I get it. He strives to make the MSM look good, but he is learning that his efforts are a day late, and a few facts short.

Let me state it for the record. The man has NO source. He cannot offer what he hasn’t got unless some dimwit liberal is ready to fall on their sword. Such is the state of liberalism today. ;o)

“I read on another post that the GJ did indict, but
Fitz chose not to charge.Perhaps the indictment was incentive to get Rove topaint a more vivid picture of Cheney’s involvement.Wouldn’t Rove have more credibility in front of
Cheney’s jury if he was not also charged with a crime
in the case? I think Rove is just enough of a snake to have
“something” on everybody, (like J. Edgar Hoover did)
not just on his enemies . . .Sometimes you have to turn on a ‘friend’ first before that ‘friend’ turns on you”

But even La-La Land has party poopers:

“The Dan Rather Treatment . . . Set up, knocked down and then their supposed friends here s___ on them. Wonderful.”

“So, after they took down Rather, they set their sights
on TruthOut?Considering the size of Rather’s audience, I can
understand why the neocons would want to take him
down. So logically, the next target for the neocons is
some podunk online outfit that reaches a few thousand
people? It doesn’t make sense – far too many bigger
fish for the neocons to fry first.”

Perfect, Easy!

(1) opposite of stand up (2) action resulted from misuse of the English language (3) involuntary muscle spasm after lying

They question Drudge, they question Michelle Malkin, but TruthOut they’ll take at their word.

I haven’t said anything about the Karl Rove non-indictment so far because I hadn’t really been following the story that closely and I knew others who had would handle it well. Tom Maguire has done just that here, here and…

Karl Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, speaks to a bit of new media overreach -- specifically, to hyperpartisan attempts by many bloggers and (fringe) journalists, the vast majority of them on the left, to practically will his client into be…

Maybe I will be the stereotype neocon and plant a rumor that Haliburton was behind Rove not getting indicted. I could just see the tinfoil hat nuts at DU and their idiotic rants…oh the pleasure.

Do they really have a source? If so, why protect it if the source was THAT wrong? If not – well, that seems to fit the actions and posturing more than anything else. Yet another case of someone’s wishes and wants replacing the actual facts.

Ultimately, ‘Stand down’ is what they have decided to do regarding their reputation.

What the hell does that mean?

Will they get frog-marched into court to get slapped with a libel suit?

Meaning, a case where the blogosphere did not correct a media inaccuracy, but rather pumped an inaccuracy into it. Here’s something pretty obvious. It took a week for the MSM to get interested in Rathergate, despite the fact that rightwing……

Like if Jessie MacBeth says he is an Army Ranger on MySpace.

Respond: “TruthOut.”