<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Zarqawi safehouse document bogus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: house plant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-616962</link>
		<dc:creator>house plant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-616962</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;house plant...&lt;/strong&gt;

Cambrian House is a very interesting idea - crowdsourced software....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>house plant&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Cambrian House is a very interesting idea &#8211; crowdsourced software&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RolandHall</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-19405</link>
		<dc:creator>RolandHall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-19405</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dan Rather’s brilliant.&quot;

You made milk come out my nose and I wasn&#039;t even drinkin&#039; any milk.  I&#039;ll bet it hurt when you wrote that.

&quot;Bush lied: al-Zarqawi isn’t dead. Neither is Elvis.&quot;

True, but unlike al-Zarqawi, Elvis left the building.

&quot;I hope the F-16 Pilot who dropped his load on the Zman’s not-so-safehouse said right before he pushed the release button “Hey terrorist, terrorize THIS!” &quot;

Or better yet, الله هو الشّيطان
Translated: Allah is Satan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dan Rather’s brilliant.&#8221;</p>
<p>You made milk come out my nose and I wasn&#8217;t even drinkin&#8217; any milk.  I&#8217;ll bet it hurt when you wrote that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bush lied: al-Zarqawi isn’t dead. Neither is Elvis.&#8221;</p>
<p>True, but unlike al-Zarqawi, Elvis left the building.</p>
<p>&#8220;I hope the F-16 Pilot who dropped his load on the Zman’s not-so-safehouse said right before he pushed the release button “Hey terrorist, terrorize THIS!” &#8221;</p>
<p>Or better yet, الله هو الشّيطان<br />
Translated: Allah is Satan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18919</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18919</guid>
		<description>Agreed!

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18817</link>
		<dc:creator>dman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18817</guid>
		<description>GT: My comment wasn&#039;t clear enough - no problem.  Let&#039;s just hope that the info recovered from Z is a real body blow to AQ, regardless of whether this piece is real or planted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT: My comment wasn&#8217;t clear enough &#8211; no problem.  Let&#8217;s just hope that the info recovered from Z is a real body blow to AQ, regardless of whether this piece is real or planted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18796</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18796</guid>
		<description>Ah....

My apologies for misunderstanding.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;.</p>
<p>My apologies for misunderstanding.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18758</link>
		<dc:creator>dman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18758</guid>
		<description>(I was being sarcastic, GT.  Propaganda is an integral part of warfare.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I was being sarcastic, GT.  Propaganda is an integral part of warfare.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoisyRoom.net &#187; Is the Zarqawi safehouse document bogus?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18604</link>
		<dc:creator>NoisyRoom.net &#187; Is the Zarqawi safehouse document bogus?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18604</guid>
		<description>[...] Courtesy of Hot Air: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Courtesy of Hot Air: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18587</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18587</guid>
		<description>&quot;Right on, Shmo. What’s a little propaganda amongst friends?&quot;

Ask the WW2 generation.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Right on, Shmo. What’s a little propaganda amongst friends?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ask the WW2 generation.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18550</link>
		<dc:creator>dman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18550</guid>
		<description>Right on, Shmo.  What&#039;s a little propaganda amongst friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Shmo.  What&#8217;s a little propaganda amongst friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paranoid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18546</link>
		<dc:creator>Paranoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18546</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alleged, dubious, questionable, so-called, suspect, suspicious...&lt;/strong&gt;

Master Shake asks &quot;why more hasn&#039;t been made of&quot; the document detailing the insurgents de......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alleged, dubious, questionable, so-called, suspect, suspicious&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Master Shake asks &#8220;why more hasn&#8217;t been made of&#8221; the document detailing the insurgents de&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shmo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18532</link>
		<dc:creator>Shmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18532</guid>
		<description>Fake or not...I don&#039;t care.  Different things happen in war; Some legit, some planted.  As long as the document contributes to our cause, I&#039;m good.

I still can&#039;t believe how someone can convince themselves that turning the clock back 500 years is what is best for the world.  It takes Jim Jones to a sick new level. I guess centuries of humiliation and irrelevance takes a toll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake or not&#8230;I don&#8217;t care.  Different things happen in war; Some legit, some planted.  As long as the document contributes to our cause, I&#8217;m good.</p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t believe how someone can convince themselves that turning the clock back 500 years is what is best for the world.  It takes Jim Jones to a sick new level. I guess centuries of humiliation and irrelevance takes a toll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18523</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18523</guid>
		<description>Bin Laden and Zarqawi belong/ed:) to the Salafy branch of Sunni Islam, which is highly intolerant of Shiites.

Most Iranians are Shiites, but they consider themselves superior to the Iraqi Shiites. However, they are still &#039;brothers&#039;. Difficult for the U.S. to tango with Iran. There are advantages and disadvantages from so many angles.

Whether the document is authentic or not, most important are the statistics in the StrategyPage - over 1000 captured or dead and counting, valuable information for weeks to come, gaining the upper hand tactically and in the media: ours, the Arabic one, and other (yes, the Guardian too, not that it matters). Best of all to have the terrorists guessing and on the defensive.

And what to say about Mr. Murtha shouting yesterday &quot;...we can&#039;t win militarily...bla, bla, bla&quot;? And Ms. Pelosi. And all the despairing groups on the Left, the U.N., the world really (not all of it but a good chunk of it).

This will give the Sunday talks fodder and the &#039;fly-over&#039; section of the country will read into the eagerness with which the usual suspects focus on the negative and the &#039;but..and what if&#039;, instead of the facts.

Be pure, be for good, and be happy! Things are going surprisingly well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bin Laden and Zarqawi belong/ed:) to the Salafy branch of Sunni Islam, which is highly intolerant of Shiites.</p>
<p>Most Iranians are Shiites, but they consider themselves superior to the Iraqi Shiites. However, they are still &#8216;brothers&#8217;. Difficult for the U.S. to tango with Iran. There are advantages and disadvantages from so many angles.</p>
<p>Whether the document is authentic or not, most important are the statistics in the StrategyPage &#8211; over 1000 captured or dead and counting, valuable information for weeks to come, gaining the upper hand tactically and in the media: ours, the Arabic one, and other (yes, the Guardian too, not that it matters). Best of all to have the terrorists guessing and on the defensive.</p>
<p>And what to say about Mr. Murtha shouting yesterday &#8220;&#8230;we can&#8217;t win militarily&#8230;bla, bla, bla&#8221;? And Ms. Pelosi. And all the despairing groups on the Left, the U.N., the world really (not all of it but a good chunk of it).</p>
<p>This will give the Sunday talks fodder and the &#8216;fly-over&#8217; section of the country will read into the eagerness with which the usual suspects focus on the negative and the &#8216;but..and what if&#8217;, instead of the facts.</p>
<p>Be pure, be for good, and be happy! Things are going surprisingly well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csjd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18516</link>
		<dc:creator>csjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18516</guid>
		<description>Oh my God, the document is a fake? I feel so used and abused. And I didn&#039;t know Mary Mapes was even in Iraq last week . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God, the document is a fake? I feel so used and abused. And I didn&#8217;t know Mary Mapes was even in Iraq last week . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18483</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18483</guid>
		<description>Is it safe to assume that Ledeen is own our side?  If the document is fake, why broadcast that point when the documents supports your side?  If it was faked by the CIA, there was a purpose behind it.  And assuming the CIA is opposed to the terrorists and the Iranians, why hinder the PsyOp by announcing it during the war and give the liberal Democrats more fodder to throw at Bush?

Am I missing something here?

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it safe to assume that Ledeen is own our side?  If the document is fake, why broadcast that point when the documents supports your side?  If it was faked by the CIA, there was a purpose behind it.  And assuming the CIA is opposed to the terrorists and the Iranians, why hinder the PsyOp by announcing it during the war and give the liberal Democrats more fodder to throw at Bush?</p>
<p>Am I missing something here?</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocket's Brain Trust</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18474</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocket's Brain Trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18474</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IRAQ -  MSM Key Patsies in AQ Strategic Planning...&lt;/strong&gt;

HT Dr. Sanity

RBT has said for a number of years that the MSM is cheerleading and rooting for the enemy in the GWOT.

Apparently this has not gone unnoticed by AQ.  In fact the use of the MSM in the war of information has becom......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IRAQ &#8211;  MSM Key Patsies in AQ Strategic Planning&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>HT Dr. Sanity</p>
<p>RBT has said for a number of years that the MSM is cheerleading and rooting for the enemy in the GWOT.</p>
<p>Apparently this has not gone unnoticed by AQ.  In fact the use of the MSM in the war of information has becom&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18437</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18437</guid>
		<description>Regardless of whether this document is real, it is still without question that in the days leading up to the attack that turned Zarqawi into worm food that we received a lot of invaluable intelligence, and recovered even more thereafter.  There were 17 raids conducted nearly concurrently with the bombing of Zarqawi&#039;s love shack and there have been many more since then, and that is not merely a coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether this document is real, it is still without question that in the days leading up to the attack that turned Zarqawi into worm food that we received a lot of invaluable intelligence, and recovered even more thereafter.  There were 17 raids conducted nearly concurrently with the bombing of Zarqawi&#8217;s love shack and there have been many more since then, and that is not merely a coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18432</link>
		<dc:creator>dman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18432</guid>
		<description>Bush lied:  al-Zarqawi isn&#039;t dead.  Neither is Elvis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush lied:  al-Zarqawi isn&#8217;t dead.  Neither is Elvis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18393</link>
		<dc:creator>EFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18393</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm.  I am not going to address the issue of the language style (lack of the term &quot;crusader&quot; or &quot;rejectionist&quot;) in the document, or the fact tht it seems to have a memo style to it.  I haven&#039;t analyzed any originals, so I can&#039;t speak about that.

But, from the point of view of a Sunni Terrorist named Zarqawi, would the memo make sense?  Perhaps.

Would things be much tougher for the U.S. if we had to fight a ground war in Iran and Iraq at the same time?  Yes, so this could be to Zarqawi&#039;s advantage.  This is why I could see him wanting to have Iran involved in the ground battle.

Some have brought up the fact that them memo mentions all the help that Iran is providing to the U.S in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Kinda out of my area of experise, but Zarqawi is a Sunni, and hates Shiites only slightly less than Americans, correct?  He has tried to get a Sunni / Shiite civil war going on.  Perhaps he mistrusts the Iranian shiites and thinks they are helping us more than they really are.  What if the Iranians are cracking down on, or at least not giving Zaraqawi as much help as he would like?  Might he then not misiterpret this as meaning that the Iranian were working with the Americans against him?  The Iranians are supporting the insurgency.  But perhaps they are keeping Zarqawi at a distance and are helping the Shiite and Sunni local insuregents, as opposed to the foreign terrorists?  And might this not make Zarqawi suspicious?

Crud.  This sort of topic needs a lot of time to make sense out of.  And I don&#039;t have that time.  But, I think a lot of people are trying to make this document fit into THEIR own world view.  This is why the Moonbats automatically think it is proof that &quot;Bush lied, people died.  CIA fake.&quot;  And since we are convinced that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and needs to be stopped, anything that contradicts that is seen as suspicious.  So we react very negatively to a memo that says something that could give moonbats ammo to use against us.

But if we look at this from the point of view of Zarqawi, it seems to make a little more sense.  IMHO.

Also, remember, just because Zarqawi says to invent fake evidence that iran is making nukes doesn&#039;t mean that Iran isn&#039;t making nukes.  And I don&#039;t think it is likely that Iran would let Zarqawi know anything about its own nuke program.  They would almost certainly keep all that information from him as much as possible.  So any &quot;information&quot; that Zarqawi would leak about Iran&#039;s nuculear ambitions would have to be fake, correct?

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm.  I am not going to address the issue of the language style (lack of the term &#8220;crusader&#8221; or &#8220;rejectionist&#8221;) in the document, or the fact tht it seems to have a memo style to it.  I haven&#8217;t analyzed any originals, so I can&#8217;t speak about that.</p>
<p>But, from the point of view of a Sunni Terrorist named Zarqawi, would the memo make sense?  Perhaps.</p>
<p>Would things be much tougher for the U.S. if we had to fight a ground war in Iran and Iraq at the same time?  Yes, so this could be to Zarqawi&#8217;s advantage.  This is why I could see him wanting to have Iran involved in the ground battle.</p>
<p>Some have brought up the fact that them memo mentions all the help that Iran is providing to the U.S in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Kinda out of my area of experise, but Zarqawi is a Sunni, and hates Shiites only slightly less than Americans, correct?  He has tried to get a Sunni / Shiite civil war going on.  Perhaps he mistrusts the Iranian shiites and thinks they are helping us more than they really are.  What if the Iranians are cracking down on, or at least not giving Zaraqawi as much help as he would like?  Might he then not misiterpret this as meaning that the Iranian were working with the Americans against him?  The Iranians are supporting the insurgency.  But perhaps they are keeping Zarqawi at a distance and are helping the Shiite and Sunni local insuregents, as opposed to the foreign terrorists?  And might this not make Zarqawi suspicious?</p>
<p>Crud.  This sort of topic needs a lot of time to make sense out of.  And I don&#8217;t have that time.  But, I think a lot of people are trying to make this document fit into THEIR own world view.  This is why the Moonbats automatically think it is proof that &#8220;Bush lied, people died.  CIA fake.&#8221;  And since we are convinced that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and needs to be stopped, anything that contradicts that is seen as suspicious.  So we react very negatively to a memo that says something that could give moonbats ammo to use against us.</p>
<p>But if we look at this from the point of view of Zarqawi, it seems to make a little more sense.  IMHO.</p>
<p>Also, remember, just because Zarqawi says to invent fake evidence that iran is making nukes doesn&#8217;t mean that Iran isn&#8217;t making nukes.  And I don&#8217;t think it is likely that Iran would let Zarqawi know anything about its own nuke program.  They would almost certainly keep all that information from him as much as possible.  So any &#8220;information&#8221; that Zarqawi would leak about Iran&#8217;s nuculear ambitions would have to be fake, correct?</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iblis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18382</link>
		<dc:creator>Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18382</guid>
		<description>Given how the Z-man was working with the mullahs (Iranian that is) I think its quite possible Zarq had a doc exonerating them, they know how the MSM and moonbats would cudgel Bush with it if he had to use force against the mullahs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how the Z-man was working with the mullahs (Iranian that is) I think its quite possible Zarq had a doc exonerating them, they know how the MSM and moonbats would cudgel Bush with it if he had to use force against the mullahs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18365</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18365</guid>
		<description>New headline: Is the A.P. bogus? Is CNN bogus? Is the NYT bogus? etc etc.

They think &quot;We don&#039;t like it, therefore it can&#039;t be true!&quot;

I think &quot;Zarqawi. Now where do I know that name from? Zarqawi, Zarqawi, I know I&#039;ve heard that name before. Oh yeah, he&#039;s that DEAD guy!&quot;

I hope the F-16 Pilot who dropped his load on the Zman&#039;s not-so-safehouse said right before he pushed the release button &quot;Hey terrorist, terrorize THIS!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New headline: Is the A.P. bogus? Is CNN bogus? Is the NYT bogus? etc etc.</p>
<p>They think &#8220;We don&#8217;t like it, therefore it can&#8217;t be true!&#8221;</p>
<p>I think &#8220;Zarqawi. Now where do I know that name from? Zarqawi, Zarqawi, I know I&#8217;ve heard that name before. Oh yeah, he&#8217;s that DEAD guy!&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope the F-16 Pilot who dropped his load on the Zman&#8217;s not-so-safehouse said right before he pushed the release button &#8220;Hey terrorist, terrorize THIS!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18358</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18358</guid>
		<description>DPR -- Who&#039;s &quot;they&quot;?  You realize that Michael Ledeen is a famous neoconservative, right?  He&#039;s not on the other side.  Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPR &#8212; Who&#8217;s &#8220;they&#8221;?  You realize that Michael Ledeen is a famous neoconservative, right?  He&#8217;s not on the other side.  Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dread Pirate Roberts VI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dread Pirate Roberts VI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18356</guid>
		<description>Reality Check!

Of course the documents are bogus!

The Iraq War&#039;s a mess and we’re losing! 
9-11 was a plot by disgruntled air traffic controllers who were fired by Reagan!
Hillary will make a great president and her ankles are not too thick!
More often that not, Kerry really does wear the pants in his family, usually!
Ann Coulter&#039;s a skank!
MM&#039;s hot!
We&#039;re all Nazis
The planet&#039;s under attack!
If we cut oil consumption by 50% the price would drop 50%
Dan Rather&#039;s brilliant.

Need I go on!

(Hey it’s nice to know that there’s still one thing we can all agree upon!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality Check!</p>
<p>Of course the documents are bogus!</p>
<p>The Iraq War&#8217;s a mess and we’re losing!<br />
9-11 was a plot by disgruntled air traffic controllers who were fired by Reagan!<br />
Hillary will make a great president and her ankles are not too thick!<br />
More often that not, Kerry really does wear the pants in his family, usually!<br />
Ann Coulter&#8217;s a skank!<br />
MM&#8217;s hot!<br />
We&#8217;re all Nazis<br />
The planet&#8217;s under attack!<br />
If we cut oil consumption by 50% the price would drop 50%<br />
Dan Rather&#8217;s brilliant.</p>
<p>Need I go on!</p>
<p>(Hey it’s nice to know that there’s still one thing we can all agree upon!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Java Zen:Thinking Out Loud</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18340</link>
		<dc:creator>Java Zen:Thinking Out Loud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fake But Accurate News: More Zarqster Un-safehouse Documents and Items...&lt;/strong&gt;

Secret, covert and High Ranking Officials who wished to remain anonymous stealthily descended on the JZ:TOL campus via Black Helicopters this morning (Guys, next time do this at night so the neighbors don&#8217;t notice.) and revealed some of the detai...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fake But Accurate News: More Zarqster Un-safehouse Documents and Items&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Secret, covert and High Ranking Officials who wished to remain anonymous stealthily descended on the JZ:TOL campus via Black Helicopters this morning (Guys, next time do this at night so the neighbors don&#8217;t notice.) and revealed some of the detai&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18335</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18335</guid>
		<description>I actually find this document fairly believable.

Remember that we don&#039;t know who actually wrote this doc, and much like an internal business doc, was written in bullet format to be clear.

Remember that many of the Wahabists were educated in the West.

As to the tactics described? Very realistic and attempting to use the current Iran/US tension and escalate it further to drive us into a &quot;wider conflict&quot;.  

Remeber that the Islamic world is not really united... it has various leaders trying for supremacy.  Iran and AQ both want control in the end...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually find this document fairly believable.</p>
<p>Remember that we don&#8217;t know who actually wrote this doc, and much like an internal business doc, was written in bullet format to be clear.</p>
<p>Remember that many of the Wahabists were educated in the West.</p>
<p>As to the tactics described? Very realistic and attempting to use the current Iran/US tension and escalate it further to drive us into a &#8220;wider conflict&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Remeber that the Islamic world is not really united&#8230; it has various leaders trying for supremacy.  Iran and AQ both want control in the end&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-18331</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/16/is-the-zarqawi-safehouse-document-bogus/#comment-18331</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beginning Of The End For Al Qaeda In Iraq?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Iraqi National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie seems to think so:

Iraq&#039;s national security adviser said Thursday a &quot;huge treasure&quot; of documents and computer records was seized after the raid on terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi&#039;s hideout, g...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beginning Of The End For Al Qaeda In Iraq?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Iraqi National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie seems to think so:</p>
<p>Iraq&#8217;s national security adviser said Thursday a &#8220;huge treasure&#8221; of documents and computer records was seized after the raid on terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi&#8217;s hideout, g&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
