Radio Alert: Patterico To Discuss Hiltzik on “Hoist The Black Flag”

posted at 2:33 pm on April 25, 2006 by Allahpundit

I’ve got an update coming with background, but most of you know already who the players are here and why it’s a must-listen. Tune in to Rightalk at 4:05 EST, when Patterico will be Ace‘s and Jeff‘s guest on their weekly talk show, “Hoist the Black Flag.” If you can’t listen at 4:05, no worries: the program repeats at five minutes after the hour all day long.

For those of you who don’t know what this is all about, stay tuned to this post for an update.

UPDATE: As promised, some background. Michael Hiltzik is a Pulitzer-Prize-winning business columnist for the Los Angeles Times. He also runs the paper’s weblog, Golden State, which is currently on hiatus. More on that in a minute.

Patterico is a blogger based in L.A. who specializes in exposing the Times’s factual errors and leftist bias. He’s tangled with Hiltzik off and on since the Golden State blog began. Read this and this for a taste of how a Pulitzerian responds to his critics.

Last Thursday, Patterico dropped this on Hiltzik and the blogosphere. I won’t recap it; read it in its entirety. If you don’t know what a “sock puppet” is (the Internet version, I mean), Wikipedia will explain.

Hiltzik responded to Patterico’s accusations with this excruciatingly lame effort on the Golden State blog, in which he tried to duck questions about his dishonest use of pseudonyms by focusing instead on the propriety of using pseudonyms generally. A few hours later, the Times suspended the blog. Hiltzik’s regular business column didn’t appear in the paper yesterday, either.

Journalist/blogger Cathy Seipp alleges that the paper is currently investigating the rest of Hiltzik’s work for possible instances of dishonesty. What’s more, Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post wrote a column about the episode (actually, two columns) reminding readers that Hiltzik’s been busted for Internet dishonesty before — having gotten caught hacking into his colleagues’ e-mail accounts when he worked in the Times’s Moscow bureau in 1993. Why did he do it? From the Kurtz column: “‘His answer was that he was nosy and curious,’ says Carey Goldberg, a former colleague in the Moscow bureau who now works for the Boston Globe. ‘We were extremely upset. It was an incredible invasion of privacy. There were a lot of personal e-mails in there.’”

Kurtz isn’t the only mainstream reporter to cover the story. Articles have appeared from Reuters, the AP, and the New York Times. The L.A. Times has kept largely mum about it except for columnist Tim Rutten, to whom Patterico responded here. And yet, despite all the coverage, not only have most media accounts continued to misrepresent why Hiltzik’s actions were objectionable, but only one reporter has even attempted to contact Patterico about the story. Fancy that.

Patterico has said more than once since the story broke that Hiltzik shouldn’t be fired, that suspending his blog is sufficient. For what it’s worth, I agree. See here and here for reasons why.

And now you’re ready to listen to Hoist the Black Flag. Again, the show re-airs five minutes after every hour for the rest of the day.

Before I conclude, I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that, thus far, practically no one on the left is defending Hiltzik’s actions. And as for those who are, let’s just say that their credibility is somewhat tainted.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The “haiatus” was the right thng to do (though not enough in the long run).

I fear that the LATimes is merely trying to weather the storm, after which they will put Hitzlack right back on. We will see that, true to their double standard, they will try to pretend that nothing is “wrong” with the dinosaur media.

What is amusing to me, being a student of history, is that the newspaper game has never been considered one of “high” standing, literary excellence, or one that is expected to be particularly unbiased. It wasn’t until after WWII that papers took on this air of being mere “reporters” as opposed to advocates.

Unfortunately for the newspaper game, it is just that — they are putting on airs. Newspapers have always been assumed to present a “side” in the USA. In the days of the early Republic, political candidates had their very own newspapers to present their opinions on matters of national importance, for instance.

But, now all of a sudden, newspapers are pretending that they are somehow “unbiased” or just giving us the “straight” news! but, this is just a subterfuge for what they are REALLY doing; what they have always done, give their “side” of the issues.

So, if the LATimes reinstates Hitzlack they are ADMITTING that they are pure bias and that Hitzlack represents their point of view, a leftist one at that.

So, now we wait and see what they do.

Thanks Michelle for keeping up on this story.
Yours Warner Todd Huston
Publius’ Forum

Warner Todd Huston on April 25, 2006 at 4:05 PM

After reading through the posts by Hiltzik and Patterico, Hiltzik comes across as the typical snarky leftist, with the “I’m the smartest guy in the room” attitude that seems to be de riguer (sp) with that set. He thoroghly deserved the slicing and dicing he got. One might say that Patterico “owns” him now.

geekrunner on April 25, 2006 at 4:51 PM

You would think that if these leftists were convinced that their position was the correct one they wouldn’t need to pretend they are someone else. I wonder how often you have to disgrace your employer to get fired at the L.A. Times?

Capitalist Infidel on April 25, 2006 at 5:49 PM

Such juvenile behavior on his part, too. Reading some past postings and comments of his, I was taken by his non-stop assaults on others by calling them “stupid”, “idiots”, and so on. In other words, if your don’t agree with him, then you are truly ignorant. You expect that from an 18-year old, but not from a middle-aged man. Why do his co-workers put up with his arrogance? I know if he worked with me I’d have him so torqued up every day that they’d have to ship him to the rubber room.

firegeezer on April 25, 2006 at 7:07 PM

OK…my posts get seriously Censored, at best here…so to speak.

KarmiCommunist on April 25, 2006 at 8:36 PM

Sock puppets seem to be breeding like rabbits.

R D on April 26, 2006 at 1:28 AM