Comments on: CIA leak update: Everything old is new again

By: birdman

birdman — Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:02:01 +0000

Dear LakeRuins very well said, I tip my cap to you very moving. I was one of the people that sent emails to the pinko slime at the University of Calf. at Sant Cruz. I was A very bad boy. I would say something like this “come over my house I would like to show you my gun collection”, and I meant it. They were crying about the emails they received, to bad. Violence begats violence, “you reap what you sow”. I read one email on a bat web site – subjust – Military – The email started out by calling these people every name in the book and then said. “We are A group of retired Army snipers and we are watching you”. I guess the hammer droped.

By: Wade's Inn

Wade's Inn — Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:27:33 +0000

Mary McCarthy AP Story Biased…

Mary McCarthy AP Story Biased…

By: Super Fun Power Hour

Super Fun Power Hour — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:25:31 +0000

McCarthy Day 7…

I’m super busy with things and not much is happening on this story, but be sure to read this, and this.

I wonder why AJ Strata’s site is down. He’s been all over this story. Sorta like what happened to Flopping Aces, another great source of McC…

By: LakeRuins

LakeRuins — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:21:56 +0000

I have said it many times, and I believe it very firmly in my soul, The liberals and the Democrats are just as responsible for the deaths of many of our servicemembers overseas as the terrorist who pulled the trigger or detonated the IED. The terrorists enablers in our own country, and apparently in all of our institutions, have provided more incentive and boosted the morale of the terrorists while at the same time expressing so much concern about those in harms way. Why do you think sHillary gives a press conference talking about body armor and includes charts and photos showing exactly where a sniper could aim to defeat it? We experience a sudden influx of deaths from snipers in Iraq, she complains about inadequate armor and Cindy Shehan and her ilk get more grist for their anti war crowd.
Want another example. The Washington Post and NY Times publish stories outlining how we are monitoring communication from terrorists. A week later I start reading CENTCOM briefings detailing how our Special Forces folks in Afghanistan are finding a lot of cell phones laying along goat paths in the mountains. Their first concern was that these triggering devices for IED’s.
The NY Times unrelenting regurgitation of the Abu Gharib story. They have allowed 8 to 10 undisciplined soldiers, some of who are prison guards in civillian life, become the face of our military. In the meantime people like SFC Paul Smith, http://www.army.mil/medalofhonor/smith/ a Medal of Honor recipient are ignored.
It is time to drop the hammer on some of these folks and teach them, as many in the press are fond of saying when refusing to show the Mohmhead cartoons, with free speech comes responsibilty.

By: gary

gary — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:38:10 +0000

June 5th, 1944…New York Times headline:”D-Day Tomorrow”.

By: Tom Shakely

Tom Shakely — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:39:16 +0000

I’m more amazed every day at just how much nonsense is coming out about our national security situation.

By: geekrunner

geekrunner — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:05:46 +0000

You know, I’m sure the Framers of the Constitution wanted open and honest debate on major issues. But to insinuate that includes openly debating the logistics of intelligence gathering and military planning is beyond the pale. This woman is in serious need of an ass-kicking. Why do these people long to destroy our country when what it stands for allows them to spew such nonsense?

By: shooter

shooter — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:37:16 +0000

National security, debated in the open. Who’s the enemy here? They didn’t really just say that…please tell me that OBL said this and the quote was misplaced…
PLEASE tell me that our newspapers are not so lost as to really think giving the enemy all of our secrets is the way for a democracy. Treason charges would follow.
Are they losing so much business to the digital age that they will say ANYTHING to sell a couple newpapers? Are they (MSM) that obtuse? This is a contest puzzle, right?
NO AMERICAN CAN THINK LIKE THAT !! CAN THEY???
Just the last few days is enough to disgust any true American, at least an American from the USA.
The enemy is laughing at you DP.

By: A Blog For All

A Blog For All — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:25:50 +0000

Synchronicity Redux…

…Porter Goss has some serious housecleaning to do. And that explains why we keep hearing about disgruntled CIA officers – they are the ones who Goss is looking at as having leaked sensitive and classified information about operations crucial to obt…..

By: Rick

Rick — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:19:21 +0000

Unfortunately, the political battle is very deeply entrenched in the intel world as well. Nothing like a spy who is more concerned with protecting the civil liberties of those he/she spies on than in protecting America’s national security interests. It doesn’t make any sense as to why someone who takes the anti-America position would want to work for the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. I guess it makes it easier to undermine our country while working there. No wonder our intelligence went down the tubes during the Clinton years. That’s also why our enemies love it when liberals are in power — liberals have our enemies interests at heart.

By: Waumpuscat

Waumpuscat — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:32:47 +0000

The Democrat Party Operatives are depending upon a lost war to recapitulate their marvelous successes of the Middle 1970s, when they saddled America with the Dolt from Georgia. Without a coherent policy framework or an ethical basis for the construction of a Campaign Platform, the Party of Treason (since the 1930s, you could look it up) can indulge their lust for Political Power (Machtlust)only if the Electorate become disgusted with with the failed International Initiatives of the presently governing Party. The disloyal Federal Bureaucracy, working from within an unassailable Democrat Stronghold, have constituted themselves the Non-Commissioned Officers of this Wehrmacht of the Coup d’Etat. The Democrat Party has NO vision for American Freedom and American Exceptionalism. The Democrat Treoreticians, to the extent that they are capable of thought, desire only to transplant the French Governing Template to America. Then we shall have riots instead of political campaigns and revolutions to change the Incumbent Masters from Tweedledums to Tweedledees, with real POWER ever residing in the BUREAUCRACY.

By: Bob Mileti

Bob Mileti — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:42:49 +0000

I agree the American Thinker has a great post on this.

If only Dan Rather hadn’t retired… I know he would have been all over this “like a swan, with every feather above the water settled, but under the water paddling like crazy”

By: withoutfeathers

withoutfeathers — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:24:41 +0000

Well, you know…If your first set of sources don’t tell you the story you want to hear, just keep digging until you find sources that do tell you what you want to hear.

Isn’t that what journalism is all about?

By: bdfaith

bdfaith — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:15:47 +0000

I linked from The McCarthy Story Grows. Excellent find.

By: IrishEi

IrishEi — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:35:08 +0000

‘Round and ’round and ’round it goes…

I’m with American Thinker. He’s definitely on to something.

By: birdman

birdman — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:39:08 +0000

Somebody call Sherlock Homes, very interesting.

By: high_desert_wanderer

high_desert_wanderer — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:21:26 +0000

An anonymous source lie? Can they do that?