Coultermania!

posted at 9:46 am on June 16, 2006 by Bryan

AnnCoulter.com
RWN interviews AC
NJ boycott effort
#1 * Buy “Godless”
Special thanks to:
Sanctuary & Expose the Left

Download Vent for your iPod

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Coulter-sycophancy? Most times. Coulter-fetishism? Unfortunately, more and more. Coulter-mania? ……no.

I maintain my opinion: she does make good, valid, worthwhile points and observations, and is extremely literate and a good read; however then, lots of times, she usually [expletive]s-up by appearing to act the snipey smartass on her ‘safe shows’ (vannity, blo’reilly, et.al.).

She used to be better. Her writing is still top-notch but her ‘presence’ is seriously crapping-down.

Has anybody seen her latest book posted yet? I’ve _heard_ that the RTF version is well scanned and checked; but the PDF’ed copy wasn’t adequately spellchecked.

solitas on June 16, 2006 at 10:33 PM

I find her comments- as quoted from the book- as pretty over the top and unnecessarily so to make the point. However, I doubt if it would have opened at #1 and be likely to surpass Al Gore’s piece of video fantasy in gross very quickly (which is what REALLY will chap the Unhinged Left!). And, frankly, I think she’s smart enough to realize that and really enjoys getting rich from the hyperventilation by people she despises.

Mike O on June 17, 2006 at 12:16 AM

I hope no-one minds if I go off topic for a moment:
RobH-as a F-14 Tomcat intructor, you should look around for Deke Slayton’s book, “Deke”-before he was a Mercury Astronaut he was an instructor just as you are; I think you would enjoy the stories he tells of those days during and right after WWII. A great book.

Doug on June 17, 2006 at 12:58 AM

Hey, know what? I’ve been scouring the internet trying to find the dirt Coulter’s heritage and religion, but it is a BIG MYSTERY! Isn’t your curiosity piqued? Who is smart enough to locate this mysterious hidden information and post it here, will earn one internet cookie err.. brownie point, err one moment of internet fame.

From my research on the net, Coulter has some history of making antisemitic remarks. The fact that she hides her heritage will make it all the more juicy when it is published.

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 1:58 AM

Got it. She is a Protestant. see link http://www.nndb.com/people/474/000022408/

Also note she dyes her hair blonde. I am working on her ethnicity now. I wonder what her heritage is. Then we can have a little game of semantics and see how she likes a taste of her own medicine. She’s a Protestant, hmmm…

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 2:12 AM

Aha..getting warmer..the coulter family crest..Scottish name derived from the Gaelic (Hey, isn’t that French?) Ya mean Coulter is a Frog? Well the name does sound French and she does look like a frog…

Hey anybody heard any good French jokes lately? I’ve heard plenty at the freerepublic, ad nauseum. Yes, it might be that Coulter is just an antisemitic French bigot. But wait…could it be that she has Jewish blood? Let’s see….

Oh, here’s the link to the Coulter family crest…

http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/coulter-family-crest.htm

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 3:00 AM

http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/coulter-family-crest.htm

I’m, still digging. It appears that Ann Coulter is a blue blood type, probably insane as a result of inbreeding. Probably a “skull and bones” type like President Bush.

Isn’t this so very interesting? Be scared, very scared, if you have any sense of intuition, think about Coulter, Bush, and where this country is headed.

More Coulter dirt to come, if I find anything of value….

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 3:18 AM

Hey, I just did a google on:

“ann coulter” bush skull and bones

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22ann+coulter%22+bush+skull+and+bones

Now, I don’t go for conspiracy garbage, but one of the first links claims an FBI cover-up that President Bush is a fag…

http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=144878

How about this search:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22ann+coulter%22+bush+illuminati

This webpage claims that Coulter is an agent for the illuminati, a psy ops agent working with Michael Moore. The webpage also claims that Coulter blames the Jews for the holocaust, that she is a vierulent antisemite. WARNING!…the webpage has a virus, so if you don’t have an antivirus program do not visit this link:

http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php3?threadid=169012

Well, enough for now. I think we’ve sussed out this Coulter character. A blue blooded insane WASP (blue bloods go insane from inbreeding, know what I mean, Vern?)

We’ve also learned of some crazy coverup story regarding President Bush having a male partner in college. Well, he did admit to smokin dope ‘n snortin coke…a regular party boy. Yep. Clinton didn’t inhale, Lewinski didn’t swallow, and Bush didn’t blow (any coke, that is ;)

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 3:35 AM

oh my god, michelle, check out this search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=president+bush+%22Victor+Ashe%22&btnG=Search

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 3:58 AM

Ha Ha you’re a freak and we don’t care cry baby aka(Dahvid)
ANN COULTER STILL CAN TAKE YOU ON FREAK…USA ROCKS

alyce on June 17, 2006 at 6:28 AM

Re: Dahvid,

Just another self loathing light in the loafers geek. Cranking out moronic Liberal vitriol on his computer from his mom’s basement. No friends. One of life’s losers.
Oh well.

there it is on June 17, 2006 at 9:57 AM

Dahvid, your anti-european rascism has ben showing through pretty strongly. Anyone you do not agree with you immediatly attack their race, then dismiss them as a troll.
You do not debate their talking points, instead you attack their ehtnicity, appearance and spread slurs and disinformation. You try to sound as if you are a liberated forward thinking person but you actually sound more rascist then a KKK grand dragon.

You are a troll and nothing more. You actually had a chance to make a difference, to have an intelectual discourse with other people here and perhaps sway opinions with a well writtin op ed piece. Your hand wringing and frothing at the mouth though have squandered that chance.

Wyrd on June 17, 2006 at 10:37 AM

Time for the web monitors to clean up this thread.

dman on June 17, 2006 at 11:13 AM

Well my daughter bought me “Godless” for Father’s Day and I have started reading it. I am about 100 pages in and I am just wondering how much further until I reach the part about the “Jersey Girls”. Based on all of the hyperventilating from the left I thought that was all that was in the book.
BTW and this should chill liberals I just helped my daughter get registered to vote as part of her turning 18. The younger generation ain’t buying what ya’ll are selling either.

LakeRuins on June 17, 2006 at 12:25 PM

Shortly after “Godless” came out, Libs bombarded Ann Coulter’s web site chat room with vitriol and harrassing posts. The ACOC suffered a meltdown and was off the web for 72 hours. The web master got it back up but it was attacked again and now it is down–and has been for over a week.

I find this indicative of Liberal behavior. The political philosophy of “feel good tolerance” only operates in a self reverential arena. Cross it up, as has Ann, and you will be shouted down.

Hypocrisy is the one and only consistent theme in the Liberal agenda.

ZULU on June 17, 2006 at 12:46 PM

Dahvid

Did you forget your medication today?

This is what happens when you live with mommy and daddy and have way too much time on your hands.

ScottyDog on June 17, 2006 at 12:54 PM

Dhimmivid – time to make the call…

Liberals Anonymous
1-800-4LOSERS

Richard Davis on June 17, 2006 at 12:57 PM

So the heritage of Coulter is a closely guarded secret. It took a lot of digging to find that she is Protestant and probably of Scottish or Gaelic heritage. Which is fine except that she attacks others regarding their race/religion. She is priveliged and probably born with a silver spoon.

The ad homenin attacks here, rather than addressing any of the questions, shows that there is no defense. We know that when people have no valid argument, they resort to personal insult. There has not been one single adult response to the charge that Coulter attacks others on racial/religous grounds, but hides her heritage. That Culter has made an antisemitic remark and has been accused of ding so in the past.

What does all this mean? Well for one, you can call names like ill-mannered children, but the republicans have lost my vote forever. You’ve lost my respect and the respect of the majority of Americans, including conservatives.

Sadly, I voted for Bush, but it is clear, especially from the responses here that in the final analysis, the reublicans are no better than the democrats. The childish insults of a low brow and moronic nature show that there is no voice of reason to speak in behalf of republicans, or democrats either.

I cannot in good conscience vote for and support what the republican party has devolved into. The idiotic replies here may give the immature and childish adults who post them a moment’s gratification, but in the final analysis, if you represent the republican party, the president and the best America has to offer, then America is doomed.

Go ahead, fire away with the crude slander, make Coulter proud, but you are losing many, many votes and the faith of the majority of Americans.

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 1:22 PM

Dahvid: Link to Coultermania and read the vile things that I said.

birdman on June 17, 2006 at 1:28 PM

Dahvid – don’t let the door hit you where the good Lord split you

Richard Davis on June 17, 2006 at 1:41 PM

Dahvid: Let me quite Ann. “Its all over for the Demms.” Get your mommy to change your diaper. YOU SMELL!

birdman on June 17, 2006 at 1:46 PM

Dahvid, What questions have you asked? Other then demanding to know ethnicity people are (and without divulging your ethnicity, religeon, or even mane as I have) all you have done is say that one editorialist is anto semantic, and then labeled all those that have disagreed with you as european jew haters. Granted, europeans are far worse then the muslims who only want to kill all the jews and christians, at least that is what I can gather from you.
I have asked you on several occasions just What is so bad about the only line in a book which you will not read that said clinton ejaculated on a fat jewish girl. You have yet to explain how or why that line is hatefull and anti jewish. it is a fact and that is all. But when I asked you to explain what anit semetic comments incensed you so you immedialty went into a several post rampage against me.
Here is something you can hate me for.
Jesus was not only a Jew, he was also a Rabb!. And he was also probaly dark skinned, as most people in his region were! Oh noeeess! fact strikes its ugly head! Quick Dahvid, come across with more idiotic hate speach.

Frankly you are the only one I have seen here spewing hate and intolerance.

Also, IO want to thank you for not voting republican in the future. I have always felt that only informed people should vote, and your crass ignorance and hiding from the facts only hurt the democratic process.
And if you think you are open minded, I may point you to an earlier link I put up to the anti defamation league. A link which you dismissed as vile, hatefull and filled with anti jewish snuff films. The fact that it is a pro jewish web site which was publishing anti jewish comics from the arab world in an attempt to educate people of the true evil we face seems to have been lost on you.

Wyrd on June 17, 2006 at 1:54 PM

Did I miss something here? I seem to recal that is a blog two weeks ago ” She’s back” Michelle had some commentary that Ann went too far with the comments about the Jersey girls. Now looking over the archives, I can find no such comment. Just a few links to other stories. Was that comment edited. I must be losing it. I know I read something like that and got a bit irked that Michelle wasn’t behind her sister conservative 100%.

kmackie6612 on June 17, 2006 at 2:34 PM

Lake Ruins: “When you peel off the emotional elements of any argument and instead base your arguments on empirical, credible data and facts anything the libs have is just destroyed.”

True. I’ve noticed that the right relies mainly on logos and ethos, but the left runs on nearly pure pathos. That is why they cannot be taken seriously. To them, it’s all about feeeeeeeelings and emotion. Facts, logic, history, common sense, what reasonable folks consider the substance of truth just doesn’t compute to the left. It’s mindboggling.

ecamorg on June 17, 2006 at 3:20 PM

ecamorg

“To them, it’s all about feeeeeeeelings and emotion.”

The above comment haz a very powerful emotional overtone “feeeeeeeeelings” seems to express your disgust with or lack of respect for others. They are your feeeeeelings, which you propose are somehow superior. You have contradicted yourself, do you understand that?

We describe psychopaths as those who has no sense empathy or feelings for others. That is the problem no just with the right or left wing, it is a human problem. A lack of respect for the feelings of others is a sure prescription for troubled waters.

What you say has the ring of truth, that is why I switched to being conservative. It should be noted that many Republican or Right Wing types are fundamentalist Christians, and base their arguments upon their BELIEF in a religion. Belief in religion is an emotionial feeeling.

Many blogs on right wing sites have deteriorated into simply stating that a belief in Christianity is the only logic needed. Indeed, a West Pointer once explained that it is not a matter of logic, rather a matter of principle, and that I would just have to accept that. These are the people with the guns and weapons controlling America’s military.

Note the comments above directed against me by righties and you will see the same pathos ascribed to the left in your comment above.

We are all basically the same inside. Bloggers here who delight in bullying or hurting others with cruel taunts to visit a shrink because they disagree with their politics, are supporting the right and defending Coulter. Shrinks say that the sadistic bully types are really hurting inside and can only feel a moment’s relief by hurting others, because they feel strong for a moment. Such mean spirited people must live with and die with their mean spirit, they will take their mean spirit before the final judgement and lie with it for eternity.

It is all about feelings, and America is ruled by the feelings, the religious beliefs of WASPS like Coulter and Bush. The comments by Coulter, by rightie bloggers, the political corruption, the unilateral action by Bush against the will of the people, the RICCO lawsuits against Bush for racketeering, the disregard of the law and the will of the people, that is mostly a product of the feelings of the WASPS in control of this country.

So after switching to Republican after 911, I have abandoned it after the highly emotional and disrespectful comments by rightie bloggers, and Wasp Queen Coulter is the (Hey! that’s pretty good huh? Remember I coined the expression: Coulter is Queen Wasp!)

So what if WASPS loose power in America. I tell you that Coulter and the mean spirited words by WASPS above will come back to haunt.

Dahvid on June 17, 2006 at 6:11 PM

Dahvid: “The above comment haz a very powerful emotional overtone “feeeeeeeeelings” seems to express your disgust with or lack of respect for others.”

Take it as you wish. It’s how I see it. I find it difficult, if not impossible to respect the opinion of folks that value symbolism over substance, feelings over facts. Life is hard and Nature is cruel. Nice has absolutely nothing to do with Truth. Absolutely nothing. That’s just the way it is.

Feeeeeelings cannot drown Truth. Feeeelings are useless unless you are trying to persuade the weak. This is not a communication class. I am not interested in trying to persuade people who keep their brain in their chest cavity. I’ve said it a hundred times. There are two groups of people:
1)Folks who see reality the way it is, and
2)Folks who see things the way they WISH they were, and this group IMO, are childish fools.

Just tell it how it is.

ecamorg on June 17, 2006 at 8:13 PM

Richard Davis, birdman ,
Tell them freaks off..
You freaks don’t like it see ya..get the hell out ..
Liberals not welcome just to lash the devil tongues at us.
Isn’t there blogs for morons like you ( Dahvid )somewhere else
and anybody else that can’t stand the right ..

ANN COULTER WILL ALWAYS PISS YOU LEFTY FREAKS OFF!!

USA ROCKS!!!!! WE SUPPORT THE WAR AND THE TROOPS…..

Liberals don’t have a say today we won in 2004 get over it.

alyce on June 17, 2006 at 9:39 PM

Hey off topic but check this out…

A Veteran Confronts Murtha
http://thehorsesmouth.blog-city.com/murtha.htm

alyce on June 17, 2006 at 10:16 PM

Dhimmvid – who dropped you on your head? What drugs fucked you up?? you write like a lunatic.. a drugged up lunatic.

Get off your high horse, you know nothing of Republicans, you know nothing of Patriotism, you’re just a Bush-hating liberal who is miserable everyday…

And GET OFF THE RELIGIOUS PART OF YOUR AURGUMENT – such a pathetic lame unoriginal aurgument….

“OH MY GOD, the Republicans are RELIGIOUS and they’re trying to take over… – HOW HORRIBLE!!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!

Don’t worry about Right Wing Religious people – WORRY ABOUT ALL THE MOSQUES OPENING UP EVERYWHERE!

Bottom line – your comments are whiney, a broken record and totally BORING! You should be ashamed of yourself.

You’re a Troop Killer.

Be a man. Stop wasting our time, and yours. Go do something useful with your life. Go french kiss a Dixie Chick blow-up doll.

Richard Davis on June 17, 2006 at 10:45 PM

Time to enforce the terms of use for this site.

dman on June 17, 2006 at 11:01 PM

If you strip away the inflammatory language, and get right down to Ms. Coulter’s points, we see that her point about the “Jersey Girls” (and in fact, all tragedy sufferers who enter the political arena, be they activist, pundit, or politician) is that if someone chooses to challenge what they say, any argument is slapped down, not on basis of fact or well contrived speech, but because they are victims of tragedy. This “Tragedy Card” works much like the “Race Card” does and seems to buy the bearer reprieve from anything of substance that can be brought against them. But Ms. Coulter’s point is constantly being made for her when the left continue to rant and rave on and on about how vile they think she is for making any comments at all about the Jersey Girls.

Perhaps Ms. Coulter’s language was harsh. I remember opening my eyes in a degree of shock at the “harpies” comment myself. But these Jersey Girls have entered the political arena themselves. When you make yourself a public figure, you will get attacked for something at some point. If Ms. Coulter had made these comments about one of the other thousand widows who have not made themselves public figures, I’d be upset too… and my view on that is based on the Constitution. Those in the public eye are not protected like the private citizen. But these Jersey Girls are public figures and to say that it is wrong to question them or even attack them for no other reason than they faced tragedy in their life is, as Ms. Coulter puts it, making them into human shields from which they can throw stones and not have stones thrown back.

It seems odd to me that this is the only thing the left is upset about. Does Ms. Coulter not attack everything that is liberalism with just as much intensity? None of them seem bothered at all by the fact that she is calling them “Godless” and creating a religion unto themselves, out of themselves. Nope, not a peep. But the Jersey Girls, this they defend until they are blue in the face because it makes conservatives look “mean”.

Which reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw not too long ago that made me laugh out loud. It said, “God, save us from the red states.” The RED states? THE RED STATES? The RED states are not the ones trying to take God out of this country and out of the lives of people.

rahjr2k on June 17, 2006 at 11:03 PM

dman – here’s a quarter

Richard Davis on June 17, 2006 at 11:04 PM

We have to distinguish between taking the gloves off and being drawn into the libs’ rathole. C’mon, folks, we’re better than this. Let’s keep it at a level befitting a national forum. The flaming convinces no one, and only turns off anyone attempting to browse the site. Let’s keep our eyes on the goal.

dman on June 17, 2006 at 11:09 PM

Where are ya Dhimwit?

(dman – lead, follow, or get out of the way, no time for your preaching today – besides, I thought you said you liked seeing “the gloves come off every now and then” – why you backing off that? be consistent, things said are not much different than what you’ve posted yourself – so who made YOU the comment police??)

OH STOP IT, GET THE WEB MASTER!!! quit snibbling and MOVE, you’re in the way

Richard Davis on June 18, 2006 at 12:10 AM

Dhimmvid: I told you that I had a post for you link to Coultermania did you check it out? All that spews from your mouth is pysobabble. Are you really Keith Obermann? If you are not their should be a spot for you at PMSNBC, your are about as stupid as Keith. Ladies and Gentleman what we have here is a example of the intelligence, bigitry, hate for this country, hatered for individuals who can think for themselevs, hatred for people who have a God, hatred for Mom and Dad, hatred for brother and sister, hatred for Manly Men, Hatred for (the lowest, slimest, dirtest I think hate of all) two of the finest, classest, lovliest, smartest, sexeist women you could find anywhere in the WORLD, Michelle and Ann. I used to spend a lot of time in a Diner called the “Cross Roads Diner” 20 yrs ago or so in Michelle’s home town. If I had walked into that Diner and saw both Ann and Michelle sitting at the counter I would have fallen in love with both of them. LOVE something you know nothing about. If you were in your prime 60 years ago, and were a Jew as you clame to be you would have made an excellent “Capo” at a place called “BUCHENWALD”. Dhimmvid you are a criminal. This ladies and gentleman is the base of the Dimmocrap party. The party of “TREASON”, a party of “SLANDER”, a party that is “GODLESS”. The party of “MAN OVER GOD”. The party of SLAVERY.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 12:11 AM

dman: It’s time to take the gloves off. Richard is right, a person who is in the wrong shuts up a person who is in the right fights to the finish.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 12:16 AM

I’ve nearly finished the book, and I cannot believe what the Left has done to themselves vis – a vis this book.
They gave her a ton of free publicity with this 9/11 widows nonsense, and her total trashing of the left is now a #1 bestseller.
No one is arguing any other points of the book, and there’s enough ammo in there for about 1000 right wing comments on 1000 left wing blogs.
Columnists and commentators will be savaging teachers and darwiniacs for at least a year.

Frank_D on June 18, 2006 at 12:26 AM

birdman – no truer words were ever spoken!

We are in a WAR! The FIGHT OF OUR LIVES! With an ememy so evil, and the liberals are helping them.

I WILL FIGHT WITH A FURY TO DEFEND MYSELF, MINE, AND OUR TROOPS.

The enemy doesn’t wear uniforms – therefore we all have to be soldiers in this war (United 93 – our first battlefield war heroes) because they are trying to kill us on our streets, in our neighborhoods, on our schoolbuses, and campuses, and public places. This is real!!

Appeasement is for losers.

Richard Davis on June 18, 2006 at 12:26 AM

Richard: Right on Philly dude. We see the enemy every day RIGHT HERE ON THESE PAGES, ON THE MSM, IN OUR CONGRESS. I will name three in Jersey, JON CORZINE, FRANK LAUNENBERG, TORRCERELLI. I have a dream that I hear a knock on my door and one of these three or Bill Clinton with his Secert Servicce body guards are there. I can not print here what I would like to say to them. Godless seditous bastards all.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 12:44 AM

I am having trouble getting my posts thru.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 12:48 AM

Dahvid, are you having fun toying around? I guess you feel pretty superior with your wits and logics.

You said “We are all basically the same inside. Bloggers here who delight in bullying or hurting others with cruel taunts to visit a shrink because they disagree with their politics, are supporting the right and defending Coulter. Shrinks say that the sadistic bully types are really hurting inside and can only feel a moment’s relief by hurting others, because they feel strong for a moment. Such mean spirited people must live with and die with their mean spirit, they will take their mean spirit before the final judgement and lie with it for eternity.”

So I guess you have not read my posts.

I defend Ann’s right to free speech. I strongly object anyone who demanded her to apologize because to apologize means to give up one’s point of view. It is like taking someone’s freedom of speech away by intimidation.

Am I on the right moral ground?

Then again, I defend the right to criticize Ann, criticize her if you want to, but don’t even try to force her to apologize like the 20 comgressmen just did. They are now on record, you know, for suppressing freedom of speech.

I support your right to criticize the folks here, and Ann Coulter too. I have always support the freedom of speech. If you have found one post I made that support stiffling anyone here to speak their mind, please post it. Therefore I think you are lying when you accuse the folks here for bullying because the only ones who are bullying Ann Coulter are the bastards who demand her to apologize, and that included Hugh Hewitt ( a conservative) and 20 congressmen.

I supported and your rights to vent but you have just accused me of bullying.

You are smart and mastered a good skill with your words. But you have lied. Because of that, you have become the scum in the bucket of liberalism.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 12:52 AM

Richard: We see the enemy every day on the pages of this Blog, every day on the MSM, every day in the halls of congress. I will name three here in Jersey, Frank Launberg, Jon Corzine, Torcerelli. I have a dream. I hear someone knooking at my door, and its one of these three or Bill Clinton with his Secret Service bodyguards. I can not post on these pages what I would say to them.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 1:03 AM

Richard Davis: Appeasement is for losers.

Damn straight.

Birdman: …the Dimmocrap party. The party of “TREASON”, a party of “SLANDER”, a party that is “GODLESS”. The party of “MAN OVER GOD”. The party of SLAVERY.

Well put. The enemy of our military is my enemy, my Country’s enemy, Freedom’s enemy. May they rot on the black floor of Hell.

ecamorg on June 18, 2006 at 1:04 AM

Launtenberg: Or what I think of them.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 1:04 AM

I can’t get thru either, Birdman. Didn’t think my comments were that offensive. Oh well. Truth sux.

ecamorg on June 18, 2006 at 1:11 AM

Right you are birdman

Don’t forget they live next door and work with us too.

The Liberals and the people they vote for, are giving aid and comfort to the enemy and getting our Troops killed.

They don’t think it’s a WAR, they think it’s a “petty crime” – like pickpocketing or prostitution

How would they fight it??

Ask them… “That’s why I ALWAYS WEAR A CONDOM” – John Kerry

Richard Davis on June 18, 2006 at 1:14 AM

ecamorg: I have had this problem numerous times bfore, so have others, computer glich, server who knows. Sometimes you will repost & both posts will come up. I hate that!

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 1:14 AM

Richard: Right on again. John f’n Kerry should wear a bag over his head. Last December on one of the Sunday morning shows he called our fighting troops in Iraq “terrorists”. They “Harrass the women”, “disrespect”Muslem law” etc. Dick (Helmet Head) Durbin called our troops no better than Nazi Gestappo on the Senate floor. Teedy boy said that we torture prisnors at Gitmo. Last November Sen Jay Bird of WV. said on “Fox News Sunday” with Chris Wallice, that four months after 9/11 when he was the head of the Senate Select Commetty on Intelligence, he went to Saude Arabia, Jorden, and of all plasces Syrea and told the leaders of these countrys that George Bush was going to invade Iraq. A brain dead moment. Iraq had plenty of time to get rid of their WMDs. Why don’t these people pick up Ak’s and fight for their side.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 1:32 AM

birdman – you’re flying baby! BZ!

Richard Davis on June 18, 2006 at 9:03 AM

I have almost finished the book and it contains so much more then just the Jersey Girl stuff. Each chapter takes on a different tenet of the religion of liberalism. The Jersey Girls stuff is simply a couple of lines in the chapter on how the Dems and liberals put up human shields to throw bombs and provide cover for “moderate” Dems. The same tactic employed by Islamic extremists. They have front organizations constantly repeating the mantra of Islam is the religion of peace while their imams’ hide in the madrasas and mosques spewing hate and inciting the faithful to violence.You are not allowed to attack what Cindy Sheehan, mother of a slain soldier in Iraq, without being accused of being insensitive. You can’t attack Murtha’s message because he is a veteran you know. Same for Kerry.
There are far more damaging things in her book then the Jersey Girls but as always the LMSM gets to decide what parts of the book will get the most attention and they have in fact proved the premise of that chapter. Her chapters on abotion, lack of action on crime and crimminals, and teachers should cause far more concern in the liberal community.
Folks get the book, read it. It contains far more then what you have heard.

LakeRuins on June 18, 2006 at 11:03 AM

Ann Coulter is great, but she should drop “the blonde act”. She’s too old and not that good looking. It’s starting to work against her.

modifiedcontent on June 18, 2006 at 11:13 AM

Richard: Just about everone here is flying. For years I have watched the Rebublicans on TV and elsewhere sit back and not answer the liberals lies. Of course we must be civil. I have always thought that this was a losing position, that we the GOP would be preceived to be weak. Then along comes first Rush, and then the others. I have great respect for Michelle M, and Sean H., I love their style. Rush and Ann are different, their style is what I really love RIGHT IN THE LIBS FACE. Rush, Ann, Michelle, Sean are what they are, Rush can’t be Sean, Michelle can’t be Ann. The libs like to play down and dirty, but when you get down in the dirt with them, so to speak, they the libs fold like a house of cards. The libs can’t take it. The TRUTH is the libs enemy. Rush hit the nail right on the head recently when he said, I’m parapharsing; the libs are taking a beating, you watch, this is when they get really funny, this is when they get really crazy.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 11:15 AM

“Ann Coulter is great, but she should drop “the blonde act”. She’s too old and not that good looking. It’s starting to work against her.

modifiedcontent on June 18, 2006 at 11:13 AM”

What? Are you telling me you think she is great because of her look? And if she looks any worse then she would be…not so great? LOL…

Man, you are out of Ann Coulter’s most favorite list just because of this post!

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 11:35 AM

I belive Ann is a “dirty blonde”, and lightens her hair. Ann is hot. Modifiedcontent: “Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.”

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 11:41 AM

Birdman…”DIRTY BLONDE”?????

LOL…you have reached the bottom of Ann’s most favorite conservative list!

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 12:08 PM

Ann, here is a tip for your makeover.

Take a look at Julie Andrew’s hairdo in the Sound of Music.

Go country with that hairdo…shirts and jeans…

Once in a while, wear a cowboy hat.

The same hairdo can go along with long gowns too…a string of pearl…

Just get off that cheap looks, please.

I know now I am at the bottom of your list too.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 12:13 PM

easy: You never heard the term, “dirty blonde”? I am not saying Ann is dirty. I am discribing her natural hair color. The term “dirty blonde”, I guess you could call a slang expression. Don’t listen to these guys here Ann I still love you the best.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 12:22 PM

Birdman, I have only one girl friend thirty some years ago that happened to be a blonde so I have very little knowledge on blondes. I wish she were a little bit more dirty then…

well, what the heck, we are both at the bottom of the list.

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 5:19 PM

easy: “Dirty blonde” is a hair coler sort of a cross between blonde and brunette. A light brown, or a dark blonde. Not a true blonde, of say gold or yellow, or plantemum. I have know many people both male and female that described their hair as “dirty blonde”. Easy we are still on the top of Anns list.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 6:12 PM

easy: I just noticed look on the cover of Ann’s book on this vent, thats “dirty blonde”, thats the hair tone that I am talking about.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 6:15 PM

Dirty Blondes usually highlight. from experience, my friends!

pullingmyhairout on June 18, 2006 at 8:30 PM

Birdman, I bet you many notice not Ann’s hair on the cover…LOL

But I still for a complete make over…cut that hair…

easy87us on June 18, 2006 at 9:07 PM

easy: I like the cowboy hat and country look, I belive Ann would look great with a cowboy hat. I prefer Ann with long hair, of course I like women with long hairand I don’t think Ann would look good with short hair, I may be wrong. As for the pants, I must confess, I like looking at womens legs, call me a pig, if shoe fits I guess I will have to wear it. I am still depressed over the min-skirts going out of style in “77”. Jimmy Carter elected prez hem lines fall beneith floor level, literaly, along with the stock market. Easy my oh my God; were turning into lib talt show hosts, who am I Opray Whimpe, Jerry Springler.

birdman on June 18, 2006 at 11:49 PM

Just for the record, you bunch of nancy boys at the end of this thread are entirely cracking me up! You sound like beauty school dropouts gossiping while you watch the latest episode of Queer Eye. If you start discussing her make-up and her shoes next, I’m going to die laughing, you light-in-the-loafers bunch of puffs.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that … and yeah, Ann looked just FAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaabulous on FoxNews the other night. Her Prada bag was to DIE for!

(Please note: the above was a joke. A funny one. If you aren’t laughing, you need to put down your In-Style magazine and have a beer. Or shoot something. Do something manly for God’s sake. You fashionista fairies.)

;)

Professor Blather on June 19, 2006 at 7:46 AM

birdman and Richard,

Let me clarify where I’m coming from: when the libs take their nasty shots, it is appropriate to take the gloves off and apply a knee to the groin now and then. Fine. But we have to be careful not to overdo it. When it degenerates into kindergarten-style name calling, it becomes counter-productive.

Of course, liberal plants like Dahvid are deliberately trying to bait us into a juvenile exchange. When the bait is taken, he has done his job. They can point their friends, and the MSM, to the thread and declare that we are just a bunch of sophomoric babies.

That really doesn’t hurt US, since we are hidden behind our pseudonyms. However, this site carries Michelle’s name and reputation. Our posts reflect on that. While we feel better by ‘letting it fly’ and giving it to the baiter, we denegrade the site and Michelle herself.

Baiting is an old political tactic. I had attended one of the first rallies in Sacramento to recall then Governor Gray Davis. The recall and pro-Davis crowds were kept across K-street from each other by the police. Predictably, one of the union-paid pro-Davis demonstrators managed to cross the street with his sign. His intent was to bait the recall crowd into a scuffle, with MSM cameras rolling, to embarass the cause. One member reached for his placard, when others pulled her back – and thus avoided the incident. The recall movement was not discredited. One tiny piece in their ultimate victory.

The lesson is that we have to keep our cool at all times, and not be baited. Ann is expert at this. She takes a strategic shot, like a martial artist, but is always IN CONTROL. We need to do likewise.

We have seen incidents when members of our military have lost their cool under pressure. While we can relate to their emotions, it certainly did not help the cause. That’s why the military maintains strict discipline.

I agree that we are in a war. That’s why DISCIPLINE is essential.

Please, I’m not trying to preach. We all need a reminder, when things get hot, to check our emotions. Myself included. I had surmised that the web monitors were not watching the thread, as the flaming occured late at night over the weekend. Things were spinning out of control, just as the baiters wanted. That’s the only reason I felt it necessary to say something.

My comments apply equally to Dahvid, better off blue, and the other liberal plants – as well as those on our side. I don’t expect any response from the libs, since this is a deliberate tactic on their part. Please, guys and gals, don’t take their bait.

Lets make Michelle, and conservatives in general, proud by our posts. This is a well-known site. The world, as it were, is watching.

(PS: sorry for the late response – I was away from the computer till now.)

dman on June 19, 2006 at 12:57 PM

Ah, Ann is truly priceless using her wit and intelligence to stir up the liberals. It’s like taking a stick to a nest of fire ants. Like the ants, the liberals run around in circles attacking anything within their stinging reach.

docdave on June 19, 2006 at 6:18 PM

dman – let’s let Michelle Malkin decide when things go over the line.

I know you mean well, but I can tell you this dman, compared to other sites I visit, Hot Air is TAME, it’s PG…

dman, when you try to force commenters to your standards you end up looking…. well, not how you want to or should…

let’s let MM decide what’s what…

If someone takes it too far, she will do something about it, until then, I respectfully request you think what you want, but try to avoid being the comment policeman, it doesn’t look good…

Consider me a friend and ally. Take care. ;o)

Richard Davis on June 20, 2006 at 8:27 AM