a much harder-to-discover manner?

(Admittedly thin but just an idea…)

“Jane, you ignorant slut”.

500 Shells isn’t a huge quantity, but it shore ain’t nuthin’.

I take exception to that ‘isn’t a huge quantity’. What determines the quantity. The number of devices? The number of people the decives can kill? Makes no difference if the number is one or one million, they are still Weapons of Mass Destruction. If those 500 weapons were deployed they would be capible of killing into the milliions of people and

it shore ain’t nuthin’

Every other news channel and the 3 major networks give us all of the propagandabalance we need.

Here are the highlights via NRO of the WMD findings yesterday: Rough transcript of last night’s press conference here. Highlights of yesterday’s Negroponte declassification, via Santorum. The actual letter. Transcript of Santorum on Hugh Hewitt. How …

Tell it to the widows of French farmers killed unearthing WW1 gas shells in their fields. Still happens after nearly 90 years.

Don’t wait for an apology from Kerry and Kennedy. Being a liberal means never having to say you’re sorry.

So a new report out says that over 500 chemical weapons, mainly mustard and sarin gas, have been found since 2003. But wait, Saddam said that he had gotten rid of all of them, how could that be?…

To me, the existence of these older WMD shows that Iraq didn’t comply with UN SCR 687, which required the destruction of all WMD – not some, or most WMD. That they’re in a degraded state could suggest that they were mishandled and/or lost by the Iraq…

Last night I watched Hannity & Colmes. Senator Rick Santorum and Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan were on, talking about the WMDs found in Iraq. Of course, you won’t hear much about the story in the MSM. There wasn’t even a mention in my daily ……

Oh boy, in that case we’ll have to get rid of Chris Matthews, Keith Olberbite, Tim Rustert, Katie Couric, Stphesomethinoranother, Brian Williams, etc……

Yesterday Senator Rick Santorum sent shockwaves through the left when it was revealed that our U.S. Troops have in fact uncovered WMDs in Iraq. The WMD’s that were uncovered killed close to five thousand Kurds using only three of these particular type…

By now, you all know that Little Ricky said last night on Fox News that they’d finally found those elusive WMDs, the existence of which was put forward as the first of many reasons we invaded Iraq. Of course, Santorum…

It’s like Rush Limbaugh always says: He will never quit until everyone agrees with him, *but* he thinks there should be at least one liberal on every college campus to serve as an example. I tend to agree.

Pay close attention to the format of shows like Hannity and Colmes. The moonbats usually get grilled by Sean, while Alan gets to interview the conservatives. It’s a technique that’s been used since CNN’s Crossfire.

And in the interest of full disclosure, personally speaking, I don’t like Colmes either.

Essex, I like your analogy too. Add to that second-hand smoke and cows tooting. ANYTHING will be more dangerous to us than whatever will be found in Iraq.

I cannot believe that no matter what the debate, Colmes takes the position of a traitor.He always say something like;”we all support the military but…”

I wish they would throw him off the program. There is no reason to have an American hating traitor on any News program.