Yale has its Taliban, Princeton gets its Red Army Faction thug

posted at 9:48 pm on June 17, 2006 by Bryan

Former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer is leaving Germany for the US, where he will become a professor at Princeton University.

This should tell us all something about Princeton: Fischer was an implacable opponent of the US-led invasion of Iraq from the beginning. Davids Medienkritik has much more about that. But that’s not what really interests me.

After he became Foreign Minister a few years ago, the late Michael Kelly wrote a very interesting bio of Mr. Fischer. Kelly was not a fan of the new German Foreign Minister, and with very good reason.

In 2001, Stern magazine published five photographs of you in action that day. What these pictures depicted was described by Berman, in a deeply informed 25,000-word article, “The Passion of Joschka Fischer” (The New Republic, Sept. 3, 2001). The photos showed you, Mr. Fischer, inflicting a “gruesome beating” on a young policeman named Rainer Marx: “Fischer and other people on the attack, the white-helmeted cop going into a crouch; Fischer’s black-gloved fist raised as if to punch the crouching cop on the back; Fischer’s comrades crowding around; the cop huddled on the ground, Fischer and his comrades appearing to kick him …”

As Berman reported, Mr. Fischer, you rose in public life as an important figure in the anti-American, anti-liberal, neo-Marxist, revolution-minded German radical left of the generation of 1968. This was the left that produced and supported the Baader-Meinhof Gang (or Red Army Faction), which, as Berman wrote, “refrained from nothing,” including “kidnappings, bank holdups, murders.” You were not a terrorist yourself, but you were a good and active friend to terrorists, weren’t you, Mr. Fischer?

In 1976, to protest the death in prison of Baader-Meinhof founder Ulrike Meinhof, you planned and participated in a Frankfurt demonstration in which, Berman wrote, “somebody tossed a Molotov cocktail at a policeman and burned him nearly to death.” You were arrested, but not charged. In 2001, Meinhof’s daughter, Bettina Rohl (who gave those damning photos to Stern) told the press that you were responsible for the throwing of that firebomb. Other contemporary witnesses, Berman reported, said that you “had never ruled out the use of Molotovs and may even have favored it.” You denied it, for the record.

Fischer also had ties to Yasser Arafat, inventor of the airplane hijacking:

Fischer was accused of having attended a meeting of the Palestine Liberation Organization in Algiers back in 1969, at which the PLO adopted a resolution to achieve final victory, which is to say, the destruction of Israel. That was not so good, and seemed triply bad for a future foreign minister of Germany, even if no one threw rocks or bombs. The ministry spokesman conceded that Fischer did attend the conference; but, doing his best to cope with one more embarrassing revelation, the spokesman made the mistake of adding that Fischer had spent only an hour there, which was like admitting to using marijuana but not to inhaling it. And, of course, the part about spending only an hour turned out to be untrue, and the spokesman, backtracking, had to acknowledge that, yes, Fischer had participated throughout.

Very nice. Princeton is bringing a former terrorist, more or less, and one who holds no academic credentials, to become its newest professor this fall.

What seems to have happened is the drug-addled students who held university sit-ins in the 60s have now taken over the institutions from within. And they’re hiring their old allies. In the case of the Taliban thug at Yale, they’re also educating their ideological children. It’s a sweet little family joined by hatred of Western values.

If that’s not what’s going on, then why are these Ivy League institutions hiring or allowing in high-school dropouts with no credentials? Ideological kinship is the only explanation that satisfies.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Good thing I’m middle-class and can’t afford to send my kids to that worthless school.

Mortis on June 17, 2006 at 9:56 PM

IVY league has become liberals’ main field for seeding and grooming of future leaders ( economic, commerical, and political) for the Democratic Party.

I tell you, man, they are organized. If you think the liberals are just a bunch of Yahoo, you are so wrong. The control of the MSM, Hollywood, and schools are part of the major strategy leading to the control of the country. This has been used many times in the past by the communists and it worked!

easy87us on June 17, 2006 at 10:03 PM

America, why are you complaining?

You wanted a complete, total, uncontrolled “freedom” of speech, you got it.

You let all sorts of people come in, from terrorists to illegal immigrants, so don’t cry now saying “why we let them in?”

America, bear the consequences of your actions.

You’re only accelerating your demise.

Sorry, but I con’t feel sorry for you, idiot country.

CatholicConservative on June 17, 2006 at 10:17 PM

Catholic, because of spineless conservatives, in past thirty years the country was run by liberals.

We have taken back the Supreme Court, we have control of the House, now we must take back the Senate and the Oval Office.

Then we must use our budgets to change the freaking school system to rid of political activists. Step by step we can take back the country. It will take time but we will prevail.

Don’t blame the entire country for the mishaps in past thirty years.

If you truly love this country, then you have to love Her unconditionally.

Be optimisstic, because we are winning, finally.

easy87us on June 17, 2006 at 10:32 PM

easy87us,

We had the “Oval Office” and Congress for how many years now?

“Take back”? Then all these years were a waste. America suffered because of the Clinton and the Bush families.

America that I blame is Washington D.C.

America that I blame is the America of those who ran and are still running it.

Washington D.C. clowns are destroying America.

I do not see any hope in them or in anybody else.

Very few are those who truly love America, and put her before their personal ambition, but unfortunately they are not popular among the clowns of D.C. nor among the population, and they don’t have the power to make a change.

A third Party is much needed.

A truly Conservative Party must be formed if we want to save this country.

Enough of hypocrisy and lies.

CatholicConservative on June 17, 2006 at 10:57 PM

Right, CC. You’re a troll or deluded if you think a third party has a chance of doing anything but losing the election for conservatives.

We’re conservatives. Incremental change. Within the system. Nice and easy.

see-dubya on June 17, 2006 at 11:02 PM

EZ87,
I agree with you to a point, but not completely. Yes, guys like Ward Churchill appear to be against the ropes, but he’s not down yet. Stay tuned. There has to be some sort of a fake indian race card to be played. In the olden days, they used to carve fake indians. Now they are professors.

Joshka Fischer threw REAL fire bombs, but the left throws figurative fire bombs every single day via the increasingly shrill Democrat Pary and their official mouthpiece, the drive by media. They have been emboldened because they know the USA will not smash them because al Jazerra and al CNN and al CBS have not been blown to smithereens. How unfortunate.

But, on the optimistic side, all of these d-bags have lost credibility with anyone in this country with half a brain, which is apparently about 51% of the voting population at the moment. Their viewership is in the crapper. NYTimes is hemmorhaging money and their subscriptions are down, big time. Air America is being proppped up by someone whose money could be used for greater things, like building me a nice house in the country.

I’m not really sure what my point is, but when you have Nancy Pelosi respond to the question, ‘do the Dems in the House of Representatives align themselves more closely with John Murtha (yo, Marines, hike up your skirts and run like little girls from Iraq) or Hillary Clinton (no defined exit date)?’ Her response was ‘definitely, yes, I don’t know, um, maybe’. That’s the kind of leadership I’m looking for. Unless I have something serious to accomplish, like flipping burgers at McDonalds.

pistolero on June 17, 2006 at 11:09 PM

The Long March Through the Institutions continues…

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1893554090/002-1757864-9283267?v=glance&n=283155

All part of the Frankfort School of Marxism – revolution from within…

wordwarp on June 18, 2006 at 12:02 AM

What next? A member of Hamas for Harvard?
Oh that happened? Ah frack!

Defector01 on June 18, 2006 at 12:47 AM

Once a terrorist, always a terrorist.

RolandHall on June 18, 2006 at 3:43 AM

Angela Davis, former revolutionary asshole, is a full professor at a California university. No qualifications beyond her “struggle” against “the man”. Lifetime tenure and an excellent salary give her a podium to spread lunacy daily. No qualifications.

clyde on June 18, 2006 at 9:03 AM

The thing that constantly amazes me about idiots who profess love for socialism is that they are often considered “intellectual” (see: American college professorial ranks). If someone is supposedly “intellectual”, doesn’t that mean they can read? If so, they can’t avoid the fact that Communism has failed everywhere it’s been instituted. Even China has begun heavy reliance on capitalism in today’s modern world. WHY is there such a devotion to a ponzi scheme? Makes no sense. Maybe it’s just the fact that these people are morons is being overlooked. Not, however, by Princeton, who is hiring a moron, since moronic beliefs obviously qualify one to be a professor there.

clyde on June 18, 2006 at 10:11 AM

While I agree that children are better off WITHOUT a “college education” today rather than being pummeled by atrocious leftist drivel, the only “education” offered by the left is total indoctrination and intimidation. The problem, however, does not lie only on the left.

How many elitists on the conservative side send their kids to these institutions of hate because they want their kids to wear an Ivy League label? TOO MANY! While the professors, curriculums and teachings in these places are openly and putridly leftist, nevertheless “conservative thinkers” send their kids to these garbage dumps and then complain that they’re biased, etc.

What we need are colleges and universities to COUNTER places like Princeton and Yale! And there’s plenty of “conservative money” available for this. Instead of bitching, conservatives should vote with their wallets. We created talk radio and Fox, why not “right wing” institutions of higher learning?

And the first professors we hire might be Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, et al.

ForYourEdification on June 18, 2006 at 11:03 AM

“The thing that constantly amazes me about idiots who profess love for socialism is that they are often considered ‘intellectual….’”

Clyde,

I actually have come to the belief that the words don’t matter to these people. Let’s look at it this way. The reason Socialism and Communism is professed by so many “intellectuals” is that Nazism is dead. It doesn’t matter what ideology they “profess,” they choose to fight against the only good government, democratic republicanism. Why? Look at them as an example. They claim solidarity with the so-called masses, yet live in Hyannisport. They claim solidarity with the worker, yet do no labor. They claim all wealth is to be given to the people, yet have millions at their disposal. They agitate for mass transportation for you, yet still use SUVs, limos, and personal jets.

No, clearly they hold no ideology except one. Power. It’s the power they crave. They want unlimited, ultimate power for themselves and in a democratic republic, that’s unavailable to anyone. No one can be Caesar in Washington. Until our government is so corrupted – and it isn’t yet, not by a longshot – they cannot rule as they wish. They must use those other failed ideologies to attract adherents. They are arrogant because they believe they alone should rule and all others must obey. All their talk is a cover for their hatred for freedom and their fellow citizens, nothing more.

ScottG on June 18, 2006 at 1:12 PM

Edification said: We created talk radio and Fox, why not “right wing” institutions of higher learning?

Wouldn’t that be great? Can’t imagine that it will ever happen. our best chance to end the practice of tenure so these idiot “intellectual professors” can be fired when they lie to their students in the name of “teaching.” Make them be honest.

pullingmyhairout on June 18, 2006 at 1:27 PM

I understand exactly why people call the Ivy League schools useless and say that they would never send their kids there — even if they could afford it. However, as a Cornell student, I’d like to beg you to encourage your kids to go to these liberal institutions. How else are we supposed to regain control if not from within? There actually are strong conservative movements on these campuses that could achieve a lot more if given the manpower.

tiekitwist on June 18, 2006 at 3:26 PM

I never thought about the power angle, but I think you’re right. However, these jerks already have the power, and are protected by tenure. Sort of like civil service, you can do virtually anything and not be fired. America is stuck with idiots like these teaching until they die, and are replaced by other idiots of like mind. And the music goes round and round…

clyde on June 18, 2006 at 4:55 PM

CatholicCon….I am not trying to appear optimisstic because I truly am.

In 1994 we took back the House. But our party is still full of Republicans that took money from the same group of contributors that contribute to the Demo party. These contributors controlled both party so whoever win they could still do business as normal. Many in the GOP are actually RINOs. Because of the background politics the true conservative Republicans cannot do a thing without the support of the RINOs! This condition last until…this year!

The consrvative House has blocked the nomination of Harriet Mier. We took Bush head on on the port deal. We already enjoyed the first Supreme Court victory of a 5-4 decision on the no-knock case. Then came the Bilbray’s victory. Because of our strong control of the House, the Amnesty bill is dead and gone for sure.

The tide has turned. That is why I am surprised that so few understand the significance of Bilbray’s victory.

Bilbray is a rebel, a true conservative running on pure conservative platform. He was shunted by Bush, stabbed in the back by McCain, dragged down by the Minutemen, and carry the burden of that foolish Cunningham. But he still won by 5%!

Bilbray showed that we don’t need the RINO money to win! Now that is significant!

We don’t need a conservative party because GOP is now a true consevative party, at least at the House. More and more RINOs will come back to the camp when they realize that they can win without the support of the RINO money.

I think we have won back the spine to the party.

All we need is to make sure the next candidate for the GOP is a true conservative, and that means no Jeb Bush.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 6:01 PM

Easy,
Who do you suggest run in 08? I’d love to hear your thoughts.
xoxo

pullingmyhairout on June 18, 2006 at 8:21 PM

easy87us,

Bear in mind that the House is up for re-election.

Can the American people wait every 2 or 4 years for their Congressman or woman, for their President do the will of those who elected him/her because he/she is afraid of losing POWER?

See, the whole thing is about POWER and Money, naturally.

Point to me one politician who cares about American and would do the will of those who elected him or her regardless of whether he or she is up for re-election or not.

If there’s one or some, they are drown in the large tide of corruption that is the nature of Washington D.C.

We need new faces, new TRUE conservatives who are not touched by corruption, who love America and would give themselves gratuitously to serve this country and those who elected them.

Until when America will wait for those current corrupted politicians to do the will of the people?

Personally, I’m fed up with them, with their partisanship that is leading to nothing in favor of America, with their search of personal interests, and with their corruption.

Enough is enough.

CatholicConservative on June 18, 2006 at 10:09 PM

PullingMyHairOut…I like someone who has an established conservative background, not from Texas, and is a grassroot guy. That means he must not belong to the beltway. He must have good governing experience and also know the politics well. He should look good and tall and be presentable.

One person comes to my mind…Senator George Allen.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 10:49 PM

Catholic,

Relax. We shall fix it one day at a time. As long as we have people like Michelle and Ann around to keep us happy, I am always full of optimism.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 11:21 PM