Rove’s lawyer on Truthout’s latest: Insane bizarre nonsensical nuttiness

posted at 7:23 pm on June 20, 2006 by Allahpundit

Huh. I thought it was more in the vein of “unhinged slackjawed wacky crackers” myself.

But YMMV.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Well, he would say that, the big liar! The truth is out there!

Pablo on June 20, 2006 at 7:41 PM

This is another Karl Rove plan……He rolls on the VP. One step closer to being president. Now if he could just get rid of pesky George…muhahaha

Psycotte on June 20, 2006 at 8:00 PM

The world of Oz is more believable then the typical leftists reality, which reminds me of the old saw ‘If wishes were fishes, we’d have them for every meal’. Wishing that Rove was indicted doesn’t make it real.

docdave on June 20, 2006 at 8:04 PM

You know… sometimes I really worry about that 23% of our population that are firmly in the moonbat camp.

Mortis on June 20, 2006 at 8:18 PM

I don’t even know what I should say about this. These guys are just too far out…….Are they really for real? I wonder.

Are they real people? I mean, is this Jason guy really playing with a full deck?

I went back and try to search for the statistics on mentally sick people in our society but I could not find it. I recall it is somewhere around 30% with light mental problem( a little bit paranoid, eg) and 10% with severe mental problems, with 2 to 3% in the dangerous category….or something like that.

Jason’s refusal to accept reality is definitely belong to that 2% category. If you force him to accept reality he would crack and sometimes they may get a gun and start a rampage, or they may break down and cry, it all depends on how violent they are. I guess Jason is the type that may just go into the toilet and space out, wearing a tin hat, of course.

easy87us on June 20, 2006 at 8:23 PM

Looking at how screwed up society today is, I wonder if instead it’s more like 40% have light problems, 30% have medium problems, 20% are dangerous and 9.9% are totally over the bend.

Given those numbers, only 0.1% of society is fully rational. Scary I know, but it would fit the evidence we see today.

RH

RobertHuntingdon on June 20, 2006 at 9:10 PM

Just goes to show you that anyone can start a blog.

pullingmyhairout on June 20, 2006 at 9:20 PM

But, this guy is real! This Jason is real. Can you believe this?

How can he be real? Not only he is hallucinating a reality for himself, but he completey rejects all external facts so he can keep on fabricating his own world with what he called “facts” that are nothing more than fragments of his own imagination.

I tell you,this guy is dangerous. If he has a gun I would take it away from him. I would take all knives away from him. In fact, I would not even let him drive until he shows signs of returning to normal. He could have an imaginery friend telling him what to do too. Take him to a shrink. This is urgent.

easy87us on June 20, 2006 at 9:40 PM

you say “Too far out in front of the news cycle.”

I say “Too far behind the LIFE cycle.”
Too far in the menstral cycle.
Fell off your tri-cycle.
And definitely stuck in the ‘groundhogs day’ cycle.
Do something useful Jason, learn to play the piano.

shooter on June 20, 2006 at 10:22 PM

This guy must be going to the same shrink that Mary Mapes is using.. They need to up the meds.

madmonaco on June 20, 2006 at 10:42 PM

Jason has booked a trip to Egypt to go swimming to confuse the message when people say he is in denial.

“Do something useful Jason, learn to play the piano.”

Probably not a good idea. When you mix a moonbat with a musical instrument, you get a traitor who denouces patriotism, the people of the country they’re from, their fan base and their sitting president.

RolandHall on June 20, 2006 at 11:21 PM

The funny part is the cheering section for TO in the comments section and TO and Talk Left. These people are nuts.

Clark1 on June 21, 2006 at 1:36 AM

Ahhhh… The Chixie Dicks!

rightside on June 21, 2006 at 2:43 AM

“This guy must be going to the same shrink that Mary Mapes is using.. They need to up the meds.”

I don’t think they’re taking any meds… and it would also appear that it’s the Mary Mapes Kinko’s that they used for their “fake but accurate” copies of the “sealed indictment”

Bob Mileti on June 21, 2006 at 5:42 AM

C’mon, Luskin: tell us how you really feel

Not to moonbats everywhere: when a lawyer starts talking about you in that kind of plain language, you just might be doing something stupid.

But please don’t stop. I haven’t been this entertained watching liberals run around in circles and run into walls since a sweet Tuesday evening in November 2004, when I got to giggle happily listening to Democrats declare victory based on exit polls ….

Carry on, liberals. Tell us again how Jason Leopold is a source of truth and wisdom. Tell us again how Karl Rove was indicted on May 12th. Please?

Professor Blather on June 21, 2006 at 7:20 AM

Here we go from Wikipedia

Occam’s razor (also spelled Ockham’s razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as a heuristic maxim that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity in scientific theories. Occam’s razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as:
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
which translates to:
entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.
Furthermore, when multiple competing theories have equal predictive powers, the principle recommends selecting those that introduce the fewest assumptions and postulate the fewest hypothetical entities. It is in this sense that Occam’s razor is usually understood.

I have wanted to bring this up for the wacky 9/11 conspiracy theorists as well. For me if you have to inhale and say “and if” more than once in an argument or discussion just take another sip of tequila and relax in the afternoon sun it will all be ok.

Priest on June 21, 2006 at 11:14 AM