<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is NSA data mining legal stupid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waumpuscat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Waumpuscat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 22:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>From the descriptions, of this data-mining process, made available by the reporters it would seem that the NSA is assembling a set of data remarkably similiar to the PHONE BOOK the Utility provides to land-line customers. But the data accumulated on &#039;Phone Numbers Of Interest by NSA are skimpy compared with the Utility&#039;s entry for each valued subscriber. The Electronic Data Magnet sweeping the Welkin for phone traffic is similar to the tried and true methods employed by policemen from the Bunco Squad, who join the crowds at the State Fair and intently observe individual persons in the crowd as they watch for the well-known furtive attributes of the Pick-Pocket. The innocent are glanced at and ignored. The light-fingered crews are brought under surveillance. If a hand grasps a wallet from some poor mark, an arrest ensues. Whose PRIVACY is violated? Will Reid and Pelosi contend the Mark&#039;s valued PRIVACY has been infringed? That is the stand they have taken on the NSA Welkin Sweepings for subversive telephone links.

NSA have arranged briefings for the DEMOCRAT Congressional Leadership and appropriate Democrat Ranking Committee Members. Where is the record of their objections to the NSA Electronic Sweeping of the Welkin? Either Reid and Pelosi issue statements approving the NSA Operations or the Executive Branch terminates their Briefings and all other discussions with them. Send them to Coventry! Civility is a two-way Street!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the descriptions, of this data-mining process, made available by the reporters it would seem that the NSA is assembling a set of data remarkably similiar to the PHONE BOOK the Utility provides to land-line customers. But the data accumulated on &#8216;Phone Numbers Of Interest by NSA are skimpy compared with the Utility&#8217;s entry for each valued subscriber. The Electronic Data Magnet sweeping the Welkin for phone traffic is similar to the tried and true methods employed by policemen from the Bunco Squad, who join the crowds at the State Fair and intently observe individual persons in the crowd as they watch for the well-known furtive attributes of the Pick-Pocket. The innocent are glanced at and ignored. The light-fingered crews are brought under surveillance. If a hand grasps a wallet from some poor mark, an arrest ensues. Whose PRIVACY is violated? Will Reid and Pelosi contend the Mark&#8217;s valued PRIVACY has been infringed? That is the stand they have taken on the NSA Welkin Sweepings for subversive telephone links.</p>
<p>NSA have arranged briefings for the DEMOCRAT Congressional Leadership and appropriate Democrat Ranking Committee Members. Where is the record of their objections to the NSA Electronic Sweeping of the Welkin? Either Reid and Pelosi issue statements approving the NSA Operations or the Executive Branch terminates their Briefings and all other discussions with them. Send them to Coventry! Civility is a two-way Street!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6177</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6177</guid>
		<description>I find all the hoopla about the data mining somewhat funny.
Everytime they scan goods that you buy they are building a database.  I am sure that Wal-mart, Kroger&#039;s, et. al. have more information on you than the NSA.  Not to mention the  IRS.

They are looking at numbers to find patterns.  Not listening to you talking to your bookie or mistress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all the hoopla about the data mining somewhat funny.<br />
Everytime they scan goods that you buy they are building a database.  I am sure that Wal-mart, Kroger&#8217;s, et. al. have more information on you than the NSA.  Not to mention the  IRS.</p>
<p>They are looking at numbers to find patterns.  Not listening to you talking to your bookie or mistress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadmanly</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadmanly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>The public wants the Government to be more aggressive, not less. The wording of the two polls in question makes all the difference.

When the question is worded such that what is described is Data Mining about call records, without listening to actual contents, then the public is 2-1 in support. When the question implies listening in without cause or apparent safeguards, the answer is a very slight tilt towards &quot;no.&quot;

Bottom line, the US people still want to see heads roll and a**es kicked. Our enemies still think we will roll over and surrender if the going gets tough. (Heck, they already got a Vet like Murtha to say, &quot;let&#039;s give it up.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public wants the Government to be more aggressive, not less. The wording of the two polls in question makes all the difference.</p>
<p>When the question is worded such that what is described is Data Mining about call records, without listening to actual contents, then the public is 2-1 in support. When the question implies listening in without cause or apparent safeguards, the answer is a very slight tilt towards &#8220;no.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bottom line, the US people still want to see heads roll and a**es kicked. Our enemies still think we will roll over and surrender if the going gets tough. (Heck, they already got a Vet like Murtha to say, &#8220;let&#8217;s give it up.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America1st</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>America1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>IMO This whole debate is pointless.  Does anyone remember anything about ECHELON or CARNIVORE?  Instigated under Clinton, still in full effect, and far far more invasive than either of the current NSA &quot;debacles&quot; .  

If you don&#039;t know about ECHELON  or CARNIVORE, then your opinion in this current debate is pointless.  If you do know about both programs and you are still maintaining that what the NSA is doing is illegal/overreaching etc then you are a crazy idealogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO This whole debate is pointless.  Does anyone remember anything about ECHELON or CARNIVORE?  Instigated under Clinton, still in full effect, and far far more invasive than either of the current NSA &#8220;debacles&#8221; .  </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know about ECHELON  or CARNIVORE, then your opinion in this current debate is pointless.  If you do know about both programs and you are still maintaining that what the NSA is doing is illegal/overreaching etc then you are a crazy idealogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skywise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6087</link>
		<dc:creator>Skywise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6087</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t at all.  I&#039;m saying that knowing whom I called is a&gt; not an invasion of privacy (because it&#039;s ALREADY legal for AT&amp;T to sell the information to the highest bidder) and b&gt; the government already knows who I communicate with because they run the post office and knew who I sent mail too long before the phone became a major form of communication.

Should there be congressional oversight of the program?  Yes there already is.

Should there be a warrant?  Aye, that&#039;s the rub...  How do you get a warrant for a faceless terrorist calling another faceless terrorist?

Is there room for political shenanigans?  Oh yeah.  But FBI records require warrants too but somehow Clinton ended up with them.  Maybe we should put up a &quot;dividing wall&quot; between the security agencies to prevent that from happening...

As for Big Brother?

I want the right to smoke in public back.  I want the right to drive in my car without being pulled over by police because I&#039;m not wearing a seatbelt.  I want the right to purchase medication from a pharmacy without a doctor&#039;s prescription.  I want the right to get to the airport 5 minutes before a flight and run down the concourse and into the plane gate like I did before 9/11.  No no... I have to strip practically naked now...

There are far more important rights being lost in the name of dogooderism then there are in AT&amp;T and the government knowing I call the playboy hotline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t at all.  I&#8217;m saying that knowing whom I called is a&gt; not an invasion of privacy (because it&#8217;s ALREADY legal for AT&amp;T to sell the information to the highest bidder) and b&gt; the government already knows who I communicate with because they run the post office and knew who I sent mail too long before the phone became a major form of communication.</p>
<p>Should there be congressional oversight of the program?  Yes there already is.</p>
<p>Should there be a warrant?  Aye, that&#8217;s the rub&#8230;  How do you get a warrant for a faceless terrorist calling another faceless terrorist?</p>
<p>Is there room for political shenanigans?  Oh yeah.  But FBI records require warrants too but somehow Clinton ended up with them.  Maybe we should put up a &#8220;dividing wall&#8221; between the security agencies to prevent that from happening&#8230;</p>
<p>As for Big Brother?</p>
<p>I want the right to smoke in public back.  I want the right to drive in my car without being pulled over by police because I&#8217;m not wearing a seatbelt.  I want the right to purchase medication from a pharmacy without a doctor&#8217;s prescription.  I want the right to get to the airport 5 minutes before a flight and run down the concourse and into the plane gate like I did before 9/11.  No no&#8230; I have to strip practically naked now&#8230;</p>
<p>There are far more important rights being lost in the name of dogooderism then there are in AT&amp;T and the government knowing I call the playboy hotline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocNeaves</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6072</link>
		<dc:creator>DocNeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6072</guid>
		<description>So, skywise, does this mean you think you live in the era of big brother?  Are you okay with them knowing all that?  What if they started persecuting you, would you think it a good thing that you can be tracked 24/7?

I think most people are trying to find an excuse to not bash Bush, a natural reaction for us conservatives, but for me, I guard privacy from any presidential administration, because I know we are only three or four administrations away from George Orwell, if we make the wrong choices.  And they always come with such clear instructions, don&#039;t they?  The problem with some of these choices is that they aren&#039;t choices you can see, so most of the time, America just lays down and rolls over for it, when they have the choice to stand up and shout, and tell them they don&#039;t like the government (or private industry, worse by far in my mind) to know so much about you.

I think they should make the law that you can&#039;t gather this info without a warrant.  You can&#039;t build a database without court oversight, and that database should be locked, only accessed for it&#039;s intended purpose (who amongst us hasn&#039;t seen mission creep when it comes time for a politician to admit there isn&#039;t much left to do on job X?), then destroyed.  This is to prevent it&#039;s misuse by the unscrupulous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, skywise, does this mean you think you live in the era of big brother?  Are you okay with them knowing all that?  What if they started persecuting you, would you think it a good thing that you can be tracked 24/7?</p>
<p>I think most people are trying to find an excuse to not bash Bush, a natural reaction for us conservatives, but for me, I guard privacy from any presidential administration, because I know we are only three or four administrations away from George Orwell, if we make the wrong choices.  And they always come with such clear instructions, don&#8217;t they?  The problem with some of these choices is that they aren&#8217;t choices you can see, so most of the time, America just lays down and rolls over for it, when they have the choice to stand up and shout, and tell them they don&#8217;t like the government (or private industry, worse by far in my mind) to know so much about you.</p>
<p>I think they should make the law that you can&#8217;t gather this info without a warrant.  You can&#8217;t build a database without court oversight, and that database should be locked, only accessed for it&#8217;s intended purpose (who amongst us hasn&#8217;t seen mission creep when it comes time for a politician to admit there isn&#8217;t much left to do on job X?), then destroyed.  This is to prevent it&#8217;s misuse by the unscrupulous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skywise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6065</link>
		<dc:creator>Skywise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6065</guid>
		<description>The ABC News story seems like a &quot;plant&quot; story to me to try to &quot;educate&quot; the public on the &quot;seriousness&quot; of this plan.

I don&#039;t have a problem with them collecting my phone calls because a&gt; They already know where I live, where I work, how much money I make, how I spend my money (through bank notification laws), the car i drive (BMV registration), my marital status, how many children I have, what kind of mail I receive etc; etc.  b&gt; Phone records are up for sale by the phone companies.  If they can sell the information, I don&#039;t have a problem with the government buying it.

What upsets me (especially with the ABC article) is that you have leftists screaming last year about how there needs to be an investigation into leakers.  So Bush orders the investigation and they use the phone records.  Now the leftists are up in arms because they might find the leakers!

Ya just can&#039;t make some people happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ABC News story seems like a &#8220;plant&#8221; story to me to try to &#8220;educate&#8221; the public on the &#8220;seriousness&#8221; of this plan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with them collecting my phone calls because a&gt; They already know where I live, where I work, how much money I make, how I spend my money (through bank notification laws), the car i drive (BMV registration), my marital status, how many children I have, what kind of mail I receive etc; etc.  b&gt; Phone records are up for sale by the phone companies.  If they can sell the information, I don&#8217;t have a problem with the government buying it.</p>
<p>What upsets me (especially with the ABC article) is that you have leftists screaming last year about how there needs to be an investigation into leakers.  So Bush orders the investigation and they use the phone records.  Now the leftists are up in arms because they might find the leakers!</p>
<p>Ya just can&#8217;t make some people happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6061</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6061</guid>
		<description>any data mining to 867-5309??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any data mining to 867-5309??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6056</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious to know the exact wording of these polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know the exact wording of these polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/05/15/is-nsa-data-mining-legal-stupid/#comment-6042</guid>
		<description>The problem with polling this issue is that there are people deliberately conflating it with another program, which in turn they insist on describing inaccurately. (How is snooping on international calls &#039;domestic spying&#039;?)

The &#039;data-mining&#039; program collects originating and receiving telephone numbers, time/date of the start and end of the call.  This is not like the contents of a letter, it&#039;s more like the information on the front of the envelope.  No content is recorded.  There is no expectation of privacy in either case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with polling this issue is that there are people deliberately conflating it with another program, which in turn they insist on describing inaccurately. (How is snooping on international calls &#8216;domestic spying&#8217;?)</p>
<p>The &#8216;data-mining&#8217; program collects originating and receiving telephone numbers, time/date of the start and end of the call.  This is not like the contents of a letter, it&#8217;s more like the information on the front of the envelope.  No content is recorded.  There is no expectation of privacy in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
