time to dump bill and start the michelle show!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dman-i agree with you 99.9% of the time but i will never
sign on for a national registration of any kind

If 95% of the potential perpetrators of a given crime fit a specific racial profile (hispanics–>illegal immigration, young men of middle-eastern origin–>terrorism, for example), then racial profiling is not only common sense, its insane not to.

May this be a model for more reforms to come.
AP reports: “With tensions rising and the police department and municipal budget stretched thin, Hazleton is about to embark on one of the toughest crackdowns on illegal immigrants anywhere in the U…

However, watch out for the biometric ID trap: how can one demand that a person present such an ID without racial profiling?

The only solution that would not be immediately struck down in court would be a biometric national ID for everyone, which I (reluctantly) support. I know that the libertarian in us hates the concept, but I can’t see any other way. We would need a Constitutional amendment to restrict use of such an ID, with better protections than those against unauthorized use of our Social Security numbers.

Missing a word there?

Plus-Now THEY need a wall, to keep their workers IN.
“most of the workers …were underage, undocumented Guatemalans.”…”worry that he is going to lose the Guatemalans, too”
-They’re all coming to the US.- thru Mexico,w/ maps?.

Lastly, the Frickin hypocrite FOX:
“At the start of his presidency nearly six years ago, Mr. Fox pledged that, as part of negotiations with the United States for LEGAL STATUS for ILLEGAL Mexican immigrants, this country would crack down on the flow of illegal immigrants crossing from Guatemala.” southern border closed/northern OPEN.
They’re all hypocritical self-serving communistic bastards!

Without the fence, if Mexico failed, we may have to invade to save America.

Do liberals see the consequence?

The wall, or fence, will provide us the buffer so we can set up a defense zone. It also serves to stop the flow of unprotected women and children from crossing the hot desert and get themselves killed.

Who in their right mind would stop building the fence?

More precisely:

1) We have policies or laws that serve as the baseline. The “floor” when dealing with each country – as we have now, but largely don’t enforce worth a damn. Visa “overstays” being one example. The mandatory 51% native ownership of businesses in many countries being another. You get the idea.

2) Where each country applies more restrictive laws to us, to US citizens and businesses, we reciprocate exactly those same restrictions upon their citizens and businesses when in the US… assuming such restrictions would even allow them in or to do business, LOL. I can feel the pain already…

3) Build both a southern and northern “friendship fence” – which are NON-Negotiable, since they are absolutely required to regain control over our borders.

4) Require both biometric intel on each alien entering the US and an ID card with that intel and their entry restrictions that they must use to conduct business while here – including major purchases, school enrollment, medical care, etc. – flagged and disabled when the Visa expires if they have not exited the country.

I’m sure there are a few more ideas out there which would create a more equitable arrangement with those who abuse our open society, but these should put some balance into the equation which is missing to an absurd degree at present.

Mexico worries about its southern border. This line is just classic: Here at Mexico’s own southern edge, Guatemalans cross legally and illegally to do jobs that Mexicans departing for the north no longer want. Suggestions on what those jobs can……