Comments on: Coultermania! NYT hops aboard the gravy train

By: Richard Davis

Richard Davis — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:08:19 +0000

The Jersey Girls started the LIBERAL chant “Don’t show the planes hitting the towers” hysteria…

THEY SHOULD SHOW THE PLANES HITTING THE TOWERS EVERYDAY.

THE THINGS THE JERSEY GIRLS SAID – GETS OUR TROOPS KILLED.

The things Ann says doesn’t get any Troops killed.

I’m glad Ann exposed the Witches of New Jersey…

By: docdave

docdave — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:10:51 +0000

Man, I love it when Ann makes the liberal heads explode.

By: ar_basin

ar_basin — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:27:39 +0000

If you peel away her often offensive bombast, Coulter’s logic is sound. The problem is that her outrageous rhetoric gets in the way of the real message, becoming an issue in and of itself.

chsw

chsw on June 11, 2006 at 11:39 PM
*********************************************

Right, becoming an issue for stupid people…

It’s a free country… you can even be stupid if you so desire.

*******************

Stupid Quotes:

Hillary: “We should do away with the Electoral College”

Hillary: “Universal Health Care” [like the DMV]

Hillary: “vicious, mean-spirited attack”

************

I just hope my mind maintains itself as I get older… I wish to not become a moron at age 50, Hillary.

By: Pajamas Media

Pajamas Media — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:16:14 +0000

Don’t Look Now…

David Carr has sparked a minor swarm over his critical essay on Ann Coulter at the NYT. Potshots abound. Here’s the gist: Allahpundit: “Did you know that AC spouts outrageous nonsense partly to sell books? You did? Okay, but have……

By: Doug

Doug — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:51:30 +0000

Ann is sharp. Libs are dull. She has focus, they are unfocused. She sheds light, they run from light. She speaks the truth, they have Hillary.

By: Perchant

Perchant — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:59:32 +0000

Wouldn’t it be great if this book was made into a movie? I can visualize this as a comedy docu-drama dripping with a sarcastic Ann Coulter narrative. If this had been a liberal book with as much hoopla surrounding it, the movie rights would have already been sold for million$.

By: Professor Blather

Professor Blather — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:31:25 +0000

I wonder if Coulter plans to send a thank you note to the New York Slimes for helping her sell another hundred thousand copies?

Which is another way of repeating my most frequently asked questions: are librulz just plain stupid?

I’m beginning to think Karl Rove may be Coulter’s literary agent. With the possible recent exception of Dan Brown, I can’t think of another author who has managed to drum up more free publicity for their work.

And the best part is – the people that HATE her are the ones working so damn hard to help her sell her books. They’re also the ones working hardest to make her look right about just about everything.

At this point, I wouldn’t care if I disagreed with every damn thing Coulter said – I’d still love her just for pissing off the left so royally.

I say Dick Cheney retires and President Bush appoints Coulter as sitting Vice President. That would be extremely schadenfreudilicious.

By: csjd

csjd — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:11 +0000

One of the Left’s favorite playbook tactics has become a recurring theme in its response to Ann’s latest book. When he cannot debate the substance of an argument, the typical leftist resorts to the tired criticism that the proponent of the argument really doesn’t believe her own rhetoric but says it only for shock value to sell more books. That is the entire theme of David Carr’s NYT “review” as well as a number of leftist appearances on television over the weekend.
I distictly recall the same tactic being used against Rush Limbaugh more than 15 years ago. Dozens of leftist commentators stated with certainty that they know the “real” Rush and he doesn’t believe his message; rather, he found the “formula” for selling a million books and attracting 20 million listeners a day to his radio show. After all, Rush is nothing but an entertainer the leftists opined. All the while, the liberals have searched for 15 years to find someone comparable to Rush.
This weekend, the intellectual vapid Lawrence O’Donnell called Ann Coulter’s arguments “schtik,” simply a script replete with inflammatory rhetoric that she doesn’t really believe. Keep doing what you’re doing, Ann, you are in great company as the target of that accusation.

By: Left Wing = Hate » Blog Archive » Culture of Corruption: New Jersey Democrats demand book be banned. What’s next in Left Wing Censorship?? Public Book Burning?? Crucifixion of Ann Coulter?

Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:42:33 +0000

[...] Update: Looks like David Carr of the NY Times is abit grumpy about Ann Coulter as is John Tierney of the NY Times , and the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz’s also. H/T to Newsmax, NewsBusters, more NewsBusters, TimesWatch, Hugh Hewitt, Right Thinking Girl, Hot Air [...]

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:31:56 +0000

Strange that in all the Ann Coulter interviews of late, debates, discussions, reviews, bloggs, commentary, etc. no one hardly talks about the essence of her book “Godless”.

It is completeley overshadowed by the Jersey chicks’ mini-statement.

Let’s make an effort to analyze and comment on the rest of the book. It might have other valuable points to ponder, such that they shouldn’t be lost – lest the Left gets away with being “Godful”.

By: godhelpUSA

godhelpUSA — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:12:29 +0000

The Left became unhinged over “Godless” not because of its substance or lack thereof. No, Coulter called them on another attempt to stifle free speech via the use of “victims” to make outrageous and indefensible claims.

The Jersey Girls were especially atrocious examples. While I don’t consider myself a Coulter fan, I applaud the attention she has drawn to this cheap left-wing tactic. This strategy soon will join the kneejerk cries of “racism” among the Left’s self-parodying implosion.

By: Wade's Inn

Wade's Inn — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:06:04 +0000

Ann Coulter – Genius and Brilliant…

Ann is brilliant. She has opened a subject (Jersey Girls, the east’s version of the Chickz Dicks) which is a no win situation for the moonbats on the left.

If they agree – Ann Wins
If the left does not reply then the assumption is they agree – ….

By: easy87us

easy87us — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:49:48 +0000

This “shield” mentalia is predominantly found in the liberal sector. I have told you guys the origin of this mental toxin. It was born out of the Communist Manifesto. It is nothing but CLASS RANKING!

In communist country, they rank people, from color red to color black! The purer the communist, the redder he is,like red hot KFC!

In their ranking system, the communist members with decorations/war records ranked highest!

War records of non-communist members don’t worth a sh#t.

Now you see why they so focus on war records!

Scum is usually originated from scum bucket.

By: easy87us

easy87us — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:35:22 +0000

Madcity, why are you so stupid to fall into Ann’s trap again?

You wrote “He and Murtha (and me, for that matter) all came of age during the Vietnam War. Limbaugh managed to avoid service. Murtha enlisted in the Marines and earned two Purple Hearts serving our country.”

This is the exact BS Ann is telling you that the liberals are doing. You are using the war record as a shield for Murtha as if he is all holy that Rush and no one without a war record can criticize him!

Hey dude, you know who designed and built those F16s that blew Al baby till thy kingdom come? They probably have no war record.

How about doctors and fire fighters and policemen?

Do you know those Americans that keep the street clean of garbage everyday probably also have no war record and no purple hearts?

So, have they earned the right to criticize Murtha?

See, you have been intoxicated by the liberal toxin and don’t even realize it. I recommend you to join the Liberal Anon. to rid the toxin in your body so you won’t fall prey to Ann Coulter again.

By: easy87us

easy87us — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:20:29 +0000

ForYouEdification…”Your post proves the point that liberals ARE an angry, writhing lot. ”

Hm, may I add pyschotic, deranged, violent, and malicious mobs? Would I be hurting their delicate, passionate, loving little liberal heart for telling the truth?

By: Dread Pirate Roberts VI

Dread Pirate Roberts VI — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:58:08 +0000

Thanks GT, now I understand why parakeets are so stupid! They read the NYT on the bottom of their cage! DUH!

By: Madcity

Madcity — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:49:27 +0000

By some of the comments left, I feel maybe you missed the gist of my post which was to point out how the Left defends againts its critics.
I agree with Ann Coulter and Rush.
Bill Wineke (papers editor)is the idiot.

By: CaptiousNut

CaptiousNut — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:08:46 +0000

The Times posits that when the lumpen masses are buying Ann’s book (as opposed to their newspapers) that something must be gravely wrong with our society.

How’s that for haughty elitism?

And since when did the NY Times become a qualified expert on profit-making?

By: ForYourEdification

ForYourEdification — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:55:17 +0000

madcity and Richard Davis:

Your post proves the point that liberals ARE an angry, writhing lot. Your writings reek from the sarcasm and hate that has permeated the liberal left and blinds it from reality. People like Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are EXPOSING the left, and more power to them!

Counter to your mocking ode, when I exhale, it is a sigh of relief that “Liberals Anonymous” is not in charge.

Murtha’s medals go way beyond “two Purple Hearts, incidentally.” But since when does that entitle the receiver to vilify and defame his country or its troops in time of war? “Authentic” heroes” do not slander their country’s troops or armed forces after they are discharged; they stand by them. Murtha and Kerry are “Authentic heroes?”

BAH, HUMBUG!

By: ForYourEdification

ForYourEdification — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:33:11 +0000

If you think about it, Ann Coulter’s words (with which I happen to entirely agree) aren’t remotely as vile as the vitriol that spews from the innards of the likes of the leaders of the left. People like Howard Dean, Al Franken, Ted Kennedy, John Murtha, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi and others of that ilk.

Ann speaks the truth — and the left cannot deal with truth!

By: Richard Davis

Richard Davis — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:12 +0000

madcity

We understand your frustration, many of us have been where you are..

Breathe sloooowly, deeeeeeeply
inhale – “America is good”
exhale – “Release the Bush-hate”

We’re here for you, right here, reach out, don’t be shy…
(we know you’re tired of saying things and voting for people who get our troops killed…) we’re here…

Liberals Anonymous

By: Richard Davis

Richard Davis — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:18:48 +0000

MadCity -

Liberals Anonymous – can help you come back.

1-800-4LOSERS

By: speed647

speed647 — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:27:20 +0000

I am SOOOOO HOT for Ann!

*sigh*

Maybe she’ll let me set up a liberal celebrity target range in her back yard…

;-)

By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)

Attila (Pillage Idiot) — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:49:24 +0000

The NY Times article about her appears to be in the business section. Sunday’s business section had an article on body odor in the workplace. No wonder Times readers don’t know much about the economy.

By: Kini

Kini — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:02:06 +0000

It all boils down to -

The left can dish it out, but can’t take it.

I like the analogy, “Truth isn’t served with Novocain”

Over the top, sure, but I LIKE IT!