Censorship breakthrough: hackers try to tear down China’s “Great Firewall”

posted at 11:09 am on May 8, 2006 by Allahpundit

Awesome. Hard to believe China’s Internet cops can’t put their 50,000 heads together and spike it pretty quickly, but let’s not spoil the mood.

How it works:

To understand Psiphon, it’s important to first understand the idea of a proxy.

A proxy is a computer server in a free country such as Canada that a user in a censored country can tap into to access censored information and relay it back to the user. For years proxies have been considered a kind of ladder to cyberspace freedom.

The problem is that in order to use a proxy, you have to know about it. This means the proxy’s IP — a set of numbers that is the computer’s actual “address” on the Internet — has to be publicly advertised. This is usually done on websites and through email. So, it’s only a matter of time before the censors also catch wind and cut off access.

Enter Psiphon.

The program effectively turns anyone’s personal computer into a proxy server. Once the software is installed on a computer in, say, Canada, that person creates a contact list of trusted friends or family members in censored countries and sends his or her IP address to them. No advertising needed.

The censored user then connects to the computer running Psiphon and accesses banned content from there, all unbeknownst to the censor…

But Psiphon doesn’t stop there. Unlike most Internet traffic, Psiphon data is encrypted and shoots around the world on a network reserved for secure financial transactions, so a censor cannot see what the person is accessing. And a censor wouldn’t be able to tell a Psiphon request from a MasterCard purchase.

Another benefit is that most other proxy-type anti-censor programs have to be installed, so if a user is being watched, evidence is on his computer for the taking. With Psiphon, the censored user installs nothing, so it leaves no trace.

In the unlikely event a computer running Psiphon is uncovered and blocked, future versions of the program will be able to connect to other computers running Psiphon as backup.

Better fascist-busting through P2P technology: the more computers there are using Psiphon over here, the harder it is to block them all over there. If all goes well, one army of Davids begets another.

Perfect timing, too. Blogs are taking off like a rocket in Iran, where there are now more than 100,000 active sites, and in China, where by year’s end there’ll be an estimated 60 million bloggers. Iran is thinking of setting up a national intranet in order to prevent the passing of electronic samizdats while the Chinese are using student spies to monitor Internet activity at their schools and narc on anyone who steps out of line.

The biggest problem for Psiphon is the fact that many people in totalitarian regimes don’t realize how much information is being censored (thanks in part to Google and Microsoft, let us not forget), and therefore aren’t likely to go looking for it. From the IHT piece:

[I]nterviews with numerous students at a sprawling and well-manicured campus of Shanghai Normal University showed that few knew anything about the student-run monitoring, and none of those who had heard of it had imagined that such a large number of students had been enlisted for it…

“Five hundred members sounds unbelievable,” said a male undergraduate who gave his name only as Zhu. “It feels very weird to think there are 500 people out there anonymously trying to guide you.”

A lot of illusions will likely be shattered in the years ahead.

Bonus fun fact: One of the guys who designed Psiphon reads Marx and Chomsky and drinks from a Che Guevara coffee mug — which, given the type of work he’s engaged in, has to be some sort of attempt at post-modern irony.

Update: A reader sends along a link to a similar distributed-proxy service called Tor. Beating Psiphon to the punch?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Recently a microsoft executive said:

“The impact of government censorship on Internet freedoms of China’s citizens has been overstated.”

I have a closer view on the internet censorship in Iran/statistics:
http://sugiero.blogspot.com/2006/04/internet-filtering-and-censorship-in.html

sugiero on May 8, 2006 at 1:21 PM

Hackers shouldnt be doing what governments are afraid to do. This is a nice idea. But it will ultimately fail.

First, this is a Peer to Peer encrypted proxy service. It can probably be adapted to share copyrighted files too, and if so, RIAA and others will be quick to ban it or sue it out of existence.

Secondly, even encrypted programs leave tell-tale traces across the wire that administrators can detect. Skype can be detected with intrusion detection systems. This new app will likely be detected too. And the penalty in China for using outlawed software? Well, they could be branded as a hacker and the sentence for that is harsh. Sometimes its death.

China will easily respond to any attempts to bypass its own authorized proxy services. If you own a webserver, you will have to have it licensed in China. Any port 80 connections to any host that is not licensed or authorized, will be dealt with swiftly, and probably harshly.

Sorry, this is not the solution to Chinese censorship you were hoping for.

BelchSpeak on May 8, 2006 at 2:00 PM

Despite Microsoft’s almost daily patches, hackers are still getting through. Even hackers perform useful functions from time to time. Let the games continue.

Regarding RIAA and MPAA – why is a Republican administration so concerned with protecting the copyrights of the liberal entertainers? A little payback might be in order here.

dman on May 8, 2006 at 2:10 PM

Since when have liberals been outraged at the actions of the most successful communist nation anyways? And shouldnt we be concerned that Chomsky reading Marxists have been monkeying around with networks reserved for secure financial networks?

“Unlike most Internet traffic, Psiphon data is encrypted and shoots around the world on a network reserved for secure financial transactions, so a censor cannot see what the person is accessing. And a censor wouldn’t be able to tell a Psiphon request from a MasterCard purchase.”

I thin this is a smokescreen for a few crackers to have a go at the Mastercard protected financial network. And how exactly are Psiphon hosts supposed to connect to this network? Is there a single node master somewhere upstream that has both an internet connection and a connection to this protected network? Also, what if China begins to use its considerable resources to crack the encryption on this network? Is no one else concerned that China may be forced to try to crack Mastercard’s network encryption scheme?

This is a bad idea by a few internet ararchists who do not have the best of intentions in mind for Chinese citizens, much less American citizens.

BelchSpeak on May 8, 2006 at 2:49 PM

I hope I see China’s communist/marxist government fail and be replaced by democracy in my lifetime.

Tom Shakely on May 8, 2006 at 2:53 PM

Hacktivists have never contributed to the greater good of the Internet. They often destroy things, expose secrets, both governmental and corporate, and gorge themselves on stolen and priated software. But somehow, this article says that these guys are the “good guys.”

From the Article:

Psiphon will be a key tool for the relatively small but highly influential group of outspoken journalists, bloggers and activists inside China

Notice this is not freedom for all Chinese citizens? Just the elite, ararchists and activists. If this worked so well, why not bring it to everyone?

These are admitted criminals. And somehow, they have tapped into the protected financial network of a major credit card company, and they are going to use a P2P proxy network to channel traffic over that protected network?

Sorry, but I think this is a smokescreen so Internet Anarchists can tap a protected financial network and try to get away with it. I would believe that it is more likely that they will spread a trojan horse program designed to take down credit card companies by flooding that network with bogus packets. These guys don’t give a damn about the Chinese citizens, only their own delusions of grandeur in finding ways to use the Internet to bring down capitalism.

BelchSpeak on May 8, 2006 at 3:20 PM

Methinks thou doest protest too much.

dman on May 8, 2006 at 3:41 PM