Deal with the devil: Maliki courts insurgents
posted at 9:42 am on June 15, 2006 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Including insurgents who’ve attacked American soldiers. Moran makes the case, reluctantly, for why he should.
I see his point. Drudge leads with a story about the Zarqawi “treasure trove”, some of which is surely true and some of which is probably Maliki trying to put the fear of god into the jihadis to get them to come to the table before they get pinched. The safehouse document Drudge highlights is especially interesting as it calls explicitly for driving a wedge between America and the Shiites to generate broad-based popular support for “the resistance.” Which, let’s note, is straight out of Ayman al-Zawahiri’s playbook:
(1) If we are in agreement that the victory of Islam and the establishment of a caliphate in the manner of the Prophet will not be achieved except through jihad against the apostate rulers and their removal, then this goal will not be accomplished by the mujahed movement while it is cut off from public support, even if the Jihadist movement pursues the method of sudden overthrow. This is because such an overthrow would not take place without some minimum of popular support and some condition of public discontent which offers the mujahed movement what it needs in terms of capabilities in the quickest fashion. Additionally, if the Jihadist movement were obliged to pursue other methods, such as a popular war of jihad or a popular intifadah, then popular support would be a decisive factor between victory and defeat.
(2) In the absence of this popular support, the Islamic mujahed movement would be crushed in the shadows, far from the masses who are distracted or fearful, and the struggle between the Jihadist elite and the arrogant authorities would be confined to prison dungeons far from the public and the light of day. This is precisely what the secular, apostate forces that are controlling our countries are striving for. These forces don’t desire to wipe out the mujahed Islamic movement, rather they are stealthily striving to separate it from the misguided or frightened Muslim masses. Therefore, our planning must strive to involve the Muslim masses in the battle, and to bring the mujahed movement to the masses and not conduct the struggle far from them.
Maliki’s strategy is to unify Iraqis against the jihad by reconciling with the Sunnis before AQ can unify them against the the new government by reconciling with the Shiites. Coupled with the tough talk today at the “treasure trove” presser and the wave of raids this past week by U.S. and Iraqi troops, offering an amnesty to jihadis is standard stick-and-carrot. If it works and the insurgency falters, our guys come home and out of harm’s way sooner than expected, with things over there in pretty good shape.
Worth a shot. Particularly considering that the new guy sounds just dumb enough to start targeting Sunnis, too.
Update: Re: the raids, forgot to mention this. The heat is most definitely on. Thanks to WordWarp for the link.
Update: The Commissar notes that there have been no coalition casualties for five days.
Update: Captain Ed and I are on the same page:
This [amnesty sounds] appalling, but it probably reflects the reality of Iraq today, and will be the only realistic way to bring an end to the infighting. We can demand that Mailiki rescind the offer, but a refusal would only burnish his credentials as an independent leader. In fact, we should protest to give him that chance. I would like nothing more that to see the cowards hand [sic] from the nearest gallows, but insisting on that point would likely make almost everyone ineligible for the amnesty. Maliki has already narrowed down eligibility to those who have not attacked civilians, which will prove problematic enough to enforce.
At some point, Iraq needs a national reconciliation if it is to avoid a civil war. The Shi’a and Kurds will have to find ways to connect to the Sunni minority on a rational political basis, and the best way to get to that stage is to combine a crackdown on insurgents and a ban on militias with a general amnesty for those who wish to return home and live normal lives.
Update: Too much good news lately for Reuters’s taste, so they adjusted the lede on their own “treasure trove” story accordingly.
Update: To follow up on Captain Ed’s post, Debka says that Bush knew about the amnesty offer — and agreed to it during his meeting with Maliki.
Update: Here’s a photo of the new man without a plan:
Worth noting: despite the caption, CNN says “U.S. intelligence was split Wednesday over whether al-Masri was the same person as Abu Hamza al-Muhajer, who was named as al-Zarqawi’s successor in a Web message last week.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.


















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I think Maliki was put in jail by Saddam and the Americans at one point, so he is no weenie. It looks to me like this guy means business on crushing the insurgents, and he intends to do what it takes. After all, the whole Iraq war is about flipping the country. Working to successfully flip some key problem people there may jusify the means.
Shmo on June 15, 2006 at 10:14 AM
They live in a “shame society” so I don’t know if that’ll work, but if the Govt can sit down and talk peace, from a position of strength, muslim to muslim, then maybe it’ll work. The new Iraqi Govt appears to be strong and the insurgents get to ’save face’ … save their faces from gettin’ blown off by American Soldiers that is! You KNOW they’re just lookin’ to get themselves a birthday present!
But, we have about 1,300 years of islamic history that shows how they pretend to want peace talks while they regroup and rebuild their forces in preperation to attack. Maybe BOTH sides are doin’ this to each other.
Maliki floods Baghdad with Iraqi troops to show what he can do to the enemy, them gives ‘em the option to disarm and go home. After losing zarqawi (piss be upon him) and the subsequent raids that followed, maybe the sunni insurgents finally get it. Drop your weapons, go home and get a job. As for the foreign terrorists, there is only one way to deal with them. Just ask any U.S. Marine how do handle those punks. Falluja anyone?
Tony737 on June 15, 2006 at 10:31 AM
They really don’t have much choice but to give them a chance to fall in behind the new sheriff. If there’s no chance to lay down arms and take part in society, why should they stop fighting at all? If it works, and everyone has an opportunity to prosper, discontent and the violence that comes with it will evaporate.
This is the lesser of 2 evils.
Pablo on June 15, 2006 at 11:05 AM
Haven’t looked at the details but I’m guessing that the amnesty is aimed at those ‘insurgents’ who took money from the AQ types, went out and emptied the AK they’d been given in the general direction of some coalition forces far enough away they weren’t likely to shoot back, dropped it and went home. The “haven’t attacked civilians” should, if testable, weed out most of the ones who were in it for idealogical reasons.
KCSteve on June 15, 2006 at 11:08 AM
Everyone should follow the link above to the “safehouse” document. Fascinating.
Clark1 on June 15, 2006 at 11:14 AM
Amnesty? Period? All right, we don’t do Re-education Camps. Just dispense entitlements, no questions asked?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“Zarqawi 1967-2006″
Illustrated by gringoVision. (gringoman.com)
gringoman on June 15, 2006 at 1:19 PM
The Al Reuters article betrays their concern over how badly thing are going . . . for THEIR antiwar position! It’s time to rally the insurgent-loving “pacifists” so pour on the propaganda.
Hey, better yet where’s Baghdad Bob? Bring him out of retirement (or hiding) to give us a little ‘Truthout’!
“No the infidels are not winning! No, they are not in our country. No, they are not in our city. No, they are not next door. No, they are not . . .” *BOOOOMB!*
The Ritz on June 15, 2006 at 3:16 PM
I’m skeptical, but if it will work, then whatever it takes to win. This is about war, not individual justice.
dman on June 15, 2006 at 4:59 PM
Real Politics vs Idealism
Sometimes you have to bite the bullet on circumstances like this
But I hate that this would apply to Muktadar Al-Sadr (i know i misspelt it but I don’t care)
Defector01 on June 15, 2006 at 5:13 PM
First of all, there are no insurgents, only terrorists. To get rid of a snake, cut off it’s head. If another appears, see #1.
RolandHall on June 15, 2006 at 9:02 PM
The new guy is gonna be dead soon -
The Marines “no better friend, no worse enemy” will get him….
Richard Davis on June 15, 2006 at 9:25 PM
From the Britt Hume show - an Iraqi spokesman said that no amnesty will be granted to those who killed Americans and that the media misunderstood and misreported this story.
Entelechy on June 16, 2006 at 12:20 AM
Prayer for our Troops:
God Bless our Troops and give them the power, courage, and wit to destroy all the terrorists, especially Al-Masri and Bin Laden.
Richard Davis on June 16, 2006 at 9:12 AM