There was a very important story on Sunday in the Washington Post, From the Embassy, a Grim Report. The story carried a “leaked” cable purportedly from ……

For anyone looking for good news, below is the link to a recent CNN poll which shows libs losing ground in the upcomming elections…
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/16/bush.poll/

As a great man once said, “Don’t let the bastids get you down”. ;o)

“Hot Air”:http://hotair.com brings up an interesting point in a “recent post”:http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/19/bad-news-monday/ about the “alledged offer by the Iranian theocracy”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article…

Who knows the actual identity of the sender or the receiver? As the State Department is full of holdovers and foreign sympathizers, I have no problem believing that a Clintonite wrote this fake cable and sent it to another Clintonite to “leak” to the press. Yes, my opinion of the workers in State is that low.

However, I don’t minimize the possible danger these employees may face. I don’t think that these people who offer “friendly advice” are truely people looking out for their safety. The women have reported they can’t identify their “friends.” This tells me that they are not from the area these women frequent, therefore likely members of the so-called insurgency. They come in to say “I’m not telling you to do this, but….” That gives them cover. They then disappear. If anyone of these “friends” can be apprehended, it would be interesting to find out what connections they have to areas or people associated with the enemy.

Actually, the Iranians wouldn’t be meddling in Iraq if only we hadn’t invaded Iraq. That pesky law of unintended consequences……Saddam was a major counterpoint to the radical mullahs. Oh irony. We (at least tacitly) backed Iraq against Iran–successfully defusing, or at least containing, a Shiite revolution without firing a gun.

Yeah, this is LOTS better.

Regarding Murtha: he HAS BEEN a supporter of the military. Emphasize HAS BEEN. He’s completely lost it.

Regarding Iran: even the possible reconciliation were true in 2003, it’s irrelevant now. Ahmandinijad is now in control.

He said in essence “if I do not see the hostage safely released by the time I am inaugurated, I shall have the entire US armed forces onto Iran.” or something in that nature.

He won by a land slide was a mandate to declare war on IRAN. In fact, the country saved the hostage by electing Reagan.

Actually, the Iranians wouldn’t be meddling in Iraq at all if Jimmy Carter dealt with them when he should have instead of playing chicken until Ronald Reagan decided to run, and then crashing a few of our helicopters in a symbolic gesture in an Iranian desert sandstorm. Jimmy Carter was a politically correct incompetent! Carter’s website claims that HE brought “freedom for the hostages.” JIMMY CARTER IS A LIAR! Carter’s lies and distortions are repulsive, and can be read at http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.org/documents/hostages.phtml

When Iran took American hostages from our embassy and held them for 444 days, Carter should have met that act of war (the embassy is “U.S. soil,” remember!) with an ultimatum and immediate military response. Instead, we got the usual liberal idiotic drivel, leading us to have to deal with a far stronger, more organized and FAR more dangerous Iran.

RONALD REAGAN “rescued” the hostages, who were released because the Iranians knew that Reagan would act. They were freed by Reagan merely running against Carter!