<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon video postscript: moment by moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:02:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-602237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-602237</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

you have a very nice blog and very informative article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>you have a very nice blog and very informative article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gore rants: I would have taken 9/11 warnings seriously</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-128367</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gore rants: I would have taken 9/11 warnings seriously</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 18:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-128367</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Not surprisingly, the little aside in the video about where the flight path should be visible is wrong. Click here and note how low the plane was in the moments before impact. It didn&#8217;t swoop down; in fact, it came in at a low angle, glanced off the ground on its approach, and then barrelled into the building. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Not surprisingly, the little aside in the video about where the flight path should be visible is wrong. Click here and note how low the plane was in the moments before impact. It didn&#8217;t swoop down; in fact, it came in at a low angle, glanced off the ground on its approach, and then barrelled into the building. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudville Gazette</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-13349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudville Gazette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-13349</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dawn Patrol...&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics - from the MilBlogs, other blogs, and the mainstream media. If you&#039;re a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dawn Patrol&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to the Dawn Patrol, our daily roundup of information on the War on Terror and other topics &#8211; from the MilBlogs, other blogs, and the mainstream media. If you&#8217;re a blogger, you can join the conversation. If you link&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labamigo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7370</link>
		<dc:creator>Labamigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 01:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7370</guid>
		<description>Anybody . . . is there or is there not a video taken from the roof of a nearby hotel?

When US District Judge Wood was assassinated in San Antonio in the early 80s the pre breakup Soviet Union allowed the FBI access to their spy satellite photography in an effort to identify the vehicle the shooter drove.  

If San Antonio is under spy satellite surveillance (they had 4 military bases there at that time) then certain DC is 
under even better surveillance.  Lets ask for those photos.  Write the Russian embassy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody . . . is there or is there not a video taken from the roof of a nearby hotel?</p>
<p>When US District Judge Wood was assassinated in San Antonio in the early 80s the pre breakup Soviet Union allowed the FBI access to their spy satellite photography in an effort to identify the vehicle the shooter drove.  </p>
<p>If San Antonio is under spy satellite surveillance (they had 4 military bases there at that time) then certain DC is<br />
under even better surveillance.  Lets ask for those photos.  Write the Russian embassy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>I love how the libs tell us how stupid Bush is, yet somehow he&#039;s soooo brilliant, that he can fool millions of people inton believing airplanes crashed into buildings. He&#039;s not stupid, he&#039;s an eeevil genius! He&#039;s Wile E. Coyote (super-genius), Dr. Evil and Lex Luthor all rolled into one. 

Wow, he&#039;s quite impressive!

Let&#039;s continue his evil reign by electing Condi in &#039;08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how the libs tell us how stupid Bush is, yet somehow he&#8217;s soooo brilliant, that he can fool millions of people inton believing airplanes crashed into buildings. He&#8217;s not stupid, he&#8217;s an eeevil genius! He&#8217;s Wile E. Coyote (super-genius), Dr. Evil and Lex Luthor all rolled into one. </p>
<p>Wow, he&#8217;s quite impressive!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s continue his evil reign by electing Condi in &#8216;08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7317</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7317</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s it.  George Bush ordered a cruise missile be sent into the Pentagon.  Although, I wonder what foreign prisons he sent the passengers of the plane to??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s it.  George Bush ordered a cruise missile be sent into the Pentagon.  Although, I wonder what foreign prisons he sent the passengers of the plane to??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuning Spork</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuning Spork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that that dark line on the ground is damage caused by American 77.  I went &lt;a href=&quot;http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and looked at photos 4 and 5 (from the top) and I don&#039;t see any damage to the lawn.  I suspect that the dark line is a shadow caused by the fire and smoke rising up from the impact.  Compare the angle of the shadow thrown by the building and the angle of the dark line to the top of the plume.  Check the video to see if the dark line elongates as the smoke rises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that that dark line on the ground is damage caused by American 77.  I went <a href="http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and looked at photos 4 and 5 (from the top) and I don&#8217;t see any damage to the lawn.  I suspect that the dark line is a shadow caused by the fire and smoke rising up from the impact.  Compare the angle of the shadow thrown by the building and the angle of the dark line to the top of the plume.  Check the video to see if the dark line elongates as the smoke rises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerub Baal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerub Baal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>One thing to think of, a large plane travelling that close to the ground would kick up a lot of dust.   Depending on the ground conditions et cetera, it is concievable that the apparent smoke trail could be dust forced up by the plane&#039;s passing.   The ground would be prone to dust in September.   Such a dust trail would leave no easily seen trace afterwards, so if the plane didn&#039;t clip the ground first, you would have no evidence of it&#039;s passing except the impact.   I seem to remember some conspiracists yelling &quot;A-HA!&quot; because there was no trace on the lawns.

As for the cameras that could read licence plates, they are specialized systems with a preset focal plane to catch people running red lights or driving through EZ-pass toll lanes with-out having an EZ-pass.   Even if something like that was aimed at that side of the Pentagon, I doubt it would have gotten any better of a shot at the distances involved.

Matt Andrade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to think of, a large plane travelling that close to the ground would kick up a lot of dust.   Depending on the ground conditions et cetera, it is concievable that the apparent smoke trail could be dust forced up by the plane&#8217;s passing.   The ground would be prone to dust in September.   Such a dust trail would leave no easily seen trace afterwards, so if the plane didn&#8217;t clip the ground first, you would have no evidence of it&#8217;s passing except the impact.   I seem to remember some conspiracists yelling &#8220;A-HA!&#8221; because there was no trace on the lawns.</p>
<p>As for the cameras that could read licence plates, they are specialized systems with a preset focal plane to catch people running red lights or driving through EZ-pass toll lanes with-out having an EZ-pass.   Even if something like that was aimed at that side of the Pentagon, I doubt it would have gotten any better of a shot at the distances involved.</p>
<p>Matt Andrade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoisyRoom.net &#187; The Smoke Trail, Explained</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>NoisyRoom.net &#187; The Smoke Trail, Explained</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7141</guid>
		<description>[...] Two bloggers have posted screencaps of the video and noticed something odd. Both Allahpundit at Hot Air and Kevin at Wizbang! remark on the smoke trail evident in the right-hand side of the frame in the moments before the attack. A few commenters (not the bloggers themselves) say this is evidence that the attack was a missile and not a fully-loaded 767, and offer by way of further proof the long-standing assertion that the damage to the Pentagon was too light to have been caused by American 77. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two bloggers have posted screencaps of the video and noticed something odd. Both Allahpundit at Hot Air and Kevin at Wizbang! remark on the smoke trail evident in the right-hand side of the frame in the moments before the attack. A few commenters (not the bloggers themselves) say this is evidence that the attack was a missile and not a fully-loaded 767, and offer by way of further proof the long-standing assertion that the damage to the Pentagon was too light to have been caused by American 77. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: high_desert_wanderer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7090</link>
		<dc:creator>high_desert_wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 14:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7090</guid>
		<description>Actually I was kind of surprised by the quality of the pictures.  Sure they&#039;re not great, but it&#039;s a security camera, what do you expect? For a camera not made to catch images of something that fast, it&#039;s not too bad.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Note the black strip indicated by the arrow. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Looks like it could almost be a shadow caused by the smoke. The sun angle is right, and thick smoke like that would have likely caused a shadow effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I was kind of surprised by the quality of the pictures.  Sure they&#8217;re not great, but it&#8217;s a security camera, what do you expect? For a camera not made to catch images of something that fast, it&#8217;s not too bad.</p>
<blockquote><p>Note the black strip indicated by the arrow. </p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like it could almost be a shadow caused by the smoke. The sun angle is right, and thick smoke like that would have likely caused a shadow effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewWaters</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7085</link>
		<dc:creator>LewWaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7085</guid>
		<description>Personally, my guess, and it&#039;s strictly a guess, as to why the lack of clear photo evidence of the plane could be due to cameras being placed where a perceived threat would come from, the parking lots. The plane came in low over the lawn, something no one anticipated.

Like everyone else, the Pentagon does not have an unlimited budget, so resources would focus where they would be deemed most effective. When the unthinkable happens, we come up short.

Like the President said, we have to be right 100% of the time. The terrorists only have to be right once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, my guess, and it&#8217;s strictly a guess, as to why the lack of clear photo evidence of the plane could be due to cameras being placed where a perceived threat would come from, the parking lots. The plane came in low over the lawn, something no one anticipated.</p>
<p>Like everyone else, the Pentagon does not have an unlimited budget, so resources would focus where they would be deemed most effective. When the unthinkable happens, we come up short.</p>
<p>Like the President said, we have to be right 100% of the time. The terrorists only have to be right once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dread Pirate Roberts VI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7068</link>
		<dc:creator>Dread Pirate Roberts VI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 13:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7068</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t care less what the moonbats think. Innocent Americans are dead, so raise the black flag and make someone pay for our loss. 

If they did not die in DC or PA, they certainly died in NYC. So if it&#039;s Iraq that&#039;s got the pay the price or someone else that&#039;s just fine with me. 

But when are we going to learn and just stop screwing around? Take the whole damn country, throw everyone who lives there out and make it one huge refinery. Then maybe these 3rd world hell-holes learn a lesson and think twice before the elect these screwball “leaders” that condone the killing of Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t care less what the moonbats think. Innocent Americans are dead, so raise the black flag and make someone pay for our loss. </p>
<p>If they did not die in DC or PA, they certainly died in NYC. So if it&#8217;s Iraq that&#8217;s got the pay the price or someone else that&#8217;s just fine with me. </p>
<p>But when are we going to learn and just stop screwing around? Take the whole damn country, throw everyone who lives there out and make it one huge refinery. Then maybe these 3rd world hell-holes learn a lesson and think twice before the elect these screwball “leaders” that condone the killing of Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleeding Right &#187; Shove it!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleeding Right &#187; Shove it!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7042</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s another one for the Conspiracy nuts and other such idots. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s another one for the Conspiracy nuts and other such idots. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VonHelton</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7040</link>
		<dc:creator>VonHelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7040</guid>
		<description>Before 9/11, they could take a picture of my license plate, and in a much higher rez.....

.....But for some strange reason, no camera could get a clear shot of a plane they knew was coming.

You&#039;d think a building like the Pentagon would be swarming with cameras.

:/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before 9/11, they could take a picture of my license plate, and in a much higher rez&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;..But for some strange reason, no camera could get a clear shot of a plane they knew was coming.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think a building like the Pentagon would be swarming with cameras.</p>
<p>:/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7034</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7034</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BREAKING: DOD TO RELEASE 9/11 PENTAGON VIDEO...&lt;/strong&gt;

(I initially kind of live blogged this from when I first heard about it a couple hours ago, so the post was a bit of a mess. I&#039;m going to clean it up now, so if you&#039;re checking back, that......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BREAKING: DOD TO RELEASE 9/11 PENTAGON VIDEO&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>(I initially kind of live blogged this from when I first heard about it a couple hours ago, so the post was a bit of a mess. I&#8217;m going to clean it up now, so if you&#8217;re checking back, that&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain's Quarters</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7027</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain's Quarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7027</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Smoke Trail, Explained...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Pentagon authorized the release of video and stills taken from a security camera that captures the attack on 9/11 by the hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, after a FOIA lawsuit by Judicial Watch. The released images do not......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Smoke Trail, Explained&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Pentagon authorized the release of video and stills taken from a security camera that captures the attack on 9/11 by the hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, after a FOIA lawsuit by Judicial Watch. The released images do not&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apologist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7016</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7016</guid>
		<description>Allah you missed it tonight. Coast to Coast had Alex Jones and another conspiracy theorist on talking about the new video. Jones was all ready with talking points about how this is just to whet the appetites of theorists and in 6-12 months the Justice Dept. will release the other tapes and they&#039;ll show Flight 77 definitively hitting the Pentagon.

But see it&#039;s all a scam. They release this evidence debunking conspiradroids, but won&#039;t address &quot;the deeper questions&quot;. This is all a scam to discredit the theorists and avoid answering &quot;all the other evidence&quot; like hijackers reported alive and well in the Middle East by Arab press, like &quot;Operation Northwood&quot;, or Mossad&#039;s warnings to the U.S. (&quot;I have the AP article in my hand!&quot;) just prior to the attacks, and all the information proving the hijackers were secret American agents controlled by a group &quot;above the government that definitely controls parts of the government.&quot;

I laughed, I cried, and then I turned it off. There&#039;s no way to debunk this stuff for them. Every peice of evidence contradicting their assertions is just more proof of the broader conspiracy.

&quot;This evidence directly contradicts your assertions.&quot;

&quot;Oh. My. God. It goes so much deeper than we ever imagined.&quot;

Dun Dun Duuuuuun.

The other guy had two soundbites from McIntyre. One from today with McIntyre saying he has photos of the debris he took on that day, and another from 9/11 saying the plane had disintegrated and there was no debris. Then he asks &quot;Was he lying then or is he lying now?&quot; It&#039;s clear that the 9/11 reporting was when he first arrived on scene and he was giving his initial impressions which matured and changed as more info became available, but the CT doesn&#039;t even mention that. He just asks &quot;Is he lying &lt;i&gt;now&lt;/i&gt; or was he lying &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt;?&quot;

These guys are just plain taking advantage of stupid people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah you missed it tonight. Coast to Coast had Alex Jones and another conspiracy theorist on talking about the new video. Jones was all ready with talking points about how this is just to whet the appetites of theorists and in 6-12 months the Justice Dept. will release the other tapes and they&#8217;ll show Flight 77 definitively hitting the Pentagon.</p>
<p>But see it&#8217;s all a scam. They release this evidence debunking conspiradroids, but won&#8217;t address &#8220;the deeper questions&#8221;. This is all a scam to discredit the theorists and avoid answering &#8220;all the other evidence&#8221; like hijackers reported alive and well in the Middle East by Arab press, like &#8220;Operation Northwood&#8221;, or Mossad&#8217;s warnings to the U.S. (&#8221;I have the AP article in my hand!&#8221;) just prior to the attacks, and all the information proving the hijackers were secret American agents controlled by a group &#8220;above the government that definitely controls parts of the government.&#8221;</p>
<p>I laughed, I cried, and then I turned it off. There&#8217;s no way to debunk this stuff for them. Every peice of evidence contradicting their assertions is just more proof of the broader conspiracy.</p>
<p>&#8220;This evidence directly contradicts your assertions.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh. My. God. It goes so much deeper than we ever imagined.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dun Dun Duuuuuun.</p>
<p>The other guy had two soundbites from McIntyre. One from today with McIntyre saying he has photos of the debris he took on that day, and another from 9/11 saying the plane had disintegrated and there was no debris. Then he asks &#8220;Was he lying then or is he lying now?&#8221; It&#8217;s clear that the 9/11 reporting was when he first arrived on scene and he was giving his initial impressions which matured and changed as more info became available, but the CT doesn&#8217;t even mention that. He just asks &#8220;Is he lying <i>now</i> or was he lying <i>then</i>?&#8221;</p>
<p>These guys are just plain taking advantage of stupid people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewWaters</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7006</link>
		<dc:creator>LewWaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7006</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, nothing will stop the moonbat conspiracists. As I remember there were over 100 eye witnesses that saw the plane skim the ground then crash into the Pentagon. There was also some wreckage found.

But why spoil a good conspiracy with truth and facts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, nothing will stop the moonbat conspiracists. As I remember there were over 100 eye witnesses that saw the plane skim the ground then crash into the Pentagon. There was also some wreckage found.</p>
<p>But why spoil a good conspiracy with truth and facts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7002</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-7002</guid>
		<description>Yea I saw this about 2 years ago.
This is the Pentagon, I&#039;d suspect they&#039;d have top security cameras (better ones) all around that place.

What about that gas station or hotel tape, across the street, that they took for evidence.  They should release those too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I saw this about 2 years ago.<br />
This is the Pentagon, I&#8217;d suspect they&#8217;d have top security cameras (better ones) all around that place.</p>
<p>What about that gas station or hotel tape, across the street, that they took for evidence.  They should release those too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizbang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-6999</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizbang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/05/17/pentagon-video-postscript-moment-by-moment/#comment-6999</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pentagon Video Postscript...&lt;/strong&gt;

Allahpundit at Hot Air goes Zapruder on the screencap I pulled from the newly released Pentagon crash video earlier today, as seen below. Apparently that&#039;s smoke not plane, and similar stills have been in the public domain for four years.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pentagon Video Postscript&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Allahpundit at Hot Air goes Zapruder on the screencap I pulled from the newly released Pentagon crash video earlier today, as seen below. Apparently that&#8217;s smoke not plane, and similar stills have been in the public domain for four years&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
