Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Mexico goes “nativist”

posted at 10:51 am on June 19, 2006 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Mexico is apparently tired of being the world’s pathway into the US:

Quiet as it is kept in political circles, Mexico, so much the focus of the United States’ immigration debate, has its own set of immigration problems. And as elected officials from President Vicente Fox on down denounce Washington’s plans to deploy troops and build more walls along the United States border, Mexico has begun a re-examination of its own policies and prejudices.

Here at Mexico’s own southern edge, Guatemalans cross legally and illegally to do jobs that Mexicans departing for the north no longer want. And hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from nearly two dozen other countries, including China, Ecuador, Cuba and Somalia, pass through on their way to the United States.

Hm. Somalia just fell to Islamist warlords. Cuba isn’t exactly a friend of the US. Neither is China. For these countries or groups that might be attached to one of them, getting agents into the US via Mexico probably isn’t the easiest way–but it’s a way works reliably, year after year.

The line about illegals doing jobs Mexicans won’t do is just too rich. What kind of job would that be, exactly? Why doesn’t the Times follow up on that?

Anyway, read the rest–it’s highly entertaining. As is this little fact:

The Rev. Ademar Barilli, a human rights advocate who, with the support of the Roman Catholic Church, runs a shelter for migrants in Tecún Umán, a Guatemalan border city, said that unlike crossing patterns at the northern border, migrants here did not typically go far into remote areas, hoping to avoid the authorities. Instead, he said, the migrants try to bribe their way through.

“A migrant with money can make it across Mexico with no problems,” Father Barilli said. “A migrant with no money gets nowhere.”

What kind of illegal migrant has money? Most likely, one that’s up to no good.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Well if you come here we will give you money that was heisted from the taxpayers,come on down!

bbz123 on June 19, 2006 at 10:54 AM

What, no record of how many ‘illegals’ get killed sneaking across Mexicos southern border?

shooter on June 19, 2006 at 11:04 AM

I think that all we really need to do is apply the exact same restrictions for each country that are applied to us.

More precisely:

1) We have policies or laws that serve as the baseline. The “floor” when dealing with each country – as we have now, but largely don’t enforce worth a damn. Visa “overstays” being one example. The mandatory 51% native ownership of businesses in many countries being another. You get the idea.

2) Where each country applies more restrictive laws to us, to US citizens and businesses, we reciprocate exactly those same restrictions upon their citizens and businesses when in the US… assuming such restrictions would even allow them in or to do business, LOL. I can feel the pain already…

3) Build both a southern and northern “friendship fence” – which are NON-Negotiable, since they are absolutely required to regain control over our borders.

4) Require both biometric intel on each alien entering the US and an ID card with that intel and their entry restrictions that they must use to conduct business while here – including major purchases, school enrollment, medical care, etc. – flagged and disabled when the Visa expires if they have not exited the country.

I’m sure there are a few more ideas out there which would create a more equitable arrangement with those who abuse our open society, but these should put some balance into the equation which is missing to an absurd degree at present.

MostlyHarmless on June 19, 2006 at 11:17 AM

Those who oppose the building of a fence across the entire border are traitors.

The wall, or fence, will provide us the buffer so we can set up a defense zone. It also serves to stop the flow of unprotected women and children from crossing the hot desert and get themselves killed.

Who in their right mind would stop building the fence?

easy87us on June 19, 2006 at 11:24 AM

I suppose Mexico is mad… those Guadamalans, Brazillians and Columbians are taking Jobs away from Mexican Illegals in America. You Know, the Ones John McCain says Mexicans have a Birth-Right Constitunional Right too…

havok on June 19, 2006 at 11:36 AM

Building the fence and securing our border is the strongest message we can send to the world that we have no intention to invade Mexico.

Without the fence, if Mexico failed, we may have to invade to save America.

Do liberals see the consequence?

easy87us on June 19, 2006 at 11:46 AM

Mr. Gutiérrez said Mexico needed to “review its laws in order to have more legitimacy when we present our points of view to the United States.” TOO LATE, you have no legitimacy!

Plus-Now THEY need a wall, to keep their workers IN.
“most of the workers …were underage, undocumented Guatemalans.”…”worry that he is going to lose the Guatemalans, too”
-They’re all coming to the US.- thru Mexico,w/ maps?.

Lastly, the Frickin hypocrite FOX:
“At the start of his presidency nearly six years ago, Mr. Fox pledged that, as part of negotiations with the United States for LEGAL STATUS for ILLEGAL Mexican immigrants, this country would crack down on the flow of illegal immigrants crossing from Guatemala.” southern border closed/northern OPEN.
They’re all hypocritical self-serving communistic bastards!

shooter on June 19, 2006 at 11:57 AM

maybe we should hire Guatemalians as our new border agents; think they got a bone to pick with mexicans crossing the border illegially?

Defector01 on June 19, 2006 at 12:04 PM

“but it’s a way works reliably, year after year.”

Missing a word there?

Convertacon on June 19, 2006 at 1:43 PM

Harmless, I agree with your premise – reciprocity is key.

However, watch out for the biometric ID trap: how can one demand that a person present such an ID without racial profiling?

The only solution that would not be immediately struck down in court would be a biometric national ID for everyone, which I (reluctantly) support. I know that the libertarian in us hates the concept, but I can’t see any other way. We would need a Constitutional amendment to restrict use of such an ID, with better protections than those against unauthorized use of our Social Security numbers.

dman on June 19, 2006 at 3:22 PM

dman,
You say “racial profiling” as if it were a bad thing…

If 95% of the potential perpetrators of a given crime fit a specific racial profile (hispanics–>illegal immigration, young men of middle-eastern origin–>terrorism, for example), then racial profiling is not only common sense, its insane not to.

inmanjh on June 19, 2006 at 7:47 PM

inmanjh- what country are you from.
there is no common sense in america!
the race/profiling card is used all the time
the first time a hispanic is asked to show his/her
biometric id they will file a profile lawsuit…and win!!!

dman-i agree with you 99.9% of the time but i will never
sign on for a national registration of any kind

mike hale on June 19, 2006 at 8:33 PM

just watched michelle on the oreilly show-
she was great as always!!! seemed to me he played to the
leftiest mouth piece kirsten powers.

time to dump bill and start the michelle show!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mike hale on June 19, 2006 at 8:51 PM

I remember reading a poem/short story when I was young (don’t ask me the name, I’ve slept since then, and have forgotten) The crux of it was that “good fences make good neighbors.” How is this piece of wisdom lost to the Senate and the open borders crowd?

rattrap47 on June 20, 2006 at 8:16 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.