Do you know how to make money from AdSense automatically? You don’t!? I’ll teach you how!…

0NL1NEP0KER99821213454 …

H00DIAP1L1S00123 …

PEN1SENLARGEMENTNEW001 …

To tell you the truth, I never even heard of him until he started making the “pull out before we win” statements, and then he started calling Iraq a quagmire constantly comparing it to Vietnam and finally he stabbed our troops in the back by condemning them and smearing the Marines.

HE MUST BE STOPPED.

EVERY PENNY SENT TO DEFEAT HIM IS MONEY WELL SPENT!

https://www.donationreport.com/init/controller/ProcessEntryCmd?key=L1M1P2P9O3

Even if she doesn’t win, it will help drain Murtha’s funds.

Rep. Jack Murtha has become the Democrats’ voice on the War in Iraq because of his decorated service as a Marine. His status as a heroic veteran has stifled some of the criticism, but that will not hold out (see…

Put him in the wax museum – right next to Cindy.

I question all three everytime he opens his mouth. Murtha must be kept in some kind of reasonable context. He was a war hero, NOW he is a politician using his war hero status to further his political career. Didn’t he just throw his hat into the ring for a leadership position in his party? One that he was asked to put on hold? And wcarr, who wrote above, is right of course; there is obvious animosity towards the Marines and the military in general from this guy.

Our military exists to protect this country and complete the missions given to them by their civilian leaders. Their mission, their purpose, their existence as soldiers, are one and the same. How can anyone possibly support our troops and not support their missions around the world? That is a rhetorical question here at HotAir, but for Murtha, it is one that should be answered and answered honestly; if that is a value he still holds.

Though Murtha’s resolution does not indicate the source of the cited poll numbers, it appears that the data originated from a private poll of Iraqi opinion commissioned by Great Britain’s Ministry of Defense (MOD) in August. As an October 23 article in the British newspaper The Sunday Telegraph noted, the poll found, among other things, that “[f]orty-five per cent of Iraqis believe attacks against British and American troops are justified” and that “82 per cent are ’strongly opposed’ to the presence of coalition troops.” While this poll apparently did not specifically ask respondents to indicate support for immediate U.S. troop withdrawal, earlier polls have. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll (subscription required) interviewing 3,444 Iraqis in the spring of 2004 found that 57 percent of Iraqis thought “the U.S. and British forces ought to leave in the next few months,” with 71 percent of Iraqis viewing the U.S. military “mostly as occupiers.” As The Washington Post reported on May 13, another poll, which was commissioned by the U.S.-led coalition and also conducted during spring 2004, indicated that “[f]our out of five Iraqis report holding a negative view of the U.S. occupation authority and of coalition forces” and that “82 percent said they disapprove of the U.S. and allied militaries in Iraq.” In January 2005, Zogby International released the results of its Iraqi public opinion poll, which was conducted in conjunction with Abu Dhabi Television. It also found that, of the 805 Iraqis interviewed, “[m]ajorities of both Sunni Arabs (82%) and Shiites (69%) … favor U.S. forces withdrawing either immediately or after an elected government is in place”; 53 percent supported attacks on coalition troops; and only the Iraqi Kurds favored the “continued U.S. presence.”

And of course – it’s a poll, which means it’s skewed, reflective of the opinion of the pollster moreso than those polled. As Stalin said, it’s not the voters that matter, it’s the person who counts the votes. Apply it to these polls – Murtha’s death grip on a single poll number on a question that was not asked is beyond comprehension. But then again, when have liberals been concerned with facts…

NEWS: – Grand Jury Declines to Indict Rep. McKinney in Police Scuffle – Illegal Hiring Is Rarely Penalized – Letter urges Bush to join House bill – Snow: Bush Will Not Let Polls Dictate Iraq War Strategy – Efforts to……

I would love to see General Washington, Patton, MacArthur address the cowards of the United Staes like this idiot. Add to that..Kerry, kennedy, Kucinich too.

If the founding Fathers coule see what America is becoming, where cowardice, treason, and cheering for the enemy (plus the murder of millions of babies, suppression of Christianity) would be allowed and praised…they would have said “Screw it”…

“1% of the American people… that’s who’s fighting this war” followed by “…Our inability to prevent another war because we don’t have the resources. A fifty billion backlog of equipment shortages…” Now does he expect that we wouldn’t expand the size of our military in the event of another war? What happened to the WWII mentality?

“They have a 1,000 foreign fighters. This is a civil war.”
0_o ?!?!?
Um… foreign fighters I thought would imply an invasion, not a civil war. Maybe I’m the crazy one.

I can’t believe he thinks we should be there for oil:
“All of us know how important it is internationally to win this war. We know how impor- We import 20 million barrels of oil a day”. So this really is a war for oil for him.

I also think measuring victory by electric, gas and water production is funny.

“We can’t win this militarily” are words that on real marine would ever utter. I know. And if he was a Lcpl under me, I’d have him cleaning toilets till we won this war.

Wish I had more time, but his 20+ min interview is too full of bizarre statements and contradiction. I really need to get back to work.

I swear, John Murtha and his “cut and run” Democrats are absolutely clueless when it comes to the military. On Meet The Press yesterday, Murtha gives his usual speech about redeploying our troops in Iraq “over the horizon”. What’s his idea of “…

I was in Germany at the time working AF Security, and we were activated for mobilization in response to the Beirut bombing. We spent about a week gearing up and getting ready to roll, probably to North Africa, where we would have supported air operations. We had a final meeting scheduled the night before we were supposed to fly out, and that was when we were told we weren’t going.

Next thing I knew, we’re invading Grenada, and packing out of Beirut. Later we come to find that we’re selling weapons to Iran, the sponsors of the Beirut murders.

That will never sit right with me. It’s little wonder they don’t respect us or fear us. We’ve just kept showing them our soft pink underbelly and letting them stab away at it. You’d expect that from Carter, but not from Reagan.

Somolia & Beirut are militay victories?
Losing an election is a win for them?

With that logic tax increases create more revenue, oops somemore bizzro logic.

When we are fighting the Islamic terrorists, what comes to your mind?

I tell you what comes to my mind. It is all about a religion gone wild! In the middle age we have the Crusade ( the Christians went wild), now we have Islam!

I have to give credit to the Christian because they have made tremendous growth to become a civilized religion in past 500 years. But Islam have not made that transition amid huge progress was made in the field of science.

We are not fighting a religious war because we are not fighting under a banner of a religion. May be most of the troops are Christian but we must be careful not to have religion mixed up with our mission.

Our mission is to fight terrorism that happens to originate mostly from Islam.

Our country must learn from this era. Religion is not a good thing when people blindly obey the religious leader and put their faith above all else.

Christian right must bear this in mind.

Christians must accept the fact that majority of the world do not accept Jesus as God. If they force this issue then they are no better than Islam.

Conservatives in America must be opened to all sects, all races and all classes of people.