Quotes of the day
It’s come to this: Venezuela approves funds to relieve the toilet-paper shortage
Video: Dem Congressman rips IRS for abuses, threatens bringing in special prosecutor
not only no, but F!@# NO!!!
Asmodeus on May 30, 2006 at 12:36 PM
No, maybe, no, and heck no! :o)
DannoJyd on May 30, 2006 at 12:37 PM
Awww, why notttttt?
c’mon, c’mon, comonnnnnnnn.
clyde on May 30, 2006 at 12:46 PM
NO NO NO>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And Hillary???”Yet for all her fame, there are missing pieces to the Clinton puzzle: What does she stand for? And where would she try to take the country if elected?”
She is a frickin’ chameleon, thats why. She will tell you what she THINKS you want to hear.
shooter on May 30, 2006 at 12:49 PM
Allah, is the crux of the first “no” centered around wishes for a sans-Frist 2008 election? Couldn’t agree more. But, otherwise I support the flag-burning amendment…and the gay marriage thing
BirdEye on May 30, 2006 at 12:51 PM
How about, hell no? and, as I will continue to say until I’m blue in the face or AP forcibly checks me into rehab, if there’s such a rush to play with the Constitution, how about repealing the 17th Amendment?
Kid from Brooklyn on May 30, 2006 at 12:52 PM
I’m glad HotAir is now promoting diversity. To use five divverent languages in one post is truly progressive.
Number 2 on May 30, 2006 at 12:58 PM
“A ban just makes children curious.” Pure projection.
Mark V. on May 30, 2006 at 1:07 PM
Yes. Or no. Maybe.
Let me think about it.
clyde on May 30, 2006 at 1:14 PM
It’s not like the President has any real power anyway.
As far as I’m concerned put a freaken blow up doll in office.
It’s the guys behind closed curtains that make the calls.
Bush probably hasn’t made his own decisions since he was a kid, probably didn’t then either.
F-ing stupid government.
Democracy my a-hole.
Kramer on May 30, 2006 at 1:24 PM
Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said
How do you know if an animal feels it is being abused by getting screwed or not? YUCK.
NTWR on May 30, 2006 at 1:27 PM
I speak goat.
Let me ask him: “Mr. Goat does it bother you when someone takes advantage of you without your consent?”
Mr. Goat: Que,
No hablo ingles.
Lo siento Mr. Goat.
Kramer on May 30, 2006 at 1:30 PM
Somewhere in that collection is a signof the apocalypse.
Iblis on May 30, 2006 at 1:37 PM
Whatever Michelle is paying you, it definately isn’t enough!
Rode Werk on May 30, 2006 at 2:31 PM
“not only no, but F!@# NO!!!”
I consider it a “sign of the apocalypse” that I find myself in agreement with someone called Asmodeus.
high_desert_wanderer on May 30, 2006 at 2:32 PM
Brian on May 30, 2006 at 2:50 PM
Must you be so negative?
saint kansas on May 30, 2006 at 2:57 PM
Nyet. Nein. Uh uh. Thtttt
clyde on May 30, 2006 at 2:58 PM
Your post is bi-lingual. English only please!
Crude One on May 30, 2006 at 3:00 PM
Who the hell cares?
chsw on May 30, 2006 at 3:05 PM
Pretty touching, the concern the Dutch pedophiles had for the cost of train travel, though it didn’t make up for their other demands.
Patton on May 30, 2006 at 3:29 PM
All a “NO” except Flag burning Amendement.
Why would anybody wants to burn the Flag?
Look at the rest of the world, they don’t burn their own Flags.
Burning the Flad is simply declaring HATE for the country the Flag belongs to. It is a sign of hate, pure and simple.
Muslims burn the American, the Israeli, the Danish, the French, and other European Flags because they hate these countries. But they do not burn their Flags, even when they disagree with the policies of their Government.
We reached the point where the American Flag has been so desecrated and trampled by “AMERICANS” that a Constitutional Amendement would be required to protect it.
And I support that Amendement.
Shame on those who burn the FLAG, they do not deserve to live in America.
CatholicConservative on May 30, 2006 at 3:38 PM
“As far as I’m concerned put a freaken blow up doll in office.”
There’s one in the Oval Office closet left over from the Clinton years.
speed647 on May 30, 2006 at 3:39 PM
Actually, the rest of the world burns OUR flag, which should be enough. Open a flag store in the Middle East and you’re bound to get rich. You only have to stock three: US, Israel, and Denmark. Those are the ones that need replacement the most often due to frequent cloth blazes in the streets.
I can see it now, in Arabic: “Bonfires R us”
clyde on May 30, 2006 at 4:24 PM
As a vet I think it’s contemptible to burn the American flag. I don’t, however, think there should be a constitutional ban on burning it. One of the things we fight and stand for is freedom of speech and expression, even when it’s directed at our nation and it’s leaders/institutions.
They just need to realize that their freedom of expression may result in a hard kick to the backside when I see it.
Grunt2Jag on May 30, 2006 at 4:57 PM
Does Frist think people are so stupid that waving a Flag burning amendment will distract from his vote for the awful, liberal, open borders Senate bill??????
Clark1 on May 30, 2006 at 5:05 PM
I can’t understand why AllahPundit is so passionately against an amendment to protect the flag from desecration. There is no evidence whatsoever that the founding fathers would consider burning the flag of the nation an example of “free speech.”
We should definitely have an amendment to protect the flag. Burning the flag is not “free speech.” It is an act of hatred AGAINST free speech, liberty, and democracy.
januarius on May 30, 2006 at 6:05 PM
Our flag wouldn’t get desecrated so often if we didn’t import socialists from the south and indoctrinate our children into PC libercommunism by allowing NEA union activists to “teach” them in our publik school camps.
NTWR on May 30, 2006 at 6:28 PM
It did start off as a depressing news day, didn’t it? I’m with you on everything but the flag thing. If they want to pass a law about flag burning, make it so it’s required that all American flags are made to contain a high explosive. That way every flag burning episode is a Conservative’s celebration!! Watch the little smidgeons of moonbat buggers flying in all directions. KA – F’n – BOOM!!!
JodyBlonde on May 30, 2006 at 6:29 PM
HELL NO (Try burning the flag around me)
NO if you’re asking if we should do this here, the only right a pedophile deserves is a bullet in the brain, if you can find anyone marksman enough to hit it.
Who cares WHAT type album this little no talent bang-tail comes out with, I won’t be buying it. If she wasn’t from a wealthy family she would be nothing more than a cheap hooker.
Rowane on May 30, 2006 at 7:07 PM
And as for the update on Hillary Clinton, take it from someone who saw years under the Clintons here in Arkansas, this woman wrecked the school systems here, screwed up health care, and generally made us the closeset thing to Lousiana’s politicians dishonesty and graft as possible. So HELL NO. NEVER VOTE FOR HER NO MATTER WHAT. She’ll lie to your face and stab you in the back with her blatant socialism.
Duty, Honor, Country
(in THAT order)
Rowane on May 30, 2006 at 7:12 PM
Allah I love your NO post. You are the best!
No No No No and No
(I agree with you)
Wild Thing on May 30, 2006 at 8:11 PM
Ref: Paris > No?????????
allah has broken Paris’s heart.
easy87us on May 30, 2006 at 10:18 PM
Hillary IS hard to define, but not because of her “intellect.” Its because she, like her scumbag husband, has absolutely no core beliefs. None.
Labamigo on May 30, 2006 at 11:51 PM
The age of consent for euthanesia in the Netherlands is 12, as long as the parent or guardian approves.
At least the kiddies will have an out if they don’t like the next life style innovation.
IMHO, I agree with this person:
” Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
Would the ACLU have as vigorously defended Hitler when he promoted his final solution as they are defending NAMBLA, which exists to promote, and facilitate an activity the demands many millstones?
Sex with animals is not illegal in Norway:
sex with animals is not illegal in Sweden
It was decriminalized in 1944, when homosexuality was decriminalized. I was told the reasoning was to channel or divert those with homosexual tendancies away from humans.
IMHO, as an animal lover, this is also a many millstone activity. Animals deserve better.
entagor on May 31, 2006 at 9:50 AM
My only concerns about flag burning are safety oriented, i.e. the open flame, possibly noxious smoke, hot debris, etc. The sentiment being expressed, however offensive, clearly is protected under the first amendment.
Besides, it’s not like it’s a cartoon of Mohammed or something really serious.
DuffBeer on May 31, 2006 at 10:34 AM
If the flag needs an amendment to protect it, then its significance is already in peril. I’d rather it wave unprotected, on its own merits.
Crude One on May 31, 2006 at 12:25 PM
What I say about flag burning wackos stands, if they try to burn one near me I’ll exercize my freedom of speech and action and stop it in the most expedient way.
People, we have to stnd for something. Men have fought, bled, and died for our flag. Can we do less?
Rowane on May 31, 2006 at 12:49 PM
You have freedom of action? What amendment grants you that?
Crude One on May 31, 2006 at 1:04 PM
“No” on everything except the Paris Hilton thing. I am SO excited about that. She is SO hot.
Ok, I have to go rinse. I threw up a little when I was writing that.
violet on May 31, 2006 at 3:34 PM
Burn a flag in front of me… feel the reaction. I carry $100 bail money at all times.
And Paris is a silly vacuous trollop, but she IS hot! :^D
ecamorg on May 31, 2006 at 9:24 PM
Logged in as . Log out »
Note: your comment may take up to 30 seconds to show up on the site (longer, if it goes into moderation). Please do not resubmit.
Subscribe in a reader